0- Exclusively heterosexual with no homosexual
1- Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2- Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3- Equally heterosexual and homosexual
4- Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5- Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6- Exclusively homosexual




Is anyone honest enough to admit it? I don't think anyone is a perfect 0 or 6

5.


While I mainly dig chicks, I am willing to admit to myself when I think a guy is cute. I don't think I'd ever actualy DO anything with a guy ever again, but who knows?

i think we should take a test.

0.

Even during my early teenage years when it's allegedly common to experiment with homosexual fantasies, I was never interested in that. I remember thinking at one point that maybe there was something wrong with me for only liking girls.

0.

I find some women very attractive, but I don't wanna get with them.

JustErin said:

Attractive as in beautiful, or attractive as in you're attracted to them? The reason I'm asking is that a lot of people feel that sexuality lies in what a person does / wants to do and not in what they get aroused by. Is that how you look at it?

what the fuck is "incidentally hetero/homosexual?"

JustErin said:

ditto

I'm a zero ...I did want to be a 1.



But in college I only let someone feel my breasts and then reciprocated.

No kiss or anything. I totally would have had an "incident" but missed my opportunity.

Now, I'm not really that interested. Each year that passes, I understand the male-female dynamic more and more. I'm intoxicated by it.

retina said:

I mean I can see the beauty in them and can understand why men (and women) would want to be with them but I am not physically attracted to them at all.

Well, for me, sexuality is only about what I am aroused by.

JustErin said:

Same here.

JustErin said:

Really? I am more likely to become aroused by pictures of females or videos of females than men. But once aroused, I want a man not a woman.

I'm aroused by things that are sexy ...and women are infinitely more sexy. Viewing them puts me in touch with my feminine sexuality and starts fueling my ego, ya know?

SynthiaRose said:

actually that applies to me too a woman's touch has never aroused me

SynthiaRose said:

Interesting, I'd never thought of that perspective but it makes sense in its own way. Then again, I wouldn't get "inspired" in that same way by looking at men. And I do think getting aroused by looking at women makes you at least a 1.

ZombieKitten said:

Me too
minus the womans touch thing as I wouldn't know
[Edited 7/27/06 23:25pm]

buncha flamin' closet cases on here for real...

SynthiaRose said:

How interesting.

I really have zero sexual arousal from women in pictures or vids or in person. It's all about men for me.

Ocean said:

I mean like if a beautiful woman like yourself came and sat next to me and your thigh touched mine, it wouldn't do anything for me - no offence!

Gay
You are a Kinsey 6 !!
a 5 or 6 is a person who is almost, or IS, exclusively gay. If you find the mere thought of straight sex to be repulsive and gross, then you are a six. Note that being on this end of the scale has nothing to do with your outward appearance or attitude... The creator if this test is a 6, but is extreemely professional and reserved in mannerisms and dress.



My test tracked 1 variable How you compared to other people your age and gender:

You scored higher than 99% on kinsey scor

So at least three women on this thread get more aroused by the sight of a woman than of a man but still consider themselves 100 per cent heterosexual. The female libido moves in mysterious ways.

retina said:

those pictures and videos must involve a sexual act for me, not just standing there

notoriousj said:

Wait, is that watching or participating? Watching straight sex doesn't affect me, and even if it did it wouldn't matter, I can stomach a lot of things and straight sex is LOW on the list. But participating in it is just plain sinfully disgusting.

retina said:

I admit it I like girls... There is just something about the way they work it. But I like cock too.
[Edited 7/27/06 23:32pm]

SynthiaRose said:

It's never too late to be a 1

JustErin said:

Same for me. I've never been aroused by a male.
I can tell when a dude has a good appearance and has his shit together so, intellectually, I can appreciate both males and females. However, in terms of attraction I don't see what women see in men.

So that's a 0 for those who care.

retina said:

OK. The Rock can arouse me fairly easily


But that's about it.

Muscles, chests and broad shoulders are awesome. But how can one compete visually with breasts, an hour glass, hips. Have mercy! Are women not the most intoxicating creations ever made?

I'm in awe -- of myself! And then add the tresses, the sensual movements, the high heels, the lacy lingerie, the soft voice, the secretly choreographed routines

The sensuality of a woman just gets better and better.

When it comes to VISUALS...women are the ultimate.
When it comes to TEXTURES... my god, men have that.

Taunt, rough, hard, strong.
How can fingers,lips, and tongues not respond to all those great textures. Awesome!

But getting aroused doesn't define my sexuality.
It's about what I want done to me. I'm sorry I need to be handled roughly. And a woman doesn't have the tools to do that.

Um, I'll refrain from being more graphic.

ZombieKitten said:

[Edited 7/28/06 0:15am]

I don't know there is something very sensual about women ...and I appreciate the female form even though Im hetro
[Edited 7/28/06 0:18am]

I think I'm a one or two.

Sweeny79 said:

How YOU doin'?