Supa , i've really thought good about asking my following question .

It's not a bait , but just something i'm wondering & curious about , from observing this thread .

You're very pro for the V-operation , explained your POV and react very intense at some male responds .
That's why this question came up to me .
You explained it to me partly with an orgnote but is this because you are in a position that you won't have to take that decision for an operation , which some men are not so easy to be convinced about ?

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

At what point does the lucky person get the *bang*??

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

oh my!!
gives new meaning to "popping one off"

I say do it. You can always reverse it later.

You won't notice any difference - there just won't be any microscopic sperm in your semen anymore.

emm said:

You don't know that you'll always be with your wife. Chances are you won't. I wouldn't do it unless it's 100% reversible.

onenitealone said:

You know, I'd be pretty upset to get paper streamers all over my face when I was expecting a whole different surprise

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

kidelrich said:

Don't focus on other chicks needs. Focus on your own. If you have kids and you know you don't want anymore, the fact that a chick somewhere in your future cannot manipulate you and your relationship using children can only be a good thing

.
[Edited 9/14/06 12:35pm]

kidelrich said:

What do you have against confetti?

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Sorry, my mind lives in the gutter.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I respectfully disagree, Supa.

kidelrich said:

If a man knows that he wants no more children, why does some woman's feelings need to enter the equation? Either she takes him and accepts no children or she can get with a man who wants kids. Men who have vasectomies generally are doing so because they are finished with having kids. If that's the case, what a future woman might want is completely irrelevant.

kidelrich said:

as your wife the fact that you would hold the hypothetical end of our marriage
and a hypothetical woman and additional children in your future
over our very real and existing children,
very real and existing partnership,
and very real and exixting sexual health and fullfillment so touching

emm said:

Things change.

kidelrich said:

yeah, like your opinion when you get a few years under your belt

emm said:

Possibly. But I think I'd have more people on the con-side if we were hanging out with my friends.

kidelrich said:

In other words, there is a pussy whippin in your future Be a man and take control and don't give your decision to some chick in the future who may never even be there! Good lord. If a woman needs children so badly, then this isn't the right man for her. If a man is so pussy whipped that he needs to go back under the knife to give a woman some children, he has bigger problems than just his vasectomy

100MPH said:

Well there are a couple of angles for me.

First there is the woman. The surgery for a woman is very invasive compared to the surgery for the man. It's the difference between cutting through stomach muscles and tissue vs cutting through scrotal skin. If a woman has already given birth to 1 or more children, hell no should the oness be on her to get fixed. She has already gone through enough physical trauma. Time for the man to be what he claims to be, a man.

Then there is the man. Men are ridiculous about these things. Why should a woman's body be carved up but you can't have a simple small incision? They have these ridiculous notions about their masculinity. Creating children you neither want or can care for is not the indication of manhood. The disapearance of sperm from your load won't change the feeling or the way that you can have sex with a woman. Many men, and many women fascilitate this line of thought, leave the responsibility of birth control to the woman.

And I truly detest the consideration of some phantom woman. If a man is done with kids he should only consider himself and his needs and desires. If he meets some chick who's only reason to be with him is to have his kids, well if he needs to validate that he's a fucking sucker and if a woman needs to manipulate a man into reversing the procedure to give her what she wants, she's a bitch. Presumably the man will have told the woman before getting real serious that he is fixed and wants no more kids. Kids to some women is the cash cow and the key to power. If she can have his kid, she can trap his ass.

People give in to the fantasy about true love and romance and future prospects. If a young woman can only get with a man who could be her dad, she needs to look realistically at whether or not that man is the right person to start a family with. It's pretty irresponsible to have kids when you are near or in your senior years and deprive the child of their parent because the older you get, the closer to death you are. What is the sense in a 10 year old kid not having a father because he's 70 and dead?

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I couldn't agree with you more on this point.
[Edited 9/14/06 15:05pm]

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Good fucking Lord.


If I ever have kids I want to be so drugged up I'm numb til they're four.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I wasn't including you because you ask about everyone's cocks. Even the girls. It's standard around here, like no search function.