MarySharon said:

Orgasmic passage. Yes! Break me!

I LOve me some ANIMAL FARM... Like I said Different Styles.

I don't have to defend my intensity or sensuality to anyone.

You people on here have problems comprehending and interpreting.

I stand by by statements, which have been mischaracterized as being passive and weak ...only because rather than analyze stated truths ...people twist, malign, and exaggerate without regard for whether they have an authentic understanding of the idea they are rejecting.


Why would a strong man want to dominate a weak, passive woman? That's pretty easy to do and is probably what drives them to the down low ...looking for a challenge.

If I admire strength, obviously I seek that for myself. I want forces to collide and the strongest to dominate. I've stated my feminist views on many threads. And I've stated in numerous threads my admiration for the power couple. Apparently, you people have never met a independent, individualistic, strong, confident woman who still wants to be dominated by her stronger man.

Yes, I want to submit to and nurture him. No matter how strong I am, I want a stronger man.

I've even alluded to characters in the Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged to give you an example of what I mean ...Both Dominique and Dagny are incredibly powerful women who nurture and submit to their men. If you want to discuss the psychology behind this ...please do.

But there has been very little intelligent rebuttal. Just two annoying posters who keeping adding comments to get attention.

Apparently not many people on this thread read. And one poster keeps referring to romance novels and I fear he thinks Rand writes romance. While she is a Romantic in the classic sense (in that she deals with idealism, transcendence and heroism,) she's not some mawkish sentimental writer.


But alas, this thread is being hijacked by lesser minds who rather than address the real truths stated ...would exaggerate, malign, and impose

Here's a description from Atlas Shrugged of Dagny standing in the presence of the stronger man she will grow to love: John Galt. We glimpse both her strength and vulnerability which is the beauty of womanhood:




Orgasmic passage. Yes! Break me!

Zelaira said:

You wouldn't know anything about some missing bull semem, would ya?

I actually believe the guy should do the work in bed.

I don't move or thrust or anything.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not just lying there: I'm very alive and responsive. I squirm and grasp and gasp and squeeze and caress, and sometimes pretend to try and get away because he's too much for me -- but I don't do anything that causes me to perspire. I may slide my legs along his body, but no real hip or torso action.

Surprisingly I've found this strategy to be pretty effective.

I think a guy appreciates a girl who is so aware of him, as opposed to someone who's a gymnast. I've been complimented by my favorite casonova who says sex with me is the best he's had (in my mind, I think 'You know I don't move right?' but I totally understand how he can feel that ... because I think I make him feel really masculine and special.)

You know how some divide house labor, saying the wife does the inside and the man the outside? Well..
My division of tasks is that I handle the foreplay and he does the rest. I LOVE foreplay ... I do all kinds of stuff with scarfs, handcuffs, creams, mirrors, lingerie, poses, movie dialogue ... I just genuinely love to play around and give full mind & body attention (oral sex, kissing, etc). I don't like any of that stuff done to me ...well I don't mind if he does movie dialogue. So, this system works out great.

Besides if there are too many people moving it can really throw things off. Especially if there's music and you're on different beats

I just like it quick and dirty.

Anybody who wants to be physically dominated has issues.

SynthiaRose said:

Speaking for myself, I love it when a woman sweats, grinds away and digs her nails in my back.

Anybody who wants to be physically dominated has issues.

Anybody who wants to be physically dominated has issues.

Well why would anybody want to be dominated? Especially women. Synthiarose is giving women a bad name. It's such stone age mentality.She is enforcing gender roles, stereotypes, being submissive. All in one. Put whatever books you are reading down, Synthia.

I don't have to defend my intensity or sensuality to anyone.

You people on here have problems comprehending and interpreting.

I stand by by statements, which have been mischaracterized as being passive and weak ...only because rather than analyze stated truths ...people twist, malign, and exaggerate without regard for whether they have an authentic understanding of the idea they are rejecting.


Why would a strong man want to dominate a weak, passive woman? That's pretty easy to do and is probably what drives them to the down low ...looking for a challenge.

If I admire strength, obviously I seek that for myself. I want forces to collide and the strongest to dominate. I've stated my feminist views on many threads. And I've stated in numerous threads my admiration for the power couple. Apparently, you people have never met a independent, individualistic, strong, confident woman who still wants to be dominated by her stronger man.

Yes, I want to submit to and nurture him. No matter how strong I am, I want a stronger man.

I've even alluded to characters in the Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged to give you an example of what I mean ...Both Dominique and Dagny are incredibly powerful women who nurture and submit to their men. If you want to discuss the psychology behind this ...please do.

But there has been very little intelligent rebuttal. Just two annoying posters who keeping adding comments to get attention.

Apparently not many people on this thread read. And one poster keeps referring to romance novels and I fear he thinks Rand writes romance. While she is a Romantic in the classic sense (in that she deals with idealism, transcendence and heroism,) she's not some mawkish sentimental writer.


But alas, this thread is being hijacked by lesser minds who rather than address the real truths stated ...would exaggerate, malign, and impose

Here's a description from Atlas Shrugged of Dagny standing in the presence of the stronger man she will grow to love: John Galt. We glimpse both her strength and vulnerability which is the beauty of womanhood:




Orgasmic passage. Yes! Break me!

SynthiaRose said:

You say you don't have to defend yourself, then you go on to do just that. When it comes down to it, whatever you want to do, do it. Fuck what people think about it. I also am into to being submissive and having a strong man dominate me but that not moving around thing is just not me. You shouldn't care what I think though. You might want to stop insulting your captive audience, too. We are all entitled to state our opinions on this thread, whether you think they are to your higher-level-of-intelligence than-the-rest-of-us liking or not.

I'm old-fashioned. If the man isn't on top, I fast-forward.

SynthiaRose said:

You say you don't have to defend yourself, then you go on to do just that. When it comes down to it, whatever you want to do, do it. Fuck what people think about it. I also am into to being submissive and having a strong man dominate me but that not moving around thing is just not me. You shouldn't care what I think though. You might want to stop insulting your captive audience, too. We are all entitled to state our opinions on this thread, whether you think they are to your higher-level-of-intelligence than-the-rest-of-us liking or not.

I can't believe this stupidity continues.

Yes, I posted my thoughts and started this thread.

Then, histrionic dimwitted people exaggerate my statements and impose interpretations that are unsupported by my posts.

Then, they make personal attacks.


By the end of the thread, I decide to stop being diplomatic and point out the ignorance.

And now I'm being accused of something.

Complete bullshit.

I've never condemned someone for their personal perferences on this thread. I've condemened stupidity and misinterpretation. You should as well.

Lemmings.

Don't accuse me of not being receptive to opinion. That's far from true. I'm not receptive to personal attacks ...which have been plenty. And those perpetrators don't deserve any passionate defense.
And yes I said I didn't have to defend my intensity and sensuality. (which doesn't mean that I will opt out of defense by the way)...and then some smart ass wants to say i'm doing it.

Umm... the rest of my post was not a defense ..it was an explanation complete with novel excerpt. And even if one thought it were a defense ...it wasn't of intensity and sensuality ...it was of my philosophy.

There are so many illogical statements that continue.

Including someone saying I'm endorsing gender roles. Um, this is a thread about sex. Not about professions or anything else in life. And then the 'insulting captive audience' quip. People posting on an Internet are hardly captive and my comments are directed toward those that have already been insulting to me.

Anyway, I've tried to ignore this thread all day ...because it's really going on longer than necessary.

But damn, I'm not going to have someone point a finger at me for losing my patience with posters here. I said what needed to be said.

Especially to two particular ones who've gone out of their way just to goad.

This thread has clearly descended into a really negative diatribe, despite my opening it with a light, whimisical tone.

I'm done. This is not the type of interaction I like to have on the org.

charlottegelin said:

"Honey, I'm hoooome! Are you in the mood?"
.

SynthiaRose said:

Awww, don't let it get to you. It's just opinions, right. There are some dimwitted people on the org, but you should just feel sorry for them instead of getting riled up. Don't trip, potato chip.

gemini13 said:

I'm trying to understand the controversy. I mean, the thread title is an invitation to opinions, no?

'Ladies, Do you move in bed or do you believe that's the guy's responsibility?'