DexMSR said: lillith said: i work full time, raise my son on my own and presently have no man to speak of however...when i do...i am a complete nurturer. i love to cook (i hate the cleaning part tho!! ), always do special little things like put love notes or sexual suggestions in his lunchbox...but yet i am very independant and enjoy giving him his space and having my own as well. i have noticed in todays mainstream (not all women) that its the 'what-has-he-done-for-me-lately' mentality that is prevalent. some may call it equality or progress or whatever, personally i find it sad. mind you, i do believe it is a two way street...he has to want to do things for me too...i enjoy having a bath run for me on occasion...a surprise meal cooked for me (even if he can't cook and its only a grilled cheese sammich!!!)...having my car detailed....things like that. i need a man who likes to be nurtured and also can nurture me right back...is respectful and i can guarantee what goes around comes around in this instance...i will respect him too.
Hell Yeah!!!!! whap! The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. -- Mark Twain.
BOB JOHNSON IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dex, your words show such a disdain for Jan and any woman who isn't agreeing with you. Again, I say you don't seem to want a discussion, you just seem to want people to agree with you and for women to "prove" themselves to you as being good women. The way you smirk at Jan and other women on this thread, the way you insult their intelligence, the way you throw out this "alone" thing, the way you belittle them as women and people, the way you make assumptions--this doesn't portray you as anything but small-spirited, when I think you're capable of so much better.
The only person I see alone and unhappy here is YOU, Dex. Maybe you need to take a look at yourself and what it is YOU aren't doing to bring the woman you need into your life and KEEP her, instead of accusing "most" American women of having the problem? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DexMSR said: Janfriend said: If are talking about love and devotion and showing and expressing it, you should just say that instead of disguising it as something else like "what a woman should do to keep your man" and the "role in actually "being" a woman to their men" Ok....how do you express your love and devotion? As if this is relevent or any of your business since you failed to say what exactly a woman needed in order to keep you. If you must know, in the beginning of our relationship, I would write notes letting know how much of a good time I had on one of our outings, how wonderful he was, how much I believed in him and his talents, and how I felt about the person he was. I don't write the letters as much, since it's been a while. I listen to him when he needs to talk about his goals or needs to vent about drama. Sometimes I just listen and sometimes I give advice. I am his supporter. I not only express my love verbally, but I am very affectionate and "mushy." I buy him things I think will interest him on a whim. I do things with him that peak his interests even if it's something I am not into. I am honest with him. There are a bunch of little things about our relationship too, but all these things I get in return. I don't believe in one-sidedness. I am independent and he knows this. I don't clean shit and I don't cook shit and he doesn't expect me to. We have an open communication with each other. He knows I don't need him and...you don't need to go outside the U.S. to find the woman you want. You can go to the deep south in an area where everyone's barefoot or the appalachian mountains | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purpleizpassion said: I don't see anything at all wrong wth a woman wanting to be treated like a Queen in 2005 or a man like a King... As long as it is mutual. I don't see anything wrong with making a man feel needed. Sure I can pump my own gas, but he likes going to do it for me so I don't have to stand outside in the snow or even mess up my nails. He is fine with that. In turn I cook, clean (which I also detest), and am there for him to talk to when he's has had a rough day. he opens up to me because I don't assume that he wants me to 'fix' or 'solve' his problem. I just listen. I am not afraid to ask him about something if I am not sure or don't know and he doesn't make me feel stupid with his answers. When he asked me to marry him he said he needed a partner in eveything he does. He wanted me to be his help. His Queen... I am. and proud of it. I think everyone got 'gender roles' mixed up when they began to discredit femininity as something that was to be used against u and qualified u to be less than a man. Men and women are wired to handle things differently naturally. While men use authority women use influence. Neither is less than the other.
BTW, he can cook and clean and give a damn good massage also! Thank you for this response! The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. -- Mark Twain.
BOB JOHNSON IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DexMSR said: Fleshofmyflesh said: Dex - this won't make me very popular, but I think you may be identifying a cultural difference, within the subset of American women.
In your experience, do Black women treat their men different than other races of women? Yes, it does have alot to do with culture and its differences. I have been all over the world and only here are our women really not of the inherent nurturing kind like women in other countries are. There are a plethora of factors involved in this change: Career advances for women, The Women's Movement, Relationship Dynamics have evolved out of what we would call more traditional roles, etc. I think I will choose to not have an American woman in my midst when it is all said and done because they just are not (NOT ALL) fine tuned anymore as to what it means to nurture their man. This thread is great and has opened my eyes to alot, but I am pretty much done. I had an experience with a most beautiful young lady last summer where I had gone to play basketball with my friends, came home and she went on and gave me a foot massage because she knew I needed it, and I in return gave her all the love and attention that was warranted that night, and we never had to turn on the television or do anything that strayed from the both of us. We layed in each others arms and just chilled with each other until it was time to sleep. You see, this is how I love to exist. When my lady is that nurturing to me, I can't help but be there for her. We have unbelieiveable chemistry in that regard. She is not American, and she has got it all right. I would never expect a woman to bow down or be my servant, but I do want the woman I am with to be that nurturer and care-giver men want or need. I will do what I need to do as a "man" to adhere to the role of being that strong pillar of strength and make her feel safe and secure at all times along with whatever else it is I need to do for my woman and the household we are building or have built. I know women love to feel safe, secure, and loved... and men love to feel cared for, loved, and nurtured above and beyond what we normally do for ourselves. I'm sorry if I got off topic. But I don't see a difference in how black women treat their man in accordance to any other race, this is only a male/female thing as far as I am concerned. The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. -- Mark Twain.
BOB JOHNSON IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AnotherLoverToo said: Dex, your words show such a disdain for Jan and any woman who isn't agreeing with you. Again, I say you don't seem to want a discussion, you just seem to want people to agree with you and for women to "prove" themselves to you as being good women. The way you smirk at Jan and other women on this thread, the way you insult their intelligence, the way you throw out this "alone" thing, the way you belittle them as women and people, the way you make assumptions--this doesn't portray you as anything but small-spirited, when I think you're capable of so much better.
The only person I see alone and unhappy here is YOU, Dex. Maybe you need to take a look at yourself and what it is YOU aren't doing to bring the woman you need into your life and KEEP her, instead of accusing "most" American women of having the problem? Exactly. He needs to look in the mirror and ask himself what it is about him that he cannot find the type of woman he wants. Like most people, he probably doesn't see the fault in himself, but in others because afterall, he has it right and they don't. I think he's just been with some tacky women who didn't truly love him. I guess if they did, he would be with one | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purpleizpassion said: toffee said: Well.... Do you think it would be fair to say that some of the perceptions with regard to women caring for their men in more traditional manners are perceived as lax due to to the growing of number of households where women are the sole and/or primary bread winners of the household? Do you think that inferiority complexes and/or ego's may also generate some of this perception? Do you think that men have encouraged this by enouraging women to go outside of the home to work? For as many men as there are that say that a feminist movement is behind the change of mindset...there are just as many men that say ..... if my woman wants to suport the household...I'll hold it down at home. And in those instances how do you view the nurturing distribution? Don't get me wrong... I'm probably as old fashioned when it comes to home as a woman can get. . . .but by the same token I still see relationships as a two way street and a commitment. In a world where men are quick to cite rational for not marrying in a committed relationship it stills seems to be the perception that the lack of traditional values fall on the shoulders of the women. Isn't that a contradiction of sorts? Where do you see as starting point for the breakdown of traditional roles in a familial setting? As for the women being alone.....sometimes alone allows you the opportunity to see what you value and what you expect a man to bring to the relationship as well. Alone isn't always a bad thing... there are many people in relationships today that feel more alone than those that physically are. Such an interesting thread in so many ways . . . . I contend that it's the lack of foundation building that allows relationships to get to the point of break-down .... communication..... truly is key. Because after the love and after the hellacious sex..... after the cuddling ...there has to be a means of communicating with regard to values, and ethics and morals and roles within the relationship..... the bottom line for me is this... regardless of who cooks the meal on any particular day I believe its more important that you dine together.....not in passing as one enters and upon the others exodus..... And no matter who wakes the other in the midst of sleep to say i need you and i want you.... the receptiveness of the other to respond to his/her partners needs supercedes the onset of foreplay and the focus on which gender initated it.... Mutual respect and communication ....and the man will know that he is respected and loved and important and so will his woman .....and knowing that without having to have those words uttered in my opinion is the starting point ..... its all about being clear on what you want in your union....but in all fairness.... unions are unique and not all inclusive on any level just as some men look to be nurtured ... many others love to generate it..... my again *takes ur to the bank!* Great response. My baby is very much a nurturer. Almost more than me! He loves to give and because of the "flipped script", when we were dating I had the strange feeling of inadequacy. We have found our balance over the years. Again, also have learned to define our own dynamic. Excellent posts! The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. -- Mark Twain.
BOB JOHNSON IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
umm...excuse me...but are all the cookies gone? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janfriend said: DexMSR said: Ok....how do you express your love and devotion? As if this is relevent or any of your business since you failed to say what exactly a woman needed in order to keep you. If you must know, in the beginning of our relationship, I would write notes letting know how much of a good time I had on one of our outings, how wonderful he was, how much I believed in him and his talents, and how I felt about the person he was. I don't write the letters as much, since it's been a while. I listen to him when he needs to talk about his goals or needs to vent about drama. Sometimes I just listen and sometimes I give advice. I am his supporter. I not only express my love verbally, but I am very affectionate and "mushy." I buy him things I think will interest him on a whim. I do things with him that peak his interests even if it's something I am not into. I am honest with him. There are a bunch of little things about our relationship too, but all these things I get in return. I don't believe in one-sidedness. I am independent and he knows this. I don't clean shit and I don't cook shit and he doesn't expect me to. We have an open communication with each other. He knows I don't need him and...you don't need to go outside the U.S. to find the woman you want. You can go to the deep south in an area where everyone's barefoot or the appalachian mountains Everything you stated here is EXACTLY what I was talking about in this thread....if you took the time to read my posts and reiterations...you "should" have seen that it is and ALWAYS is...about reciprocation and equality without relinquishing the inherent roles men and women do play....period. The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. -- Mark Twain.
BOB JOHNSON IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DexMSR said: Janfriend said: As if this is relevent or any of your business since you failed to say what exactly a woman needed in order to keep you. If you must know, in the beginning of our relationship, I would write notes letting know how much of a good time I had on one of our outings, how wonderful he was, how much I believed in him and his talents, and how I felt about the person he was. I don't write the letters as much, since it's been a while. I listen to him when he needs to talk about his goals or needs to vent about drama. Sometimes I just listen and sometimes I give advice. I am his supporter. I not only express my love verbally, but I am very affectionate and "mushy." I buy him things I think will interest him on a whim. I do things with him that peak his interests even if it's something I am not into. I am honest with him. There are a bunch of little things about our relationship too, but all these things I get in return. I don't believe in one-sidedness. I am independent and he knows this. I don't clean shit and I don't cook shit and he doesn't expect me to. We have an open communication with each other. He knows I don't need him and...you don't need to go outside the U.S. to find the woman you want. You can go to the deep south in an area where everyone's barefoot or the appalachian mountains Everything you stated here is EXACTLY what I was talking about in this thread....if you took the time to read my posts and reiterations...you "should" have seen that it is and ALWAYS is...about reciprocation and equality without relinquishing the inherent roles men and women do play....period. Awww, honey, I suspect she knew what you were askin' all along. She just didn't feel like she should have to "prove" herself and she wanted to get you to show your true intentions. Dex: look inside yourself. That's where the answer is. Stop projecting your own shit/past with women onto others. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DexMSR said: Janfriend said: As if this is relevent or any of your business since you failed to say what exactly a woman needed in order to keep you. If you must know, in the beginning of our relationship, I would write notes letting know how much of a good time I had on one of our outings, how wonderful he was, how much I believed in him and his talents, and how I felt about the person he was. I don't write the letters as much, since it's been a while. I listen to him when he needs to talk about his goals or needs to vent about drama. Sometimes I just listen and sometimes I give advice. I am his supporter. I not only express my love verbally, but I am very affectionate and "mushy." I buy him things I think will interest him on a whim. I do things with him that peak his interests even if it's something I am not into. I am honest with him. There are a bunch of little things about our relationship too, but all these things I get in return. I don't believe in one-sidedness. I am independent and he knows this. I don't clean shit and I don't cook shit and he doesn't expect me to. We have an open communication with each other. He knows I don't need him and...you don't need to go outside the U.S. to find the woman you want. You can go to the deep south in an area where everyone's barefoot or the appalachian mountains Everything you stated here is EXACTLY what I was talking about in this thread....if you took the time to read my posts and reiterations...you "should" have seen that it is and ALWAYS is...about reciprocation and equality without relinquishing the inherent roles men and women do play....period. If that's what you meant, that is not what you said. Others have said it on this thread, but not you. I read everything you wrote and it came off accusitory of women, specifically American ones. You talked about roles and what a woman needs to do (although never giving examples of it) and anyone who didn't agree with as being alone...as if that was a bad thing because, of course, a woman doesn't want to be alone I don't believe in roles. If I want my man to stay home with the kids and cook and clean, he better do it dammit! [Edited 5/24/05 23:42pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
medina said: umm...excuse me...but are all the cookies gone?
The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. -- Mark Twain.
BOB JOHNSON IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AnotherLoverToo said: DexMSR said: Everything you stated here is EXACTLY what I was talking about in this thread....if you took the time to read my posts and reiterations...you "should" have seen that it is and ALWAYS is...about reciprocation and equality without relinquishing the inherent roles men and women do play....period. Awww, honey, I suspect she knew what you were askin' all along. She just didn't feel like she should have to "prove" herself and she wanted to get you to show your true intentions. Dex: look inside yourself. That's where the answer is. Stop projecting your own shit/past with women onto others. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janfriend said: DexMSR said: Everything you stated here is EXACTLY what I was talking about in this thread....if you took the time to read my posts and reiterations...you "should" have seen that it is and ALWAYS is...about reciprocation and equality without relinquishing the inherent roles men and women do play....period. If that's what you meant, that is not what you said. Others have said it on this thread, but not you. I read everything you wrote and it came off accusitory of women, specifically American ones. You talked about roles and what a woman needs to do (although never giving examples of it) and anyone who didn't agree with as being alone...as if that was a bad thing because, of course, a woman doesn't want to be alone Nor does a man, and that man wants to be nurtured and appreciated just as the woman does and should..and this is NOT the first time I said this in this thread. Whap! But thank you for all your fiery banter.... The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. -- Mark Twain.
BOB JOHNSON IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AnotherLoverToo said: DexMSR said: Everything you stated here is EXACTLY what I was talking about in this thread....if you took the time to read my posts and reiterations...you "should" have seen that it is and ALWAYS is...about reciprocation and equality without relinquishing the inherent roles men and women do play....period. Awww, honey, I suspect she knew what you were askin' all along. She just didn't feel like she should have to "prove" herself and she wanted to get you to show your true intentions. Dex: look inside yourself. That's where the answer is. Stop projecting your own shit/past with women onto others. True intentions? What true intentions? And I would not call my travelling all over the world my "shit past" but a very eye-opening experience that showed me that over here....women (not all) have got it all wrong...but that's just me. And in a debate there will always be "two" sides....and who doesn't look for endorsements from like minded folks? The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. -- Mark Twain.
BOB JOHNSON IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DexMSR said: Janfriend said: If that's what you meant, that is not what you said. Others have said it on this thread, but not you. I read everything you wrote and it came off accusitory of women, specifically American ones. You talked about roles and what a woman needs to do (although never giving examples of it) and anyone who didn't agree with as being alone...as if that was a bad thing because, of course, a woman doesn't want to be alone Nor does a man, and that man wants to be nurtured and appreciated just as the woman does and should..and this is NOT the first time I said this in this thread. Whap! But thank you for all your fiery banter.... I was being sarcastic when I said a woman doesn't want to be alone. If you assume a woman doesn't want to be alone, that is the wrong assumption | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janfriend said: DexMSR said: Nor does a man, and that man wants to be nurtured and appreciated just as the woman does and should..and this is NOT the first time I said this in this thread. Whap! But thank you for all your fiery banter.... I was being sarcastic when I said a woman doesn't want to be alone. If you assume a woman doesn't want to be alone, that is the wrong assumption No one "really" wants to be alone...single maybe...but alone...nope! The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. -- Mark Twain.
BOB JOHNSON IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janfriend said: DexMSR said: Well, whether YOU like it or not, there are roles women DO play just as there are roles men play in our society. You can take sides where you wish, but the facts still remain. You can toot your horn, stomp and scream, burn a bra, but you are still the inherent nurturers, by Natures/God's grand design. You can fool yourself into thinking your man doesn't or won't enjoy a nice home cooked meal or to be spoiled by YOU for as much as you will give it. I neve once said that it is "solely" relegated to the woman, as BOTH should have vested interests in treating their partners as something special. BUT....Rhonda stated it best, the "women's movement did a huge part in doing away with the gender roles that men miss and admire.
What Rhonda didn't address was before the women's movement these gender roles were never wanted in the first place. If they were, there wouldn't have been a need for a women's movement. You think a woman enjoys cleaning up after your shit, cooking everyday, being the caregiver? Think again. Women didn't hold the same rights as men, couldn't own property, or vote. They were the property of their husbands (which is why they took their last name), passed from father to husband. How dare a woman not be grateful and show her appreciation and not dote on her husband who after all, is going to provide for her, right? Men didn't admire these things, they felt entitled to it. After all, he's providing for her, right? Good Lord, she better do what she can to keep this good man. She better spoil him like he were her child to keep her good man. Hell, I don't even like cleaning up after myself, you think I'm gonna be leaping for joy when someone else wants me to wash their dirty undies? "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DexMSR said: Janfriend said: I was being sarcastic when I said a woman doesn't want to be alone. If you assume a woman doesn't want to be alone, that is the wrong assumption No one "really" wants to be alone...single maybe...but alone...nope! Dex, there's a BIG difference between single and alone. You can be single your entire life and never be alone. You can be in a long term relationship and be the loneliest person in the world. But neither has anything to do with being a "real" man or a "real" woman. It's been my experience that the usage of the phrase "real" man/woman smacks of sexism and homophobia. That may not have been your intention, at least consicously, but that's definitely how it came across to me and no doubt many others. I've gotta wonder though, since you've accused any woman here who disagreed with you of being alone or a lesbian. (Hard to find much less sexist or homophobic notions) [Edited 5/25/05 2:18am] "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: It's been my experience that the usage of the phrase "real" man/woman smacks of sexism and homophobia. That may not have been your intention, at least consicously, but that's definitely how it came across to me and no doubt many others. I've gotta wonder though, since you've accused any woman here who disagreed with you of being alone or a lesbian. (Hard to find much less sexist or homophobic notions) [Edited 5/25/05 2:18am] come on..... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
abierman said: meow85 said: It's been my experience that the usage of the phrase "real" man/woman smacks of sexism and homophobia. That may not have been your intention, at least consicously, but that's definitely how it came across to me and no doubt many others. I've gotta wonder though, since you've accused any woman here who disagreed with you of being alone or a lesbian. (Hard to find much less sexist or homophobic notions) [Edited 5/25/05 2:18am] come on..... What? So you agree with Dex that a woman who doesn't want to play housemaid to a man is either doomed to be alone, or a big dyke? I can't even begin to count the number of times I've heard that phrase used to put down people (especially women) who either don't conform to traditional gender roles, or who are queer. Speaking as a bisexual womanI am uncomfortable with the term "real man/woman". It's a loaded phrase, with centuries of gender politics baggage tied to it. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: abierman said: come on..... What? So you agree with Dex that a woman who doesn't want to play housemaid to a man is either doomed to be alone, or a big dyke? I will not react to your question since I don't know whatever the fuck Dex is saying about that.... Speaking as a bisexual womanI am uncomfortable with the term "real man/woman". It's a loaded phrase, with centuries of gender politics baggage tied to it. This is such bullshit, it seems like you like this underdog-position, you want it to be loaded.....it is you against the big bad world, right??? Get a grip, we all have our struggles, just because you are bi-sexual it doesn't mean you have more or less.... you are the one who is eating from both sides, good for you! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
abierman said:[quote] meow85 said: I will not react to your question since I don't know whatever the fuck Dex is saying about that.... Speaking as a bisexual womanI am uncomfortable with the term "real man/woman". It's a loaded phrase, with centuries of gender politics baggage tied to it. This is such bullshit, it seems like you like this underdog-position, you want it to be loaded.....it is you against the big bad world, right??? Get a grip, we all have our struggles, just because you are bi-sexual it doesn't mean you have more or less.... you are the one who is eating from both sides, good for you! Yep. That's right. I love being the underdog and keep myself in said position just so I have something to bitch about it. Thanks for telling me where I stand. We all have struggles, you say? I don't have more or less because of my sexuality, you say? Well no shit. Maybe you need a nap, because you gave one hostile response to me stating how I feel about a set of words. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: abierman said: This is such bullshit, it seems like you like this underdog-position, you want it to be loaded.....it is you against the big bad world, right??? Get a grip, we all have our struggles, just because you are bi-sexual it doesn't mean you have more or less.... you are the one who is eating from both sides, good for you! Yep. That's right. I love being the underdog and keep myself in said position just so I have something to bitch about it. Thanks for telling me where I stand. We all have struggles, you say? I don't have more or less because of my sexuality, you say? Well no shit. Maybe you need a nap, because you gave one hostile response to me stating how I feel about a set of words. I am stating that you are over-sensitive about someone using the words real woman/man, calling him sexist right away! I am turning the tables my friend! I had a good night's rest, thank you! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
abierman said: meow85 said: Yep. That's right. I love being the underdog and keep myself in said position just so I have something to bitch about it. Thanks for telling me where I stand. We all have struggles, you say? I don't have more or less because of my sexuality, you say? Well no shit. Maybe you need a nap, because you gave one hostile response to me stating how I feel about a set of words. I am stating that you are over-sensitive about someone using the words real woman/man, calling him sexist right away! I am turning the tables my friend! I had a good night's rest, thank you! I didn't call him sexist. In fact, if you go back and read my post you'll see that I made a point of saying I didn't know what his intentions were by choosing those words. I'm not being over-sensitive. In any other siuation where I've heard those words used, it was meant to indicate that only heterosexual, traditional men and women are "real" men and women, and that anyone else is something less than so. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DexMSR said: AnotherLoverToo said: Awww, honey, I suspect she knew what you were askin' all along. She just didn't feel like she should have to "prove" herself and she wanted to get you to show your true intentions. Dex: look inside yourself. That's where the answer is. Stop projecting your own shit/past with women onto others. True intentions? What true intentions? And I would not call my travelling all over the world my "shit past" but a very eye-opening experience that showed me that over here....women (not all) have got it all wrong...but that's just me. And in a debate there will always be "two" sides....and who doesn't look for endorsements from like minded folks? I don't think that its that the women have got it wrong, its just that they don't meet up to YOUR expectations of a what a women should be. Thats fine by me - everyone is entitled to have preferences on a partner but you can't say that women are wrong just because they won't do the things you expect in a relationship. I don't have a problem with women and men taking care of each other - that is what a relationship is all about!! Its more the fact that you expect women to be the nuturers (cook, clean) and men to be the providers (work, fix cars) but that now isn't neccessarily the case. In America and the UK, for example, women are now more independent than ever, especially since realising that they have exactly the same potential as men to have a career, etc. and a lot of men are realising that it is just as fulfilling to be a stay-at-home dad as it is to work. I'll leave graffiti where you've never been kissed | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DexMSR said: AnotherLoverToo said: Awww, honey, I suspect she knew what you were askin' all along. She just didn't feel like she should have to "prove" herself and she wanted to get you to show your true intentions. Dex: look inside yourself. That's where the answer is. Stop projecting your own shit/past with women onto others. True intentions? What true intentions? And I would not call my travelling all over the world my "shit past" but a very eye-opening experience that showed me that over here....women (not all) have got it all wrong...but that's just me. And in a debate there will always be "two" sides....and who doesn't look for endorsements from like minded folks? Dex, honey, what you're doing is called "universalizing", it's recognized as a faulty thinking pattern. It means taking your personal experience--ONE American guy--and making it the absolute truth. Maybe it's YOUR truth, Dex, but assuming you know how "most American women" are within their relationships is pretty arrogant and just plain untrue. Secondly, maybe you've visited a few other countries, but until you've actually lived and worked for long periods of time in one, you don't really see what a culture is like. People put on their best faces for visitors; maybe on the surface you saw one thing, but I guarantee you that there is more beneath the surface. Again, I say--stop putting your anger at your inability to find a partner onto American women. You need to concentrate on making yourself the man you want to be in order to attract the woman you want. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AnotherLoverToo said: DexMSR said: True intentions? What true intentions? And I would not call my travelling all over the world my "shit past" but a very eye-opening experience that showed me that over here....women (not all) have got it all wrong...but that's just me. And in a debate there will always be "two" sides....and who doesn't look for endorsements from like minded folks? Dex, honey, what you're doing is called "universalizing", it's recognized as a faulty thinking pattern. It means taking your personal experience--ONE American guy--and making it the absolute truth. Maybe it's YOUR truth, Dex, but assuming you know how "most American women" are within their relationships is pretty arrogant and just plain untrue. Secondly, maybe you've visited a few other countries, but until you've actually lived and worked for long periods of time in one, you don't really see what a culture is like. People put on their best faces for visitors; maybe on the surface you saw one thing, but I guarantee you that there is more beneath the surface. Again, I say--stop putting your anger at your inability to find a partner onto American women. You need to concentrate on making yourself the man you want to be in order to attract the woman you want. First of all..."this" is just a "thread" and I create my threads for shock value, humor, and to get folks to think about topics they may not "generally" think about or just have not taken time to ponder over. So yes I do generalize in order to create the "debate". Secondly, I have not only visited all these countries but I "did", in fact, LIVE in Europe for THREE FULL YEARS...yes...THREE! So don't you get caught up in making assumptions about me as well shorty, as I am very well aware of the cultures I have immersed myself in. Lastly, when did I ever say that I could not find a partner, or even angry about it? Dont come at me laced with "your" assumptions sista, as they are truly unfounded. And again, I create my threads with vast generalizations to fuel the folks that it may not apply to, to get down and dirty in my thread. I don't take this mentality into my "real" world. You see, "my" generalizations are kept just that....GENERAL. It seems "your" generalizations here have been aimed precisely at me. Examine that. Whap!! The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. -- Mark Twain.
BOB JOHNSON IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DexMSR said: AnotherLoverToo said: Dex, honey, what you're doing is called "universalizing", it's recognized as a faulty thinking pattern. It means taking your personal experience--ONE American guy--and making it the absolute truth. Maybe it's YOUR truth, Dex, but assuming you know how "most American women" are within their relationships is pretty arrogant and just plain untrue. Secondly, maybe you've visited a few other countries, but until you've actually lived and worked for long periods of time in one, you don't really see what a culture is like. People put on their best faces for visitors; maybe on the surface you saw one thing, but I guarantee you that there is more beneath the surface. Again, I say--stop putting your anger at your inability to find a partner onto American women. You need to concentrate on making yourself the man you want to be in order to attract the woman you want. First of all..."this" is just a "thread" and I create my threads for shock value, humor, and to get folks to think about topics they may not "generally" think about or just have not taken time to ponder over. So yes I do generalize in order to create the "debate". Secondly, I have not only visited all these countries but I "did", in fact, LIVE in Europe for THREE FULL YEARS...yes...THREE! So don't you get caught up in making assumptions about me as well shorty, as I am very well aware of the cultures I have immersed myself in. Lastly, when did I ever say that I could not find a partner, or even angry about it? Dont come at me laced with "your" assumptions sista, as they are truly unfounded. And again, I create my threads with vast generalizations to fuel the folks that it may not apply to, to get down and dirty in my thread. I don't take this mentality into my "real" world. You see, "my" generalizations are kept just that....GENERAL. It seems "your" generalizations here have been aimed precisely at me. Examine that. Whap!! Dex, honey, don't get yourself all riled up!! You have started a thread that you admit generalizes just to get a rise out of people. You have literally giggled and accused women on this thread of either being unintelligent, illiterate, being lesbians or destined to be alone if they didn't agree with you. Yeah, I aimed my comments at YOU, rather than generalizing that "all black men who live in California" think like you. And here we go on your frustration about your past and being alone (your words) "When I was in my long term relationship, I would surprise her with a cd of her favorite artist...bought concert tickets to a show I had no intention on going, but bought it for her and her girl to go....little notes on the windshield for her to see on the way to work....but got none of that in return...she was a sensual and sexual abyss....there were no intimacies....but she did attempt to cook when it was something she was not used to...but I can cook." "I think I will choose to not have an American woman in my midst when it is all said and done because they just are not (NOT ALL) fine tuned anymore as to what it means to nurture their man. This thread is great and has opened my eyes to alot, but I am pretty much done" You're doin' a lot of talkin' and generalizing about how American women don't measure up. Instead of focusing on them and crying about it, pointing fingers, you go out there and be a "man" and get yourself that woman you want!! But recognize that your issues about American women are probably about YOU, honey bunny. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DexMSR said: Janfriend said: As if this is relevent or any of your business since you failed to say what exactly a woman needed in order to keep you. If you must know, in the beginning of our relationship, I would write notes letting know how much of a good time I had on one of our outings, how wonderful he was, how much I believed in him and his talents, and how I felt about the person he was. I don't write the letters as much, since it's been a while. I listen to him when he needs to talk about his goals or needs to vent about drama. Sometimes I just listen and sometimes I give advice. I am his supporter. I not only express my love verbally, but I am very affectionate and "mushy." I buy him things I think will interest him on a whim. I do things with him that peak his interests even if it's something I am not into. I am honest with him. There are a bunch of little things about our relationship too, but all these things I get in return. I don't believe in one-sidedness. I am independent and he knows this. I don't clean shit and I don't cook shit and he doesn't expect me to. We have an open communication with each other. He knows I don't need him and...you don't need to go outside the U.S. to find the woman you want. You can go to the deep south in an area where everyone's barefoot or the appalachian mountains Everything you stated here is EXACTLY what I was talking about in this thread....if you took the time to read my posts and reiterations...you "should" have seen that it is and ALWAYS is...about reciprocation and equality without relinquishing the inherent roles men and women do play....period. There is no such thing as inheirent roles. My relationship and how I am in that relationship has nothng to do with my vagina. I am a human being interacting with another human being and there is nothing I need to be appreciative or grateful about. He's not doing me a favor I don't let anyone define who I am in this world. I define myself [Edited 5/25/05 9:12am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |