independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Pretentious bollocks
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 10/07/05 4:57pm

Fauxie

minneapolisgenius said:

TheFrog said:



I dunno - i think their output screams, "we've taken a shit load of drugs" more than it does of being pretentious. But then both of those can lead to the same result. lol

I love Pink Floyd incidentally. So i'm biased. whistling

Well said. nod I will never understand why they are constantly being labled as "pretentious". confuse This album is a perfect example of 70's psychedelic rock, that's all. Nothing pretentious about it IMO. If I were a musician/songwriter back then, I would have written something similar as well, with all the pychedelics I've taken. lol And Gilmour's playing on it is just sublime. cloud9 It's somehow become the thing to do nowdays: label Pink Floyd (and also Radiohead, with those constant band comparisons) as pretentious. So cliche. shrug

And if I HAD to label one of their albums as being some self-indulgent, pseudo-intellectual effort, I'd say The Wall qualifies more than DSOTM. nod But I love that one too. I just don't listen to it as much.



I think the phrase 'self-indulgent' fits them more than 'pretentious'. Tracks like 'Echoes' and 'Shine On...' are definitely long-winded and meandering to say the least. I like them, but it doesn't escape me that they were terribly self-indulgent. Still, it was successful and turns out people liked it, so why not?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 10/08/05 3:35am

PANDURITO

avatar

Imago777 said:

Anxiety said:


oh, i don't think yoko's work is pretentious at all. it actually provokes thought about simple things, which i think is very sweet and charming. some of her stuff is pretty funny, even. some of it is very vulnerable. i enjoy her stuff, she has a great imagination.

I don't agree with you.

I do nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 10/08/05 4:39am

Funkster

avatar

JDINTERACTIVE said:

AsylumUtopia said:


Do you really think DSOTM is pretentious bollocks or is the picture just something for us to look at ? biggrin

Anyway, I've seen plenty of pretentious bollocks. Ireland has a tax amnesty for artists, which means artists, writers and musicians pay no tax at all, the bastards. This is supposed to promote culture, and I guess it does, but it also encourages a plethora of pretentious wankers to talk a lot of bollocks and believe they are artists just because they can throw a bundle of sticks together and vomit on them.


Well Pink Floyd are pretentious. Lets be honest.


You need to re-phrase, Roger Waters is pretentious.
[Edited 10/8/05 4:40am]
"Art calls for complete mastery of techniques, developed by reflection within the soul."
Like music, dig this: http://www.peterguy.merseyblogs.co.uk/
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 10/08/05 4:57am

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

Fauxie said:

minneapolisgenius said:


Well said. nod I will never understand why they are constantly being labled as "pretentious". confuse This album is a perfect example of 70's psychedelic rock, that's all. Nothing pretentious about it IMO. If I were a musician/songwriter back then, I would have written something similar as well, with all the pychedelics I've taken. lol And Gilmour's playing on it is just sublime. cloud9 It's somehow become the thing to do nowdays: label Pink Floyd (and also Radiohead, with those constant band comparisons) as pretentious. So cliche. shrug

And if I HAD to label one of their albums as being some self-indulgent, pseudo-intellectual effort, I'd say The Wall qualifies more than DSOTM. nod But I love that one too. I just don't listen to it as much.



I think the phrase 'self-indulgent' fits them more than 'pretentious'. Tracks like 'Echoes' and 'Shine On...' are definitely long-winded and meandering to say the least. I like them, but it doesn't escape me that they were terribly self-indulgent. Still, it was successful and turns out people liked it, so why not?

I agree. And there's nothing wrong with self-indulgent sometimes. biggrin
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 10/08/05 5:30am

Anxiety

Imago777 said:


I don't agree with you.


then you and the mexican food i ate last night have something in common. ill
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 10/08/05 4:11pm

2the9s

IstenSzek said:

cough~orgbookclub~cough

neutral


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Pretentious bollocks