New topic
Printablemdiver said: BreddieMercury said: You may have her body over lunch, but I'll always have her heart. That is a fair deal, you get her heart I get her body! 
Do you think she will mind us striking this deal?  Ignore him..if sexy was a colour it would be red | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
REDBABY said: mdiver said: That is a fair deal, you get her heart I get her body!
Do you think she will mind us striking this deal? Ignore him..Ha Breddie you have no chance now  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thesexofit said: Man, what a silly question. what are u 12?
| |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| Moderator
|
Is there a time limit?? 
Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture! REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince "I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
moderatorREDFEATHERS said: I find it easier to wank off a bigger dick as opposed to a small one.. I get a better grip and rhythm going... my hand kinda keeps slipping off a smaller one..
 Women can't wank , they tend to do it too hard  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dewrede said: REDFEATHERS said: I find it easier to wank off a bigger dick as opposed to a small one.. I get a better grip and rhythm going... my hand kinda keeps slipping off a smaller one..
Women can't wank , they tend to do it too hard  really? I must have a soft touch, I keep getting told to grip it more firmly! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
charlottegelin said: Dewrede said: Women can't wank , they tend to do it too hard really? I must have a soft touch, I keep getting told to grip it more firmly! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I just got smacked in the back of the head twice by my girlfriend.
First, cuz I asked her this question; & second cuz she looked over my shoulder to see what I was readin', then said, "Idiot! It says wank off, not walk off!" I'm a sad, sad man. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Illustrator said: I just got smacked in the back of the head twice by my girlfriend.
First, cuz I asked her this question; & second cuz she looked over my shoulder to see what I was readin', then said, "Idiot! It says wank off, not walk off!" I'm a sad, sad man.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
althom said: charlottegelin said: really? I must have a soft touch, I keep getting told to grip it more firmly!if sexy was a colour it would be red | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Big and small are very arbitrary terms, if you problem is slippage then any short penis with a wide girth should be fine for you. Admittedly, a long thin penis would present itself with more opportunity to regain a grip before your slip off the end. As we are all aware a short thin penis is no use to man, woman or beast.
With regard to time, I think that that (all variation considered) it would take longer to “wank off” a longer penis if you are making full use of shaft length. Predominantly, male stimulation is received via the glans and by crossing the glans once per stroke you are administering pleasure. If we assign this a pleasure point of 1 then each stroke (up and down) will administer 2 pleasure points to the male. If we then assume that a finite number of pleasure points would make the average male ejaculate then of course the time it takes to travel the length of the penis would determine how many times you would cross/pass the glans and therefore how quickly he would climax. Ergo, a longer penis has a longer stroke time and therefore would take longer to climax.  Happy is he who finds out the causes for things.Virgil (70-19 BC). Virgil was such a lying bastard! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PREDOMINANT said: Big and small are very arbitrary terms, if you problem is slippage then any short penis with a wide girth should be fine for you. Admittedly, a long thin penis would present itself with more opportunity to regain a grip before your slip off the end. As we are all aware a short thin penis is no use to man, woman or beast.
With regard to time, I think that that (all variation considered) it would take longer to “wank off” a longer penis if you are making full use of shaft length. Predominantly, male stimulation is received via the glans and by crossing the glans once per stroke you are administering pleasure. If we assign this a pleasure point of 1 then each stroke (up and down) will administer 2 pleasure points to the male. If we then assume that a finite number of pleasure points would make the average male ejaculate then of course the time it takes to travel the length of the penis would determine how many times you would cross/pass the glans and therefore how quickly he would climax. Ergo, a longer penis has a longer stroke time and therefore would take longer to climax. OMG I knew I could count on you! THANK YOU!! You never cease to amaze me! 
if sexy was a colour it would be red | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
REDBABY said: PREDOMINANT said: Big and small are very arbitrary terms, if you problem is slippage then any short penis with a wide girth should be fine for you. Admittedly, a long thin penis would present itself with more opportunity to regain a grip before your slip off the end. As we are all aware a short thin penis is no use to man, woman or beast.
With regard to time, I think that that (all variation considered) it would take longer to “wank off” a longer penis if you are making full use of shaft length. Predominantly, male stimulation is received via the glans and by crossing the glans once per stroke you are administering pleasure. If we assign this a pleasure point of 1 then each stroke (up and down) will administer 2 pleasure points to the male. If we then assume that a finite number of pleasure points would make the average male ejaculate then of course the time it takes to travel the length of the penis would determine how many times you would cross/pass the glans and therefore how quickly he would climax. Ergo, a longer penis has a longer stroke time and therefore would take longer to climax. OMG I knew I could count on you! THANK YOU!! You never cease to amaze me!
Happy is he who finds out the causes for things.Virgil (70-19 BC). Virgil was such a lying bastard! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PREDOMINANT said: Big and small are very arbitrary terms, if you problem is slippage then any short penis with a wide girth should be fine for you. Admittedly, a long thin penis would present itself with more opportunity to regain a grip before your slip off the end. As we are all aware a short thin penis is no use to man, woman or beast.
With regard to time, I think that that (all variation considered) it would take longer to “wank off” a longer penis if you are making full use of shaft length. Predominantly, male stimulation is received via the glans and by crossing the glans once per stroke you are administering pleasure. If we assign this a pleasure point of 1 then each stroke (up and down) will administer 2 pleasure points to the male. If we then assume that a finite number of pleasure points would make the average male ejaculate then of course the time it takes to travel the length of the penis would determine how many times you would cross/pass the glans and therefore how quickly he would climax. Ergo, a longer penis has a longer stroke time and therefore would take longer to climax. Well, fuck me. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PREDOMINANT said: Big and small are very arbitrary terms, if you problem is slippage then any short penis with a wide girth should be fine for you. Admittedly, a long thin penis would present itself with more opportunity to regain a grip before your slip off the end. As we are all aware a short thin penis is no use to man, woman or beast.
With regard to time, I think that that (all variation considered) it would take longer to “wank off” a longer penis if you are making full use of shaft length. Predominantly, male stimulation is received via the glans and by crossing the glans once per stroke you are administering pleasure. If we assign this a pleasure point of 1 then each stroke (up and down) will administer 2 pleasure points to the male. If we then assume that a finite number of pleasure points would make the average male ejaculate then of course the time it takes to travel the length of the penis would determine how many times you would cross/pass the glans and therefore how quickly he would climax. Ergo, a longer penis has a longer stroke time and therefore would take longer to climax. you've thought about that waaaaay too much ...just had lunch with Toni by the way  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nomad said: PREDOMINANT said: Big and small are very arbitrary terms, if you problem is slippage then any short penis with a wide girth should be fine for you. Admittedly, a long thin penis would present itself with more opportunity to regain a grip before your slip off the end. As we are all aware a short thin penis is no use to man, woman or beast.
With regard to time, I think that that (all variation considered) it would take longer to “wank off” a longer penis if you are making full use of shaft length. Predominantly, male stimulation is received via the glans and by crossing the glans once per stroke you are administering pleasure. If we assign this a pleasure point of 1 then each stroke (up and down) will administer 2 pleasure points to the male. If we then assume that a finite number of pleasure points would make the average male ejaculate then of course the time it takes to travel the length of the penis would determine how many times you would cross/pass the glans and therefore how quickly he would climax. Ergo, a longer penis has a longer stroke time and therefore would take longer to climax. you've thought about that waaaaay too much ...just had lunch with Toni by the way Say hello to her from me..  if sexy was a colour it would be red | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
REDBABY said: Nomad said: you've thought about that waaaaay too much ...just had lunch with Toni by the way Say hello to her from me.. will do | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nomad said: REDBABY said: Say hello to her from me.. will do ..and you can tell her it DOES take longer to wank off a big dick.. if sexy was a colour it would be red | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
REDBABY said: Nomad said: will do ..and you can tell her it DOES take longer to wank off a big dick.. Only theoretically, in practice there are too many variables to consider Happy is he who finds out the causes for things.Virgil (70-19 BC). Virgil was such a lying bastard! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
REDFEATHERS said: mdiver said: Nic has this been bothering you long sweetie? About 5 mins so far..  |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cloudbuster said: PREDOMINANT said: Big and small are very arbitrary terms, if you problem is slippage then any short penis with a wide girth should be fine for you. Admittedly, a long thin penis would present itself with more opportunity to regain a grip before your slip off the end. As we are all aware a short thin penis is no use to man, woman or beast.
With regard to time, I think that that (all variation considered) it would take longer to “wank off” a longer penis if you are making full use of shaft length. Predominantly, male stimulation is received via the glans and by crossing the glans once per stroke you are administering pleasure. If we assign this a pleasure point of 1 then each stroke (up and down) will administer 2 pleasure points to the male. If we then assume that a finite number of pleasure points would make the average male ejaculate then of course the time it takes to travel the length of the penis would determine how many times you would cross/pass the glans and therefore how quickly he would climax. Ergo, a longer penis has a longer stroke time and therefore would take longer to climax. Well, fuck me.  To Sir, with Love | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dewrede said: REDFEATHERS said: I find it easier to wank off a bigger dick as opposed to a small one.. I get a better grip and rhythm going... my hand kinda keeps slipping off a smaller one..
Women can't wank , they tend to do it too hard I've never had any complaints about the firmness of a woman's grip but sometimes, while "wanking it", women have pulled the foreskin all the way back so roughly that it hurts. It actually never needs to go all the way back. Also, they've somtimes stroked the head too much without the assistance of either foreskin or lubrication. Then it gets dry and sore quite fast. Some women are amazing at it though. They alternate between mouth and hand like true experts and know exactly when it's time to change pace, pause or just stick with it without stopping. They're usually the same women that truly enjoy doing it. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |