independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Thu 20th Nov 2008 1:00pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > The FOO FIGHTERS do a STUNNING remake..
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
AuthorMessage
Thread started 08/02/08 12:31pm

LoveAlive

The FOO FIGHTERS do a STUNNING remake..

This is one of the best remakes I have ever heard..

I dunno if you all remember the song "Baker Street" by Gerry Rafferty(if not,:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgbGaYTkkPU)

but here's the Foo Fighters remake: http://www.youtube.com/wa...xdBNCovYBc

I still love the orig better(gotta love that sax part!) but I think the Foo Fighters did an EXCELLENT remake!
[Edited 8/2/08 12:31pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 08/02/08 12:35pm

Dance

They should NEVER do covers for any reason EVER.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 08/02/08 12:36pm

LoveAlive

Dance said:

They should NEVER do covers for any reason EVER.


u didnt like their cover of BAKER STREET? I loved it!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 08/02/08 1:00pm

horatio

avatar

love

The Vogue of Imitation
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 08/02/08 2:06pm

shorttrini

avatar

I like their cover of "Band On The Run", better.

"Love is like peeing in your pants, everyone sees it but only you feel its warmth"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 08/02/08 2:47pm

728huey

avatar

It was a nice cover, but there's something about the original that makes it unique and timeless. I think it was the first major hit that used an instrumental chorus to carry the song, and the sax solo really stood out from the rest of the song. Granted, the guitar licks on the Foo Fighters cover was faithful to the original, but it just sounds like another guitar solo.

typing

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 08/02/08 2:52pm

RodeoSchro

Meh. Inferior drumming. Too much distortion in the rhythm guitar. Just shows that bands forgot how to write licks and hooks about 18 years ago.

Proud Member of Ivy's Posse!!!!!!!

Second Funkiest White Man in America

McCain = Bush = Failed policies. NO MORE!

WWW.NIGHTRANGER.COM
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 08/02/08 2:54pm

namepeace

avatar

LoveAlive said:

Dance said:

They should NEVER do covers for any reason EVER.


u didnt like their cover of BAKER STREET? I loved it!


Dance doesn't like many things. FYI.

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder

It's Great Gettin' Up Mornin' In America
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 08/02/08 2:57pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

728huey said:

It was a nice cover, but there's something about the original that makes it unique and timeless. I think it was the first major hit that used an instrumental chorus to carry the song, and the sax solo really stood out from the rest of the song. Granted, the guitar licks on the Foo Fighters cover was faithful to the original, but it just sounds like another guitar solo.

typing



I also think they stripped the subtlety from the song.
I do think someone should remake it, but maybe not the Foo Fighters.
SNOW PATROL should cover Baker Street.

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, 44TH PRESIDENT ELECT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

YES WE CAN! CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 08/02/08 2:57pm

RodeoSchro

RodeoSchro said:

Meh. Inferior drumming. Too much distortion in the rhythm guitar. Just shows that bands forgot how to write licks and hooks about 18 years ago.


I'm listening to Gerry Rafferty's original version right now. The Foo Fighters didn't even come close to matching Rafferty.

Dance is right. The Foo Fighters should not do covers because it shows they are not very good musicians. Certainly not compared to the bands they're trying to cover.

Proud Member of Ivy's Posse!!!!!!!

Second Funkiest White Man in America

McCain = Bush = Failed policies. NO MORE!

WWW.NIGHTRANGER.COM
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 08/02/08 3:01pm

RodeoSchro

The Foo Fighters need to take lessons on playing "Baker Street" from these guys:

Proud Member of Ivy's Posse!!!!!!!

Second Funkiest White Man in America

McCain = Bush = Failed policies. NO MORE!

WWW.NIGHTRANGER.COM
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 08/02/08 9:19pm

Kim69

I love the Foo Fighters....hate that cover though....bad idea for them to even try without taking it a little more serious. sad

'Love will be your Soldier' - Nikka Costa

http://ddirtyshow.podomatic.com/
hiphopwithaqueerview
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 08/03/08 10:00pm

kcwm

avatar

So I take it you guys hate the Foos cover of Darling Nikki too razz

Receiving transmission from David Bowie's nipple antenna. Do you read me Lieutenant Bowie, I said do you read me...Lieutenant Bowie
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 08/04/08 12:11am

xperience319

avatar

LoveAlive said:

The FOO FIGHTERS do a STUNNING remake..


LoveAlive said:

FOO FIGHTERS do a STUNNING remake..


LoveAlive said:

FOO FIGHTERS STUNNING


LoveAlive said:

STUNNING


LoveAlive said:

...



disbelief

cop Uh-oh Meow85 is here! Everybody act politically correct! cop
FaceDownUnder.com - Aussie fansite
pussy Thanks to ToraToraDreams for the pussy! pussy
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 08/04/08 7:13am

liltalkm

This is one of my favorite covers of all time too.

Let the haters hate, but when you consider the original, the Foo's version just rocks.


Later

I'm not, I'm not gonna just sit here
and let this go to waste
watching the clock tick on my life
This time, this times gonna be different
'cause I know what I want
Listing the people I'm taking down
This is what I'm fighting for.

The Left Side -
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 08/04/08 7:16am

RipHer2Shreds

avatar

Somebody brought this cover version into the conversation a while back on here. The sax is kinda cheesy in the original, but given that the song is about a sax player who makes his money playing in subway stations, it fits the song. The guitar in the remake doesn't work for me.

Blanche: Oh, I do love the rain so! It reminds me of my first kiss.
Dorothy: Awww, your first kiss was in the rain...
Blanche: No, it was in the shower.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 08/04/08 7:20am

RodeoSchro

kcwm said:

So I take it you guys hate the Foos cover of Darling Nikki too razz


All they did was try to play Prince's version note-for-note. What's the point of that?

You bring up a good point - what is a cover? What should it be? I've thought about it and it's hard to come up with good covers. Most are like the "Darling Nikki" type - simply a copy.

Others are like "Baker Street" - failed attempts at living up the greatness of the original. Either because of a bad interpretation, poor musicianship, or both.

In any case, there's almost nowhere to go with a cover except down.

I think the best place for covers is for brand-new artists trying to get attention. Cover an innocuous song - like Tiffany did with Tommy James' "I Think We're Alone Now".

Or, if you are a fantastic vocalist, you can attempt a cover as a way of showing off your voice.

And finally, covers are cool in concert. There, it's more like an attempt to keep a party going than anything else.

The only good covers that come to my mind are Prince's - he did Joan Osborne's "One of Us" right, and the version of "Guitar" that he released could arguably be called a cover version of his own song.

Proud Member of Ivy's Posse!!!!!!!

Second Funkiest White Man in America

McCain = Bush = Failed policies. NO MORE!

WWW.NIGHTRANGER.COM
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 08/04/08 9:40am

LinnLM1

They do a great job covering "Baker St."

the music knows what your motives are when you are making it

listen to The Replacements - its good for the soul
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 08/04/08 12:00pm

RodeoSchro

LinnLM1 said:

They do a great job covering "Baker St."


Your signature reminded me that I've been meaning to check out the Replacements.

Proud Member of Ivy's Posse!!!!!!!

Second Funkiest White Man in America

McCain = Bush = Failed policies. NO MORE!

WWW.NIGHTRANGER.COM
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 08/04/08 12:35pm

lastdecember

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

RodeoSchro said:

Meh. Inferior drumming. Too much distortion in the rhythm guitar. Just shows that bands forgot how to write licks and hooks about 18 years ago.


I'm listening to Gerry Rafferty's original version right now. The Foo Fighters didn't even come close to matching Rafferty.

Dance is right. The Foo Fighters should not do covers because it shows they are not very good musicians. Certainly not compared to the bands they're trying to cover.


Rick Springfield nailed it on his covers album back in 2005 "the day after yesterday". He kept all the things needed and didnt alter a thing, some times it helps when the person doing the cover actual was a recording artist when it came out, the Foo Fighters, though a pretty good band, were barely born.


Rick Springfield - Venus in Overdrive
check out Stefani Vara "Water" http://www.myspace.com/stefanivara
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 08/04/08 12:59pm

Rightly

avatar

I liked it

but it´s in no way stunning

Their "band on the run" is good too.

Both contemporary and mainstream in sound, but lack that creative dynamic energy that the originals have.

small circles, big wheels!

say something once, why say it again?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 08/04/08 5:21pm

kcwm

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

kcwm said:

So I take it you guys hate the Foos cover of Darling Nikki too razz


All they did was try to play Prince's version note-for-note. What's the point of that?

You bring up a good point - what is a cover? What should it be? I've thought about it and it's hard to come up with good covers. Most are like the "Darling Nikki" type - simply a copy.

Others are like "Baker Street" - failed attempts at living up the greatness of the original. Either because of a bad interpretation, poor musicianship, or both.

In any case, there's almost nowhere to go with a cover except down.

I think the best place for covers is for brand-new artists trying to get attention. Cover an innocuous song - like Tiffany did with Tommy James' "I Think We're Alone Now".

Or, if you are a fantastic vocalist, you can attempt a cover as a way of showing off your voice.

And finally, covers are cool in concert. There, it's more like an attempt to keep a party going than anything else.

The only good covers that come to my mind are Prince's - he did Joan Osborne's "One of Us" right, and the version of "Guitar" that he released could arguably be called a cover version of his own song.


I love it when bands totally change songs when they cover them, good examples would have to be "Seven Nation Army" covered by The Flaming Lips, even the Scissor Sisters cover of "Comfortably Numb" is great

Receiving transmission from David Bowie's nipple antenna. Do you read me Lieutenant Bowie, I said do you read me...Lieutenant Bowie
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > The FOO FIGHTERS do a STUNNING remake..