independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Why aren't award shows released on home media?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 06/07/16 7:30am

MotownSubdivis
ion

Why aren't award shows released on home media?

I've conducted a fruitless search for the first edition of the VMAs online where all the streaming sites that seem to have it don't.

That got me to wondering, how come award shows don't receive proper home media releases? For music enthusiasts, being able to watch all editions of the Grammys, the AMA's and in my case, the VMA's would be a nice treat. Though I prefer home media releases, even having them available to watch in full online in decent quality would be a nice consolation.

I am aware that there are some clips available of these shows strewn about online but that's not enough for those of us who wish to see these shows as they originally aired. Any idea why after all these years we still don't have a Grammy/ AMA collection or a VMA boxset?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 06/07/16 8:02am

Graycap23

avatar

Now that u mention it, the only one I've ever seen was Motown 25

FOOLS multiply when WISE Men & Women are silent.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 06/07/16 8:03am

marksinclair

avatar

MotownSubdivision said:

I've conducted a fruitless search for the first edition of the VMAs online where all the streaming sites that seem to have it don't.

That got me to wondering, how come award shows don't receive proper home media releases? For music enthusiasts, being able to watch all editions of the Grammys, the AMA's and in my case, the VMA's would be a nice treat. Though I prefer home media releases, even having them available to watch in full online in decent quality would be a nice consolation.

I am aware that there are some clips available of these shows strewn about online but that's not enough for those of us who wish to see these shows as they originally aired. Any idea why after all these years we still don't have a Grammy/ AMA collection or a VMA boxset?

Totally agree, though personally I wouldn't want to watch the whole award show as aired. Having watched a number of Prince's award show performances on bad quality YouTube feeds in the last few weeks I would love to see an anthology of these performances released to DVD. I am sure fans of other artists would appreciate the same but after the original airing they seem to just disappear.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 06/07/16 8:09am

MotownSubdivis
ion

marksinclair said:



MotownSubdivision said:


I've conducted a fruitless search for the first edition of the VMAs online where all the streaming sites that seem to have it don't.



That got me to wondering, how come award shows don't receive proper home media releases? For music enthusiasts, being able to watch all editions of the Grammys, the AMA's and in my case, the VMA's would be a nice treat. Though I prefer home media releases, even having them available to watch in full online in decent quality would be a nice consolation.



I am aware that there are some clips available of these shows strewn about online but that's not enough for those of us who wish to see these shows as they originally aired. Any idea why after all these years we still don't have a Grammy/ AMA collection or a VMA boxset?




Totally agree, though personally I wouldn't want to watch the whole award show as aired. Having watched a number of Prince's award show performances on bad quality YouTube feeds in the last few weeks I would love to see an anthology of these performances released to DVD. I am sure fans of other artists would appreciate the same but after the original airing they seem to just disappear.

Why not as they originally aired?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 06/07/16 8:15am

MotownSubdivis
ion

Graycap23 said:

Now that u mention it, the only one I've ever seen was Motown 25

To be fair, Motown 25 was a special one-off case (and even then it took 31 years for it to receive a proper home media release). However, it just doesn't make sense to me why award shows don't document their history better than they have. For those who were around during the airing of older editions and those who weren't alive yet but wish to see them, it would be ideal to make them available in some type of watchable format whether it be high quality streaming or (preferably) physical media.

Dick Clark Productions even has a YouTube channel which uploads loads various (edited) clips from the AMAs over the years. Why not just upload the entirety of the shows instead of simply showcasing what amounts to teaser trailers? To add to that, these clips are just of artists receiving awards and not of performances that took place on the shows. They've got the footage but they seem to prefer keeping it stored away and forcing people to upload clips of shoddy quality just to preserve the memories.
[Edited 6/7/16 8:20am]
[Edited 6/7/16 13:43pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 06/07/16 8:22am

marksinclair

avatar

MotownSubdivision said:

marksinclair said:

Totally agree, though personally I wouldn't want to watch the whole award show as aired. Having watched a number of Prince's award show performances on bad quality YouTube feeds in the last few weeks I would love to see an anthology of these performances released to DVD. I am sure fans of other artists would appreciate the same but after the original airing they seem to just disappear.

Why not as they originally aired?

.

I think the moment has passed once it has happened in a way. The awards speeches, guest hosts awkward chat/jokes etc time out after they have played it once in my opinion. Some live performances can be great though, and sometime preferable to watching a recording of a full live show as it is set up to be televised for a large audience and showcase an act quickly and with one off production details that are never duplicated.

.

For example, really enjoyed watching the Earth Wind and Fire 2002 BET Awards tribute and performance the other day and would be cool to have a collection of these type clips available in better quality

[Edited 6/7/16 8:23am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 06/07/16 8:25am

MotownSubdivis
ion

marksinclair said:



MotownSubdivision said:


marksinclair said:



Totally agree, though personally I wouldn't want to watch the whole award show as aired. Having watched a number of Prince's award show performances on bad quality YouTube feeds in the last few weeks I would love to see an anthology of these performances released to DVD. I am sure fans of other artists would appreciate the same but after the original airing they seem to just disappear.



Why not as they originally aired?

.


I think the moment has passed once it has happened in a way. The awards speeches, guest hosts awkward chat/jokes etc time out after they have played it once in my opinion. Some live performances can be great though, and sometime preferable to watching a recording of a full live show as it is set up to be televised for a large audience and showcase an act quickly and with one off production details that are never duplicated.


.


For example, really enjoyed watching the Earth Wind and Fire 2002 BET Awards tribute and performance the other day and would be cool to have a collection of these type clips available in better quality


[Edited 6/7/16 8:23am]

I understand. I'd personally rather have the shows in their entirety for completion's sake and then the viewer can be given the ability to skip to what they want via basic scene selection. If most of the show is going to be included, you may as well include the whole thing.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 06/07/16 8:36am

dalsh327

Years ago Dick Clark said there's more money in licensing clips than selling entire shows to home video, plus he only had the broadcast rights. That's why when Saturday Night Live showed the Prince tribute, they wouldn't be able to show it anywhere else except NBC. If they were going to put it out on home video, they'd have to get permission from the estate and work details out. I don't know if it was even on Hulu or their official website.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 06/07/16 8:43am

Graycap23

avatar

With so many people involved in these type of shows..............I can't imagine how on Earth they would manage to sort out who gets paid.

FOOLS multiply when WISE Men & Women are silent.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 06/07/16 8:43am

marksinclair

avatar

dalsh327 said:

Years ago Dick Clark said there's more money in licensing clips than selling entire shows to home video, plus he only had the broadcast rights. That's why when Saturday Night Live showed the Prince tribute, they wouldn't be able to show it anywhere else except NBC. If they were going to put it out on home video, they'd have to get permission from the estate and work details out. I don't know if it was even on Hulu or their official website.

.

if it's easy for them to rebroadcast (as per the Prince SNL tribute) it's a shame it doesn't happen more regularly. there must be a lot of archive stuff locked away which the networks could replay every now and then in some kind of format. in the UK bbc4 is rerunning top of the pops episodes from the 70s/80s in full and in order so sure it could be done with other shows

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 06/07/16 8:46am

MotownSubdivis
ion

dalsh327 said:

Years ago Dick Clark said there's more money in licensing clips than selling entire shows to home video, plus he only had the broadcast rights. That's why when Saturday Night Live showed the Prince tribute, they wouldn't be able to show it anywhere else except NBC. If they were going to put it out on home video, they'd have to get permission from the estate and work details out. I don't know if it was even on Hulu or their official website.

Interesting (and not in a good way), I wonder why that is?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 06/07/16 10:48am

namepeace

My guess is it has to do with resolving all of the music publishing issues, as well as the various rights of publicity of the performers. When you watch episodes of Chappelle's Show and SNL on streaming services, or on DVD/Blu-ray sets, the musical performances (good and bad) are mostly omitted.

Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 06/07/16 10:59am

thetimefan

avatar

Has to be music publishing rights, all the record labels, artists, songwriters etc would all have to agree and a royalty is paid on all copies of the DVD/Blu Ray so it wouldn't be cost effective.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 06/07/16 12:14pm

PatrickS77

avatar

Copyright nightmare most likely. Not worth the hassle. And who would really buy full award shows?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 06/07/16 12:23pm

bobzilla77

As I understand it, most of the contracts for award shows are written such that the production company only has broadcast rights to the performance, not release rights.

.

This leaves the master tape in a catch-22. The artist can't simply release it because the network or production company owns part of the rights; and the company can't release it to home video without signing a whole new contract with every artist.

.

This is also why benefit/ charity albums often don't get reissued. The artists often sign contracts with limited release rights, usually for a limited time period, with the idea being that money from the record sales will support the charity. That way the artist can do something nice without having to worry that the charitable releases are competing too much with their own records. But sometimes that happens, like Shout Factory making home video of Live Aid and the Amnesty International shows from the 80s available a few years ago.

.

But as the years go by, there may be a way for that to get worked out. I agree it would be nice to have a video compilation of Prince's best TV appearances in one place, or like "best soul performances in the history of the Grammys".

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 06/07/16 12:59pm

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

Probably has to do with licensing out all of the artist. Someone mentioned Motown 25, well that was just all Motown artist besides a few. Michael Jackson was the only artist to peform a non Motown song. Him and Bros were at Epic at the time. Marvin Gaye and Diana Ross were the other non Motown act but they performed there Motown hits.
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 06/07/16 4:24pm

214

I wonder the same.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 06/07/16 5:06pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

thetimefan said:

Has to be music publishing rights, all the record labels, artists, songwriters etc would all have to agree and a royalty is paid on all copies of the DVD/Blu Ray so it wouldn't be cost effective.

Some old sitcoms & dramas had music in them by popular acts, but when released on home video, the songs were replaced because they were asking for too much money. Even at the original broadcast, some shows used re-recordings by session singers as this was cheaper than using the original songs, like Knight Rider. The Frank Sinatra theme song for Married... With Children was replaced on the DVD, but is still on the TV reruns. There's also the case that in general, music on home video has never been a huge seller like a popular movie or video game. That's why most music related VHS/DVD go out of print after awhile. The audience is more limited. Not enough sales to make the expense of trying to get the music and image rights worth pursuing. If they decide to restore the footage, then that's another expense and restoring film/video is a slow process. There's few music & variety TV shows that have been released in entirety like regular TV shows have. There's been stuff like The Best Of Donny & Marie, and compilations of Midnight Special, Shindig, Old Grey Whistle Test, & Soul Train released, mostly with footage of really popular acts or big hit songs. The only ones I've seen with all episodes in full are lesser known programs that didn't have many episodes like Jazz Casual & The!!!Beat.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 06/07/16 8:53pm

dalsh327

MotownSubdivision said:

dalsh327 said:

Years ago Dick Clark said there's more money in licensing clips than selling entire shows to home video, plus he only had the broadcast rights. That's why when Saturday Night Live showed the Prince tribute, they wouldn't be able to show it anywhere else except NBC. If they were going to put it out on home video, they'd have to get permission from the estate and work details out. I don't know if it was even on Hulu or their official website.

Interesting (and not in a good way), I wonder why that is?

I know they released Midnight Special on DVD but I don't think Prince's clip was included.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 06/08/16 2:08am

Chancellor

avatar

PatrickS77 said:

Copyright nightmare most likely. Not worth the hassle. And who would really buy full award shows?

That, and the FIRST thing many of the performing Artists would say is "Cut my performance from the package becuz the house band did not do me justice or the Cameras caught me at all the wrong angles.."....It would be a nightmare and the Production Company producing the Award show would end up with less than 5-min of a 3hr show....People don't even know the nightmares that go on behind the scenes at Award shows......Only "Specials" like "Live Aid" or "Motown" should be considered for DVD release......

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 06/08/16 10:35am

MotownSubdivis
ion

Well now I can understand the nightmare behind award shows and the even larger chaos of releasing them on home media.

However, I still think that these shows should be better preserved than they are. Whether they are available in good, restored quality via an official YouTube channel or are accessible via streaming from whoever's in charge's official website. The Grammys, for example, should have archives where past editions of the show are available to watch. Same with MTV and the VMAs which would be much easier to package than the Grammys or AMAs since there's much less editions.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 06/08/16 11:21am

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

MotownSubdivision said:

Well now I can understand the nightmare behind award shows and the even larger chaos of releasing them on home media.

However, I still think that these shows should be better preserved than they are. Whether they are available in good, restored quality via an official YouTube channel or are accessible via streaming from whoever's in charge's official website. The Grammys, for example, should have archives where past editions of the show are available to watch. Same with MTV and the VMAs which would be much easier to package than the Grammys or AMAs since there's much less editions.

Footage to things like these are available certain libraries. I know there is a rare Isley Bros 1969 concert that is only available at the UCLA library yet was filmed at Yankee Stadium.
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 06/13/16 6:15am

dalsh327

My guess is UCLA wound up with donated footage.

BBC is government run so they go by a different set of rules, there's a lot of footage that they've said has been lost, but take into account how many territories England used to control, there has to be multiple copies of some shows and special events.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Why aren't award shows released on home media?