independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > It's official! Thomas Hayden Church is going to whup on Spidey as...
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 11/09/05 6:05am

JediMaster

avatar

It's official! Thomas Hayden Church is going to whup on Spidey as...

The Sandman!!!!





From Ain't It Cool:


Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with the news of the weekend. The first of (possibly) 3 villains in SPIDER-MAN 3 has been revealed by Sony. It's not a surprise to us here. We've been reporting that Church was going to be playing Sandman since April and Mary Jane herself said that one of the villains was going to be Sandman a month or so ago. Now the real the question is Topher Grace. Who is he playing? Did Dunst really let it all slip when she said the villains were Venom and Sandman? The sources who gave us the heads up on Sandman in the first place all seem sure that Grace is playing Electro, so... Who knows? I'm sure we'll be seeing a Daily Bugle report soon... but will it have Grace with a drippy black costume or shooting electricity from his fingers?

[Edited 11/9/05 6:11am]
jedi

Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 11/09/05 6:06am

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 11/09/05 6:12am

abierman

minneapolisgenius said:




lol that's so gay!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 11/09/05 6:17am

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

abierman said:

minneapolisgenius said:




lol that's so gay!

That's why he's called "Gay Spiderman". lol

I found him online somewhere. lol
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 11/09/05 6:17am

MisterMan38

i forget my spidey comics ... what are the sandmans "talents" ???? confused eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 11/09/05 6:22am

OdysseyMiles

Sweet. cartman
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 11/09/05 6:29am

JediMaster

avatar

MisterMan38 said:

i forget my spidey comics ... what are the sandmans "talents" ???? confused eek


Here ya go! From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

The Sandman (William Baker, alias Flint Marko) is a comic book supervillian in the Marvel Comics universe, and an enemy of Spider-Man. He was created by Stan Lee and Steve Ditko, and first appeared in Amazing Spider-Man #4 (1963).

The Sandman has the ability to transform into a malleable sand-like substance which can be hardened, dispersed, or shaped according to his will. He possesses vast superhuman strength several times in excess of Spider-Man's, making him an equal to The Thing (85-Ton Level). This ability came from an incident of accidental radiation bombardment on an atomic bomb testing beach, the result of which was that Marko's molecules merged with that of the sand under him.

In addition to his many crime sprees, Sandman has served as a founding member of the Frightful Four which often tangled with the Fantastic Four, and of the Sinister Six which frequently battled Spider-Man and the Hulk.

At one point, after a humiliating experience of temporarily becoming a monster after he merged with Hydro-Man, he reformed, thanks in part to the support of the Thing, and became a member of the Avengers, and later a mercenary in the employ of Silver Sable. He later reverted to his villainous ways, claiming to have been faking his heroic career, although it was revealed that the Wizard had used his mind-controlling "Id Machine" to force him to act as a villain.

Later, Sandman joined an incarnation of the Sinister Six, working with Venom. It was in this incarnation that Venom bit the Sandman, poisoning him, making his body crumble. He blamed Spider-Man in the beginning but he then asked him to deliver a message to his mother. The Sandman crumbled to pieces and seemingly died, dispersing down a sewer drain.

However, Marko was in actuality not dead. His sandy remains eventually became spread out over Jones Beach, New York, with his mind and personality scattered. The beach Sandman had now merged with and taken control over began to mindlessly swallow up people into the sand, in an unconscious attempt to slowly piece himself back together. Spider-Man tried to free the captured people from the Sandman's consciousness, only succeeding when Marko exploded from containing too many clashing mindsets. Relatively soon afterward, the sand that Sandman's body was composed of spread to different areas around New York, and all of the different aspects and personalities of Sandman's shattered mind formed into their own individual beings - Marko's good side, evil side, feminine side and childlike, infant side were all separated to different parts of the city. After they were all finally merged back together into one again, the standard evil side of his personality once again became the dominant one, and the criminal named the Sandman is once again at large.



[Edited 11/9/05 6:30am]
jedi

Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 11/09/05 6:57am

MisterMan38

i dont know ... sounds wimpy to me ...

lol wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 11/09/05 7:00am

shausler

good choice

i love the faithful costume
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 11/09/05 7:21am

Anxiety

shausler said:

good choice

i love the faithful costume



nod it's about damn time they had a spidey villain who looks faithful to the original. he looks perfect, down to the hair. i wonder how they'll screw it up? lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 11/09/05 7:38am

shausler

Anxiety said:

shausler said:

good choice

i love the faithful costume



nod it's about damn time they had a spidey villain who looks faithful to the original. he looks perfect, down to the hair. i wonder how they'll screw it up? lol



so true

green goblin was a discrace
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 11/09/05 7:47am

Anxiety

shausler said:

Anxiety said:




nod it's about damn time they had a spidey villain who looks faithful to the original. he looks perfect, down to the hair. i wonder how they'll screw it up? lol



so true

green goblin was a discrace


doc ock was a little better, but he was still a bit too snazzed up. i wish they'd do one installment of these movies retro styley.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 11/09/05 8:37am

JediMaster

avatar

shausler said:

Anxiety said:




nod it's about damn time they had a spidey villain who looks faithful to the original. he looks perfect, down to the hair. i wonder how they'll screw it up? lol



so true

green goblin was a discrace


Well, he looked stupid, but Defoe kicked ass as the Goblin/Norman Osbourne.
jedi

Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 11/09/05 8:39am

JediMaster

avatar

Anxiety said:

shausler said:




so true

green goblin was a discrace


doc ock was a little better, but he was still a bit too snazzed up. i wish they'd do one installment of these movies retro styley.


oh, now see, I LOVED the look of Doc Ock. The managed to keep a whole lot of his style from the comic, but also not make him look like a tard.

Story wise, the movies have been VERY "retro styley", especially the second.
jedi

Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 11/09/05 8:51am

shausler

JediMaster said:

Anxiety said:



doc ock was a little better, but he was still a bit too snazzed up. i wish they'd do one installment of these movies retro styley.


oh, now see, I LOVED the look of Doc Ock. The managed to keep a whole lot of his style from the comic, but also not make him look like a tard.

Story wise, the movies have been VERY "retro styley", especially the second.



the goblin costume

in movie one

was a flippin disater and travesty
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 11/09/05 9:13am

Anxiety

JediMaster said:



Story wise, the movies have been VERY "retro styley", especially the second.


yeah, i guess so. they could have messed with the origin far worse than they did.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 11/09/05 9:15am

shausler

and that chick as mary jane is a

horror

casting couch gone wrong
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 11/09/05 9:22am

Anxiety

shausler said:

and that chick as mary jane is a

horror

casting couch gone wrong


i hate kirsten dunst. barf
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 11/09/05 9:38am

MisterMan38

i actually think the peter parker and OCK were near perfect selections .... kirsten dunst is an odd one .... i admit ... nothing like i envisioned mary jane watson ever looking !!!

but the best is J JONAH JAMESON !!! lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 11/09/05 9:41am

GooeyTheHamste
r

minneapolisgenius said:

I found him online somewhere. lol


hmm

You find LOTS of things online, dontya?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 11/09/05 1:00pm

JediMaster

avatar

shausler said:

JediMaster said:



oh, now see, I LOVED the look of Doc Ock. The managed to keep a whole lot of his style from the comic, but also not make him look like a tard.

Story wise, the movies have been VERY "retro styley", especially the second.



the goblin costume

in movie one

was a flippin disater and travesty


I agree, but Willem DeFoe OWNED that role, and the movie rocked! I can forgive the Power Ranger costume for the GG.
jedi

Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 11/09/05 1:01pm

JediMaster

avatar

Anxiety said:

shausler said:

and that chick as mary jane is a

horror

casting couch gone wrong


i hate kirsten dunst. barf


omfg She is incredible! I can't believe you two!
jedi

Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 11/09/05 1:02pm

Spats

I agree. They dropped the ball with the Mary Jane part. Mary Jane looked like a drop dead beautiful model in the comic books. In the movie they get Kristen Dunst who is far from drop dead beautiful and has saggy breasts. Blah.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 11/09/05 1:07pm

shausler

JediMaster said:

Anxiety said:



i hate kirsten dunst. barf


omfg She is incredible! I can't believe you two!



jeds

i grew up on marvel tales

she is no mary jane

shes a lippless wonder

she holds none of the smokey coolness that

defined mary jane




tiger


wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 11/09/05 1:07pm

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

GooeyTheHamster said:

minneapolisgenius said:

I found him online somewhere. lol


hmm

You find LOTS of things online, dontya?

biggrin I find everything online. razz
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 11/09/05 1:17pm

JediMaster

avatar

shausler said:

JediMaster said:



omfg She is incredible! I can't believe you two!



jeds

i grew up on marvel tales

she is no mary jane

shes a lippless wonder

she holds none of the smokey coolness that

defined mary jane




tiger


wink


Gotta disagree. Personally, I thought they did a good job of finding a balance between the sexpot MJ of the 70s, and the good girlfriend/wife of the later years.
jedi

Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 11/09/05 1:18pm

JediMaster

avatar

Spats said:

I agree. They dropped the ball with the Mary Jane part. Mary Jane looked like a drop dead beautiful model in the comic books. In the movie they get Kristen Dunst who is far from drop dead beautiful and has saggy breasts. Blah.


disbelief
jedi

Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 11/09/05 1:23pm

Spats

Not to mention Kirston has these gross thin lips. Mary Jane in the comics has beautifil full lips.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 11/10/05 1:43pm

AnckSuNamun

avatar

abierman said:

minneapolisgenius said:




lol that's so gay!


falloff
rose looking for you in the woods tonight rose Switch FC SW-2874-2863-4789 (Rum&Coke)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 11/10/05 2:02pm

XxAxX

avatar

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > It's official! Thomas Hayden Church is going to whup on Spidey as...