Does the fact that Chloe Sevigny gave head to Vince Gallo onscreen in "The Brown Bunny" change the way you see her and why?

really, i don't see it as any worse than when an actor lets another actor stick a tongue in their mouth on camera. in my opinion, that's every bit as intimate.

Anxiety said:

there's a big diference between a tongue and a cock dude.....

Agreeing with Anxiety. All actors are whores. I don't mean that in a judgmental way. The aim of the craft is to create an emotional and/or physical illusion. There isn't that much difference between a mouth and a cock when you're "pretending."

ALREADY POSTED!

GO HERE -----> http://www.prince.org/msg/100/111815

madartista said:

Is it really pretending when you have a cock in your mouth? I mean it's in your mouth! Come on man, there's a big difference!

gooeythehamster said:

sinisterpentatonic said:

What?

sinisterpentatonic said:

The physicality is very different, but acting is acting. Either way, the actor is acting like a character who is performing a service on another person acting like a different character. It isn't Chloe giving Vincent a blowjob, it's Chloe's character Jill giving a blowjob to Vincent's character Jack.

gooeythehamster said:

not exactly. That thread doesn't ask the question of does such a performance change the view of her and why.

madartista said:

Ok! But Vincent's dick is still in Chole's mouth.

I know what you're trying to say, but I'm willing to bet this was one of Vincents favorite parts to rehearse.

sinisterpentatonic said:

And I will completely agree!

madartista said:

Jeez. You want me to actually read one line threads?

awwww okay.

And no. Her giving blow jobs does not change my view on one of the most promising actresses on this planet.

Hmm what I am wondering is.. why couldn't they take a page form the "spice at night" type of shows where the dick sucking is fake...

I sure as hell aint gonna suck no dick on film unless he is gonna eat some pussy too and he has to eat it longer and first before I begin to to take his rod im my hand. infact he better have a cum moustache from me while I am polishing da knob!!!

Already in another thread called "The Brown Bunny"

Teacher said:

But not placed in the WILL YOU STILL RESPECT YOUR MOMMA WHEN YOU FIND OUT WHAT SHE DID TO GET YOU kind of perspective...

Teacher said:

not exactly.

Well, I can't really make an opinion about it until I see pics.

gooeythehamster said:

EXACTLY!!! Nice work, G-man!

And makes me realize that with my other ramblings, I never did answer the question. Yes, it does change how I see her. In a positive way. That's really "getting into character". I've done some acting classes, and understand emotionally exposing yourself. It ain't easy. And I'm just talking about in a classroom, not on a film set to be shown all over the world. Very brave.

gooeythehamster said:

Same goes for me! That she lost the Oscar still bugs me, but I think she's an incredible actress (and really beautiful!). Do I wish she hadn't done it? Yeah, I kinda do I guess, but it doesn't diminish her talent as an actress. I just think she's got horrible taste - so to speak - in men

madartista said:

I agree that it's brave, but it's also a little stupid & a bit repulsive IMO. How nice for Vincent to include that & shoot it in a way where it must be seen! She has to really do it! It's for my ego... I mean, my art!

I could see if they were on some deeper level than actor/actress & actress/director, but this seems a bit foul to me (yet I'm still wondering how much happened between Heather Graham & Robert Downey Jr. in 2 Girls & a Guy & I love the shit outta that movie that's an issue for me to sort out, I guess) I wonder how many other directors will try to pull this shit on their actresses

Vincent is nuts so I'm always curious about what he's up to. I'm not crazy about the choice to do this, but I'll eventually see the film. Ebert said it was the worst film in the history of Cannes Vincent's retort? Calling Ebert a "fat pig" - NICE


Chloe

leopold said:

In my opinion, it's the difference between like and love. I certainly wouldn't put either body part in my mouth during a normal day at work (though perhaps I have during a memorably ABnormal day at work, but that's a long time ago and another story ALtogether). When I think of someone in another line of work who's paid to do stuff like this, I really don't think it matters what body part is going where, it's more a matter of crossing boundaries and messing around with one's levels of intimacy. I'm sure there are some heterosexual male actors who might find it just as much of a "big deal" to kiss another man on screen as it might have been to Sevigny to be asked to blow Gallo on camera.

CalhounSq said:

Sadly, I think they were on some deeper level. I've read that they were dating for a while...bad taste in men. And his curse on Ebert was ridiculous. He was one of many people calling it the worst film at Cannes. I'm sure he just felt like he should single out the most vocal and well-known of the bunch.

My new movie is called Ass Commander.

Talk about getting into character.

gooeythehamster said:

how are auditions going?

gooeythehamster said:

ass?

oh, well - never mind what i said about dick and french kissing and intimacy. ass is different.

i'll feel on some ass like i'm eating a bag of cheetos. PASS THE ASS.

the way i look at it is if the dick is in her mouth, she's not really acting. i know someone else said this as well but i just needed to get my in, lol.

i think it makes her pretty classless. i've never been a big fan of her in the first place but giving her exboyfriend a BJ on film doen't exactly boost my opinion of her. she's no better than a porn star and a porn star is no better than a prostitute, imo.

JasmineFire said:

all actors are prostitutes. whether it's emotional or sexual, they're giving themselves up for money.

Chloe actually likes to do Wild stuff. But if I were her I wouldn't have done it. Remember Chloe hung with Harmony who directed KIDS and GUMMO.