Previews in UK on 19th May..

Who will go watch it?

i want to go see it


if all else fails, i love tom so im good

I'll see it. It looks fun. I'm not really a Tom Hanks fan, but I'm not a Tom Hanks hater either. I find him an odd choice for the movie. But it can go either way.

I'M SO THERE!

CarrieMpls said:

how could you not love tom ????







he's so darn sweet

Everybody make sure you go out and see this movie! We made it and so by supporting the movie, you might just give me a bonus

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

who made it ?????

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I'm totally there!!! I loved the book and I hope the movie does it justice. You can't lose with Tom Hanks starring and Ron Howard directing.

HI SUPA!!!

m

nakedpianoplayer said:

Sony Pictures

MIGUELGOMEZ said:

It has definite potential to be great. Hopefully we'll get to see it before it's released.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

you work for sony pictures ???


im so lost

nakedpianoplayer said:

Yes I do

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

FUN !!! what do you do ???

Tom Hanks' new hairdo is a bit creepy.

I wonder if Harrison Ford would have been a better choice.

NDRU said:

nah
robert langdon wasn't a hardcore kickass kinda guy, @least from reading the two books it didnt seem like it...when he had to he'd do it...harrison is too much for his character i think...

i thought tom was a great choice

it's a thought tho!

nakedpianoplayer said:

I'm in International TV Finance. Fun place to work tho. Cool people, great atmosphere, totally gay friendly, I can have my mohawk hairdo if I want and there are always stars hanging around somewhere. I love working here

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

i'll go see it now fer sher

I wanted Giles from Buffy the Vampire Slayer to be Langdon.




M
[Edited 4/25/06 11:31am]

NDRU said:

The mullet looks retarded. I read the first 30 pages of the book, and was totally bored. Won't be seeing this.

SammiJ said:

It just seemed like Langdon was the more athletic type, and a sexy professor type, like Indy Jones (though I pictured him younger than Harrison Ford).

I'm sure Tom can handle it.

What about the hair, though?

VoicesCarry said:

Dan Brown isn't much of a writer in terms of style, but I thought the books were anything but boring.

NDRU said:

Just wasn't my thing, I guess. I don't like much contemporary literature; terrible writing, mostly.

Dan Brown said it was like watching the novel come to life... very complimentary for an author to say about a movie adaptation of his book.

DiminutiveRocker said:

Wow!!!! I cannot wait to see this. This movie is going to make us so much money!

DiminutiveRocker said:

Of course he'd say that; I'm sure he has a stake in the profits. And if it does well he can spin off more of 'em at a rapid clip.

VoicesCarry said:

The writing itself definitely sucks. It could have been written by any best-selling author. And each book is virtually identical. But I have read all of them. They're some of the best page turners I've ever read.

bad writing or not (what IS bad writing..it's all in your own opinion really )
they were fucking good books.

SammiJ said:

Take a single paragraph of his books and you might say he's a bad (or at least not notable) writer. But there's an art to giving a book momentum. And his books have incredible momentum.
[Edited 4/25/06 11:54am]

SammiJ said:

I wasn't dissing anyone who liked 'em, just weren't for me.

nakedpianoplayer said:

I guess you didn't see The Terminal?????

Hanks can be so obnoxious.....let's just hope he doesn't scream in this movie!