Good, I guess. I've eaten countless chickens, but abusing one for shock value in a sleazy movie is wrong, if not criminal. It's obvious that they were some fucked up people at that time. Waters doesn't seem like the cruel type now, though.

Like I say, whatever a person wants to do--like eat dog shit--is okay with me.

Waters says it wasn't animal abuse, because they later cooked and ate the chicken.

After they abused it.

I'm not agreeing with him, just stating his "logic."