I loved this movie. It's a Batman for grownups. Had my favorite villain in it too. It is definately the best out of the four. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: I loved this movie. It's a Batman for grownups. Had my favorite villain in it too. It is definately the best out of the four.
Best of the FIVE (unless, of course, you're just pretending that Batman & Robin never happened. I wouldn't blame you for that at all). Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JediMaster said: Stymie said: I loved this movie. It's a Batman for grownups. Had my favorite villain in it too. It is definately the best out of the four.
Best of the FIVE (unless, of course, you're just pretending that Batman & Robin never happened. I wouldn't blame you for that at all). This was defenitely the first movie I actually felt good about. I would own this DVD. (I do not own the previous ones, except "Forever" for 2 reasons: Kilmer was harsh, and I never thought Hollywood would redeem themselve with a good batman movie) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JediMaster said: Stymie said: I loved this movie. It's a Batman for grownups. Had my favorite villain in it too. It is definately the best out of the four.
Best of the FIVE (unless, of course, you're just pretending that Batman & Robin never happened. I wouldn't blame you for that at all). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JediMaster said: VinnyM27 said: That was always kind of news to me. It was kind of an unpleasant surprise, but then when you watch "Batman:TAS" (the early ninties cartoon), it makes a lot of sense. I just hope they don't overdo it becuase they didn't in the series. "Batman" Gotham, the villians, etc.,should be the focus. not the playboy antics of Wayne and the fact that it's just an act. The more they stress it being "just an act" the more it seems like Batman is gay (which there is nothing wrong with, but it sends that message). I've never gotten the impression he was "gay". To me, the act is to deflect attention away from his crusade. If he plays up the idea that all he cares about are babes, cars, booze and the jetsetter lifestyle, then the general public will never once suspect he is capable of being the Batman. It would be like finding out that Paris Hilton dresses up and fights crime. I didn't think this flick overdid it all. In fact, I thought they struck the perfect balance. It had been ignored in all the other films, and its a critical part of the character. I see what you mean....so you think Paris Hilton's whole thing is just an act and she is doing heroic things accross the world? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thescandalouslife said: Katie Holmes was the weak link in the film. The casting was all wrong for her; her facial expressions and tone are identical to her performance as Joey Potter on Dawson's Creek. The whole wrinkling of her forehead, widening her eyes, opening her mouth; the whiny/arrogant tone of her voice...it's all the same. She has no depth.
She's just too young and can still play a teenager well, I'm sure. Playing her own age (or possibly older!) isn't right for her right now. Has she even proved herself to get this role? Charlize Theron or someone along those lines would have been much better casting! I petition Theron or Angelina Jolie for the sequel. I'm glad to hear Holmes will not be in the sequel (although I wish her no ill will, even with this TomKat bullshit I have to sit through). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: JediMaster said: Best of the FIVE (unless, of course, you're just pretending that Batman & Robin never happened. I wouldn't blame you for that at all). This was defenitely the first movie I actually felt good about. I would own this DVD. (I do not own the previous ones, except "Forever" for 2 reasons: Kilmer was harsh, and I never thought Hollywood would redeem themselve with a good batman movie) I don't believe anyone can defend Kilmer as Batman over Keaton but whatever..... As for the DVDs, I keep hearing that special editions will finally come out before Christmas (probably the same day as "Batman Begins"). I would definately buy 1, 2 and 5 right away. If they sell it has a boxed set (which I doubt since there is already a boxed set with the first four movies) and if it's only slightly more than buying the three movies alone, I might consdier adding the problematic 3 and the terrible beyond belief 4 to my collection. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VinnyM27 said: I'm glad to hear Holmes will not be in the sequel (although I wish her no ill will, even with this TomKat bullshit I have to sit through).
Joker: "I have given a name to my pain, and it is 'TomKat.'" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Just got back from seeing it, finally.
Can I just say that Cillian Murphy is the prettiest gottdamn man on the planet? My goodness!! I was swooning in my seat. Swooning!! Those eyes! Those lips! whew. And yeah, fun movie. Loved the scarecrow character, loved Liam (as always) and there were quite a few good laughs. all in all: |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: Just got back from seeing it, finally.
Isn't Cillian just fucking beautiful? i kept trying to figure out where i knew him from and it hit me: 28 Days Later.Can I just say that Cillian Murphy is the prettiest gottdamn man on the planet? My goodness!! I was swooning in my seat. Swooning!! Those eyes! Those lips! whew. And yeah, fun movie. Loved the scarecrow character, loved Liam (as always) and there were quite a few good laughs. all in all: | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VinnyM27 said: I don't believe anyone can defend Kilmer as Batman over Keaton but whatever.....
No offense, and I understand everyone has their own opinion, but I don't understand how anyone can defend Keaton as Batman. It was insulting, the second they announced it... "Mr. Mom" as Batman. What a joke. He sucked almost, not quite, but almost as bad as Clooney. Like him or not, Kilmer is an amazing actor, and gave the role more credibility, than Keaton's feeble attempt. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I thought that the film was great. The best Batman film by a mile.
Bale really WAS Batman. He nailed it. I thought that those drugged out scenes with the Scarecrows gas and that hideous mask were just great! I alo thought that the movie made you feel real emotion about poor Bruce Wayne when he was a kid, the death of his parents etc. When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: VinnyM27 said: I don't believe anyone can defend Kilmer as Batman over Keaton but whatever.....
No offense, and I understand everyone has their own opinion, but I don't understand how anyone can defend Keaton as Batman. It was insulting, the second they announced it... "Mr. Mom" as Batman. What a joke. He sucked almost, not quite, but almost as bad as Clooney. Like him or not, Kilmer is an amazing actor, and gave the role more credibility, than Keaton's feeble attempt. Sorry if you took my comment that wrong way. No offense taken by me. And what was on Kilmer's resume...."Real Genuis" as Batman? Or that super shitty spy spoof "Top Secret"? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VinnyM27 said: Sorry if you took my comment that wrong way. No offense taken by me.
And what was on Kilmer's resume...."Real Genuis" as Batman? Or that super shitty spy spoof "Top Secret"? No offense taken by me... I guess since I never really paid much attention to Kilmer's early work, I forgot about those movies. All in all, I think Kilmer was more of a physical match than Keaton. Keaton's need of a hairpiece, chin piece to give him a square jawline, and trying to exaggerate his height cause he is short... Kilmer was physically more believeable, is what I should have said. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What do you think about Gordon driving the Batmobile and using the weapons? I didn't really like that. But I DO love the "car" itself! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
calldapplwondery83 said: What do you think about Gordon driving the Batmobile and using the weapons? I didn't really like that. But I DO love the "car" itself!
The car was awesome... I was impressed. It makes sense that his car should look like nothing else on the road, and it was realistic. I think the fact that Gordon drove it, helped establish a better relationship... or a more factual relationship between Batman and Gordon. Similar to the way it is in the comics, as opposed to the ridiculous "Gordon" of the Burton/Shumacher fiascos. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: calldapplwondery83 said: What do you think about Gordon driving the Batmobile and using the weapons? I didn't really like that. But I DO love the "car" itself!
Similar to the way it is in the comics, as opposed to the ridiculous "Gordon" of the Burton/Shumacher fiascos. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Just seen it again, great stuff! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Best scene has to be Batman interrogating Flass upside down...
"SWEAR TO ME!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Loved it. Seen it 3 times which is a big deal for me. Especially for someone who really isn't into the comic scene. It seemed so realistic like someone in today's world could portray. The icing on the cake for me was seeing grown men sitting on the edge of their seats in the theatre, enjoying it. That said alot about the movie to me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Bruce Wayne Meets The Wu-Tang Clan In The Shaolin Temple.....
LOVED EVERY MINUTE OF IT. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: VinnyM27 said: I don't believe anyone can defend Kilmer as Batman over Keaton but whatever.....
No offense, and I understand everyone has their own opinion, but I don't understand how anyone can defend Keaton as Batman. It was insulting, the second they announced it... "Mr. Mom" as Batman. What a joke. He sucked almost, not quite, but almost as bad as Clooney. It could have been worse. Didn't Tim Burton want Bill Murray (among others) for the role? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheBatman said: calldapplwondery83 said: What do you think about Gordon driving the Batmobile and using the weapons? I didn't really like that. But I DO love the "car" itself!
The car was awesome... I was impressed. It makes sense that his car should look like nothing else on the road, and it was realistic. I think the fact that Gordon drove it, helped establish a better relationship... or a more factual relationship between Batman and Gordon. Similar to the way it is in the comics, as opposed to the ridiculous "Gordon" of the Burton/Shumacher fiascos. Couldn't agree more. My biggest complaint about the overall previous Bat-franchise. Thank God Nolan and Goyer understood the character of Gordon. Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TMPletz said: TheBatman said: No offense, and I understand everyone has their own opinion, but I don't understand how anyone can defend Keaton as Batman. It was insulting, the second they announced it... "Mr. Mom" as Batman. What a joke. He sucked almost, not quite, but almost as bad as Clooney. It could have been worse. Didn't Tim Burton want Bill Murray (among others) for the role? Yes, originally he did! Can you imagine how bad THAT would have sucked? I love Burton, but he needs to stay away from superheroes. His aborted Superman films would have been atrocious as well, since he wanted Nic Cage to play the Man of Steel! Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JediMaster said: TMPletz said: It could have been worse. Didn't Tim Burton want Bill Murray (among others) for the role? Yes, originally he did! Can you imagine how bad THAT would have sucked? I love Burton, but he needs to stay away from superheroes. His aborted Superman films would have been atrocious as well, since he wanted Nic Cage to play the Man of Steel! And his teaming up with Jon Peters would have destroyed the franchise. It's a good thing Peters used his dumb ideas on "Wild Wild West" instead. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TMPletz said: JediMaster said: Yes, originally he did! Can you imagine how bad THAT would have sucked? I love Burton, but he needs to stay away from superheroes. His aborted Superman films would have been atrocious as well, since he wanted Nic Cage to play the Man of Steel! And his teaming up with Jon Peters would have destroyed the franchise. It's a good thing Peters used his dumb ideas on "Wild Wild West" instead. Yes, Peters is an idiot. Hell, "Peters" is a good name for him, since it describes him so well. I remember reading an interview with Kevin Smith where he mentioned that Peters wanted him to write a "gay R2-D2" type robot into the Superman movie! Whata moron! Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JediMaster said: TMPletz said: And his teaming up with Jon Peters would have destroyed the franchise. It's a good thing Peters used his dumb ideas on "Wild Wild West" instead. Yes, Peters is an idiot. Hell, "Peters" is a good name for him, since it describes him so well. I remember reading an interview with Kevin Smith where he mentioned that Peters wanted him to write a "gay R2-D2" type robot into the Superman movie! Whata moron! Yeah, Kevin's whole take on him and Tim Burton is expressed on his DVD "An Evening With Kevin Smith". Funny stuff! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Here's an interesting tidbit from Aintitcool. Personally, I suspect it's BS, but it sounds interesting:
The Joker... to be played by the most humorless actor in Hollywood?
Hey folks, Harry here... I know the headline seems to indicate that I've a negative opinion of this rumored casting exploration that Chris Nolan is 'allegedly' pursuing. However, nothing could be further from the truth. I think Sean Penn is near brilliant casting for the Joker. When making the list of folks in the current poll, he never dawned on me - but that's more my lack of vision, than anything else. For me - casting a man who was introduced to the public as one of the screen's great cinematic jokers in FAST TIMES AT RIDGEMONT HIGH... But who in recent years has seemingly had no sense of humor whatsoever... well, to me that's a really great basis for The Joker. The Joker - frankly, isn't funny. And if a joke is pulled on him, he never laughs - in fact, quite the opposite... he overreacts in a homicidal fashion. Joker was the sort of villain that'd pull a trigger on a gun at your waist, blowing your spine out your back... and then laughing maniacally as though it was the funniest thing ever. He's more Tommy Udo, the clown face... it isn't Emmett Kelly, it's John Wayne Gacy. NOW - this is just a rumor - and one that comes from a British rumor rag - but ya never know - it's a helluva choice - and not the typical random rumor... it feels smart. Over here in Blighty's 'Now' magazine (celebrity tat), there's a potentially interesting story regarding a story that's crept out from the Batman Begins premiere party. According to the reporter, a drunken Christian Bale revealed that Chris Nolan is courting Sean Penn to play the Joker in the next Batman film. However there's still some finessing to do because Sean's apparently unsure about 'taking' his buddy, Jack Nicholson's, role. Could be guff but it's another potential to add to the list. Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Any hint yet at a DVD release date? Amazon.de says January 16th 2006, but I guess it won't be that long. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
calldapplwondery83 said: Any hint yet at a DVD release date? Amazon.de says January 16th 2006, but I guess it won't be that long.
Oh, I'm sure it will be out before the Holidays. I predict before Thanskgiving. Do not hurry yourself in your spirit to become offended, for the taking of offense is what rests in the bosom of the stupid ones. (Ecclesiastes 7:9) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |