CalhounSq said:

and amen to that!

She's way pretty for an ordinary person, but not so great for a movie star.

Sweeny79 said:

I don't agree. She is skinny, but since when is that the same thing as pretty?

kidelrich said:

That is an excellent question my friend... I guess I do equate the two.

Like I said she's no moviestar,but I seen worse then her around. She's not exactly the hunchback of notre dame!

Sweeny79 said:

All that really matters is that he's happy. None of our opinions will change his mind. But I don't think she should be in a movie portraying a hot chick. She doesn't fit the part.

kidelrich said:

and

He coulda got someone better for the part...as I was watching I was distacted by the fact that Dante had problems choosing between her and the other chick... I was like WHY???

He should have had someone more conventionally beautiful in the role, so at least you understood Dante's struggle.


But then again the movie features aguy with "Porch Monkey 4 Life" taped on his shirt, donkey fucking,lord of the rings reinactments, go carts and a dude named pickle fucker...what the fuck? Why am I worried about how hot a minor character is.

Sweeny79 said:

Of course, Dante isn't a great looking guy, either. And Rosario Dawson(that is her name, Sweeny!) is smokin'!!! It's one of those movies where I want to shake the guy and say you will never find a girl like that again. Ever. Wake Up!

kidelrich said:

I know what her name is I was trying to remember her character's name.

Wait was it Becky?

Sweeny79 said:

Sweeny79 said:

BTW, Rear Window is another film like. Jimmy Stewart isn't sure if he should marry Grace Freakin' Kelly!!! Idiot.

Sweeny79 said:

[Edited 7/31/06 14:06pm]

kidelrich said:

Very true!

I fucking love that movie as well!

TMPletz said:

It's a little known fact but it's true.

Sweeny79 said:

I Grace Kelly. I hate watching old movies and realizing the beautiful women are either ancient or dead.

kidelrich said:

I feel the same way lots a times... I really love Jimmy Stewart.

Sweeny79 said:

Seriously???

CalhounSq said:

You have to see it to understand...it's not as bad as you think... he's trying to take it back and make the term mean something else.

Sweeny79 said:

Yea, I'd have to see it...

And her last name is Scwalbach. Or something like that. Her name is not even attractive. She looks like a victim of bad cosmetic surgery. And it's not really fair casting the wife.

senik said:

YES. YES. YEs. yEs. YeS.

CalhounSq said:

The movie is making fun of the character who is saying it, not the people that phrase references, if that helps.

kidelrich said:

Regardless it's a strange term to bring up. I don't know what it means to Kevin Smith but I know what it means to ME...

CalhounSq said:

I think I understand what you're saying. But Kevin Smith wouldn't have written such a great part as the love interest and cast Rosario Dawson if he was serious about it.

kidelrich said:

I'm not taking a position on Kevin's beliefs or preferences. I'm simply stating that use of the term is questionable b/c it's such a loaded term...

CalhounSq said:

If I had to guess I'd say that's why Smith choose to use it! Something that is so loaded with emotion has great potential for humor.

Didn't Freud say that humor was our way of expressing the darkest parts of ourselves, that it acted as a vent for our worst qualities?... I think that's what makes Kevin Smith so funny! He plays on that....but with love in his heart...and he shows us just how fucked up we really are, and just how lovable we can be.