Now Aaron Carter comes out and says Michael did one thing that was a little inappropriate. I know will now say he's doing it for the money but honestly, I don't think that everyone who has to say something negative about MJ is in it for the money. Cause that would mean that MJ was the only person on the planet who was surrounded by opportunists only and frankly, I don't believe this. There were people like this no doubt, but come on.

https://people.com/tv/aar...l-jackson/

Maybe Aaron is talking about this:

Or maybe something else. I don't think he'll say that MJ touched him tho, but, let's wait and see what happens next.

MotownSubdivision said:

ThatWhiteDude said:

Again, it’s a Prince site, of course you‘ll meet people who dislike MJ and they have every right to do so. And you‘ll meet people here who believe these allegations and they have the right to do so. But I don’t believe it’s cause they are Prince fans. You could meet those on every other platform for other artists. But you‘d also meet MJ Fans on other platforms. You come off as if you want ro start another war between the two fanbases.

but there's a difference between not liking someone and using that dislike to assume the worst for someone.

This sentence right here is what I was talking about. You're making assumptions about these particular Prince Fans as well, don't you see it? Maybe they just believe Wade and James cause they just believe them, ever thought of that? That's what I meant.

Free2BMe said:

Maybe you need to tell that to the Prince fan who started this thread. Oops, I guess you conveniently overlooked that.

jaawwnn said:

It is perfectly possible for him to have been a messed up man with an unhealthy obsession with childhood but also not an abuser

Leaving Neverland didn't convince me because it didn't even try, it worked on the assumption that he was guilty. Defending MJ isn't my hill to die on though, if people get off on cancelling him so be it.

Also, I believe the last thread was only locked because of the thread time limit on the org.

[Edited 5/21/19 10:04am]

He was not an abuser. He loved children. All children. Not just boys but children of all races, ethnicities, colors and hairstyles. To him sleeping with children was a way of giving love. True, he did seem to choose cute boys as his companions but don't we all choose a specific friend when we are children? And Michael was a child at heart. He was also a woman lover and dicked them down furiously in privacy but too much of a gentleman to be chasing and parading women around so he just allowed himself to be seen with those kids to perpetuate the image of the eternal child, which is exactly what he was. L.O.V.E. was his motto. It should be ours as well. On a last note, is there a living soul who doesn't know the date of construction of their local train station? Use your COMMAN SENSE!

jaawwnn said:

It is perfectly possible for him to have been a messed up man with an unhealthy obsession with childhood but also not an abuser

Leaving Neverland didn't convince me because it didn't even try, it worked on the assumption that he was guilty. Defending MJ isn't my hill to die on though, if people get off on cancelling him so be it.

Also, I believe the last thread was only locked because of the thread time limit on the org.

[Edited 5/21/19 10:04am]

He was not an abuser. He loved children. All children. Not just boys but children of all races, ethnicities, colors and hairstyles. To him sleeping with children was a way of giving love. True, he did seem to choose cute boys as his companions but don't we all choose a specific friend when we are children? And Michael was a child at heart. He was also a woman lover and dicked them down furiously in privacy but too much of a gentleman to be chasing and parading women around so he just allowed himself to be seen with those kids to perpetuate the image of the eternal child, which is exactly what he was. L.O.V.E. was his motto. It should be ours as well. On a last note, is there a living soul who doesn't know the date of construction of their local train station? Use your COMMAN SENSE!

jaawwnn said:

ItsLetoyaBaby said:

He was not an abuser. He loved children. All children. Not just boys but children of all races, ethnicities, colors and hairstyles. To him sleeping with children was a way of giving love. True, he did seem to choose cute boys as his companions but don't we all choose a specific friend when we are children? And Michael was a child at heart. He was also a woman lover and dicked them down furiously in privacy but too much of a gentleman to be chasing and parading women around so he just allowed himself to be seen with those kids to perpetuate the image of the eternal child, which is exactly what he was. L.O.V.E. was his motto. It should be ours as well. On a last note, is there a living soul who doesn't know the date of construction of their local train station? Use your COMMAN SENSE!

Sorry to say that this trolling is less convincing than the Letoya stuff, looks like you've lost your touch. It'd have worked better if you could have held out for someone else to start an MJ thread but looks like you had an itchy finger. [Edited 5/21/19 21:23pm]

ItsLetoyaBaby said:

MotownSubdivision said: