How about pictures of kids dressed as adults?

..or the rules should actually state such images are not allowed. I dunno, maybe I'm just weird like that

JoweeCoco said:

read the top of the GD forum.

Don't post adult images, or offensive images. You may link to such content if you wish, but make sure you include a warning in your post. Some people read the Org at work you know

fantasyislander said:

The rules to which he referred to in his org note which supposedly should back up his decision do not mention nudity at all. Not to mention that supposedly using the img tags for this pic http://www.axestream.com/pics/xxx4.jpg (NSFW) is not allowed, but this is http://www.axestream.com/pics/xxx2.jpg. Again I say that no pics were ever hosted by prince.org and that in both cases it's about a link to an image. In this particular case the title of the thread gave a good enough warning, so anyone at work or with a strong dislike for such content could have easily avoided being exposed to this material.

I say either you ban nudity completely or you allow it if the title of the thread gives a good enough warning. Then if people reply to a thread of which the original post/topic didn't have a NSFW warning and want to link to a pic containing nudity, they should give a warning and only link to the image, not using the img tags even if nudity in general is allowed.

Either option sounds fair to me, but I'm sure some will try to make it more complicated than they has to be...
[Edited 11/6/04 11:27am]

JoweeCoco said:

Or, you can just read what I've posted... which is one of the options I gave. Or, you can continue to fight a fight you're going to lose. That's another choice.

You decide... thank you.

June7 said:

Sorry, didn't mean to undermine your authority, Sir, but I thought the purpose of a forum was to have fair discussions.

If you read my posts carefully you can see I'm merely asking for some clarity on what is and what is not allowed because at this point it is not and your arguments are weak and not backed up by either the Terms Of Service or the Forum Rules.

Perhaps you missed these...

Be civilized
Don't create offensive, vulgar, obscene, threatening, abusive or excessively profane posts. Do not instigate, engage in, or encourage 'flame wars'.

Then, there's this too...


Moderators have final say.
prince.org administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit, relocate and/or remove any message, at any time, for any reason. Consider all editing decisions final. If you don't agree with a decision, you may discuss it with the moderator who made the judgment in private. If you cannot reach resolution with the Moderator in private, contact the site administrator via e-mail (ben@prince.org), explaining the entire situation, with all relevant links/excerpts/emails, etc. Under no circumstance attempt to start a 'debate' about specific moderation decisions in a public forum.

Or the statement above the forum, which I posted earlier...

Don't post adult images, or offensive images. You may link to such content if you wish, but make sure you include a warning in your post. Some people read the Org at work you know


I hope this makes things nice and clear for you, sir.

June7 said:

Uhm, ok, so what's "offensive", "vulgar" or "obscene" about my post and how would it be different if I just posted a conventional link to those images. How does that change the content of my message? Don't answer, it's a rhetorical question.

I never said you didn't have final say, you can do whatever you want, however that doesn't mean anything. The fact you can do things which I can't is merely the result of the priviledges you have been given by the administator.

I did ask for clarity in the appropriate forum, but instead this sticky was created which doesn't answer any of my questions which I understand you or any other mods don't have to answer, but I thought I was being fair enough in my approach. Alas, here's the result of that...

Since you're either unwilling or unable to answer my questions I will ask Ben, so lock this thread if you want to, but please don't delete any of the posts as I'd like to include them in my email to Ben.

Okay..I wont post my interesting pic of Cloudbuster

What I've never understood is why adult images are not allowed, as they are not "work safe" or as a warning to those underage, but topics about how big or small ones dick may be, how tight one may be, what the fastest time they've acheived orgasm is, if they prefer anal and how they go about it, etc., etc., etc. are all a-okay. They may not use an image to display the male/female body or graphic content of people together, but the image is still there.

It just never really made sense to me. I dunno... is the rule in force soley for the fact that ones boss may creep up from behind and see a nude image on your monitor?

AzureStarr said:

Im guessing that if the org allowed such pictures on a regular basis,then they would have to install some sort of safety features or parental locks or something. Not to mention that many orgers may find them objectionable when posted without warning.

What about naked pictures of Prince?

Can we post the lovesexy cover picture?
[Edited 11/6/04 19:44pm]

MrTation said:

call me a prude if you want, but anyone who wants to see naked pics can google some images. what in the world is it doing on a prince website??

What I've never understood is why adult images are not allowed, as they are not "work safe" or as a warning to those underage, but topics about how big or small ones dick may be, how tight one may be, what the fastest time they've acheived orgasm is, if they prefer anal and how they go about it, etc., etc., etc. are all a-okay. They may not use an image to display the male/female body or graphic content of people together, but the image is still there.

fantasyislander said:

You don't have to read any of the NSFW threads. Not to mention that half of topics on this site have nothing to do with Prince anyway.

P&R: (4,927 topics)
GD: (31,637 topics)
Music: Non-Prince: (15,118 topics)