independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Spats...
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 10/26/06 10:28pm

Spats

purplerein said:

CortestheKiller said:



Which would indicate that it has worked, or at least for awhile. Haven't you ever dumped or been dumped? I mean, I went through a few before I found my keeper, too.



I had "sacktime" with all my girlfriends. I wasn't afraid to initiate things, as Spats is.


I had sacktime with every girlfriend i have been with except the babe. And i wasn't afraid.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 10/26/06 10:34pm

Spats

something said:

CortestheKiller said:



So long as you're sending some sort of vibe that you want the sacktime. But I see nothing wrong with some girl saying, "Hey, let's go to bed, Spatsy."



i find it hard to believe that he is. if you read anything he's ever said he believes that making any effort in the relationship is compromising his principles and turns him into a sissy boy wimp. he made an effort with the babe (read: took her to dinner ONCE, and to the harbourfront ONCE) and said he felt like he'd compromised himself. he wants the woman to do EVERYTHING. approach, ask for date, ask for second date, initiate sacktime, make no faces during sacktime, nothing oral, then get off (as in dismount) and go home when HE'S done... no concern for her satisfaction.



I only have a problem depending on what the effort is.

There is nothing wrong with not wanting to go downtown.

There is nothing wrong with asking the girl to get off when i have had enough.

I only asked them to leave a couple times because they were complaining about no cuddling afterwards. It's my bedroom afterall.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 10/26/06 10:35pm

Spats

7in9 said:

As yet i am pretty undecided, there are times when he amuses me and others when his views and methods make me wanna punch him. However this is, after all, the internet and as time moves on i am shifing towards the idea he is a troll.
Whatever he is i am sure that if he is real.....that he is gonna die lonely...if he is an alter.....he is very good at maintaining the facade.

In summation....he passes the time between the important stuff.


Why in the hell am i gonna die lonely?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 10/26/06 10:38pm

Fauxie

Number23 said:

CortestheKiller said:



I agree. And I'm not entirely sure why any one would come on someone's appreciation thread to shit on said person.

Number23, I, too, appreciate you.

Ever notice controversial, edgy orgers like ourselves never bully or harass anyone?


falloff

I'm sorry, but that had me chuckling. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 10/26/06 10:47pm

CinisterCee

I like when he says "the babe". smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 10/26/06 10:48pm

FuNkeNsteiN

avatar

Spats said:

purplerein said:



1) she can't be an ugo
2) she has to be cool
3) she has to approach him.


he's destined for failure


Why is that so unrealistic. I am not asking for much.

falloff
It is not known why FuNkeNsteiN capitalizes his name as he does, though some speculate sunlight deficiency caused by the most pimpified white guy afro in Nordic history.

- Lammastide
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 10/26/06 10:55pm

Fauxie

purplerein said:

7in9 said:

As yet i am pretty undecided, there are times when he amuses me and others when his views and methods make me wanna punch him. However this is, after all, the internet and as time moves on i am shifing towards the idea he is a troll.
Whatever he is i am sure that if he is real.....that he is gonna die lonely...if he is an alter.....he is very good at maintaining the facade.

In summation....he passes the time between the important stuff.


co sign, sorta



And so the shift begins. Every time there's some kind of 'controversial' orger who grabs the org's attention with views not shared by most it starts out with almost to an orger people bashing them (with exceptions of course, albeit the overwhelming minority).

Most orgers are not bothered enough to really get into it, but another minority, this time a sub-section of those against said controversial orger, takes things to a whole new level, joyfully rebutting and even seeking out the person, ready with aggressive or derogatory posts.

Gradually a change happens and people tire of the repetitive nature of the back and forth between controversial orger and their detractors. A few speak up saying controversial orger isn't all bad, is misunderstood, or criticise the detractors, and suddenly even the harshest critics soften their tone.

For further information look up 'EvilWhiteMale' in your org handbooks.

p.43: "EvilWhileMale is a dickhead. I disagree with everything he says, and he's a walking contradiction."

p.45: "I don't mind EvilWhiteMale. He just has strong opinions and likes to get a rise out of orgers, and they foolishly take the bait. If you don't like him, don't reply to his posts. Besides, he does have nice pecs."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 10/26/06 10:55pm

jone70

avatar

I dig Spats most of the time--sometimes I get a bit sarcastic with him, though; it's hard for me not too. Although some of his views are a bit unpopular as Cortes pointed out; I personally think that's because he hasn't been in love yet. Once that happens a lot of "rules" fall by the way side...


I want to know if he wears spats when prowling for babes... smile
The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 10/26/06 10:57pm

FuNkeNsteiN

avatar

Spats said:

There is nothing wrong with not wanting to go downtown

Uhm... You know most women do need clitoral stimulation to get off. So yes, there is something wrong with not wanting to go downtown. Heck, how many times do women come when they're with you? They probably don't come, or just come once. If you truly want to please a woman, you need to learn how to go downtown. I don't see why your tongue in a clit/pussy is such a revolting thought for you, dear Spats.
It is not known why FuNkeNsteiN capitalizes his name as he does, though some speculate sunlight deficiency caused by the most pimpified white guy afro in Nordic history.

- Lammastide
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 10/27/06 2:04pm

something

FuNkeNsteiN said:

Spats said:

There is nothing wrong with not wanting to go downtown

Uhm... You know most women do need clitoral stimulation to get off. So yes, there is something wrong with not wanting to go downtown. Heck, how many times do women come when they're with you? They probably don't come, or just come once. If you truly want to please a woman, you need to learn how to go downtown. I don't see why your tongue in a clit/pussy is such a revolting thought for you, dear Spats.


that's easily solved by not caring about the woman's satisfaction.... as is the case in spatsy's reality.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 10/27/06 2:09pm

IrresistibleB1
tch

Fauxie said:

purplerein said:



co sign, sorta



And so the shift begins. Every time there's some kind of 'controversial' orger who grabs the org's attention with views not shared by most it starts out with almost to an orger people bashing them (with exceptions of course, albeit the overwhelming minority).

Most orgers are not bothered enough to really get into it, but another minority, this time a sub-section of those against said controversial orger, takes things to a whole new level, joyfully rebutting and even seeking out the person, ready with aggressive or derogatory posts.

Gradually a change happens and people tire of the repetitive nature of the back and forth between controversial orger and their detractors. A few speak up saying controversial orger isn't all bad, is misunderstood, or criticise the detractors, and suddenly even the harshest critics soften their tone.

For further information look up 'EvilWhiteMale' in your org handbooks.

p.43: "EvilWhileMale is a dickhead. I disagree with everything he says, and he's a walking contradiction."

p.45: "I don't mind EvilWhiteMale. He just has strong opinions and likes to get a rise out of orgers, and they foolishly take the bait. If you don't like him, don't reply to his posts. Besides, he does have nice pecs."


lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 10/27/06 2:10pm

Number23

Fauxie said:

Number23 said:


Ever notice controversial, edgy orgers like ourselves never bully or harass anyone?


falloff

I'm sorry, but that had me chuckling. smile

Chuckling at the intentional irony, hopefully.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 10/27/06 8:16pm

Fauxie

Number23 said:

Fauxie said:



falloff

I'm sorry, but that had me chuckling. smile

Chuckling at the intentional irony, hopefully.


Of course. You're more than just memorable hair. hug
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 10/27/06 8:31pm

Fauxie

IrresistibleB1tch said:

Fauxie said:




And so the shift begins. Every time there's some kind of 'controversial' orger who grabs the org's attention with views not shared by most it starts out with almost to an orger people bashing them (with exceptions of course, albeit the overwhelming minority).

Most orgers are not bothered enough to really get into it, but another minority, this time a sub-section of those against said controversial orger, takes things to a whole new level, joyfully rebutting and even seeking out the person, ready with aggressive or derogatory posts.

Gradually a change happens and people tire of the repetitive nature of the back and forth between controversial orger and their detractors. A few speak up saying controversial orger isn't all bad, is misunderstood, or criticise the detractors, and suddenly even the harshest critics soften their tone.

For further information look up 'EvilWhiteMale' in your org handbooks.

p.43: "EvilWhileMale is a dickhead. I disagree with everything he says, and he's a walking contradiction."

p.45: "I don't mind EvilWhiteMale. He just has strong opinions and likes to get a rise out of orgers, and they foolishly take the bait. If you don't like him, don't reply to his posts. Besides, he does have nice pecs."


lol


There's truth in there, no? smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 10/27/06 10:09pm

Spats

jone70 said:

I dig Spats most of the time--sometimes I get a bit sarcastic with him, though; it's hard for me not too. Although some of his views are a bit unpopular as Cortes pointed out; I personally think that's because he hasn't been in love yet. Once that happens a lot of "rules" fall by the way side...


I want to know if he wears spats when prowling for babes... smile


I was in love once and it never made me act like a sissy boy like it does sooo many men. I kept my self respect. Thank the lord. biggrin
[Edited 10/27/06 22:11pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 10/27/06 10:17pm

Spats

FuNkeNsteiN said:

Spats said:

There is nothing wrong with not wanting to go downtown

Uhm... You know most women do need clitoral stimulation to get off. So yes, there is something wrong with not wanting to go downtown. Heck, how many times do women come when they're with you? They probably don't come, or just come once. If you truly want to please a woman, you need to learn how to go downtown. I don't see why your tongue in a clit/pussy is such a revolting thought for you, dear Spats.


I am not going downtown. I did it once and never again. That's the lowest i have ever sunk. I have had girlfriends try and sweet talk me into doing it all the way to getting pissed that I wouldn't do it. But I still refused. lol No one should do anything they don't want to do in bed.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 10/27/06 10:18pm

Spats

something said:

FuNkeNsteiN said:


Uhm... You know most women do need clitoral stimulation to get off. So yes, there is something wrong with not wanting to go downtown. Heck, how many times do women come when they're with you? They probably don't come, or just come once. If you truly want to please a woman, you need to learn how to go downtown. I don't see why your tongue in a clit/pussy is such a revolting thought for you, dear Spats.


that's easily solved by not caring about the woman's satisfaction.... as is the case in spatsy's reality.


Yeah, but if you are not comfortable doing it you should do it anyway?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 10/28/06 9:29am

shellyevon

avatar

Spats said:

something said:



that's easily solved by not caring about the woman's satisfaction.... as is the case in spatsy's reality.


Yeah, but if you are not comfortable doing it you should do it anyway?


You should do something to reciprocate what she's doing for you. Each person is responsible to satisfy their partner IMO.
You should make her happy, whatever that takes. If you're not willing to try and do that much, you should stick to paid partners.
"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind"-Dr Seuss

Pain is something to carry, like a radio...You should stand up for your right to feel your pain- Jim Morrison
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 10/28/06 9:39am

Spats

shellyevon said:

Spats said:



Yeah, but if you are not comfortable doing it you should do it anyway?


You should do something to reciprocate what she's doing for you. Each person is responsible to satisfy their partner IMO.
You should make her happy, whatever that takes. If you're not willing to try and do that much, you should stick to paid partners.


It is not a person's responsibility to satisfy their girlfriend or boyfriend.It's great if it happens but it's not their responsibility. We are only respnsible for ourselves.

If something makes the person uncomfrotable they should not have to do it or be asked to do it. I have never asked a girlfriend to do anything that would make her uncomfortable. I expect the same in return.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 10/28/06 9:46am

purplerein

Spats said:

shellyevon said:



You should do something to reciprocate what she's doing for you. Each person is responsible to satisfy their partner IMO.
You should make her happy, whatever that takes. If you're not willing to try and do that much, you should stick to paid partners.


It is not a person's responsibility to satisfy their girlfriend or boyfriend.It's great if it happens but it's not their responsibility. We are only respnsible for ourselves.

If something makes the person uncomfrotable they should not have to do it or be asked to do it. I have never asked a girlfriend to do anything that would make her uncomfortable. I expect the same in return.


i picture spats laying flat on his back, jerking off...as his sack mate lays on his/her back jerking off. what a party.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 10/28/06 9:48am

purplerein

Spats said:

jone70 said:

I dig Spats most of the time--sometimes I get a bit sarcastic with him, though; it's hard for me not too. Although some of his views are a bit unpopular as Cortes pointed out; I personally think that's because he hasn't been in love yet. Once that happens a lot of "rules" fall by the way side...


I want to know if he wears spats when prowling for babes... smile


I was in love once and it never made me act like a sissy boy like it does sooo many men. I kept my self respect. Thank the lord. biggrin
[Edited 10/27/06 22:11pm]


in that one line, you attack other men who are in love and express it. you call them 'sissy boys'...i pity you spats, I really do.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 10/28/06 10:01am

JustErin

avatar

Spats said:

something said:



that's easily solved by not caring about the woman's satisfaction.... as is the case in spatsy's reality.


Yeah, but if you are not comfortable doing it you should do it anyway?


Absolutely not. If one is not comfortable they should never do something just to make the other person happy.

That said, if someone is not happy that their partner refuses to do a certain act and it upsets them that much, they should move on to someone that will do it.

People like and dislike certain things and there is nothing wrong with that. They key is finding a partner that enjoys (and keeps away from) the same things you do.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 10/28/06 10:06am

shellyevon

avatar

Spats said:

shellyevon said:



You should do something to reciprocate what she's doing for you. Each person is responsible to satisfy their partner IMO.
You should make her happy, whatever that takes. If you're not willing to try and do that much, you should stick to paid partners.


It is not a person's responsibility to satisfy their girlfriend or boyfriend.It's great if it happens but it's not their responsibility. We are only respnsible for ourselves.

If something makes the person uncomfrotable they should not have to do it or be asked to do it. I have never asked a girlfriend to do anything that would make her uncomfortable. I expect the same in return.


Your point about not expecting someone to do something uncomfortable is reasonable. But the best relatioships and sex happen when both people try to think more about the other person's happiness. The one of the best parts of sex is knowing you completely satified your partner. I mean. you can take care of your own needs by yourself.
"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind"-Dr Seuss

Pain is something to carry, like a radio...You should stand up for your right to feel your pain- Jim Morrison
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 10/28/06 10:07am

Spats

purplerein said:

Spats said:



I was in love once and it never made me act like a sissy boy like it does sooo many men. I kept my self respect. Thank the lord. biggrin
[Edited 10/27/06 22:11pm]


in that one line, you attack other men who are in love and express it. you call them 'sissy boys'...i pity you spats, I really do.


I can't help it if i hate to see guys act silly like that. There is nothing more pathetic than watching a guy get down on his knees and asking a woman to marry him at one of those sporting events or in general, or doing kissy face stuff in public. Or poems and flowers, etc. It's sissy behavior,
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 10/28/06 10:09am

Spats

shellyevon said:

Spats said:



It is not a person's responsibility to satisfy their girlfriend or boyfriend.It's great if it happens but it's not their responsibility. We are only respnsible for ourselves.

If something makes the person uncomfrotable they should not have to do it or be asked to do it. I have never asked a girlfriend to do anything that would make her uncomfortable. I expect the same in return.


Your point about not expecting someone to do something uncomfortable is reasonable. But the best relatioships and sex happen when both people try to think more about the other person's happiness. The one of the best parts of sex is knowing you completely satified your partner. I mean. you can take care of your own needs by yourself.


Yeah but the experience is not going to be very good if one of the people wants to throw up because they think going downtown is gross.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 10/28/06 10:11am

FuNkeNsteiN

avatar

Spats said:

purplerein said:



in that one line, you attack other men who are in love and express it. you call them 'sissy boys'...i pity you spats, I really do.


I can't help it if i hate to see guys act silly like that. There is nothing more pathetic than watching a guy get down on his knees and asking a woman to marry him at one of those sporting events or in general, or doing kissy face stuff in public. Or poems and flowers, etc. It's sissy behavior,

If you ever wonder why you can't seem to hold on to your so called girlfriends, just re-read your post. Also, the part about you not giving a fuck if you pleasure a woman or not might have something to do with it also...
[Edited 10/28/06 10:12am]
It is not known why FuNkeNsteiN capitalizes his name as he does, though some speculate sunlight deficiency caused by the most pimpified white guy afro in Nordic history.

- Lammastide
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 10/28/06 10:12am

Spats

JustErin said:

Spats said:



Yeah, but if you are not comfortable doing it you should do it anyway?


Absolutely not. If one is not comfortable they should never do something just to make the other person happy.

That said, if someone is not happy that their partner refuses to do a certain act and it upsets them that much, they should move on to someone that will do it.

People like and dislike certain things and there is nothing wrong with that. They key is finding a partner that enjoys (and keeps away from) the same things you do.


Exactly. But it's hard to find a woman that doesn't like to go downtown. Women love that stuff.
disbelief
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 10/28/06 10:13am

purplerein

Spats said:

purplerein said:



in that one line, you attack other men who are in love and express it. you call them 'sissy boys'...i pity you spats, I really do.


I can't help it if i hate to see guys act silly like that. There is nothing more pathetic than watching a guy get down on his knees and asking a woman to marry him at one of those sporting events or in general, or doing kissy face stuff in public. Or poems and flowers, etc. It's sissy behavior,



To you it's sissy behaviour...and what the fuck does "sissy" mean to you anyway?

to others, it's expressing feelings.

you loathe expressing feelings, and that's your core problem.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 10/28/06 10:15am

Spats

FuNkeNsteiN said:

Spats said:



I can't help it if i hate to see guys act silly like that. There is nothing more pathetic than watching a guy get down on his knees and asking a woman to marry him at one of those sporting events or in general, or doing kissy face stuff in public. Or poems and flowers, etc. It's sissy behavior,

If you ever wonder why you can't seem to hold on to your so called girlfriends, just re-read your post. Also, the part about you not giving a fuck if you pleasure a woman or not might have something to do with it also...
[Edited 10/28/06 10:12am]


I realize why my relationships don't last a long time. It's because they stop being cool or i get bored and want something better and i leave.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 10/28/06 10:18am

Spats

purplerein said:

Spats said:



I can't help it if i hate to see guys act silly like that. There is nothing more pathetic than watching a guy get down on his knees and asking a woman to marry him at one of those sporting events or in general, or doing kissy face stuff in public. Or poems and flowers, etc. It's sissy behavior,



To you it's sissy behaviour...and what the fuck does "sissy" mean to you anyway?

to others, it's expressing feelings.

you loathe expressing feelings, and that's your core problem.


Yeah but you can express feelings without getting mushy and doing sissy stuff. You can still do it while at the same time being cool.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Spats...