Author | Message |
Any SUV owners at the Org? I used to drive a 2001 RAV4. I have so many great memories with this car that I feel like I had a relationship. I love driving in the highway and getting an adrenaline rush. My adventure came to a halt early this year when I got into an accident. I should have taken a small nap at my college's library, but I was so excited that I had gotten an A on a Cognition research paper that I chose to get in the road. To make a long story short, I now own a Hyundai Sonata 2006, but I am not happy with my purchase. Though it is a very safe car, it has a lousy CD stereo. As an avid music listener and someone who doesn't like the local radios selection, I feel like I've lost something important.
I would appreciate if you share with me your comments, experiences and opinions about SUVs. I am considering buying an SUV in the future. If you currently own an SUV, what were some features that you considered important when you made your decision to buy an SUV rather than any other vehicle? What do you think and/or feel about reports that say that SUVs are not as safe as other cars? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
Been happy with my KIA Sportage EX 2000 - All wheel/4wheel drive
Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture! REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince "I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
luv4u said: Been happy with my KIA Sportage EX 2000 - All wheel/4wheel drive
NICE! How's the CD stereo on that KIA Sportage EX 2000? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
gyro34 said: luv4u said: Been happy with my KIA Sportage EX 2000 - All wheel/4wheel drive
NICE! How's the CD stereo on that KIA Sportage EX 2000? It's pretty good Everytime I'm on the road I'm always playing Prince or something else. Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture! REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince "I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't right now but due for an upgrade in march....this is my next baby...
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | SUVs represent so much of what is wrong with the US.
You don't need one. Plain and simple. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: SUVs represent so much of what is wrong with the US.
You don't need one. Plain and simple. Where i live they come in real handy though! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: SUVs represent so much of what is wrong with the US.
You don't need one. Plain and simple. Straight up. Oh shit, my hat done fell off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: SUVs represent so much of what is wrong with the US.
You don't need one. Plain and simple. Co-sign. For gawd's sake, if you're going to get one of those things, get a hybrid. oh noes, prince is gonna soo me!!1! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
oh noes, prince is gonna soo me!!1! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: SUVs represent so much of what is wrong with the US.
You don't need one. Plain and simple. They sure are handy when you have two large dogs and a baby. I can't fit them all in a car. I had a Ford Escape but I hated it so I got rid of it. Now I drive a boring Dodge Caravan. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: SUVs represent so much of what is wrong with the US.
You don't need one. Plain and simple. I know you gave the "lol" sign but I really hope you are kidding. Who are we to judge what other people need? You just started a thread talking about boxes and closets and closets full of clothes? Think about about all the oil and natural resources that went into creating those clothes(growing and making the fabrics - running the machinery to make the clothes - transporting the clothes and it goes on and on) to sit in your closet. Besides people who drive SUV's pay extra taxes in order to drive the car they choose because of gas taxes. If they eliminated SUV's today your gas prices would immediately go WAY up due to the huge loss in tax revenue. SUV owners basically are paying for our roads and pet projects such as light rail. For the record I drive a Camry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
<-- Self-Righteous Bitch and Willing to Own It oh noes, prince is gonna soo me!!1! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I got a 2005 Escape, and had the same problem with a crappy stereo. I used to have a 1999 Mustang, and the stereo that came with it was incredible. So when I went shopping for an Escape, the few that I test drove had Ford's premium sound system in them. I changed my mind at the last moment and went with a different color, and all the features on the car seemed to be the same - however it had the cheapo sound system and I didn't realize it.
Alpine has some kind of package on Crutchfield, where you can get the speakers, a deck, and an amp for like $1000 total. I wound up replacing all my speakers with Infinity's and put in an Alpine deck. I really need to amp it up too, but I don't want to bother with all the wiring. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | lovemachine said: CarrieMpls said: SUVs represent so much of what is wrong with the US.
You don't need one. Plain and simple. I know you gave the "lol" sign but I really hope you are kidding. Who are we to judge what other people need? You just started a thread talking about boxes and closets and closets full of clothes? Think about about all the oil and natural resources that went into creating those clothes(growing and making the fabrics - running the machinery to make the clothes - transporting the clothes and it goes on and on) to sit in your closet. Besides people who drive SUV's pay extra taxes in order to drive the car they choose because of gas taxes. If they eliminated SUV's today your gas prices would immediately go WAY up due to the huge loss in tax revenue. SUV owners basically are paying for our roads and pet projects such as light rail. For the record I drive a Camry. I was most certainly not joking. Unless you have a need for an offroad vehicle, (or heck, even if you at least do it as a hobby) it's at least irresponsible, at most unethical. I don't really feel like arguing with you about it though. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: lovemachine said: I know you gave the "lol" sign but I really hope you are kidding. Who are we to judge what other people need? You just started a thread talking about boxes and closets and closets full of clothes? Think about about all the oil and natural resources that went into creating those clothes(growing and making the fabrics - running the machinery to make the clothes - transporting the clothes and it goes on and on) to sit in your closet. Besides people who drive SUV's pay extra taxes in order to drive the car they choose because of gas taxes. If they eliminated SUV's today your gas prices would immediately go WAY up due to the huge loss in tax revenue. SUV owners basically are paying for our roads and pet projects such as light rail. For the record I drive a Camry. I was most certainly not joking. Unless you have a need for an offroad vehicle, (or heck, even if you at least do it as a hobby) it's at least irresponsible, at most unethical. I don't really feel like arguing with you about it though. I guess vans, pickups and sports cars are unethical and irresponsible too? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
My car is giving me trouble, so I'm considering getting a mid-size SUV to replace it.
I don't want one of those giant SUV's, just something that can fit my wife and 3 kids with room for luggage or bikes. I really want the new '07 Honda CRV ...but I don't think that I can afford it... I was also looking at the Dodge Caliber By St. Boogar and all the saints at the backside door of Purgatory! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | JustErin said: CarrieMpls said: I was most certainly not joking. Unless you have a need for an offroad vehicle, (or heck, even if you at least do it as a hobby) it's at least irresponsible, at most unethical. I don't really feel like arguing with you about it though. I guess vans, pickups and sports cars are unethical and irresponsible too? No, I think excess (in general) and waste of natural resources in particular is irresponsible and sometimes borders on the unethical. If you have a genuine need for such vehicles, they make perfect sense. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lovemachine said: CarrieMpls said: SUVs represent so much of what is wrong with the US.
You don't need one. Plain and simple. I know you gave the "lol" sign but I really hope you are kidding. Who are we to judge what other people need? You just started a thread talking about boxes and closets and closets full of clothes? Think about about all the oil and natural resources that went into creating those clothes(growing and making the fabrics - running the machinery to make the clothes - transporting the clothes and it goes on and on) to sit in your closet. Besides people who drive SUV's pay extra taxes in order to drive the car they choose because of gas taxes. If they eliminated SUV's today your gas prices would immediately go WAY up due to the huge loss in tax revenue. SUV owners basically are paying for our roads and pet projects such as light rail. For the record I drive a Camry. you forget the tax breaks the government gave SUV buyers. i do believe that's been reversed, but for several years, SUV owners were actually a drain on the tax base. a friend of mine actually bought an SUV just for that reason - she is married and has two cocker spaniels - so size was not really a necessity here. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: JustErin said: I guess vans, pickups and sports cars are unethical and irresponsible too? No, I think excess (in general) and waste of natural resources in particular is irresponsible and sometimes borders on the unethical. If you have a genuine need for such vehicles, they make perfect sense. That's just it...many people think that SUVs are a symbol of greed and excess when in fact most SUVs on the road are cheaper than a lot of sedans. Many of them aren't even actual 4x4s and are smaller than pickups and have better mileage than many sportscars and vans. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I've always had SUV's and always will. Why not? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator | I do In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | JustErin said: CarrieMpls said: No, I think excess (in general) and waste of natural resources in particular is irresponsible and sometimes borders on the unethical. If you have a genuine need for such vehicles, they make perfect sense. That's just it...many people think that SUVs are a symbol of greed and excess when in fact most SUVs on the road are cheaper than a lot of sedans. Many of them aren't even actual 4x4s and are smaller than pickups and have better mileage than many sportscars and vans. So you're saying that, in general, SUVs are cheaper for the consumer and more fuel efficient than regular cars? |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: JustErin said: That's just it...many people think that SUVs are a symbol of greed and excess when in fact most SUVs on the road are cheaper than a lot of sedans. Many of them aren't even actual 4x4s and are smaller than pickups and have better mileage than many sportscars and vans. So you're saying that, in general, SUVs are cheaper for the consumer and more fuel efficient than regular cars? That's not what I said at all. I said that smaller/mid sized ones are more fuel efficiant than many vans, pickups and sport cars. And yes, there are quite a few SUVs that are cheaper than many sedans. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | JustErin said: CarrieMpls said: So you're saying that, in general, SUVs are cheaper for the consumer and more fuel efficient than regular cars? That's not what I said at all. I said that smaller/mid sized ones are more fuel efficiant than many vans, pickups and sport cars. And yes, there are quite a few SUVs that are cheaper than many sedans. Well, of course there are exceptions to the rule. I also said they 'represent' what is bad about amercia, not that they're the root of all evil. I don't get vans either, unless there is a need for your business, or large family or whatever. Heck, I'd much prefer to be carless myself and wish the public transportation system in Mpls were good enough that that would be possible. Maybe this is like my fashion thing, with folks not understanding spending $1000s on articles of clothing. I wouldn't do it, but I get where it stems from. I also understand why some would call that unethical. So maybe, to each their own. But when it involves oil it opens up a much bigger can of worms. It's bigger than that. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: JustErin said: That's not what I said at all. I said that smaller/mid sized ones are more fuel efficiant than many vans, pickups and sport cars. And yes, there are quite a few SUVs that are cheaper than many sedans. Well, of course there are exceptions to the rule. I also said they 'represent' what is bad about amercia, not that they're the root of all evil. I don't get vans either, unless there is a need for your business, or large family or whatever. Heck, I'd much prefer to be carless myself and wish the public transportation system in Mpls were good enough that that would be possible. Maybe this is like my fashion thing, with folks not understanding spending $1000s on articles of clothing. I wouldn't do it, but I get where it stems from. I also understand why some would call that unethical. So maybe, to each their own. But when it involves oil it opens up a much bigger can of worms. It's bigger than that. Ok. I just assume that people who buy them (expecially the less expensive ones) are getting them because they need something bigger than a car for their family. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | JustErin said: CarrieMpls said: Well, of course there are exceptions to the rule. I also said they 'represent' what is bad about amercia, not that they're the root of all evil. I don't get vans either, unless there is a need for your business, or large family or whatever. Heck, I'd much prefer to be carless myself and wish the public transportation system in Mpls were good enough that that would be possible. Maybe this is like my fashion thing, with folks not understanding spending $1000s on articles of clothing. I wouldn't do it, but I get where it stems from. I also understand why some would call that unethical. So maybe, to each their own. But when it involves oil it opens up a much bigger can of worms. It's bigger than that. Ok. I just assume that people who buy them (expecially the less expensive ones) are getting them because they need something bigger than a car for their family. SUVs aren't built for city/suburban driving. That's why they are called sport utility vehicles. They're made for driving in mountains and off-road terrain. And personally, the majority of SUV owners I see driving them are in their car alone. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dodge Durango
Screw the atmosphere. No kids, just love the SUV. (Insert something clever here) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: JustErin said: Ok. I just assume that people who buy them (expecially the less expensive ones) are getting them because they need something bigger than a car for their family. SUVs aren't built for city/suburban driving. That's why they are called sport utility vehicles. They're made for driving in mountains and off-road terrain. And personally, the majority of SUV owners I see driving them are in their car alone. Like I said, many models are not even actual 4x4s. Mine wasn't, it wasn't even a V6. It wasn't a gas guzzler at all, it wasn't a huge beast on the road, it was the perfect size for me and my needs. There are many other reasons for buying a SUV other than going off roading. People need more space because of large families or even personal size (my uncle is 6'4 and can't even fit into most sedans without having his knees by his ears), some people like the way they handle in winter weather, some use them to haul boats and trailers (and need more seating than a pickup gives)...it's not all about off-road terrain. I do agree that the huge-ass, uber expensive luxury ones are ridiculous and are often bought as a status symbol, but I would not say that this is the average SUV driver these days. It's about finding something that meets your needs. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: JustErin said: Ok. I just assume that people who buy them (expecially the less expensive ones) are getting them because they need something bigger than a car for their family. SUVs aren't built for city/suburban driving. That's why they are called sport utility vehicles. They're made for driving in mountains and off-road terrain. And personally, the majority of SUV owners I see driving them are in their car alone. Our roads are in desperate need of SUVage. I could NEVER drive a car. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |