gemini13 said: XxAxX said: i disagree that spats' 'filter is dirty and clogged' you're imposing a double standard here, do you see that? let me spell it out for you. first you defend synthia's preference for gender roles (man=aggressor, pursuer, active one in bed; woman = submissive, pursued, less active in bed). and even though synthia's sexual preference makes her sound like she's kind of into bondage which equates to a possibly questionable psychological background you support her there as well. (personally i am SO glad women are not requires to behave as synthia describes because that's the role we have been expected to play for centuries. i find it a total turn off to be 'the pursued' fuck that shit, imo). anyway back to the point: and THEN, after allowing Synthia the right to choose her admittedly 'different' sexual proferences THEN you have the nerve to refuse to allow spats the same freedom to choose his preferences? excuse me but that has double standard written all over it. [Edited 11/8/05 7:32am] Nope, I don't agree with your opinion. Spats is a pig, and I don't agree with his superficiality. I don't care what he does sexually, his standards for dating are clearly only based on looks, even though he himself is average looking. THAT is what I am arguing, and nothing else. fuck me ggodamn. now THAT's funny. i love this thread. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
XxAxX said: you are understanding and kind to synthia (even though in my opinion and in the opinion of many other women who've weighed in here - synthia's preference represents a backward, repressive social role)
A repressive and social role in SEX... If that's her view of life in general, well, then she's a fucking hypocrite, but I don't read that in her posts... BUT you are harsh to spats, who lists his turn-ons.
Superficial turn ons yes, I didn't see SynthiaRose post a list of superficial things she likes about her man (length of his cock, colour of his hair, table manner (give me a fucking break) etc...) To me Spats comes off as some socially neglected individual who has it out for women and tries to find even the slightest thing that he doesn't agree with about women and projects it as some huge social flaw just becuase they're women... then again, you're pretty insultive to just about everyone on this thread.
Maybe that's because I'm not into retarded thinking and treat everyone as they appear... Neversin. [Edited 11/8/05 8:19am] O(+>NIИ<+)O
“Is man merely a mistake of God's? Or God merely a mistake of man's?” - Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Neversin said: XxAxX said: you are understanding and kind to synthia (even though in my opinion and in the opinion of many other women who've weighed in here - synthia's preference represents a backward, repressive social role)
A repressive and social role in SEX... If that's her view of life in general, well, then she's a fucking hypocrite, but I don't read that in her posts... Superficial turn ons yes, I didn't see SynthiaRose post a list of superficial things she likes about her man (length of his cock, colour of his hair, table manner (give me a fucking break) etc...) To me Spats comes off as some socially neglected individual who has it out for women and tries to find even the slightest thing that he doesn't agree with about women and projects it as some huge social flaw just becuase they're women... then again, you're pretty insultive to just about everyone on this thread.
Maybe that's because I'm not into retarded thinking and treat everyone as they appear... Neversin. [Edited 11/8/05 8:19am] Thank you. "To me Spats comes off as some socially neglected individual who has it out for women and tries to find even the slightest thing that he doesn't agree with about women and projects it as some huge social flaw just becuase they're women..." "Maybe that's because I'm not into retarded thinking and treat everyone as they appear..." Now THAT'S my kind of thinking. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Neversin said: XxAxX said: you are understanding and kind to synthia (even though in my opinion and in the opinion of many other women who've weighed in here - synthia's preference represents a backward, repressive social role)
A repressive and social role in SEX... If that's her view of life in general, well, then she's a fucking hypocrite, but I don't read that in her posts... Superficial turn ons yes, I didn't see SynthiaRose post a list of superficial things she likes about her man (length of his cock, colour of his hair, table manner (give me a fucking break) etc...) To me Spats comes off as some socially neglected individual who has it out for women and tries to find even the slightest thing that he doesn't agree with about women and projects it as some huge social flaw just becuase they're women... then again, you're pretty insultive to just about everyone on this thread.
Maybe that's because I'm not into retarded thinking and treat everyone as they appear... Neversin. [Edited 11/8/05 8:19am] well, just from your posts up in here, posts which demonstrate your own biases and prejudices, i'd say you must be a real bucket of fun to spend time with yourself, mate | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
How am i socially neglected? That does not make sense. I don't pick out "the slightest thing". Every thing i have picked out that annoys me has not been a little thing. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: gemini13 said: Awww, don't let it get to you. It's just opinions, right. There are some dimwitted people on the org, but you should just feel sorry for them instead of getting riled up. Don't trip, potato chip. I'm trying to understand the controversy. I mean, the thread title is an invitation to opinions, no? 'Ladies, Do you move in bed or do you believe that's the guy's responsibility?' yes, that was the ???...so r u a lazy women in bed???? now is it really r responisibly to move it,,,or is it yours or is it ours???? SOME PEOPLE--THOSE WHO THINK IT'S EVER THEIR PLACE TO CHANGE SOMEONE--WILL FIND NEW "FAULTS" WHEN OLD ONES GET "FIXED".
milwaukee prince meetup.com milwaukee prince perplerain.com | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SIRTONY said: CalhounSq said: I'm trying to understand the controversy. I mean, the thread title is an invitation to opinions, no? 'Ladies, Do you move in bed or do you believe that's the guy's responsibility?' yes, that was the ???...so r u a lazy women in bed???? now is it really r responisibly to move it,,,or is it yours or is it ours???? I already answered | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You know. . . each person.... each relationship and even each interaction is different. No one is right or wrong... they are merely what's right for them at that given moment (which could very well be the exact opposite one hour later ) gotta love mulitiples and diversity.
There are times (at least I think) where both men and women need to be submissive... be dominated and totally taken and controlled sexually, mentally, and physically by their partner.... and likewise times when they need to take control and make it their own) isn't it beautiful not to define each moment or religate ourselves to a specific category... not only sexually but all inclusively. . . . life is beautiful.... experience it all on every level | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yeah, but i don't understand why anyone would want to be dominated or "taken". Especially women. Especially when they have been preaching about equality for years. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: Yeah, but i don't understand why anyone would want to be dominated or "taken". Especially women. Especially when they have been preaching about equality for years.
but you understand the drive to take a woman don't ya? What's not to understand. I get what syn's saying but I thought the jellyfish thing was really kinda odd. But she says she does move around so waht is the point of this thread 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yeah, it's called being horny. But i have never "taken" a woman. I am not an aggressive person. We have just just hooked up. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: Yeah, it's called being horny. But i have never "taken" a woman. I am not an aggressive person. We have just just hooked up.
Sure. 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It just does make sense why a women wants to be "taken". It is just those Romance novels ideas again. It's just weird. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats? Are you exciting in bed at all? What's with all the hang ups? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
gemini13 said: Spats? Are you exciting in bed at all? What's with all the hang ups?
Co sign yeah i have been wondering the same thing | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think the moment you start thinking about 'responsibility' in bed you're getting away from the real gravy. Spontaneity is king. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: Spontaneity is king.
I agree | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
gemini13 said: Fauxie said: Spontaneity is king.
I agree Excellent, let's have sex! You go underneath first and then you have to... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Am i exciting? I don't know. You would have to ask the women/girls i have been with. I told you the complaints they had. If that's all they have then i am doing pretty damn good. If they want to be "taken" and want me to be Mr.Agressive they will be letdown. It's just not me and i would not want to be with a woman who wanted to a be "taken". That's weird. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: gemini13 said: I agree Excellent, let's have sex! You go underneath first and then you have to... No, you need to be on top! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
gemini13 said: Fauxie said: Excellent, let's have sex! You go underneath first and then you have to... No, you need to be on top! Wait, do you have a pen and pad handy? Let's get this organised first. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: Am i exciting? I don't know. You would have to ask the women/girls i have been with. I told you the complaints they had. If that's all they have then i am doing pretty damn good. If they want to be "taken" and want me to be Mr.Agressive they will be letdown. It's just not me and i would not want to be with a woman who wanted to a be "taken". That's weird.
I could never be THAT experimental in bed | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: gemini13 said: No, you need to be on top! Wait, do you have a pen and pad handy? Let's get this organised first. Well, before we even do that, I need to filter you through my list of ridiculous standards before I'll even bother waiting for you to make the first move. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
gemini13 said: Fauxie said: Wait, do you have a pen and pad handy? Let's get this organised first. Well, before we even do that, I need to filter you through my list of ridiculous standards before I'll even bother waiting for you to make the first move. Yes, you're right. First up, is being 'taken' an acceptable concept for you? I won't even so much as look at a woman who won't allow herself to be taken. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: gemini13 said: Well, before we even do that, I need to filter you through my list of ridiculous standards before I'll even bother waiting for you to make the first move. Yes, you're right. First up, is being 'taken' an acceptable concept for you? I won't even so much as look at a woman who won't allow herself to be taken. Wow, that's such a prehistoric idea. When are you going to stop talking? That's annoying! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
gemini13 said: Fauxie said: Yes, you're right. First up, is being 'taken' an acceptable concept for you? I won't even so much as look at a woman who won't allow herself to be taken. Wow, that's such a prehistoric idea. When are you going to stop talking? That's annoying! I'm sorry. Can't I say 'oooh' or 'aaah'? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: gemini13 said: Wow, that's such a prehistoric idea. When are you going to stop talking? That's annoying! I'm sorry. Can't I say 'oooh' or 'aaah'? No. that's too Romance Novelish for me. Besides, I'll probably just want to puke or laugh at you. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Call me weird then, cuz I love to be plundered by a strong man BUT i don't lie there like a dead fish the whole time 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
this thread is fonk'n hillarious
there r times when an ass should be still and there r times when an ass should be workin'n it move dem hips gurl lazy assez | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: Am i exciting? I don't know. You would have to ask the women/girls i have been with. I told you the complaints they had. If that's all they have then i am doing pretty damn good. If they want to be "taken" and want me to be Mr.Agressive they will be letdown. It's just not me and i would not want to be with a woman who wanted to a be "taken". That's weird.
I LOVE THIS!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |