brownsugar said: Slave2daGroove said: They still make men like this? I thought that model was discontinued? seriously yeah thats really a deal breaker co-sign! No More Haters on the Internet. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
brownsugar said: charlottegelin said: [Edited 3/15/06 20:07pm] thats really gross. It sure is. And enemas are cheap too. That shit does not make any sense. Shit crumbs all in my damn bed. NASTY. One of Dansa's org hornies
Supa is my gay messiah and he eats homeless dandruff sammitches on the bus. HULK NEED LAID, HULK SMASH!! The reigning queen of GD. All bitches step down. Prince.org: Where's Mani? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Liars and cheats, without question, would be #1.
Baggage-laden, insecure women would have to be #2. And, I would like to thank Spats for posting before me and making me appear all the more sensitive. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ThreadBare said: Liars and cheats, without question, would be #1.
Baggage-laden, insecure women would have to be #2. And, I would like to thank Spats for posting before me and making me appear all the more sensitive. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: ThreadBare said: Liars and cheats, without question, would be #1.
Baggage-laden, insecure women would have to be #2. And, I would like to thank Spats for posting before me and making me appear all the more sensitive. Big rumps are a deal breaker as well. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: mdiver said: Big rumps are a deal breaker as well. whew! i'm in the clear! i guess that crushes my wee bit crush | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | brownsugar said: Spats said: Big rumps are a deal breaker as well. whew! i'm in the clear! i guess that crushes my wee bit crush |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: brownsugar said: whew! i'm in the clear! i guess that crushes my wee bit crush i've never been in a relationship, so i can't say much for that...as for friendships, the biggest no-no to me is betraying my trust. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I take more shit from friends than romantic partners, as they are easier to sort of "compartmentalize" in your life. Somebody can be really fun to hang out with, but not a reliable source of moral support. . . that kind of thing. One of my dearest friends is frequently late, a skilled white-liar, and can't keep a secret to save her life. So, I adjust my expectations accordingly, because there are lots of things I love about her. Another dear friend is the picture of integrity and I'd trust him with anything, and never tire of his company, but he's not a great at being a shoulder to cry on. And that's ok.
Romantic partnership dealbreakers: lack of integrity/honesty, no sense of humor, emotionally or physically abusive, lack of sexual interest or willingness, geography (no more long distance relationships for me), not affectionate, unwilling to accept me as I am, irrationality as a general mode of being (which will exlude most religious folks), being a workaholic, wanting children. I used to put monogamy on that list, but hey, I'm giving it a try. polyanna edit [Edited 3/16/06 9:43am] Seattle Org Invasion July 28th-30th http://www.prince.org/msg/2/177514
Third Annual MinneVasion Oct 20-22nd http://www.prince.org/msg/2/183063 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
brownsugar said: Spats said: Big rumps are a deal breaker as well. whew! i'm in the clear! i guess that crushes my wee bit crush If you have a big butt why don't you get one of those Butt Masters or whatever they are called? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: brownsugar said: whew! i'm in the clear! i guess that crushes my wee bit crush If you have a big butt why don't you get one of those Butt Masters or whatever they are called? i don't think theres anything wrong with my ass , i'll get by-i think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: But even then, I think I keep those people on a certain level of friendship. For me, it's all about managing my expectations of people. Of course, I've also been blessed with some pretty amazing friends. Same Here. People sometimes take a long time hiding their faults I've never heard another man say he wasn't interested in boobs. I went out with someone and she didn't want me to go "downtown"! I tried to tell her she was missing out on something really great, to no avail. She thought it was gross and couldn't figure out why I'd want too? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rev said: CarrieMpls said: But even then, I think I keep those people on a certain level of friendship. For me, it's all about managing my expectations of people. Of course, I've also been blessed with some pretty amazing friends. Same Here. People sometimes take a long time hiding their faults I've never heard another man say he wasn't interested in boobs. I went out with someone and she didn't want me to go "downtown"! I tried to tell her she was missing out on something really great, to no avail. She thought it was gross and couldn't figure out why I'd want too? give her spats number | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
charlottegelin said: Rev said: Same Here. People sometimes take a long time hiding their faults I've never heard another man say he wasn't interested in boobs. I went out with someone and she didn't want me to go "downtown"! I tried to tell her she was missing out on something really great, to no avail. She thought it was gross and couldn't figure out why I'd want too? give her spats number | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Handclapsfingasnapz said: charlottegelin said: give her spats number | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He didn't say what she looked like. I won't go out with just anyone. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Why were my dealbreakers deleted????? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
brownsugar said: ugh! i can't stand a drunk ass man!
cheating dishonesty disloyalty what would be even worse is not being there for me. You're being a bit picky. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: Why were my dealbreakers deleted?????
because they came from you. duh. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DynamicSavior said: brownsugar said: thats really gross. It sure is. And enemas are cheap too. That shit does not make any sense. Shit crumbs all in my damn bed. NASTY. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
potential boyfriends:
drugs (the occasional drink is fine) any violent or abusive behavior (verbal or physical) lying being dumb enough to get caught cheating lack of emotional support boring me to tears friends: bad attitudes selfishness dishonesty lack of discretion w/ my business *this one's tricky b/c I have a friend who's very, VERY toxic but I refuse to drop her until she does something really bad I have different standards for the two But potential boyfriends never even "arrive" if they have bad qualities It's easier to try & trust a new friend... but you still get fucked over | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
althom said: brownsugar said: ugh! i can't stand a drunk ass man!
cheating dishonesty disloyalty what would be even worse is not being there for me. You're being a bit picky. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DynamicSavior said: Shit crumbs all in my damn bed. NASTY.
[Edited 3/17/06 12:22pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SeattleInvasion said: I take more shit from friends than romantic partners, as they are easier to sort of "compartmentalize" in your life. Somebody can be really fun to hang out with, but not a reliable source of moral support. . . that kind of thing. One of my dearest friends is frequently late, a skilled white-liar, and can't keep a secret to save her life. So, I adjust my expectations accordingly, because there are lots of things I love about her. Another dear friend is the picture of integrity and I'd trust him with anything, and never tire of his company, but he's not a great at being a shoulder to cry on. And that's ok.
Romantic partnership dealbreakers: lack of integrity/honesty, no sense of humor, emotionally or physically abusive, lack of sexual interest or willingness, geography (no more long distance relationships for me), not affectionate, unwilling to accept me as I am, irrationality as a general mode of being (which will exlude most religious folks), being a workaholic, wanting children. I used to put monogamy on that list, but hey, I'm giving it a try. polyanna edit [Edited 3/16/06 9:43am] damn, you've had quite the change of heart. long distance relationsips are tricky. it's so easy to get carried away with this person who you communicate with mostly on the phone and internet and then you actually spend a large amount of face-to-face time and BAM, it's like a whole different person. some people can make them work. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: SeattleInvasion said: I take more shit from friends than romantic partners, as they are easier to sort of "compartmentalize" in your life. Somebody can be really fun to hang out with, but not a reliable source of moral support. . . that kind of thing. One of my dearest friends is frequently late, a skilled white-liar, and can't keep a secret to save her life. So, I adjust my expectations accordingly, because there are lots of things I love about her. Another dear friend is the picture of integrity and I'd trust him with anything, and never tire of his company, but he's not a great at being a shoulder to cry on. And that's ok.
Romantic partnership dealbreakers: lack of integrity/honesty, no sense of humor, emotionally or physically abusive, lack of sexual interest or willingness, geography (no more long distance relationships for me), not affectionate, unwilling to accept me as I am, irrationality as a general mode of being (which will exlude most religious folks), being a workaholic, wanting children. I used to put monogamy on that list, but hey, I'm giving it a try. polyanna edit [Edited 3/16/06 9:43am] damn, you've had quite the change of heart. long distance relationsips are tricky. it's so easy to get carried away with this person who you communicate with mostly on the phone and internet and then you actually spend a large amount of face-to-face time and BAM, it's like a whole different person. some people can make them work. I don't know that I've had a change of heart, really. I still think polyamory is the ideal family structure for me, but it requires a chemistry that is hard to attain. I'll take it on a relationship-by-relationship basis. And, actually, the relationship I'm in isn't necessarily monogamous. He doesn't care if I have sex with girls. But, in practice, I haven't since I've been with him, and I don't know that I will any time soon. As for LDRs, I've been through a couple of them, and yeah, there are illusions that are easier to maintain with infrequent visits vs the reality of day-to-day life, but more than that, I just find the time spent apart to be too painful. Don't want to go through months/years of agony like that. LDR-edit [Edited 3/17/06 14:41pm] Seattle Org Invasion July 28th-30th http://www.prince.org/msg/2/177514
Third Annual MinneVasion Oct 20-22nd http://www.prince.org/msg/2/183063 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SeattleInvasion said: JasmineFire said: damn, you've had quite the change of heart. long distance relationsips are tricky. it's so easy to get carried away with this person who you communicate with mostly on the phone and internet and then you actually spend a large amount of face-to-face time and BAM, it's like a whole different person. some people can make them work. I don't know that I've had a change of heart, really. I still think polyamory is the ideal family structure for me, but it requires a chemistry that is hard to attain. I'll take it on a relationship-by-relationship basis. And, actually, the relationship I'm in isn't necessarily monogamous. He doesn't care if I have sex with girls. But, in practice, I haven't since I've been with him, and I don't know that I will any time soon. As for LDRs, I've been through a couple of them, and yeah, there are illusions that are easier to maintain with infrequent visits vs the reality of day-to-day life, but more than that, I just find the time spent apart to be too painful. Don't want to go through months/years of agony like that. LDR-edit [Edited 3/17/06 14:41pm] that's funny that he doesn't care if you have sex with girls. me are so silly sometimes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: SeattleInvasion said: I don't know that I've had a change of heart, really. I still think polyamory is the ideal family structure for me, but it requires a chemistry that is hard to attain. I'll take it on a relationship-by-relationship basis. And, actually, the relationship I'm in isn't necessarily monogamous. He doesn't care if I have sex with girls. But, in practice, I haven't since I've been with him, and I don't know that I will any time soon. As for LDRs, I've been through a couple of them, and yeah, there are illusions that are easier to maintain with infrequent visits vs the reality of day-to-day life, but more than that, I just find the time spent apart to be too painful. Don't want to go through months/years of agony like that. LDR-edit [Edited 3/17/06 14:41pm] that's funny that he doesn't care if you have sex with girls. me are so silly sometimes. Yeah, I don't get it, but whatever, works for me! Seattle Org Invasion July 28th-30th http://www.prince.org/msg/2/177514
Third Annual MinneVasion Oct 20-22nd http://www.prince.org/msg/2/183063 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |