Author | Message |
milk contains milk apparently,, who knew? New food labels for Tescos, A major supermarket chain are labelling their milk bottles with the warning "contains milk," and that bags of nuts "contains nuts."
http://www.manchesteronli..._nuts.html "Tesco - which also warns shoppers that cream contains milk and that salted butter contains milk and salt - defended its decision, saying it wanted customers to have "all the possible information they should need." ... [Edited 2/20/06 5:13am] ... [Edited 2/20/06 5:17am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well you know what folk are like eh Llee? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JDINTERACTIVE said: Well you know what folk are like eh Llee?
yeah, they're daft as a brush | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The world's gone mad.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
what!!! coffee has coffee in it!!!? boy didn't see that one | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
...mmm! Milky! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
hey, nowadays, you just can't be sure anymore. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"Allergy advice: Contains eggs" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LleeLlee said: "Allergy advice: Contains eggs" I kinda hate to say it but I prefer the Darwinian approach. Anyone dumb enough to eat eggs with an egg allergy not realising eggs "contain eggs" needs to be removed from this planet | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
it's probably a good idea considering how lawsuit happy people are. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reincarnate said: LleeLlee said: "Allergy advice: Contains eggs" I kinda hate to say it but I prefer the Darwinian approach. Anyone dumb enough to eat eggs with an egg allergy not realising eggs "contain eggs" needs to be removed from this planet I like to imagine that there is no such person, but I agree, if there is, then he/she must be working for Tescos. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: it's probably a good idea considering how lawsuit happy people are.
Labels should be clearly labelled (erm..I should work for tescos too) But theres no need to state it so obviously. why not label it with a puzzle like? My first is in Mother but not in brother, my second is in tilk, but also in silk and my third is in plilk but not in dilk. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LleeLlee said: JasmineFire said: it's probably a good idea considering how lawsuit happy people are.
Labels should be clearly labelled (erm..I should work for tescos too) But theres no need to state it so obviously. why not label it with a puzzle like? My first is in Mother but not in brother, my second is in tilk, but also in silk and my third is in plilk but not in dilk. I think the label should just say "label," you know, so people know it's a label. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
why not just be honest too?
"Warning: Contains cheap coffee that we wouldnt pour down our drains." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LleeLlee said: JasmineFire said: it's probably a good idea considering how lawsuit happy people are.
Labels should be clearly labelled (erm..I should work for tescos too) But theres no need to state it so obviously. why not label it with a puzzle like? My first is in Mother but not in brother, my second is in tilk, but also in silk and my third is in plilk but not in dilk. true. i think such obvious labels are silly but sometimes people will sue just to sue. remember that old lady who sued mcdonalds because she spilled her hot coffee on herself? Of course your ass is gonna get burned if you spill hot coffee on yourself but she sued anyway and she won. there's a warning on my peanutbutter jar that says, 'Warning: contains nuts' 'cause you never know who the idiots are. [Edited 2/20/06 6:23am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2the9s said: LleeLlee said: Labels should be clearly labelled (erm..I should work for tescos too) But theres no need to state it so obviously. why not label it with a puzzle like? My first is in Mother but not in brother, my second is in tilk, but also in silk and my third is in plilk but not in dilk. I think the label should just say "label," you know, so people know it's a label. This thread contains 2the9s | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LleeLlee said: 2the9s said: I think the label should just say "label," you know, so people know it's a label. This thread contains 2the9s only consume if idiotproofed. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LleeLlee said: 2the9s said: I think the label should just say "label," you know, so people know it's a label. This thread contains 2the9s Got 2the9s? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: LleeLlee said: Labels should be clearly labelled (erm..I should work for tescos too) But theres no need to state it so obviously. why not label it with a puzzle like? My first is in Mother but not in brother, my second is in tilk, but also in silk and my third is in plilk but not in dilk. true. i think such obvious labels are silly but sometimes people will sue just to sue. remember that old lady who sued mcdonalds because she spilled her hot coffee on herself? Of course your ass is gonna get burned if you spill hot coffee on yourself but she sued anyway and she won. there's a warning on my peanutbutter jar that says, 'Warning: contains nuts' 'cause you never know who the idiots are. [Edited 2/20/06 6:23am] Really? So they have been doing this in Brooklyn for some years? Or did it start when 9s moved there? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
all i know is, it's a good thing the labels don't include ink, or else i'd really be screwed. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LleeLlee said: JasmineFire said: true. i think such obvious labels are silly but sometimes people will sue just to sue. remember that old lady who sued mcdonalds because she spilled her hot coffee on herself? Of course your ass is gonna get burned if you spill hot coffee on yourself but she sued anyway and she won. there's a warning on my peanutbutter jar that says, 'Warning: contains nuts' 'cause you never know who the idiots are. [Edited 2/20/06 6:23am] Really? So they have been doing this in Brooklyn for some years? Or did it start when 9s moved there? I remember first seeing obvious labels like this maybe five years ago or so. It seems like since food allergies have become much more serious, these labels have become more popular. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: LleeLlee said: Really? So they have been doing this in Brooklyn for some years? Or did it start when 9s moved there? I remember first seeing obvious labels like this maybe five years ago or so. It seems like since food allergies have become much more serious, these labels have become more popular. You should label your hair "hair" so you don't think it's a giant bug when you are half asleep. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2the9s said: JasmineFire said: I remember first seeing obvious labels like this maybe five years ago or so. It seems like since food allergies have become much more serious, these labels have become more popular. You should label your hair "hair" so you don't think it's a giant bug when you are half asleep. i know that helped me tremendously. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Here in the land of sue happy individuals..... You have to go so far as to say not only is coffee hot
it is piping hot. (True story) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The entertainment value of this thread far exceeds its merit. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBomb777 said: The entertainment value of this thread far exceeds its merit.
i'm finding it very educational. i mean, coffee is piping hot? i'm glad someone told me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anx said: all i know is, it's a good thing the labels don't include ink, or else i'd really be screwed.
Why not break it down more, Cows Milk: Contains milk from cow. ... [Edited 2/20/06 9:05am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasmineFire said: LleeLlee said: Really? So they have been doing this in Brooklyn for some years? Or did it start when 9s moved there? I remember first seeing obvious labels like this maybe five years ago or so. It seems like since food allergies have become much more serious, these labels have become more popular. I understand, but its ridiculous to say that a bottle of milk contains milk. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i'm just glad that food labels have to distinguish between being flavored or real. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Muse2NOPharaoh said: Here in the land of sue happy individuals..... You have to go so far as to say not only is coffee hot
it is piping hot. (True story) piping hot? lol. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |