Author | Message |
Dating models! So... is it wrong if I browse model agencies' webpages, pick up a girl I like, then book a photosession with her and arrange a fake one - just so that I can be close to models? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
yep.
they're overrated, btw. been there. people who do that for a living have issues. . [Edited 7/3/06 20:13pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mrdespues said: yep.
they're overrated, btw. been there. people who do that for a living have issues. . [Edited 7/3/06 20:13pm] Ya, ok. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What about browsing the webpages and looking up their contact information from a phonebook. Then waiting outside their houses in the bushes, following them for (say) for a day or two - just to find out if they have boyfriends - and then approaching them? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: What about browsing the webpages and looking up their contact information from a phonebook. Then waiting outside their houses in the bushes, following them for (say) for a day or two - just to find out if they have boyfriends - and then approaching them?
Why approach? Jump and grab is way sexier. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Somebody please call the police. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: So... is it wrong if I browse model agencies' webpages, pick up a girl I like, then book a photosession with her and arrange a fake one - just so that I can be close to models?
You ever see the movie "Audition"??... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You are brilliant!!!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: mrdespues said: yep.
they're overrated, btw. been there. people who do that for a living have issues. . [Edited 7/3/06 20:13pm] Ya, ok. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Altough maybe I shouldn't be so willing to play their game. I only wish women would get rid of their attitudes and stalk the man for a change. But unfortunately most women are still stuck to the 50s and 60s and expect the man to do all the stalking. [Edited 7/3/06 21:20pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mrdespues said: JustErin said: Ya, ok. Btw, I didn't mean that I thought you haven't dated models. I was laughing at your blanket statement that people who do that for a living have "issues" and are "overrated". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: mrdespues said: Btw, I didn't mean that I thought you haven't dated models. I was laughing at your blanket statement that people who do that for a living have "issues" and are "overrated". yeah, i know... it was a blanket statement, but it's usually true... i know there are there are some fine and intelligent ones too, but the industry is so wrong with the ways it treats unsuspecting girls that a lot of them end up messed up... the most image-conscious industry in the world doesn't provide for a lot of job satisfaction, except getting paid for a pretty face, know what i mean? my ex was a model for a short period and travelled to exotic places... every single photographer was a sleaze and most of the affiliates were sleazes... there can be a very sick side to a lot of it, present jokes on this thread aside. . [Edited 7/3/06 21:36pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Seriously speaking, no. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: Seriously speaking, no.
I would love to date a model. I think most guys would if they could. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: Altough maybe I shouldn't be so willing to play their game. I only wish women would get rid of their attitudes and stalk the man for a change. But unfortunately most women are still stuck to the 50s and 60s and expect the man to do all the stalking.
No, you don't want that. It's not nearly as enjoyable as you might think it would be. I've said too much. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: Altough maybe I shouldn't be so willing to play their game. I only wish women would get rid of their attitudes and stalk the man for a change. But unfortunately most women are still stuck to the 50s and 60s and expect the man to do all the stalking.
[Edited 7/3/06 21:20pm] Amazing Spats read this thread & didn't catch this one | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: Novabreaker said: Altough maybe I shouldn't be so willing to play their game. I only wish women would get rid of their attitudes and stalk the man for a change. But unfortunately most women are still stuck to the 50s and 60s and expect the man to do all the stalking.
[Edited 7/3/06 21:20pm] Amazing Spats read this thread & didn't catch this one I saw it. People can mock me all they want but it's true. Women are still stuck in the past when it comes to this stuff. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: So... is it wrong if I browse model agencies' webpages, pick up a girl I like, then book a photosession with her and arrange a fake one - just so that I can be close to models?
It'll never work. To begin with, the average model's day rate at a nationally/internationally reputable agency STARTS at $1500-$2000. That's what is paid for catalog girls who do stuff like TARGET.Girls who do uppper tier catalog like Nordstrom or Neiman market are in the $3000-$4000 per day range. So you can imagine what is costs to get a more famous face. Editorial naturally, is less...for everyone. Usually under $300 per day...but if they haven't "seen" your magazine before, guess what? No booking. Advertising for a major product? Forget it. Depending on how luxurious the product is you're talking upwards of $8,000 a day. You could say that you're a testing photographer looking for girls in the new faces department, but unless they've gone in for a meeting with director of new faces, and they've seen and approved your portfolio, or you used to be the assistant of an internationally known photogrpher, or a photogrpaher that has been on their client roster---PFFFFTTT! ...oh did I mention that you will actually be responsible for going in to meet the agent to show them the testing photographs for the girl's portfolio and the agency's website? Not to mention that you as the "client" are responsible for the transportation, meals, and lodging for the model the MOMENT they leave their abode to get to the job and their return transportation once the production is completed... ...then of course there are the small details the agent will enter into your "client" file such as the production, location, ad agency or art direstor, the product the day rate AND your BILLING INFORMATION. ...and don't think for a second that these people are that stupid...not even the models themselves. The world of fashion is a VERY small one and the girls are very well versed in what is a proper shoot, or simply disaster shoot where people simply have no idea what they're doing, and lastly what is a COMPLETE SHAM. Agents are on the phone with their talent the moment they arrive at a job and throughout the day to make sure things are going smoothly. It only takes a second for bad feelings to erupt and suddenly have a phone war happening in the middle of a real shoot...let alone what they would do once they figure out that you've tried to bullshit them In a nutshell: not a very good idea. Try some happening nightspots or beach bars known to cater to fashionistas instead. You'll have better luck . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ThreadBare said: Novabreaker said: Altough maybe I shouldn't be so willing to play their game. I only wish women would get rid of their attitudes and stalk the man for a change. But unfortunately most women are still stuck to the 50s and 60s and expect the man to do all the stalking.
No, you don't want that. It's not nearly as enjoyable as you might think it would be. I've said too much. you didn't like my orgnotes? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Novabreaker said: Altough maybe I shouldn't be so willing to play their game. I only wish women would get rid of their attitudes and stalk the man for a change. But unfortunately most women are still stuck to the 50s and 60s and expect the man to do all the stalking.
[Edited 7/3/06 21:20pm] |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: So... is it wrong if I browse model agencies' webpages, pick up a girl I like, then book a photosession with her and arrange a fake one - just so that I can be close to models?
I wouldn't suggest it. Have you ever seen the movie, The Audition? I AM BEATLOAF
www.myspace.com/teriteriboberi www.stickam.com/profile/Beatloaf www.myspace.com/americasfunnyman www.stephenking.com www.tomgreen.com I'm my own favorite orger and that trumps any elitist list you guys can come up with. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: mrdespues said: yep.
they're overrated, btw. been there. people who do that for a living have issues. . [Edited 7/3/06 20:13pm] Ya, ok. I know right I'm not even attracted to super attractive people. I just like to be around them. Ugly people suck. Beautiful people are the only minority I prefer to be apart of. Lance is SO a bottom | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mrdespues said: JustErin said: Btw, I didn't mean that I thought you haven't dated models. I was laughing at your blanket statement that people who do that for a living have "issues" and are "overrated". yeah, i know... it was a blanket statement, but it's usually true... i know there are there are some fine and intelligent ones too, but the industry is so wrong with the ways it treats unsuspecting girls that a lot of them end up messed up... the most image-conscious industry in the world doesn't provide for a lot of job satisfaction, except getting paid for a pretty face, know what i mean? my ex was a model for a short period and travelled to exotic places... every single photographer was a sleaze and most of the affiliates were sleazes... there can be a very sick side to a lot of it, present jokes on this thread aside. Interesting note about your ex's experiences... there are bad apples in every bunch, and that business can be kind of brutal, but you'd be surprised how many of them are people with families and normal lives (well at least as normal as it can be when you have to work 25 days out of the month). What kind of modeling did your ex specialize in, btw? in the editorial (i.e. fashion magazine) scene, is indeed very rock & roll -like in experience, but I can't imagine a model experiencing that when she's doing catalog or lifestyle advertising; there are always company executives present from the client that lend a very conservative atmosphere to the working process. . [Edited 7/3/06 21:36pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Actually, this is a kind of interesting concept to me: what exactly is it that a person's looking for that makes them want to date a model? I mean, wouldn't a bank teller or a kindergarden teacher be just as cool, as long as she had whatever physical attributes that were of your preference ? [Edited 7/4/06 5:24am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DiscoballStallion said: JustErin said: Ya, ok. I know right I'm not even attracted to super attractive people. I just like to be around them. Ugly people suck. Beautiful people are the only minority I prefer to be apart of. i have no idea what you are talking about but back off! . [Edited 7/4/06 5:51am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: ThreadBare said: No, you don't want that. It's not nearly as enjoyable as you might think it would be. I've said too much. you didn't like my orgnotes? Your orgnotes were fine. Your husband's e-mails about your orgnotes, on the other hand... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ottensen said: It'll never work.
To begin with, the average model's day rate at a nationally/internationally reputable agency STARTS at $1500-$2000. That's what is paid for catalog girls who do stuff like TARGET.Girls who do uppper tier catalog like Nordstrom or Neiman market are in the $3000-$4000 per day range. So you can imagine what is costs to get a more famous face. Editorial naturally, is less...for everyone. Usually under $300 per day...but if they haven't "seen" your magazine before, guess what? No booking. Advertising for a major product? Forget it. Depending on how luxurious the product is you're talking upwards of $8,000 a day. You could say that you're a testing photographer looking for girls in the new faces department, but unless they've gone in for a meeting with director of new faces, and they've seen and approved your portfolio, or you used to be the assistant of an internationally known photogrpher, or a photogrpaher that has been on their client roster---PFFFFTTT! ...oh did I mention that you will actually be responsible for going in to meet the agent to show them the testing photographs for the girl's portfolio and the agency's website? Not to mention that you as the "client" are responsible for the transportation, meals, and lodging for the model the MOMENT they leave their abode to get to the job and their return transportation once the production is completed... ...then of course there are the small details the agent will enter into your "client" file such as the production, location, ad agency or art direstor, the product the day rate AND your BILLING INFORMATION. ...and don't think for a second that these people are that stupid...not even the models themselves. The world of fashion is a VERY small one and the girls are very well versed in what is a proper shoot, or simply disaster shoot where people simply have no idea what they're doing, and lastly what is a COMPLETE SHAM. Agents are on the phone with their talent the moment they arrive at a job and throughout the day to make sure things are going smoothly. It only takes a second for bad feelings to erupt and suddenly have a phone war happening in the middle of a real shoot...let alone what they would do once they figure out that you've tried to bullshit them In a nutshell: not a very good idea. Try some happening nightspots or beach bars known to cater to fashionistas instead. You'll have better luck . I think you should save your talents for the P&R forum! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: Ottensen said: It'll never work.
To begin with, the average model's day rate at a nationally/internationally reputable agency STARTS at $1500-$2000. That's what is paid for catalog girls who do stuff like TARGET.Girls who do uppper tier catalog like Nordstrom or Neiman market are in the $3000-$4000 per day range. So you can imagine what is costs to get a more famous face. Editorial naturally, is less...for everyone. Usually under $300 per day...but if they haven't "seen" your magazine before, guess what? No booking. Advertising for a major product? Forget it. Depending on how luxurious the product is you're talking upwards of $8,000 a day. You could say that you're a testing photographer looking for girls in the new faces department, but unless they've gone in for a meeting with director of new faces, and they've seen and approved your portfolio, or you used to be the assistant of an internationally known photogrpher, or a photogrpaher that has been on their client roster---PFFFFTTT! ...oh did I mention that you will actually be responsible for going in to meet the agent to show them the testing photographs for the girl's portfolio and the agency's website? Not to mention that you as the "client" are responsible for the transportation, meals, and lodging for the model the MOMENT they leave their abode to get to the job and their return transportation once the production is completed... ...then of course there are the small details the agent will enter into your "client" file such as the production, location, ad agency or art direstor, the product the day rate AND your BILLING INFORMATION. ...and don't think for a second that these people are that stupid...not even the models themselves. The world of fashion is a VERY small one and the girls are very well versed in what is a proper shoot, or simply disaster shoot where people simply have no idea what they're doing, and lastly what is a COMPLETE SHAM. Agents are on the phone with their talent the moment they arrive at a job and throughout the day to make sure things are going smoothly. It only takes a second for bad feelings to erupt and suddenly have a phone war happening in the middle of a real shoot...let alone what they would do once they figure out that you've tried to bullshit them In a nutshell: not a very good idea. Try some happening nightspots or beach bars known to cater to fashionistas instead. You'll have better luck . I think you should save your talents for the P&R forum! I suspect Ottensen has talent to spare. I always enjoy her posts -- even when she disagrees with me, as she has on occasion. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: So... is it wrong if I browse model agencies' webpages, pick up a girl I like, then book a photosession with her and arrange a fake one - just so that I can be close to models?
I should have my brother talk to you. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ottensen said: Actually, this is a kind of interesting concept to me: what exactly is it that a person's looking for that makes them want to date a model? I mean, wouldn't a bank teller or a kindergarden teacher be just as cool, as long as she had whatever physical attributes that were of your preference ?
Now but that would be completely missing the point. I mean, I can fully imagine myself finding happiness from all kinds of things in my life - finding beauty in the more subtle shades, becoming more mature and developing and aesthetic eye for something more than just blunt attractiveness - but what I am really trying to say here is that I want happiness with A MODEL. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |