New topic
Printable
|
ZombieKitten said: HamsterHuey said: me too, I know enough to not watch this, since murder does not = entertainment in my mind 
 Oh my, so no Matrix, no CSI, no Tarantino. Just Disney? |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
HamsterHuey said: ZombieKitten said: me too, I know enough to not watch this, since murder does not = entertainment in my mind
Oh my, so no Matrix, no CSI, no Tarantino. Just Disney?  pretty much!!!! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
some people just don't take their freedom seriously. he's gonna open a lot of old wounds by writing this "if i did it" book...i think its just for money. I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
missfee said: some people just don't take their freedom seriously. he's gonna open a lot of old wounds by writing this "if i did it" book...i think its just for money.
exactly...what about the victims' families?  "You could say I'm a terminal case/You could burn up my clothes/Smash up my ride...well, maybe not the ride" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OK... there are a few gaping problems here....
1) In what publication was this printed? No attribution is given. 2) If this is a true story, its source is the National friggin' Enquirer!  That's tantamount to believing something Latoya Jackson -- on crack -- says.
3) If the Enquirer story is so "detailed," then how come the publishing company's name isn't given? I'd think this would be of primary importance. 4) He couldn't keep the money. It would go immediately to the family of the civil case plaintiffs. And even if he spent it, they'd get whatever he spent it on... unless it was some immaterial think like a vacation, etc. I don't even think the money would be protected in off-shore accounts. (We need a lawyer up in here!) This all is very silly. I hope people aren't getting pissed over a story that's likely false. Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: OK... there are a few gaping problems here....
1) In what publication was this printed? No attribution is given. 2) If this is a true story, its source is the National friggin' Enquirer! That's tantamount to believing something Latoya Jackson -- on crack -- says.
3) If the Enquirer story is so "detailed," then how come the publishing company's name isn't given? I'd think this would be of primary importance. 4) He couldn't keep the money. It would go immediately to the family of the civil case plaintiffs. And even if he spent it, they'd get whatever he spent it on... unless it was some immaterial think like a vacation, etc. I don't even think the money would be protected in off-shore accounts. (We need a lawyer up in here!) This all is very silly. I hope people aren't getting pissed over a story that's likely false.  
I thank you for putting it so....but unfortunately, if you read many of the entries, its too late, cuz folks are plenty P-O'd about this story....I think I would've taken it seriously if it was reported in the comix section....thats how ridiculous it is to believe anything in the Enquirer...the same paper, mind u, that still hasn't let go of exposing all of the Diana murder conspiracies and weekly updates on Area 51....  He was like a cock who thought the sun had risen to hear him crow.
(George Eliot) the video for the above... 
http://www.youtube.com/wa...re=related | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: OK... there are a few gaping problems here....
1) In what publication was this printed? No attribution is given. 2) If this is a true story, its source is the National friggin' Enquirer! That's tantamount to believing something Latoya Jackson -- on crack -- says.3) If the Enquirer story is so "detailed," then how come the publishing company's name isn't given? I'd think this would be of primary importance.
4) He couldn't keep the money. It would go immediately to the family of the civil case plaintiffs. And even if he spent it, they'd get whatever he spent it on... unless it was some immaterial think like a vacation, etc. I don't even think the money would be protected in off-shore accounts. (We need a lawyer up in here!) This all is very silly. I hope people aren't getting pissed over a story that's likely false. You might not believe this, but the Enquirer was the publication to read, during the peak of the Simpson case, for details... real details. It's a news industry secret, and we own up to it every now and then. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Just when I thought O.J. Simpson couldn't go any lower. He does it again. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: CalhounSq said: You gotta be fucking kidding me
  I was just gonna start an AWOL thread about you!!!!!   I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
