This is controversial. Stunning pics, but this is not porn though right?

http://www.gods-art.de/start-en.html

Hey call me a peado but I swear these pics DO NOT TURN ME ON!

Photographers, where do u draw the line between girls posing naked when not having sex, and this.....

To be frank, I have barely looked at this site, some may be pure peodo, but some seems harmless enough surely if u are not aroused.

The hegre bit though has one stunning girl though.....

So can u appreciate the photography and beauty of these pics without being branded as a sicko? I fel a little squimish at some of it but ?

Surely girls are beutiful whatever age right?

Hmmmm.

Good question actually.

I think that there tends to be some artistic merit in Pornography.
Believe it or not, directors are always trying to make their films as steamy and as sexy as possible, often trying to get certain seens (particulary money shots and blowjobs) perfect.

True--it's still intended for sexual purposes--but there are directors out there who are trying to do more than just make a wank fest.

Personaly, I love porn--but I do believe there's aline between sexually explicit art, and just plain old porn.

the stuff on that page isn't actually bad: all the girls there are of legal age (18 and up) and they're not engaged in anything sexual, they're just posing in artistic ways. the human body's a beautiful thing, y'know, and if used in the proper manner can create the best art.

as for porn, it ain't really on the same level as erotic photography.

Don't see why this would be pedo , they look above 18

Art comes in many forms. There is good and bad taste.

I think nude photography can be lovely, but the thing about that site is that most of the girls are of a really specific look/body type, and the photos seem to be ABOUT the nudity, not about beauty or interesting lines or those sorts of less sexually driven artistic pursuits.

Nice enough, but not very interesting as porn OR as photography, imho.

Some look early teens to me.

Anyway can photo's of underage girls in non sexual poses be classed as illegal porn?

If it were boys would it be different?

Females I guess are alot more beutiful phyiscally then men. That is from an asexual point of view. I have no interest in males whatsoever .....
[Edited 3/14/05 4:41am]

Imo , it's not porn unless sexual activities are taking place ,
that goes for boys too
No , i don't get turn on by men either

http://www.gods-art.de/pi...wer05.html

Man is she hot! Not hot but beutiful. Stunning even. U can buy books of her off amazon.....hmmmmm

Shame no one is selling though.

Whats so funny?

http://www.gods-art.de/pi...ts/09.html

I almost fell out of my chair when I seen this pic! She has an uncanny resemblence to an ex girlfriend, but after took a look at the tits I realized it wasn't her.

Nuddy burdz.....

Whoa! Ur ex musta been fine then