Author | Message |
Love at first sight . . . Do you believe in it? Or, have you ever experienced it? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's a nice idea, but it doesn't exist. Real love takes time to develop. The closest you'll get is lust at first sight, but that can sometimes be enough. [Edited 1/16/05 1:35am] "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes, to the extent that we can be overwhelmed by passion, without any intimacy or commitment (both of which take time). It is a sort of infatuation. However, I believe that because there is not intimacy or commitment, infatuated love is fated to fade away. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: It's a nice idea, but it doesn't exist. Real love takes time to develop. The closest you'll get is lust at first sight, but that can sometimes be enough.
[Edited 1/16/05 1:35am] Well, I'd say it's a fallacy to say it's either inherently non-existent or existent. Neither the cause or the effect can be shown to inherently exist or not exist independently. I would posit that it is empty of independent existence or nonexistence and therefore conventionally and dependently exists. Maybe I've digressed? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Never had it, not willing to say it isn't "real" for some folks though. As previously stated, it's just "lust" most of the time. I doubt it would ever happen to me... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
All comes down to semantics really. Define 'love' and 'first sight'. For me, I can conceive of an intense physical attraction to someone and perhaps an intuitive feeling about a person, but can't really account for what that intuitive feeling would really be based on and how valid it would be. You could argue that it was luck (should marriage or a serious relationship follow shortly after), if you believed in that concept, and that's a whole other issue. But anyway, if that sudden physical attraction were to turn quickly into a successful, loving relationship you can see how someone might say it was 'love at first sight'. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well, that's exactly how I feel about the orger Ocean (Kylie).
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes and yes Time flies like an arrow
Fruit flies like bananas | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ive never experienced it personaly but I have a couple friends who swear they did fall in love at first sight...so the romantic in me hopes that its possible | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes. I do.
But I don't believe in true love. Explaination: 1) Love at First site: Physical attraction. Or you're lonely and have a set of requirements for the opposite sex (or same sex--whatever), and the person you're "stunned" by fits enough of those requirements blatantly, that you want to tear off all their clothes, covert them in barbeque sauce, and lick it off of them. That's love at first site--sort of superficial or maybe even desperate. 2) True Love - elusive. Doesn't exist. At least not in the sense that it implies there is "one" person out there for you. We're evolved apes, and ultimately our sex drives lead the way. We build commitments, and if we work hard at it and our partners do too, that's the closest thing to true love that I can imagine. Then again, I'm no expert--I ust got dumped. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
yes i do
yes i have | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mach said: yes i do
yes i have | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Love at first sight I always thought implied more than physical attraction.. an intuitive feeling that "you're supposed to get to know a person". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBoi777 said: Mach said: yes i do
yes i have oh you sexy THANG ... come do that on my lap | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: meow85 said: It's a nice idea, but it doesn't exist. Real love takes time to develop. The closest you'll get is lust at first sight, but that can sometimes be enough.
[Edited 1/16/05 1:35am] Well, I'd say it's a fallacy to say it's either inherently non-existent or existent. Neither the cause or the effect can be shown to inherently exist or not exist independently. I would posit that it is empty of independent existence or nonexistence and therefore conventionally and dependently exists. Maybe I've digressed? that is so something i would say (and mean!) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBoi777 said: 1) Love at First site: Physical attraction. Or you're lonely and have a set of requirements for the opposite sex (or same sex--whatever), and the person you're "stunned" by fits enough of those requirements blatantly, that you want to tear off all their clothes, covert them in barbeque sauce, and lick it off of them. That's love at first site--sort of superficial or maybe even desperate.
2) True Love - elusive. Doesn't exist. At least not in the sense that it implies there is "one" person out there for you. We're evolved apes, and ultimately our sex drives lead the way. We build commitments, and if we work hard at it and our partners do too, that's the closest thing to true love that I can imagine. Then again, I'm no expert--I just got dumped. I co-sign with all the reasons given. I have experienced love at first sight often, but only made it work longer than one night twice. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HamsterHuey said: AsianBoi777 said: 1) Love at First site: Physical attraction. Or you're lonely and have a set of requirements for the opposite sex (or same sex--whatever), and the person you're "stunned" by fits enough of those requirements blatantly, that you want to tear off all their clothes, covert them in barbeque sauce, and lick it off of them. That's love at first site--sort of superficial or maybe even desperate.
2) True Love - elusive. Doesn't exist. At least not in the sense that it implies there is "one" person out there for you. We're evolved apes, and ultimately our sex drives lead the way. We build commitments, and if we work hard at it and our partners do too, that's the closest thing to true love that I can imagine. Then again, I'm no expert--I just got dumped. I co-sign with all the reasons given. I have experienced love at first sight often, but only made it work longer than one night twice. But what are your priorities? Is it love you're looking for? Are u looking at all? Are u looking too hard? What are you doing Friday night? All pertinent questions. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HamsterHuey said: I have experienced love at first sight often, but only made it work longer than one night twice. I consider that pretty fruitful | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
irresistibleb1tch said: Fauxie said: Well, I'd say it's a fallacy to say it's either inherently non-existent or existent. Neither the cause or the effect can be shown to inherently exist or not exist independently. I would posit that it is empty of independent existence or nonexistence and therefore conventionally and dependently exists. Maybe I've digressed? that is so something i would say (and mean!) And it is something I did say, and mean, sorta. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HamsterHuey said: AsianBoi777 said: 1) Love at First site: Physical attraction. Or you're lonely and have a set of requirements for the opposite sex (or same sex--whatever), and the person you're "stunned" by fits enough of those requirements blatantly, that you want to tear off all their clothes, covert them in barbeque sauce, and lick it off of them. That's love at first site--sort of superficial or maybe even desperate.
2) True Love - elusive. Doesn't exist. At least not in the sense that it implies there is "one" person out there for you. We're evolved apes, and ultimately our sex drives lead the way. We build commitments, and if we work hard at it and our partners do too, that's the closest thing to true love that I can imagine. Then again, I'm no expert--I just got dumped. I co-sign with all the reasons given. I have experienced love at first sight often, but only made it work longer than one night twice. How 'bout love at first post? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBoi777 said: HamsterHuey said: I co-sign with all the reasons given. I have experienced love at first sight often, but only made it work longer than one night twice. How 'bout love at first post? I'll get u AB! Damn IT boy! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBoi777 said: HamsterHuey said: I co-sign with all the reasons given. I have experienced love at first sight often, but only made it work longer than one night twice. How 'bout love at first post? love a pig roast ? WTF | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mach said: AsianBoi777 said: How 'bout love at first post? love a pig roast ? WTF How 'bout love at the very first sign I detect of even an iota of marital strife? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBoi777 said: Mach said: love a pig roast ? WTF How 'bout love at the very first sign I detect of even an iota of marital strife? That marriage is definitely on the ropes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: AsianBoi777 said: How 'bout love at first post? I'll get u AB! Damn IT boy! I'd flirt with you too Fauxie, but our relationship is based on really harsh rhetoric--isn't that more fun? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBoi777 said: How 'bout love at the very first sign I detect of even an iota of marital strife? That's what my stepmom believed in! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBoi777 said: Mach said: love a pig roast ? WTF How 'bout love at the very first sign I detect of even an iota of marital strife? i told you ...DAMNIT ...i am NOT cooking pig roast !! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CinisterCee said: HamsterHuey said: I have experienced love at first sight often, but only made it work longer than one night twice. I consider that pretty fruitful As both relations lasted longer than seven years, I think that too. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBoi777 said: Fauxie said: I'll get u AB! Damn IT boy! I'd flirt with you too Fauxie, but our relationship is based on really harsh rhetoric--isn't that more fun? Harsh rhetoric? My mordacious wordsmithery reams your otiose scribblings. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
And besides, I didn't come to Thailand to flirt with farangs. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |