New topic
PrintableAnd for the record...I think Jackie Chan has more than earned the right to call out Chris Tucker if he feels he's screwing with one of his films. | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
Byron said: TheCrucialExperience said: Yeah Chan has done a lot of films. Hmm? I wonder if him being 18 years OLDER than Tucker has anything to do with it?   Irrelevant...completely. Why? Because again (for the memory-impared) here's what Chan said about Tucker: "He's still a new actor," Chan, 51, said. "How many movies has he made?" Emphasis on "still a new actor". Basically, you're agreeing with Chan...
And Tucker has only been the focus of maybe four films...in the others, his participation has been minimal...not the one in which the movie's success depended upon his performance or presence. I think both you AND Chris Tucker have a LOT to learn about Hollywood...lol  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
XxAxX said: TheCrucialExperience said: And I'm sure Chan's 1978 "Half a Loaf of Kung Fu" was real "ARTSY"
 i'm telling jackie you said that. he'll kick your butt AND tucker's Oh no! I hope he won't beat me over the head with a loaf of bread!  "But what of black women? . . . I most sincerely doubt if any other race of women could have brought its fineness up through so devilish a fire." -- W.E.B. Du Bois -- | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: TheCrucialExperience said: Yeah Chan has done a lot of films. Hmm? I wonder if him being 18 years OLDER than Tucker has anything to do with it? Irrelevant...completely. Why? Because again (for the memory-impared) here's what Chan said about Tucker: "He's still a new actor," Chan, 51, said. "How many movies has he made?" Emphasis on "still a new actor". Basically, you're agreeing with Chan...
And Tucker has only been the focus of maybe four films...in the others, his participation has been minimal...not the one in which the movie's success depended upon his performance or presence. I think both you AND Chris Tucker have a LOT to learn about Hollywood...lol LOL! So YOU can tell me what NEW ACTOR means? What's the ending period of a NEW ACTOR? 2 Years? 10 years? Tucker's been acting for over a decade and this clown comes in here saying "Tucker IS a NEW ACTOR." How DUMB is that? Again, when Jackie gets a hit in the states WITHOUT having an sidekick then YOU can pump Jackie up. But since YOU know SO MUCH about Hollywood, I'm sure you can tell us when Jackie's NEXT BIG AMERICAN HIT WITH HIM AS LEAD IS GONNA BE, true? "But what of black women? . . . I most sincerely doubt if any other race of women could have brought its fineness up through so devilish a fire." -- W.E.B. Du Bois -- | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jackie don't let them hurt me! please don't let them hurt me !!
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: And for the record...I think Jackie Chan has more than earned the right to call out Chris Tucker if he feels he's screwing with one of his films.
You missed the point, Mr. Hollywood. If Jackie has a problem with Tucker, he should go to Tucker and NOT go public with it. That's weak for a man to air his co-workers/partners issues to the public. THAT'S the whole point to ALL I've been saying. Somehow people have turned this into "World Cinema vs America Cinema" and "Jackie's career vs Tucker's career" and it's not about either of these but about discussing issues with one another through proper channels. "But what of black women? . . . I most sincerely doubt if any other race of women could have brought its fineness up through so devilish a fire." -- W.E.B. Du Bois -- | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
how about you just shut up and let them release the movie, chris?
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
XxAxX said: how about you just shut up and let them release the movie, chris?
"But what of black women? . . . I most sincerely doubt if any other race of women could have brought its fineness up through so devilish a fire." -- W.E.B. Du Bois -- | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheCrucialExperience said: Byron said: Irrelevant...completely. Why? Because again (for the memory-impared) here's what Chan said about Tucker: "He's still a new actor," Chan, 51, said. "How many movies has he made?" Emphasis on "still a new actor". Basically, you're agreeing with Chan...
And Tucker has only been the focus of maybe four films...in the others, his participation has been minimal...not the one in which the movie's success depended upon his performance or presence. I think both you AND Chris Tucker have a LOT to learn about Hollywood...lol LOL! So YOU can tell me what NEW ACTOR means? What's the ending period of a NEW ACTOR? 2 Years? 10 years? Tucker's been acting for over a decade and this clown comes in here saying "Tucker IS a NEW ACTOR." How DUMB is that? Again, when Jackie gets a hit in the states WITHOUT having an sidekick then YOU can pump Jackie up. But since YOU know SO MUCH about Hollywood, I'm sure you can tell us when Jackie's NEXT BIG AMERICAN HIT WITH HIM AS LEAD IS GONNA BE, true? "New actor" means a limited resume, especially where being a lead character is concerned. Find a way for Tucker to not fit that description. I'll wait. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheCrucialExperience said: Byron said: And for the record...I think Jackie Chan has more than earned the right to call out Chris Tucker if he feels he's screwing with one of his films.
You missed the point, Mr. Hollywood. If Jackie has a problem with Tucker, he should go to Tucker and NOT go public with it. That's weak for a man to air his co-workers/partners issues to the public. THAT'S the whole point to ALL I've been saying. Somehow people have turned this into "World Cinema vs America Cinema" and "Jackie's career vs Tucker's career" and it's not about either of these but about discussing issues with one another through proper channels. Did you ever think that he already HAD gone to Tucker first??...Maybe Tucker, the great God of American Cinema, wasn't listening? God help the director who's film is being held up because Tucker insists on being in the editing room before a single frame is ever filmed. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i won't budge an inch. i'm standing right here until you give me final editing rights. so there!
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JACKIE CHAN
1962 Big and Little Wong Tin-Bar 1963 The Love Eternal 1964 The Story of Qui Xiang Lin 1966 Come Drink with Me 1968 A Touch of Zen 1971 The Little Tiger of Canton 1971 The Heroine 1972 Fist of Fury 1972 Police Woman 1972 Hapkido 1973 Not Scared to Die 1973 Enter the Dragon 1974 Golden Lotus 1975 The Himalayan 1975 All in the Family 1976 Hand of Death 1976 New Fist of Fury 1976 Shaolin Wooden Men 1976 Killer Meteors 1978 Snake and Crane Arts of Shaolin 1978 Half a Loaf of Kung Fu 1978 Magnificent Bodyguards 1978 Spiritual Kung Fu 1978 Dragon Fist 1978 Snake in the Eagle's Shadow 1978 Drunken Master (aka Drunk Monkey in the Tiger's Eye) 1979 Fearless Hyena 1980 The Young Master 1980 The Big Brawl (aka Battle Creek Brawl) 1981 Cannonball Run 1982 Dragon Lord 1982 Fantasy Mission Force 1983 Winners and Sinners 1983 Cannonball Run Part II 1983 Project A 1984 Wheels On Meals 1985 My Lucky Stars 1985 The Protector 1985 Twinkle Twinkle Lucky Stars 1985 Heart of Dragon 1985 Police Story 1986 Armour of God 1987 Project A Part II 1988 Dragons Forever 1988 Police Story Part II 1989 Miracles (aka Mr Canton and Lady Rose) 1991 Operation Condor 1991 Island of Fire 1992 Twin Dragons 1992 Police Story Part III 1993 City Hunter 1993 Crime Story 1993 Project S 1994 Drunken Master 2 1995 Rumble in the Bronx 1995 Thunderbolt 1996 First Strike (aka Police Story Part IV) 1997 Mr Nice Guy 1998 Who Am I? 1998 Rush Hour 1999 Gorgeous 2000 Shanghai Noon 2001 The Accidental Spy 2001 Rush Hour 2 2002 The Tuxedo 2003 Shanghai Knights 2003 The Medallion 2004 Around the World in 80 Days I just HAD to highlight some of those TITLES!
I can't BELIEVE Jackie has NEVER been nominated for ANY of those films. "But what of black women? . . . I most sincerely doubt if any other race of women could have brought its fineness up through so devilish a fire." -- W.E.B. Du Bois -- | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
if my acting career dies after this at least i have a lot of funky dance moves
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: TheCrucialExperience said: LOL! So YOU can tell me what NEW ACTOR means? What's the ending period of a NEW ACTOR? 2 Years? 10 years? Tucker's been acting for over a decade and this clown comes in here saying "Tucker IS a NEW ACTOR." How DUMB is that? Again, when Jackie gets a hit in the states WITHOUT having an sidekick then YOU can pump Jackie up. But since YOU know SO MUCH about Hollywood, I'm sure you can tell us when Jackie's NEXT BIG AMERICAN HIT WITH HIM AS LEAD IS GONNA BE, true? "New actor" means a limited resume, especially where being a lead character is concerned. Find a way for Tucker to not fit that description. I'll wait. So you are absolutely SURE that's what NEW ACTOR means? Where are you getting your info from? THIS I MUST hear! LOL! "Limited Resume" LOL! "But what of black women? . . . I most sincerely doubt if any other race of women could have brought its fineness up through so devilish a fire." -- W.E.B. Du Bois -- | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: TheCrucialExperience said: You missed the point, Mr. Hollywood. If Jackie has a problem with Tucker, he should go to Tucker and NOT go public with it. That's weak for a man to air his co-workers/partners issues to the public. THAT'S the whole point to ALL I've been saying. Somehow people have turned this into "World Cinema vs America Cinema" and "Jackie's career vs Tucker's career" and it's not about either of these but about discussing issues with one another through proper channels. Did you ever think that he already HAD gone to Tucker first??...Maybe Tucker, the great God of American Cinema, wasn't listening? God help the director who's film is being held up because Tucker insists on being in the editing room before a single frame is ever filmed. OH! I see what you're saying: So if it didn't work behind closd doors, be a ho about it and GO PUBLIC. Got it now. I bet your friends LOVE your trust. "But what of black women? . . . I most sincerely doubt if any other race of women could have brought its fineness up through so devilish a fire." -- W.E.B. Du Bois -- | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
gimme final editing rights or i'll poke your eyes out
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rhondab said: CalhounSq said: FUCK Chris, Jackie & those dumb ass movies
 You're such a fuckin' lady!!
hell to the naw!!! 
   I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rush hour 3 is something that I can get on bootleg... I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
nominate for thread of the year | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
If we're to believe Jackie's version is true you can understand his frustration. On the other hand, Chris is a good comedian and he probably doesn't want a bunch of cornball jokes and sorry cliches these Hollywood-types like to throw in. I know I'd want some say on what makes it into the movie and what doesn't. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whodknee said: If we're to believe Jackie's version is true you can understand his frustration. On the other hand, Chris is a good comedian and he probably doesn't want a bunch of cornball jokes and sorry cliches these Hollywood-types like to throw in. I know I'd want some say on what makes it into the movie and what doesn't.
That's what the Rush Hour series is all about. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think Chris has an eye for editing. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Do we really need another Rush Hour? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
