independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > MJ tapes transcripts
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 11 of 14 « First<567891011121314>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #300 posted 10/10/09 7:15pm

midnightmover

Comic relief. Will Madonna still be doing her MJ tribute now that she knows what MJ really thought of her? hmmm lol
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #301 posted 10/10/09 7:29pm

midnightmover

They did apparently find gay porn at Neverland. When Wade Robson was being questioned that came out, according to Vanity Fair. In an attempt to get to the truth I asked MJ's defenders to produce that section of the transcripts but not a single one of them did (even though many of them have the transcripts on their hard drives).
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #302 posted 10/10/09 7:34pm

bboy87

avatar

midnightmover said:

They did apparently find gay porn at Neverland. When Wade Robson was being questioned that came out, according to Vanity Fair. In an attempt to get to the truth I asked MJ's defenders to produce that section of the transcripts but not a single one of them did (even though many of them have the transcripts on their hard drives).

You mean the Vanity Fair article that was published during the trial? I don't remember a mention of gay porn, just a bunch of straight and girl on girl stuff. I'm sure someone has the article and transcripts
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #303 posted 10/10/09 7:39pm

midnightmover

bboy87 said:

midnightmover said:

They did apparently find gay porn at Neverland. When Wade Robson was being questioned that came out, according to Vanity Fair. In an attempt to get to the truth I asked MJ's defenders to produce that section of the transcripts but not a single one of them did (even though many of them have the transcripts on their hard drives).

You mean the Vanity Fair article that was published during the trial? I don't remember a mention of gay porn, just a bunch of straight and girl on girl stuff. I'm sure someone has the article and transcripts

Wade Robson, being questioned by the prosecution, as reported in Vanity Fair.....


"If you had known Michael Jackson, as a grown man, was reading Playboy, Hustler, Penthouse, magazines like that, showing naked women, would that have concerned you?" Robson said no, but it would depend on the kind of pornographic material. Zonen (a prosecutor) seized the opportunity. He strode over to the table where the evidence was kept and pulled out a large photo book called Boys Will Be Boys. Over and over he asked Robson to pick a page and describe what he saw—naked boys of 10, 11, or 12 with their genitalia prominently displayed. Then Zonen produced a second book, "of photographs of two men engaged in sex acts with one another." He asked, "And, in fact, the sex acts are all acts of either masturbation, oral sex, or sodomy; is that right?" Robson said yes. "Would you be concerned about a person who possesses that book crawling into bed with a 10-year-old boy?" Robson said, "Yes, I guess so." And so on. Every time Mesereau (Michael's lawyer) tried to blunt the previous testimony, Zonen would get up and grab another book — seven in all.
[Edited 10/10/09 19:39pm]
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #304 posted 10/10/09 7:46pm

whatsgoingon

avatar

lavenderfields said:

Layzie said:



Yes, because if a man isn't trying to screw everything that comes his way can't be heterosexual. rolleyes

It's interesting that after all these years some people haven't grasp that fact that MJ was not normal. I love the man and his music, but I believe that he had deep issues with many subjects including sex. If you were raised by an overly religious mother, had grown women throw themselevs at you as a child, and had to lay in your bed while your father and brothers had sex with groupies you might have certain issues with sex too. And just because a person has issues with sex doesn't make them gay or asexual. The people who know him best all say that he wasn't gay. When the po-po raided his house during the '06 child abuse trial, they said that they found a shit load of (heterosexual) porn. LMP has stated many times that while they were married, he had a strong sexual appetite....
[Edited 10/10/09 15:05pm]
[Edited 10/10/09 15:06pm]


They also found kiddie porn along with the heterosexual porn. I am not an expert on porn in any way shape or form, but it seems to me if there is kiddie porn involved, there is more going on than meets the eye. I am sorry, but kiddie porn is just wrong and the implication of its existence in MJ's home indicates something sordid.

With respect to his supposed sexual relationship with Lisa Marie, gay men marry all the time and have sex with women. It does not prove anything. It is possible he may have had sex with Lisa Marie, but, I do not believe that sex with women was his preference. Do I know this for a fact? No I do not. Again, it is just my opinion based on what I have read on MJ over the years.


If they found kiddie porn, they would have charged him with possession of child porn, it's practically the easiest crime to be charged with and get a conviction for, infact most men who get caught with kiddie-porn plead guilty before the case gets to court, because in most cases it such an open an shut case.

Sneddon wanted MJ convicted so badly, that if there was such evidence he would have nailed him right there and then, instead of charging him with something as stupid kidnapping.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #305 posted 10/10/09 7:52pm

dearmother

avatar

midnightmover said:

They did apparently find gay porn at Neverland. When Wade Robson was being questioned that came out, according to Vanity Fair. In an attempt to get to the truth I asked MJ's defenders to produce that section of the transcripts but not a single one of them did (even though many of them have the transcripts on their hard drives).



i totally disproved your gay porn stance by looking up the so-called porn books. you've got amnesia
[Edited 10/10/09 19:52pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #306 posted 10/10/09 7:53pm

dearmother

avatar

there was only straight porn in house
a few arty photo books

and even the straight porn didn't have mj's fingerprints on it, i donn't think
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #307 posted 10/10/09 7:53pm

mimi07

avatar

midnightmover said:

Comic relief. Will Madonna still be doing her MJ tribute now that she knows what MJ really thought of her? hmmm lol

we don't know what he thought. he was talking about madonna of the late 80's early 90's when he was a crazy badass. and he said motherhood would change her... she's obviously different
[Edited 10/10/09 20:28pm]
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #308 posted 10/10/09 7:54pm

bboy87

avatar

midnightmover said:

bboy87 said:


You mean the Vanity Fair article that was published during the trial? I don't remember a mention of gay porn, just a bunch of straight and girl on girl stuff. I'm sure someone has the article and transcripts

Wade Robson, being questioned by the prosecution, as reported in Vanity Fair.....


"If you had known Michael Jackson, as a grown man, was reading Playboy, Hustler, Penthouse, magazines like that, showing naked women, would that have concerned you?" Robson said no, but it would depend on the kind of pornographic material. Zonen (a prosecutor) seized the opportunity. He strode over to the table where the evidence was kept and pulled out a large photo book called Boys Will Be Boys. Over and over he asked Robson to pick a page and describe what he saw—naked boys of 10, 11, or 12 with their genitalia prominently displayed. Then Zonen produced a second book, "of photographs of two men engaged in sex acts with one another." He asked, "And, in fact, the sex acts are all acts of either masturbation, oral sex, or sodomy; is that right?" Robson said yes. "Would you be concerned about a person who possesses that book crawling into bed with a 10-year-old boy?" Robson said, "Yes, I guess so." And so on. Every time Mesereau (Michael's lawyer) tried to blunt the previous testimony, Zonen would get up and grab another book — seven in all.
[Edited 10/10/09 19:39pm]


If I remember correctly, the photographer sent that to Michael as a gift or something


here's the court transcripts
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=4934ZTD9

Michael Jackson never molested us young men say
Thu May 5, 2005 08:21 PM ET

By Dan Whitcomb and Alexandria Sage

SANTA MARIA, Calif. (Reuters) - Two young men portrayed by prosecutors as Michael Jackson's victims when they were adolescents emphatically denied on Thursday that he ever abused them, as defense lawyers battled accusations that the pop star was a serial molester.

In dramatic testimony to open Jackson's defense case, both Wade Robson and Brett Barnes said they remained friends with the 46-year-old entertainer with whom they had shared a bed on countless occasions at his Neverland Valley Ranch.

"Did Mr. Jackson ever molest you at any time?" lead defense attorney Tom Mesereau asked Robson, a 22-year-old choreographer and former child dance prodigy who has worked with Britney Spears.

"Absolutely not," Robson responded.

"Did Mr. Jackson ever touch you in a sexual way?" Mesereau asked. "No, never," Robson said.

Earlier in the trial, a former Neverland maid testified that she saw Robson showering with Jackson, their underpants lying on the bathroom floor. But Robson, under questioning by Mesereau, said he never was in the shower with Jackson.

Another former Neverland employee had told the jury that she once saw
Jackson touch Barnes' buttocks when he was a teen. But Barnes, now 23, flatly rejected any suggestion of inappropriate behavior by the entertainer.

"Absolutely not and I can tell you if he had I wouldn't be here right now," he said. Asked if he was aware of the earlier testimony, a defiant Barnes said: "I am and I'm very mad about that because it's untrue. They are putting my name through dirt and I'm really, really, really not happy about it."

'I'M TELLING YOU NOTHING EVER HAPPENED'

Though the acccusations of Jackson's conduct with Robson and Barnes are not part of the current charges against him, legal experts say the testimony about the singer's past history with young boys may have been the most damaging part of the prosecution case.

On cross-examination, Deputy District Attorney Ron Zonen pressed both men over the propriety of young boys sleeping with a grown man and even challenged Robson's assertion Jackson had never touched him inappropriately.

"What you're really telling us is that nothing ever happened while you were awake," Zonen said to Robson at one point.

"I'm telling you nothing ever happened," Robson answered.

Zonen then showed him books with photos nude young boys seized from Jackson's home and asked if he would have concerns over sharing a bed with the owner of such materials.

Robson said no, but confronted by Zonen with another book that featured pictures of men engaged in various sex acts with each other and asked if he then had concerns, Robson quietly answered: "Yes, I guess so."

Mesereau tried to mitigate that testimony by saying that the books were seized from Jackson's large library, which was filled with a decade's worth of heterosexual magazines such as Playboy and Hustler.

Robson refused to agree that the material Zonen had shown him could be considered homoerotic and said he believed Jackson "has a sexual interest in women."

Under cross-examination both boys appeared to concede that Jackson had behaved toward them in a manner that prosecutors describe as grooming of potential victims -- asking for their trust, calling them members of his family and spending time alone with them.

Barnes also said that he quit his job as a roulette dealer in his native Australia to travel to California for his testimony and was staying at Neverland during his visit.

Earlier on Thursday Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville rejected a defense request to dismiss the charges against Jackson, a motion filed after prosecutors rested their case on Wednesday, 2 1/2 months into the trial.
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #309 posted 10/10/09 7:57pm

bboy87

avatar

bboy87 said:[quote]

midnightmover said:



If I remember correctly, the photographer sent that to Michael as a gift or something


here's the court transcripts
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=4934ZTD9

Michael Jackson never molested us young men say
Thu May 5, 2005 08:21 PM ET

By Dan Whitcomb and Alexandria Sage

SANTA MARIA, Calif. (Reuters) - Two young men portrayed by prosecutors as Michael Jackson's victims when they were adolescents emphatically denied on Thursday that he ever abused them, as defense lawyers battled accusations that the pop star was a serial molester.

In dramatic testimony to open Jackson's defense case, both Wade Robson and Brett Barnes said they remained friends with the 46-year-old entertainer with whom they had shared a bed on countless occasions at his Neverland Valley Ranch.

"Did Mr. Jackson ever molest you at any time?" lead defense attorney Tom Mesereau asked Robson, a 22-year-old choreographer and former child dance prodigy who has worked with Britney Spears.

"Absolutely not," Robson responded.

"Did Mr. Jackson ever touch you in a sexual way?" Mesereau asked. "No, never," Robson said.

Earlier in the trial, a former Neverland maid testified that she saw Robson showering with Jackson, their underpants lying on the bathroom floor. But Robson, under questioning by Mesereau, said he never was in the shower with Jackson.

Another former Neverland employee had told the jury that she once saw
Jackson touch Barnes' buttocks when he was a teen. But Barnes, now 23, flatly rejected any suggestion of inappropriate behavior by the entertainer.

"Absolutely not and I can tell you if he had I wouldn't be here right now," he said. Asked if he was aware of the earlier testimony, a defiant Barnes said: "I am and I'm very mad about that because it's untrue. They are putting my name through dirt and I'm really, really, really not happy about it."

'I'M TELLING YOU NOTHING EVER HAPPENED'

Though the acccusations of Jackson's conduct with Robson and Barnes are not part of the current charges against him, legal experts say the testimony about the singer's past history with young boys may have been the most damaging part of the prosecution case.

On cross-examination, Deputy District Attorney Ron Zonen pressed both men over the propriety of young boys sleeping with a grown man and even challenged Robson's assertion Jackson had never touched him inappropriately.

"What you're really telling us is that nothing ever happened while you were awake," Zonen said to Robson at one point.

"I'm telling you nothing ever happened," Robson answered.

Zonen then showed him books with photos nude young boys seized from Jackson's home and asked if he would have concerns over sharing a bed with the owner of such materials.

Robson said no, but confronted by Zonen with another book that featured pictures of men engaged in various sex acts with each other and asked if he then had concerns, Robson quietly answered: "Yes, I guess so."

Mesereau tried to mitigate that testimony by saying that the books were seized from Jackson's large library, which was filled with a decade's worth of heterosexual magazines such as Playboy and Hustler.

Robson refused to agree that the material Zonen had shown him could be considered homoerotic and said he believed Jackson "has a sexual interest in women."

Under cross-examination both boys appeared to concede that Jackson had behaved toward them in a manner that prosecutors describe as grooming of potential victims -- asking for their trust, calling them members of his family and spending time alone with them.

Barnes also said that he quit his job as a roulette dealer in his native Australia to travel to California for his testimony and was staying at Neverland during his visit.

Earlier on Thursday Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville rejected a defense request to dismiss the charges against Jackson, a motion filed after prosecutors rested their case on Wednesday, 2 1/2 months into the trial.



After June 13th 2005, I put all of it behind me so I'm re-reading all of this
lol
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #310 posted 10/10/09 7:58pm

mimi07

avatar

bboy87 said:

lavenderfields said:



They also found kiddie porn along with the heterosexual porn. I am not an expert on porn in any way shape or form, but it seems to me if there is kiddie porn involved, there is more going on than meets the eye. I am sorry, but kiddie porn is just wrong and the implication of its existence in MJ's home indicates something sordid.

With respect to his supposed sexual relationship with Lisa Marie, gay men marry all the time and have sex with women. It does not prove anything. It is possible he may have had sex with Lisa Marie, but, I do not believe that sex with women was his preference. Do I know this for a fact? No I do not. Again, it is just my opinion based on what I have read on MJ over the years.

Um...they didn't find child pornography at Neverland neutral


i know! damn how informatmtion can get twisted lol

they found pics/painting of kids that we've all seen most of. also fans give him lots of stuff too when they know he's interested in them
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #311 posted 10/10/09 8:03pm

midnightmover

dearmother said:

midnightmover said:

They did apparently find gay porn at Neverland. When Wade Robson was being questioned that came out, according to Vanity Fair. In an attempt to get to the truth I asked MJ's defenders to produce that section of the transcripts but not a single one of them did (even though many of them have the transcripts on their hard drives).



i totally disproved your gay porn stance by looking up the so-called porn books. you've got amnesia
[Edited 10/10/09 19:52pm]

falloff Could your IQ possibly be any lower? There is only ONE BOOK named in there and it is NOT THE ONE that features the sex acts. I explained this to you before. Read the quotes and comprehend. wink
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #312 posted 10/10/09 8:06pm

midnightmover

mimi07 said:

midnightmover said:

Comic relief. Will Madonna still be doing her MJ tribute now that she knows what MJ really thought of her? hmmm lol

we don't know what he thought. he was talking a e madonna of the late 80's early 90's when he was a crazy badass. and he said motherhood would change her... she's obviously different

What the fuck are you talking about? He said "She's not a nice person" and listed her as someone who was jealous of him. He was hanging out with her in the early 90s but he was giving his opinion in the PRESENT TENSE!

But thanks for proving what Lavenderfields said about how blind MJ fans are. Even when something is right in front of you as plain as daylight you still choose not to see it. eek
[Edited 10/10/09 20:28pm]
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #313 posted 10/10/09 8:16pm

midnightmover

bboy87 said:[quote]

midnightmover said:



If I remember correctly, the photographer sent that to Michael as a gift or something


here's the court transcripts
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=4934ZTD9

Michael Jackson never molested us young men say
Thu May 5, 2005 08:21 PM ET

By Dan Whitcomb and Alexandria Sage

SANTA MARIA, Calif. (Reuters) - Two young men portrayed by prosecutors as Michael Jackson's victims when they were adolescents emphatically denied on Thursday that he ever abused them, as defense lawyers battled accusations that the pop star was a serial molester.

In dramatic testimony to open Jackson's defense case, both Wade Robson and Brett Barnes said they remained friends with the 46-year-old entertainer with whom they had shared a bed on countless occasions at his Neverland Valley Ranch.

"Did Mr. Jackson ever molest you at any time?" lead defense attorney Tom Mesereau asked Robson, a 22-year-old choreographer and former child dance prodigy who has worked with Britney Spears.

"Absolutely not," Robson responded.

"Did Mr. Jackson ever touch you in a sexual way?" Mesereau asked. "No, never," Robson said.

Earlier in the trial, a former Neverland maid testified that she saw Robson showering with Jackson, their underpants lying on the bathroom floor. But Robson, under questioning by Mesereau, said he never was in the shower with Jackson.

Another former Neverland employee had told the jury that she once saw
Jackson touch Barnes' buttocks when he was a teen. But Barnes, now 23, flatly rejected any suggestion of inappropriate behavior by the entertainer.

"Absolutely not and I can tell you if he had I wouldn't be here right now," he said. Asked if he was aware of the earlier testimony, a defiant Barnes said: "I am and I'm very mad about that because it's untrue. They are putting my name through dirt and I'm really, really, really not happy about it."

'I'M TELLING YOU NOTHING EVER HAPPENED'

Though the acccusations of Jackson's conduct with Robson and Barnes are not part of the current charges against him, legal experts say the testimony about the singer's past history with young boys may have been the most damaging part of the prosecution case.

On cross-examination, Deputy District Attorney Ron Zonen pressed both men over the propriety of young boys sleeping with a grown man and even challenged Robson's assertion Jackson had never touched him inappropriately.

"What you're really telling us is that nothing ever happened while you were awake," Zonen said to Robson at one point.

"I'm telling you nothing ever happened," Robson answered.

Zonen then showed him books with photos nude young boys seized from Jackson's home and asked if he would have concerns over sharing a bed with the owner of such materials.

Robson said no, but confronted by Zonen with another book that featured pictures of men engaged in various sex acts with each other and asked if he then had concerns, Robson quietly answered: "Yes, I guess so."


Mesereau tried to mitigate that testimony by saying that the books were seized from Jackson's large library, which was filled with a decade's worth of heterosexual magazines such as Playboy and Hustler.

Robson refused to agree that the material Zonen had shown him could be considered homoerotic and said he believed Jackson "has a sexual interest in women."

Under cross-examination both boys appeared to concede that Jackson had behaved toward them in a manner that prosecutors describe as grooming of potential victims -- asking for their trust, calling them members of his family and spending time alone with them.

Barnes also said that he quit his job as a roulette dealer in his native Australia to travel to California for his testimony and was staying at Neverland during his visit.

Earlier on Thursday Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville rejected a defense request to dismiss the charges against Jackson, a motion filed after prosecutors rested their case on Wednesday, 2 1/2 months into the trial.

This account confirms what Vanity Fair said! You guys who claim to know so much haven't even noticed this! eek
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #314 posted 10/10/09 8:17pm

dearmother

avatar

i bet madonna laughed when she heard about it, i would
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #315 posted 10/10/09 8:18pm

dearmother

avatar

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #316 posted 10/10/09 8:22pm

midnightmover

dearmother said:


This post is an admission of intellectual defeat on your part.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #317 posted 10/10/09 8:26pm

mimi07

avatar

midnightmover said:

mimi07 said:


we don't know what he thought. he was talking a e madonna of the late 80's early 90's when he was a crazy badass. and he said motherhood would change her... she's obviously different

What the fuck are you talking about? He said "She's not a nice person" and listed her as someone who was jealous of him. He was hanging out with her in the early 90s but he was giving his opinion in the PRESENT TENSE! But thanks for proving what was said earlier about how blind MJ fans are.
[Edited 10/10/09 20:09pm]

yeah present tense was almost 10 years ago, right smart ass and u chose to ignore when he said she might have changed.
[Edited 10/10/09 20:27pm]
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #318 posted 10/10/09 8:27pm

Arnotts

midnightmover said:

mimi07 said:


we don't know what he thought. he was talking a e madonna of the late 80's early 90's when he was a crazy badass. and he said motherhood would change her... she's obviously different

What the fuck are you talking about? He said "She's not a nice person" and listed her as someone who was jealous of him. He was hanging out with her in the early 90s but he was giving his opinion in the PRESENT TENSE! But thanks for proving what was said earlier about how blind MJ fans are.
[Edited 10/10/09 20:09pm]

Yes he was talking in the present tense but before that he stated 'when I was with her' which would of been back in the 90's. Michaels way of phrasing things isnt the best. But he definitley was talking about the experience he had with her in the 90's. Have you red the whole transcripts? It doesnt sound like it. Because he did go on to say motherhood would change her, even though she had been a mother for the past 3 or 4 years when he stated that but he probably hadnt met her again after that, besides the Liz Taylor event.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #319 posted 10/10/09 8:28pm

whatsgoingon

avatar

lavenderfields said:

Layzie said:



Yes, because if a man isn't trying to screw everything that comes his way can't be heterosexual. rolleyes

It's interesting that after all these years some people haven't grasp that fact that MJ was not normal. I love the man and his music, but I believe that he had deep issues with many subjects including sex. If you were raised by an overly religious mother, had grown women throw themselevs at you as a child, and had to lay in your bed while your father and brothers had sex with groupies you might have certain issues with sex too. And just because a person has issues with sex doesn't make them gay or asexual. The people who know him best all say that he wasn't gay. When the po-po raided his house during the '06 child abuse trial, they said that they found a shit load of (heterosexual) porn. LMP has stated many times that while they were married, he had a strong sexual appetite....
[Edited 10/10/09 15:05pm]
[Edited 10/10/09 15:06pm]


With respect to his supposed sexual relationship with Lisa Marie, gay men marry all the time and have sex with women. It does not prove anything. It is possible he may have had sex with Lisa Marie, but, I do not believe that sex with women was his preference. Do I know this for a fact? No I do not. Again, it is just my opinion based on what I have read on MJ over the years.


Well at least you concede that it is possible he had a sexual relationship with LMP, even though you believe he could still be gay. It's true there are lots of gay men that do and can have sexual relationships with women. That's the difference between someone like you and Midnightmover. Midnightmover believes and convince he is 100% right that MJ could not have a relationship with any woman because he was gay.

Now, I don't believe MJ was some playa, like some fans do, and he had women left, right and centre, he clearly wasn't a casanova. But if he was gay and had a double life, where are all the gay lovers? Why haven't they come out now and spoken up? There is more proof that he and Grace, the Nanny were lovers than him and any man.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #320 posted 10/10/09 8:30pm

mimi07

avatar

Arnotts said:

midnightmover said:


What the fuck are you talking about? He said "She's not a nice person" and listed her as someone who was jealous of him. He was hanging out with her in the early 90s but he was giving his opinion in the PRESENT TENSE! But thanks for proving what was said earlier about how blind MJ fans are.
[Edited 10/10/09 20:09pm]

Yes he was talking in the present tense but before that he stated 'when I was with her' which would of been back in the 90's. Michaels way of phrasing things isnt the best. But he definitley was talking about the experience he had with her in the 90's. Have you red the whole transcripts? It doesnt sound like it. Because he did go on to say motherhood would change her, even though she had been a mother for the past 3 or 4 years when he stated that but he probably hadnt met her again after that, besides the Liz Taylor event.


thank you...like i was saying
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #321 posted 10/10/09 8:33pm

mimi07

avatar

dearmother said:



lol ur right
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #322 posted 10/10/09 8:34pm

midnightmover

Arnotts said:

midnightmover said:


What the fuck are you talking about? He said "She's not a nice person" and listed her as someone who was jealous of him. He was hanging out with her in the early 90s but he was giving his opinion in the PRESENT TENSE! But thanks for proving what was said earlier about how blind MJ fans are.
[Edited 10/10/09 20:09pm]

Yes he was talking in the present tense but before that he stated 'when I was with her' which would of been back in the 90's. Michaels way of phrasing things isnt the best. But he definitley was talking about the experience he had with her in the 90's. Have you red the whole transcripts? It doesnt sound like it. Because he did go on to say motherhood would change her, even though she had been a mother for the past 3 or 4 years when he stated that but he probably hadnt met her again after that, besides the Liz Taylor event.

He was giving his opinion of her at the time of the interview. He said "SHE'S NOT A NICE PERSON". He described how jealous she was of him. Of course he gave examples of her rudeness from the the early 90s because that's when he was hanging out with her, but he was clearly giving his opinion in the PRESENT TENSE!
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #323 posted 10/10/09 8:36pm

Arnotts

For those of you who believe he's a pedophile I just want to know, when it comes to Macauley Culkin, Brett Barnes, Emanual, and the like, do you believe he picked and chose who he would molest and they werent part of it, or do you think they're lying when they say that he didnt? I've always been curious about there opinion on that. I just think out of all the boys Macauley was the one he was most taken with, of course I don't mean that in a sexual way as I don't believe he was a pedophile but I look at it as the way your taken with a friend, like a best friend. But someone who views him as having more sinister thoughts I wonder what there view on that is.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #324 posted 10/10/09 8:39pm

Arnotts

midnightmover said:

Arnotts said:


Yes he was talking in the present tense but before that he stated 'when I was with her' which would of been back in the 90's. Michaels way of phrasing things isnt the best. But he definitley was talking about the experience he had with her in the 90's. Have you red the whole transcripts? It doesnt sound like it. Because he did go on to say motherhood would change her, even though she had been a mother for the past 3 or 4 years when he stated that but he probably hadnt met her again after that, besides the Liz Taylor event.

He was giving his opinion of her at the time of the interview. He said "SHE'S NOT A NICE PERSON". He described how jealous she was of him. Of course he gave examples of her rudeness from the the early 90s because that's when he was hanging out with her, but he was clearly giving his opinion in the PRESENT TENSE!

Yes, I get that, but he hadnt met her in the present tense. He hadnt seen her since the 1991 event so all he had to base his thoughts on was that time. How can you not get that? Thats what we mean, even if he was talking in the present tense he was still talking about the way she was when he knew her.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #325 posted 10/10/09 8:39pm

midnightmover

whatsgoingon said:

lavenderfields said:



With respect to his supposed sexual relationship with Lisa Marie, gay men marry all the time and have sex with women. It does not prove anything. It is possible he may have had sex with Lisa Marie, but, I do not believe that sex with women was his preference. Do I know this for a fact? No I do not. Again, it is just my opinion based on what I have read on MJ over the years.


Well at least you concede that it is possible he had a sexual relationship with LMP, even though you believe he could still be gay. It's true there are lots of gay men that do and can have sexual relationships with women. That's the difference between someone like you and Midnightmover. Midnightmover believes and convince he is 100% right that MJ could not have a relationship with any woman because he was gay.

Now, I don't believe MJ was some playa, like some fans do, and he had women left, right and centre, he clearly wasn't a casanova. But if he was gay and had a double life, where are all the gay lovers? Why haven't they come out now and spoken up? There is more proof that he and Grace, the Nanny were lovers than him and any man.

Stop lying! I've said a million times that I think he had sex with Lisa Marie. The fact that you are misrepresenting me so brazenly shows why your posts can't be taken seriously. First you resort to wild speculations about my sexuality, then to complete lies about my arguments. Like most MJ defenders you have an appalling lack of integrity.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #326 posted 10/10/09 8:44pm

midnightmover

Arnotts said:

midnightmover said:


He was giving his opinion of her at the time of the interview. He said "SHE'S NOT A NICE PERSON". He described how jealous she was of him. Of course he gave examples of her rudeness from the the early 90s because that's when he was hanging out with her, but he was clearly giving his opinion in the PRESENT TENSE!

Yes, I get that, but he hadnt met her in the present tense. He hadnt seen her since the 1991 event so all he had to base his thoughts on was that time. How can you not get that? Thats what we mean, even if he was talking in the present tense he was still talking about the way she was when he knew her.

You've now completely changed your argument. You're now simply saying that his opinion was BASED around his past experiences with her. But whatever his opinion was BASED ON, there is no question that the opinion expressed in those tapes reflects the way he felt at the present time. What that opinion was BASED ON is another issue.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #327 posted 10/10/09 8:48pm

lavenderfields

mimi07 said:[quote]

bboy87 said:


Um...they didn't find child pornography at Neverland neutral


i know! damn how informatmtion can get twisted lol


I cannot say what evidence found at Neverland Ranch was officially presented at trial of the top of my head but apparently the following is an offical list of evidence that was found at the ranch. Whether it was or was not presented at trial I am not sure. However, whether it was presented or not to me does not matter as there are sometimes many legal loopholes which preclude evidence from being presented. What is important to me, is the list of items found at Neverland. This, in and of itself is enough for me to form an opinion. See below. This is from a website that listed the partial items seized:


This is only a partial list of what was found in the Neverland search.
I emphasize that: a partial list.
I’ve summarized the official descriptions of these pieces of evidence,
hence the numerous elipses.

A few points of interest to note:

1. Contrary to the f’loons claims, a number of nudie male materials were found. Remember, this is just part of the list, it doesn’t include, for instance, some of the nude guy materials we already know about.

2. MJ had Macauley’s photo in his _bathroom_. Where a lot of his porn was found (plus some bottles of booze not included in this particular list). This, f’loons, is the bathroom used by the boys who spent time in MJ’s bedroom.

3. The cops retrieved a couple of bags containing, among other things, bloody bedsheets and nine pairs of men’s underwear from the *library area of the upstairs video/arcade room*!

4. This partial list goes far to illustrate how Neverland was _loaded_ with porn. They found it everywhere. Note that most of it was freely available to kids. Very little was locked up.

5. Check out the drug stuff. It’s well known that MJ has a substance abuse problem, and that he’s hooked on Xanax. Look at all the prescriptions found in other people’s names. Note that his bestest, most favorite DERMATOLOGIST buddy doctor – Dr. Arnold Klein – wrote a prescription for Xanax for MJ’s dear friend Frank Tyson, which was found in MJ’s possession. What’s a dermatologist doing writing a scrip for mood-altering drug?
Also note that a Las Vegas physician wrote two other scrips for Xanax, *neither* of which were in MJ’s name, but both of which were found in his possession.
And Dr. Klein wrote another prescription for another person whose given address was actually that of a television production company!
Plus the syringe. Plus the ‘unidentified substance’ which was sent off to the state lab for testing.
Plus the letter from MJ’s physician about detox programs.
Put it all together and what do you get?

Here we go:
Item number 301…five DVD media covers…the covers indicated the contents were films from the Hustler ‘Barely Legal’ series…

…Item number 302 was described as a pornographic magazine located within the master bathroom at the Neverland Ranch residence. …I found it to be a periodical entitled, ‘The Best of Club’…

…Item number 303..three books that contained nude photographs, found in the master bedroom within the Neverland Ranch… …the first book was… titled Scenes D’Interieur…The book consisted of a compilation of photographs of nude and/or semi-nude women, in sexually explicit poses.
…The second book was…Camp Cove – Photos Sydney Men… the book was a compilation of naked and semi-naked men…
…The third book was…titled Dressup: Playacts and Fantasies of Childhood. …This book appeared to be a compilation of photographs that appeared to depict either pre-teen or early teen age individuals. Some of the pictured children were nude and/or semi-nude.

…Item Number 304. This item was described as being two pornographic magazines and two nude art books found in the master bathroom at the Neverland Ranch. …The Gynoids appeared to have a fetish (bondage, sadomasochism, piercings, etc.) related theme.

…Item number 305…a photograph of Macauley Culkin, which was located in the master bathroom…

…Item number 306…a pornographic magazine located within a metal brief case in the master bathroom…

…Item number 307…a book, which contained nude photographs of men…found in the master bathroom…titled Bidgood…a compilation of photographs of nude and semi-nude men.

…Item Number 309…a black leather bag, which contained pornographic magazines and pornographic DVDs.

…Within a separate compartment within this front portion of the briefcase…a 5cc syringe (no needle).

…On the reverse side of the briefcase was a compartment that contained miscellaneous loose papers and envelopes.
…There was a postcard depicting young boys (clothed) lined up at a urinal.

…The main compartment contained miscellaneous paperwork, pornographic periodicals…and two DVD cases that appeared to contain pornographic material…the first DVD was titled Michael Ryan’s Believe It Or Not…the second DVD was titled Sloppy Dogs Presents: Fuck Me, I’m A Bad Girl.

…a letter from a student Councilor/Teacher…wrote of a desire to bring a group of children to California for the purposes of meeting with Michael Jackson.

…a greeting card from Erma J. Lardydell…the writer indicated she sang with Michael Jackson and provided the name of her son, Prince Alba, who was thirteen years of age…

…The final items within this compartment were the May 2002 issue of Gallery and the September 2002 issue of Gallery.

Item Number 313…a book that contained nude photographs. This item was located in the master bathroom…This book was titled Naked As A Jaybird…some of the pictures depicted sexually explicit activities.

…Item Number 505. This item was described as being three books with photographs of nude and partially clothed children. This item was found in the downstairs cellar area of the video/arcade area.

Item number 508…a book depicting nude children…titled The Fourth Sex, Adolescent Extremes…some of the pictures depicted individuals wearing no clothing, or in a state of partial dress…

Item Number 509…a book…titled Cronos…the book appeared to be a compilation of numerous photographs depicting men, women, and children of both sexes…the majority of the photographs depicted the subjects completely unclothed, including the male and female children…

…Item Number 510…two bags of miscellaneous underclothes and bloodied bed linen…located in the upstairs library room of the video/arcade area. The Disneyland bag contained a red Prada brand, long-sleeve shirt…I also found the bag to contain a white cotton sheet with reddish brown stains on it, which I believed were consistent with blood staining. The Garden City Hotel bag had a white Harbor Bay long-sleeved cotton shirt; a folded cotton bed sheet…and numerous pairs of size 30 cotton briefs…in total, there were nine pair of men’s cotton brief underwear. Some of the briefs had discolorations and/or stains, but all pairs appeared to have been washed.

Item number 514…the glass vial…seemed to contain remnants of a substance…submitted to the California…Crime Laboratory…

Item Number 515…medicine bottles, found in the upstairs library room of the video arcade area…four prescription bottles…

…the first bottle indicated the prescription was prescribed to a subject named Michael Armstrong…the prescription was for Percocet…

…the second bottle…to Peter Midani…it should be noted this address was also associated with a Grace Rwarambu (the nanny) …the location is actually a television production company…prescribing physician was a Dr. Klein…contained Prednisone…

…third bottle prescribed to ‘M.M.’…contents were…’Erytab’…
…fourth bottle indicated the intended recipient of the prescription was Frank Tyson…Dr. Arnold Klein…Beverly Hills…prescribed this medication…The prescription was for Alprazolam …

Item Number 518…prescription paperwork…a prescription for Frank Tyson…for Alprazolam…prescribing physician was Dr. William VanValin…a prescription for a Manuel Rivera…for Xanax…the prescribing physician was a Dr. William VanValin.

Item Number 349…paperwork found within the master bathroom…letter is addressed to ‘Dearest MJ’…the letter indicated it was from Dr. Farshchian…The letter pertains to a ‘program’ for outpatient detoxification…

Item Number 1001…Barely Legal magazine…found in the museum/office area…

Item number 1002…a magazine, found in the museum/office area…the December 2002 issue of ‘Naughty Neighbors’…

Item #365…two hardbound books…’Robert Maxwell Photographs’…’The Christy Report Exploring The Outer Edges of the Sexual Experience’…

Item Number 366…several books and magazines…located within the master bedroom/den area…
…five copies of ‘The Nudist’…contained nude photographs of men, women, and children…

…19 copies of ‘The Nudist, Sunshine and Health’…contained photographs of nude men, women, and children…

…one magazine titled ‘Solair Universelle Day Nudisme’…contained photographs of nude men, women, and children…

…a magazine titled ‘American Sunbather’…contained photographs of nude men, women, and children…

…three issues of ‘Eden’…contained photographs of nude men, women, and children…

…a softcover book…titled Man, a Sexual Study of Man…depicted naked males engaged in sexually explicit activities including oral copulation and anal sex…

…a softcover book…titled Taormina Wilhelm Von Gloeden…a compilation of photographs, which depicted both adult and juvenile males, who were posed in the nude…

…a softcover book…titled The Golden Age Of Neglect…the sexual behavior depicted in this book contained photography which depicted both male and female subjects, in various stages of undress, including full nudity. Some of the photographs depicted sexually explicit activity, including oral sex, masturbation, and digital penetration…the subjects appear to be within the age range of late adolescence to early adults…

…hard cover book…titled Before the Hand of Man…a compilation of photographs which depict nude males… hard cover book…titled Bob and Rod…a compilation of photographs of two adult males, who for the most part, were pictured in full and partial nudity…

MJ once wrote a note to his late sister-in-law:
“Dee Dee Please read this article about child malestation [sic] and please read it to Taj, T.S. and Tarryl [her children]. It brings out how even your own reletives [sic] can be malesters [sic] of children, or even uncle or aunts malesting [sic] nephew or nieces. Please read.”

http://www.courttv.com/ne...y2/17.html
[Edited 10/10/09 20:48pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #328 posted 10/10/09 8:50pm

Arnotts

midnightmover said:

Arnotts said:


Yes, I get that, but he hadnt met her in the present tense. He hadnt seen her since the 1991 event so all he had to base his thoughts on was that time. How can you not get that? Thats what we mean, even if he was talking in the present tense he was still talking about the way she was when he knew her.

You've now completely changed your argument. You're now simply saying that his opinion was BASED around his past experiences with her. But whatever his opinion was BASED ON, there is no question that the opinion expressed in those tapes reflects the way he felt at the present time. What that opinion was BASED ON is another issue.

I havent changed my argument. I've been saying that from the start. Can you explain to me what exactly I've changed? I stated from the start he was always talking present tense. But he was still talking about past situations, because he has NO current situation to talk of her about. Maybe you cant see that, but I'm sure Madonna realises the way she was back then and why he thought of her like that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #329 posted 10/10/09 8:53pm

midnightmover

Arnotts said:

midnightmover said:


You've now completely changed your argument. You're now simply saying that his opinion was BASED around his past experiences with her. But whatever his opinion was BASED ON, there is no question that the opinion expressed in those tapes reflects the way he felt at the present time. What that opinion was BASED ON is another issue.

I havent changed my argument. I've been saying that from the start. Can you explain to me what exactly I've changed? I stated from the start he was always talking present tense. But he was still talking about past situations, because he has NO current situation to talk of her about. Maybe you cant see that, but I'm sure Madonna realises the way she was back then and why he thought of her like that.

If you agree with me that he was giving his opinion in the present tense then there was really no reason for you to respond to me at all. We agree. He didn't like her.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 11 of 14 « First<567891011121314>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > MJ tapes transcripts