So you want to see Heiress spit out her own teeth? Nice!

If we knew what your ORIGINAL screen name was (the one you most likely were banned with), it would shed an abundance of light on your personality. What's with the attitude? Why are you so defensive? There's way more insight into your personality that you're giving that you're not noticing.

Do people like you actually roam the earth unattended spitting at people and thinking they can get away with it?

You're right though. I'm overcompensating. I should just spit back.

First of all I have never been banned which I mentioned when TheRealFiness thought I was FACE and secondly who says that account is still active? Who says I posted in the past? If I deactivated my account you won't find anything unless you would like to manually search all posts made since Feb 2002 and again, there would be nothing to find if I never posted in the first place.

Sure as hell won't be someone like you, girlie man.

When I did I say that I spit on people? Learn to control yourself. Don't be so childish and dramatic. Do you not even have enough self-worth to just walk away? Or do you feel better stooping to a lower level just to satisfy your ego?

slapping, spitting, ball kicking is all wrong. retaliating with excessive force is not justification.


seriously.....

In this day and age, saliva is a weapon and the amount of force allowed to counter is has yet to be legally defined.
But....

Felony conviction for spitting upheld on technical grounds.

[No authors listed]

AIDS: The Ohio Supreme Court upheld the felony conviction of an HIV-positive man who spat in the face of a police officer. The prosecution contended that in 1993, Jimmy Bird used saliva as a weapon against a police officer who had Bird in custody on a charge of disorderly conduct. Bird pleaded no contest to one count of felonious assault and was sentenced to a term of 3 to 15 years in prison. On appeal, Bird sought to have his conviction overturned based on the lack of medical evidence that HIV can be transmitted by saliva. A State appeals court ruled against Bird in 1996, and the Supreme Court upheld the ruling.

I'm pretty sure that when the guy spat in the police officer's face, he wasn't doing it with the intent to transmit his HIV.

And that matters because???

It was just another frivolous lawsuit with good lawyers.

Frivolous? How can a felony conviction be frivolous? Civil lawsuits can be frivolous. This, however, was a criminal case.

Oh, come on. The police officer just got pissed off that the guy spit at him, got a lawyer, investigated the guy, and decided to sue once they found out he was HIV+.

That's right.

My wife is Thai, so I have to do that a lot.

But seriously, she has a terrible temper which up until a year or so ago could lead her to get violent. She used to slap me, push me, kick out, and stand on the bed screaming out so the whole street could hear. I'm a very non-confrontational person and very, very rarely get even slightly angry, which always allowed me to be in control and let things play out. However, after a while, seeing the red marks on my arms and back and having to go through the inevitable calming down and making up, and despite the make up sex, I decided it just couldn't continue, no matter how much I understood the reasons for her behaviour and sympathised with her. The whole thing was just tiring for us both. We talked about it a lot and she learned to control herself and now everything is cool. She can still do the shrill screaming thing but she never slaps or anything anymore. We give each other a little space on the rare occasion we argue and now she's much more capable of just talking things through rationally and reasonably. Feels good.

Does peoples opinions change if the woman in question is a lesbian?

Decided to sue? You aren't suing someone when it's a criminal case. You're thinking civil. In criminal cases the STATE is the plaintiff.