(This was taken from an Israeli adult website http://adultstart.msn.co.il/default.asp )

A new research has found out that there's a 1:10 chance that your wife or girlfriend were actualle born male.

The research took 7 years in Europe and North America and included over 40,000 women. "No one was more surprised than me" said Manfred Schultz (39) who was in chanrge of this research.

"We came to the conclusion that 14% of all women in the western world have begun their lives as males". Said Schultz "It helped us understand the decrease in child birth in the recent years".

Schultz also told that after the research he was so shocked that he actually asked his wife to prove that she was born female. She replied by throwing a used tampon on him. So now Schultz advises men to be a little more subtle when trying to find the truth about their wives.

they CONCLUDED 14% were born male? hm. well it's either a fact or it isn't, not a conclusion. I wasn't aware there were that many sex reassignments, but perhaps there are, y'all Euros are funny like that (JUST KIDDING) anyway...that "something extra" could quite probably include all the hermaphrodites of the world who are butchered and left as girls 90% of the time, which is ENTIRELY different than being born male.

I'm liking this thread already and it's only just begun!

cuntroversial said:

The something extra was a gentle way of saying penis. They are talking about sex change operations. and conclusion is just my translation from the hebrew site, so I might have used the wrong word.

doctormcmeekle said:

You'd shag it, wouldn't you?

Heavenly said:

i'm aware of that, i'm not arguing your statement, but their "conclusion" based on the research. Remember truth is in the eye of the beholder. Hermaphrodites are born with penii too, as well as the feminine counterparts-in some cultures, and apparently in ours according to that other thread, that makes them male, and thus "repairing" the "problem" and making them outwardly female, would count as a sex reassignment.

I don't buy it.

tackam said:

Me either without the aid of some sort of female hormone what would happen to the child at puberty? They would not develop as a female just because someone shopped their winky off at birth. This is hooey!

Sweeny79 said:

Well, not that part. People are born transgendered all the time, and usually they know something is "wrong" long before puberty. And right, if people who are not actually male have their (sometimes disfigured) penises removed, they will not grow up to be girls. Such surgery should never happen before kids are old enough to say what gender they really are.


What I don't buy are the percentages. It can't be that high.

tackam said:

Maybe they did the research in a very umm...confused place

tackam said:

Born male!



[Edited 1/2/05 2:04am]

PANDURITO said:

What?

We Europeans are sooo fucked up!

Total bullshit.

tackam said:

That's why I'm trying to find SOME sense in it...some possible variable that they could have misconstrued along the way. But in all reality, it's far more likely they picked a very non-representative microcosm.

cuntroversial said:

Yep. Bad selection methodology would be my guess.

tackam said:

Me neither. "Intersexed" people do exist, and I remember learning about them in college, but as I recall, the percentage was much lower than 14%.