independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Prince and Michael Jackson started at the same time
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 12/11/17 12:54am

Mandingo

Prince and Michael Jackson started at the same time

Although MJ was in the Jackson 5 and did have a few solos like BEN, really when we think about it, he and Prince both debuted as young African American male rnb artists around the same time.

Off the wall could have failed. There were no guarantees.

My point is that Prince and MJ both had the same amount to prove at the same time and saying MJ started before Prince is simplistic. A child's career is very very different to their coming of age adult music. You wouldnt judge Britney or Christina on their Disney days would you? Prince was in Grand Central and Champagne as a kid. He recorded with Willie as well.He wasn't new to the game either.
Both MJ and Prince as the artists we REALLY critique them on; started in the late 70''s. As equals. MJ did not have any right to success and Prince had as much to win or lose.
[Edited 12/11/17 0:57am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 12/11/17 2:00am

mediumdry

My favorite songs with Michael Jackson are I Want You Back (released 7 October 1969, with a marvelous version of Who's Loving You on the b side) and Candy Girl ABC (released 24 February 1970).

.

It was all downhill after that. razz

Paisley Park is in your heart - Love Is Here!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 12/11/17 2:04am

thedance

avatar

Both P & MJ were true legends.. nod

However Prince was far more talented (he was a God gifted musician)... IMHO... cool biggrin

Prince 4Ever. heart
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 12/11/17 2:47am

dance4me3121

thedance said:

Both P & MJ were true legends.. nod

However Prince was far more talented (he was a God gifted musician)... IMHO... cool biggrin


Time to change the thread title to "Prince vs Michael Jackson Part 1098".
Just kidding.I love them both.out of all the singers and musicians I've listened to and watched since I was born,these 2 have amazed me the most.They are incredible.Favorite MJ songs are
This place hotel,who is it,smooth criminal,tabloid junkie,and will u be there
[Edited 12/11/17 2:48am]
[Edited 12/11/17 2:51am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 12/11/17 5:17am

FlyOnTheWall

Mandingo said:

Although MJ was in the Jackson 5 and did have a few solos like BEN, really when we think about it, he and Prince both debuted as young African American male rnb artists around the same time. Off the wall could have failed. There were no guarantees. My point is that Prince and MJ both had the same amount to prove at the same time and saying MJ started before Prince is simplistic. A child's career is very very different to their coming of age adult music. You wouldnt judge Britney or Christina on their Disney days would you? Prince was in Grand Central and Champagne as a kid. He recorded with Willie as well.He wasn't new to the game either. Both MJ and Prince as the artists we REALLY critique them on; started in the late 70''s. As equals. MJ did not have any right to success and Prince had as much to win or lose. [Edited 12/11/17 0:57am]

The diffence is the Prince was completely unknown and MJ was already a household name. That said, I grew up loving both of them.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 12/11/17 6:31am

LightOfArt

Comparing Jackson 5 and later The Jacksons to the mickey mouse club is a stretch lol

Looking cute in your avatar though

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 12/11/17 6:35am

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

It's no secret around here that I became a Prince fan in 1979, thanks to the pioneering efforts of Detroit's favorite DJ, the ONE and ONLY Electrifying MOJO. Which would mean I was in the 3rd grade. However, I became a Michael Jackson fan before that. The very first music video I ever saw was...




I think I was 5 years old then and that song endeared me to Michael long before his other successes and regardless of Prince's.

I loved them BOTH for who they were individually and how their talent and efforts, influenced and most importantly...helped me...become the ME that I am. And I've come to completely understand that there is absolutely nothing wrong with loving them BOTH! heart

I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 12/11/17 7:03am

MotownSubdivis
ion

The Jackson 5 was a part of Michael's career whereas the Mickey Mouse Club was not part of the careers of Britney and Christina. To compare the two and say they're one in the same is silly.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 12/11/17 7:05am

nextedition

avatar

Lol! Its like saying George Michael didnt have his Wham time. Of course they started out differently. MJ was already a big name and Prince wasnt.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 12/11/17 9:46am

TrivialPursuit

avatar

thedance said:

Both P & MJ were true legends.. nod

However Prince was far more talented (he was a God gifted musician)... IMHO... cool biggrin


That's an apples and oranges statement, really. To say Prince was more talented is really (and probably unintentional on your part) disrespectful to the amazing legacy and career of Michael Jackson.

Both are African-American men, born in 1958 in the midwest into poor families with multiple children. Both struggled with their father's overbearing personalities. Both had a natural inclination to music early on in life.

Prince had it slightly better because despite his parents divorcing, living with Andre, etc., he had a normal person's childhood. MJ was thrust into show business in kindergarten or first grade.

MJ had solo records before Off The Wall, so Prince still had a later start. Got To Be There, Ben, Music & Me, Forever Michael were albums from 1972-1975. Four albums in three years. OTW didn't happen for another four years after Forever Michael. When you talk about instruments, there is no doubt MJ could play piano, and probably played drums or guitar a bit - enough to play a hook or create a melody or rhythm. (And he could beatbox like a motherfucker - Prince did not but he could vocalize percussive elements). MJ also played on his albums, just not quite as much as Prince's one-man-band approach. Even on "Morphine", his name is in the instrument credits more than others.

MJ certainly had more #1 hits than Prince did, which is pretty massive considering his output was a fraction of what Prince did. MJ saw the plus of making folks wait a few years before putting something out. Leave 'em hanging and wanting more. Prince created so frequently that his output could have been once a quarter (4x a year) easily.

Both were dynamic performers, amazing songwriters, complex creatures the likes of which even legends like James Brown or George Clinton never quite reached the status of in their lives. I'm sure JB & GC were proud of MJ & Prince though. You always want better for your kids, or the next generation. "Learn from me, and do better with it". I'm not sure if there is really anyone who is a pretender to the throne right now. We might get another MJ or Prince type talent down the line. (They might even be born today and us not know it.) The world and its dynamics are different today, so the raw need to make it, the struggle, and the requirements of being a real musician are lax. It's easier to sit at a computer and throw beats together. MJ & Prince were lugging instruments and a band around to make shit happen, not their MacBook Pro and a soundboard from Guitar World. So - time will tell.

But now that the dust has settled, a bit, on both of these men's careers - I've yet to see a really valid argument on one being blindingly better than the other.

"eye don’t really care so much what people say about me because it is a reflection of who they r."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 12/11/17 12:41pm

paisleypark4

avatar

A smiling adult African American male (Michael Jackson) with a black afro, wearing a black tuxedo, white shirt, and a black bow tie. Both of his thumbs are hooked into his pants pockets with his palms and fingers facing forward and splayed out. The sides of his jacket are tucked behind his hands as he leans back slightly, giving a playful, casual touch to his formal look. Behind him there is a brown brick wall and to the side of his head are "MICHAEL JACKSON" in yellow chalk writing and "OFF THE WALL" in white chalk writing. "JACKSON" and "WALL" are separately underlined.August 10 1979

Prince ForYou.jpgApril 7 1978

This is true. Obviously Off The Wall was the winner, but I always adored For You for being so musical and rich in sensuality. I actually like "For You" more than "Prince", but not more than Off The Wall. I wodner if Mike ever listened to the album at the time or what were his thoughts on it.

Straight Jacket Funk Affair
Album plays and love for vinyl records.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 12/11/17 12:46pm

StrangeButTrue

avatar

MotownSubdivision said:

The Jackson 5 was a part of Michael's career whereas the Mickey Mouse Club was not part of the careers of Britney and Christina. To compare the two and say they're one in the same is silly.

.

Mickey Mouse Club is the reason for the careers of Bertney and Xtina.

if it was just a dream, call me a dreamer 2
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 12/11/17 12:59pm

namepeace

Mandingo said:


I see your point, that MJ and Prince were reaching the tipping points of their careers at the same time (1979). It's a legitimate one. I just quibble with how you get there.

Although MJ was in the Jackson 5 and did have a few solos like BEN, really when we think about it, he and Prince both debuted as young African American male rnb artists around the same time.

Michael Jackson debuted as a solo artist in 1972, when he was a teenager, 6 years before Prince dropped his solo debut in his teens. The album and singles charted relatively well. You can't ignore that.

Off the wall could have failed. There were no guarantees. My point is that Prince and MJ both had the same amount to prove at the same time and saying MJ started before Prince is simplistic. A child's career is very very different to their coming of age adult music. You wouldnt judge Britney or Christina on their Disney days would you?

That's not the best analogy. Britney and Christina weren't releasing pop albums when they were with Disney, nor were they household names when they dropped their solo debuts.

Prince was in Grand Central and Champagne as a kid. He recorded with Willie as well.He wasn't new to the game either. Both MJ and Prince as the artists we REALLY critique them on; started in the late 70''s. As equals. MJ did not have any right to success and Prince had as much to win or lose.

That's not completely accurate. Prince was an experienced musician, but that experience does not compare to MJ being in one of the biggest acts in pop music history before he launched his solo career. As a "child star," MJ didn't have "any right" to future success, but he had tasted it already and he wanted to go to the next level.

That's why MJ knew that Off The Wall would be a defining point in his career. For his part Prince knew his sophomore LP would need to produce results so he didn't just get lost in the shuffle. He redefined his look, sound and image the following year with Dirty Mind.

The stakes were high for both of them in 1979, and superstardom was not a foregone conclusion. You're right on that. But the contexts were different. They both wanted superstardom, but only one of them had been a star by that time.

[Edited 12/11/17 13:00pm]

Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 12/11/17 1:09pm

Mandingo

namepeace said:

Mandingo said:


I see your point, that MJ and Prince were reaching the tipping points of their careers at the same time (1979). It's a legitimate one. I just quibble with how you get there.

Although MJ was in the Jackson 5 and did have a few solos like BEN, really when we think about it, he and Prince both debuted as young African American male rnb artists around the same time.

Michael Jackson debuted as a solo artist in 1972, when he was a teenager, 6 years before Prince dropped his solo debut in his teens. The album and singles charted relatively well. You can't ignore that.

Off the wall could have failed. There were no guarantees. My point is that Prince and MJ both had the same amount to prove at the same time and saying MJ started before Prince is simplistic. A child's career is very very different to their coming of age adult music. You wouldnt judge Britney or Christina on their Disney days would you?

That's not the best analogy. Britney and Christina weren't releasing pop albums when they were with Disney, nor were they household names when they dropped their solo debuts.

Prince was in Grand Central and Champagne as a kid. He recorded with Willie as well.He wasn't new to the game either. Both MJ and Prince as the artists we REALLY critique them on; started in the late 70''s. As equals. MJ did not have any right to success and Prince had as much to win or lose.

That's not completely accurate. Prince was an experienced musician, but that experience does not compare to MJ being in one of the biggest acts in pop music history before he launched his solo career. As a "child star," MJ didn't have "any right" to future success, but he had tasted it already and he wanted to go to the next level.

That's why MJ knew that Off The Wall would be a defining point in his career. For his part Prince knew his sophomore LP would need to produce results so he didn't just get lost in the shuffle. He redefined his look, sound and image the following year with Dirty Mind.

The stakes were high for both of them in 1979, and superstardom was not a foregone conclusion. You're right on that. But the contexts were different. They both wanted superstardom, but only one of them had been a star by that time.

[Edited 12/11/17 13:00pm]

Agreed. Thanks for clarifying. So good when people can talk on the org or even debate but do so respectfully. I feel I learned something from you. Thank you and peace

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 12/11/17 1:13pm

Mandingo

paisleypark4 said:

A smiling adult African American male (Michael Jackson) with a black afro, wearing a black tuxedo, white shirt, and a black bow tie. Both of his thumbs are hooked into his pants pockets with his palms and fingers facing forward and splayed out. The sides of his jacket are tucked behind his hands as he leans back slightly, giving a playful, casual touch to his formal look. Behind him there is a brown brick wall and to the side of his head are "MICHAEL JACKSON" in yellow chalk writing and "OFF THE WALL" in white chalk writing. "JACKSON" and "WALL" are separately underlined.August 10 1979

Prince ForYou.jpgApril 7 1978

This is true. Obviously Off The Wall was the winner, but I always adored For You for being so musical and rich in sensuality. I actually like "For You" more than "Prince", but not more than Off The Wall. I wodner if Mike ever listened to the album at the time or what were his thoughts on it.

Thank you,

Good to see at least two people on the thread actually got what I was trying to say and didn't get caught up in the Disney comment. Jeesh..no wonder Trump's President. People hear the shiny words and chase them....hey peolple...WALL, CHINA.....OBAMAAAA's birth certificate....go fetch!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 12/11/17 1:21pm

MotownSubdivis
ion

StrangeButTrue said:

MotownSubdivision said:

The Jackson 5 was a part of Michael's career whereas the Mickey Mouse Club was not part of the careers of Britney and Christina. To compare the two and say they're one in the same is silly.

.

Mickey Mouse Club is the reason for the careers of Bertney and Xtina.

Exactly. It's the reason for the career, not the actual career. The Jackson 5 was a part of Michael's career.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 12/11/17 2:02pm

namepeace

Mandingo said:

namepeace said:

[Edited 12/11/17 13:00pm]

Agreed. Thanks for clarifying. So good when people can talk on the org or even debate but do so respectfully. I feel I learned something from you. Thank you and peace


You raised great points. Spike Lee makes many of the same points in his documentary of MJ and the making of Off The Wall.

Happy holidays . . . and happy Orging!

Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 12/11/17 2:13pm

StrangeButTrue

avatar

MotownSubdivision said:

StrangeButTrue said:

.

Mickey Mouse Club is the reason for the careers of Bertney and Xtina.

Exactly. It's the reason for the career, not the actual career. The Jackson 5 was a part of Michael's career.

.

I like a lot of the J5 stuff so much, it is almost hard to believe that the fella on Invincible album is that same kid. J5 became big due to sheer talent.

if it was just a dream, call me a dreamer 2
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 12/11/17 2:52pm

mnbvc

MotownSubdivision said:

StrangeButTrue said:

.

Mickey Mouse Club is the reason for the careers of Bertney and Xtina.

Exactly. It's the reason for the career, not the actual career. The Jackson 5 was a part of Michael's career.

While Mickey Mouse Club is not their music recording career, it was clearly their connection to the music industry and thus part of their career in the entertainment industry as a whole.

But I'm guessing most would say Beyonce's career started with Destiny's Child. Star Search was just a one off non-contractual performance, unlike the Mickey Mouse Club.

[Edited 12/11/17 14:52pm]

[Edited 12/11/17 15:35pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 12/11/17 3:56pm

StrangeButTrue

avatar

mnbvc said:

But I'm guessing most would say Beyonce's career started with Destiny's Child. Star Search was just a one off non-contractual performance, unlike the Mickey Mouse Club.


.
Beyoncé came along with Wyclef when people were super Fugees thirsty and Destinys Child had to invite anyone and everyone on the remix to get and keep attention. Rodney Jerkins garbage. IMO for like 20 years now Beyoncé has been shoved into the public consciousness and a lot of her "classic" shit is embarrassing sounding, like Bills or Bugaboo or Bootylicious it was flash in the pan goofy gimmicky shit for disposable MTV videos and WTF attention al a "automobills" and "this jelly". Then they made Survivor where it was all "look at how we can stand people dissing how desperate we are for attention" and it just kinda kept getting more artistically ridiculous and gaudy ever since. So in a way she did follow the MJ trajectory the most literally.

if it was just a dream, call me a dreamer 2
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 12/11/17 4:21pm

purple05

Mandingo said:

Although MJ was in the Jackson 5 and did have a few solos like BEN, really when we think about it, he and Prince both debuted as young African American male rnb artists around the same time.

Off the wall could have failed. There were no guarantees.

My point is that Prince and MJ both had the same amount to prove at the same time and saying MJ started before Prince is simplistic. A child's career is very very different to their coming of age adult music. You wouldnt judge Britney or Christina on their Disney days would you? Prince was in Grand Central and Champagne as a kid. He recorded with Willie as well.He wasn't new to the game either.
Both MJ and Prince as the artists we REALLY critique them on; started in the late 70''s. As equals. MJ did not have any right to success and Prince had as much to win or lose.
[Edited 12/11/17 0:57am]

No they didn't start the same time. MJ had been touring and opening for acts such as James Brown, Jackie Wilson, etc since the mid 60s. He got his first record deal in the late 60s, then he signed to Motown and released his first single in 1969.
MJ did 9/10 professional tours, 13 group & 4 solo albums all before Prince's debut. You just can't erase that and his immense fame during that time frame for the sake of your argument.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 12/11/17 4:24pm

purple05

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

It's no secret around here that I became a Prince fan in 1979, thanks to the pioneering efforts of Detroit's favorite DJ, the ONE and ONLY Electrifying MOJO. Which would mean I was in the 3rd grade. However, I became a Michael Jackson fan before that. The very first music video I ever saw was...





I think I was 5 years old then and that song endeared me to Michael long before his other successes and regardless of Prince's.

I loved them BOTH for who they were individually and how their talent and efforts, influenced and most importantly...helped me...become the ME that I am. And I've come to completely understand that there is absolutely nothing wrong with loving them BOTH! heart


Thnx my first time seeing that video.
I agree you can love them both. They both have their place in music history. They were both very talented musically.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 12/11/17 5:51pm

MotownSubdivis
ion

mnbvc said:

MotownSubdivision said:

Exactly. It's the reason for the career, not the actual career. The Jackson 5 was a part of Michael's career.

While Mickey Mouse Club is not their music recording career, it was clearly their connection to the music industry and thus part of their career in the entertainment industry as a whole.

But I'm guessing most would say Beyonce's career started with Destiny's Child. Star Search was just a one off non-contractual performance, unlike the Mickey Mouse Club.

[Edited 12/11/17 14:52pm]

[Edited 12/11/17 15:35pm]

Even so, it still isn't the same as when Michael was a part of the Jackson 5; as in actually being signed to a label, releasing albums and having charting singles. The keyword for the Mickey Mouse Club is "connection"; it was the liaison to bigger things for Britney and Christina while being signed to Motown after toiling around for years trying to get noticed and becoming the Jackson 5 was the start of bigger things for Michael.

[Edited 12/11/17 17:54pm]

[Edited 12/12/17 4:10am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 12/11/17 7:08pm

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

They were born the same year is as close as it got with these 2 starting at the same time.
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 12/11/17 10:04pm

purple05

MotownSubdivision said:



mnbvc said:




MotownSubdivision said:



Exactly. It's the reason for the career, not the actual career. The Jackson 5 was a part of Michael's career.



While Mickey Mouse Club is not their music recording career, it was clearly their connection to the music industry and thus part of their career in the entertainment industry as a whole.


But I'm guessing most would say Beyonce's career started with Destiny's Child. Star Search was just a one off non-contractual performance, unlike the Mickey Mouse Club.


[Edited 12/11/17 14:52pm]


[Edited 12/11/17 15:35pm]



Even so, it still isn't the same as when Michael was a part of the Jackson 5; as in actually being signed to a label, releasing albums and having charting singles. The keyword for the Mickey Mouse Club is "connection"; it was the liaison to bigger things for Britney and Christina while being signed to Motown after toiling around for years trying to get noticed and becoming the Jackson 5 was the start of bigger things for Michael.

[Edited 12/11/17 17:54pm]



I'm not getting the Mickey Mouse club connection either. MJ was working an adult schedule from 67. I guess MJs Caitlin circuit days could equal that but they were performing with professional acts then
[Edited 12/11/17 22:15pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 12/11/17 10:07pm

purple05

LittleBLUECorvette said:

They were born the same year is as close as it got with these 2 starting at the same time.

What's ironic is hat I googled Jackson 5 chitlim circuit and an old prince.org thread you started came up and it sums up this topic.

"A lot of folks don't realize what the J5 were doin' before they signed with Motown and/or before they released there first single. Some folks just think they just came from no where like they artist now a days. They honed the craft performin' with some of the rhythm and blues and soul greats of all-time.


As early as 1967, they were already performin' at the Regal Theater in Chicago (basically the Apollo of Chicago.) They won the their Armature night 4 weeks straight were they got to perform on the same bill as Bobby Taylor and the Vancouvers and Gladys Knight & the Pips.


Later that year, they went up north to the Apollo in Harlem and won Armature night there also. They played the other theaters at that time known as (The Chitlin' Circuit) which included the Howard in DC and the Uptown in Philadelphia.


Other act's they'd be on the same bill as include James Brown, Sam & Dave, The O'Jays, Etta James, Delfonics, Marshall & the Chi-Lites, Jackie Wilson, Joe Tex among others. And this was long before Motown came calling!!"

Another post in the thread
"The Jackson 5's early years began as early as 1963 when Tito Jackson began playing Joe's guitar around the house with his other brothers Jackie and Jermaine singing Motown songs with him.

Also what's unknown is that when they started as "The Jackson Brothers", Tito played rhythm guitar, Jermaine didn't play an instrument during those early days. Then as the group discovered their talents (Tito went on to play lead guitar, while Jermaine played rhythm guitar and later bass), the younger brothers Marlon and Michael (especially him) began wanting to get in.

Even after Michael made his first public singing debut in late '63 during a Christmas recital at five, Joe still wouldn't let him (or Marlon) into his brother's band but after Katherine Jackson kept pushing for Michael, Joe finally allowed Michael and Marlon in the band in mid-1964 but gave them instruments. Michael played bongos and Marlon played tambourine.

Michael began to dance and do his own little numbers around 1965 or 1966 and by the latter year, it was no doubt in Joe's eyes from the responses Michael got singing and dancing that Michael was the reason the Jackson Brothers were getting ahead in the talent showcases they were starting to enter.

After a high school talent show win, the Jackson Brothers changed their name to The Jackson Five (not "5" at first) and Michael, Jackie and Jermaine began sharing lead vocals daily. In 1967, they made their first appearances at the chitlin' circuit where they got all that notice from the guys you mentioned. Even James Brown spotted them during one show and mentored them a bit.

1967 also marked the group's first professional year as entertainers and recording artists after signing with Steeltown Records and "Big Boy" was a big radio hit, it sold over 10,000 copies after the record was distributed by Atco Records in January of 1968. They released two more records and began getting top billing at black venues across the country as a professional act.

Joe had struggled to get them in Motown as late as 1966 but finally got them the deal in March 1969 but the Jacksons actually auditioned to get the deal in 1968 where that infamous audition tape came from in Detroit. Plus the Jackson Five were NEVER billed as a bubblegum act, they were much like their Chicago neighbors the Five Stairsteps, a premier soul group.

Motown babied them in a way when they got with them...

Michael and his brothers were professional since 1967."

http://prince.org/msg/8/314200
[Edited 12/11/17 22:15pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 12/12/17 4:18am

mnbvc

purple05 said:

MotownSubdivision said:

Even so, it still isn't the same as when Michael was a part of the Jackson 5; as in actually being signed to a label, releasing albums and having charting singles. The keyword for the Mickey Mouse Club is "connection"; it was the liaison to bigger things for Britney and Christina while being signed to Motown after toiling around for years trying to get noticed and becoming the Jackson 5 was the start of bigger things for Michael.

[Edited 12/11/17 17:54pm]

I'm not getting the Mickey Mouse club connection either. MJ was working an adult schedule from 67. I guess MJs Caitlin circuit days could equal that but they were performing with professional acts then [Edited 12/11/17 22:15pm]

True, it's not the same as MJ was far more talented and he was already a professional under the age of 10. When it all adds up, MJ had around a 40 year career of success in the entertainment industry, which is legendary. His sister Janet seems to be getting to that mark now as Good Times debuted 40 Septembers ago and she was on the Jackson Variety Show in 1976. (With the only asterisk being MJ and co opened the doors for all that)

With her Vegas show Britney has now been successful in the entertainment industry for over 20 years, when you count the Mickey Mouse Club. (I would say her lack of singing is arguably offset by her show giving people more jobs than a Celine Dion type show)

[Edited 12/12/17 4:19am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 12/12/17 7:13am

MotownSubdivis
ion

purple05 said:

MotownSubdivision said:



mnbvc said:




MotownSubdivision said:



Exactly. It's the reason for the career, not the actual career. The Jackson 5 was a part of Michael's career.



While Mickey Mouse Club is not their music recording career, it was clearly their connection to the music industry and thus part of their career in the entertainment industry as a whole.


But I'm guessing most would say Beyonce's career started with Destiny's Child. Star Search was just a one off non-contractual performance, unlike the Mickey Mouse Club.


[Edited 12/11/17 14:52pm]


[Edited 12/11/17 15:35pm]



Even so, it still isn't the same as when Michael was a part of the Jackson 5; as in actually being signed to a label, releasing albums and having charting singles. The keyword for the Mickey Mouse Club is "connection"; it was the liaison to bigger things for Britney and Christina while being signed to Motown after toiling around for years trying to get noticed and becoming the Jackson 5 was the start of bigger things for Michael.

[Edited 12/11/17 17:54pm]



I'm not getting the Mickey Mouse club connection either. MJ was working an adult schedule from 67. I guess MJs Caitlin circuit days could equal that but they were performing with professional acts then
[Edited 12/11/17 22:15pm]
Even then, you can't really equate the Mickey Mouse Club to the what the Chitlin' Circuit was.

I'm not even trying to dog Britney and Christina for being a part of the MMC; that's how they got their start and it is a legitimate one in its own right. But to compare that to the absolute laborious task that was the Chitlin' Circuit is to underestimate just what it was. Anyone who made it through that stage of their career and achieved some degree of success after that is a legend in my book.

Prince had it far easier than that.
[Edited 12/12/17 7:13am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 12/12/17 7:21am

Mandingo

Ok.

I know MJ strted performing and recording as a young boy way before Prince and had superstardom when Prince was unknown

But..

My point is that despite all his success in the Jackson 5, Off The Wall mean't Michael had to really come to the world as a 'new' artist. He couldn't 'rest on his laurels'.

His look, sound, dancing, even his features were all NEW. He had to line up as an adult and try to have a successful solo album just the same as Prince did in 1978's FOR YOU...

Ok ok, Michael had the up of being in the game longer but in terms of just imagining them as 2 African American guys born in 1958 trying to have success as a solo artist in the late 1970's ...I feel they both had an equal shot. OTW could have flopped. FOR YOU could have rocketed Prince to superstardom with MJ just becoming a has been who appears on greatest hits from the 70's compilations as little Michael from the Jacksons.

Those albums were defining for them both and they both had as much to lose as to gain.

To simplify, look at it like the new Justice League movie. The characters in that are beloved and established. Supes, WW, The Flash..even Fish boy. But you can see that they flopped when they didn't bring their A game.

Even a seasoned respected artist like MJ could have lost his title to Prince in the late 70's.

They started their careers as we remember them today in the late 70's and each had a shot..an equal shot. Just like when Rocky beat Apollo Creed neutral

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 12/12/17 7:40am

MotownSubdivis
ion

Mandingo said:

Ok.



I know MJ strted performing and recording as a young boy way before Prince and had superstardom when Prince was unknown



But..



My point is that despite all his success in the Jackson 5, Off The Wall mean't Michael had to really come to the world as a 'new' artist. He couldn't 'rest on his laurels'.



His look, sound, dancing, even his features were all NEW. He had to line up as an adult and try to have a successful solo album just the same as Prince did in 1978's FOR YOU...


Ok ok, Michael had the up of being in the game longer but in terms of just imagining them as 2 African American guys born in 1958 trying to have success as a solo artist in the late 1970's ...I feel they both had an equal shot. OTW could have flopped. FOR YOU could have rocketed Prince to superstardom with MJ just becoming a has been who appears on greatest hits from the 70's compilations as little Michael from the Jacksons.



Those albums were defining for them both and they both had as much to lose as to gain.



To simplify, look at it like the new Justice League movie. The characters in that are beloved and established. Supes, WW, The Flash..even Fish boy. But you can see that they flopped when they didn't bring their A game.



Even a seasoned respected artist like MJ could have lost his title to Prince in the late 70's.



They started their careers as we remember them today in the late 70's and each had a shot..an equal shot. Just like when Rocky beat Apollo Creed neutral

All right, you explained that better this time. I understand you now.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Prince and Michael Jackson started at the same time