This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.
Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)| Author | Message |
Prince #29 on RS "Fifty Greatest Artists of All Time" Prince is # 29 in Rolling Stone magazine's cover story about "The Immortals: The Fifty Greatest Artists of All Time".
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lets do this...ill post the two oft repeated statements and then we can lock this thread up and save net space, k? Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
hes actually at no 28 woohooo If the milk turns out to be sour i aint the kinda pussy to drink it!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
EVERY music magazine seems to do this kind of thing @LEAST once a year;it's old!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
10 ahaed of john Lennon and one behind Nirvana If the milk turns out to be sour i aint the kinda pussy to drink it!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The Immortals are the greatest rock & roll artists of all time. They are also more than that. The fifty men, women and bands celebrated in the following pages (and in an exclusive photo gallery) are the singers, songwriters, record makers and performers who are continually in the music -- as pioneers, teachers and stars; touching our souls and pulling us to our feet, on a daily basis -- even when they are no longer with us.
If the milk turns out to be sour i aint the kinda pussy to drink it!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NPGFlav said: Prince is # 29 in Rolling Stone magazine's cover story about "The Immortals: The Fifty Greatest Artists of All Time".
I am never surprised by these majority white owned magz always rank the the beatles,elvis,and the RS as the top 3 of whatever pole that is taken. They should never be ranked higher than Little Richard , Chuck Berry or James Brown because they were influenced by these black artist. They should be in the top 10 but the first 3 spots is just disrespectful! Rollingstone saya that the poll was answered by these musicians peers but i seriously doubt it! Prince should be way ahead of nirvana and probably ranked in the late teens.The story is laid out so other artists write about theese fifty names and it's Amir Thompson (?uestlove) that's writin' about Prince. The first spots are as expected reserved for The Beatles, Elivs and The Rolling Stones. Other names inlclude: Michael Jackson #35 (by Anthony La Reid), David Bowie #39(by Lou Reed), Sly And The Family Stone #43 (by Don Was), Public Enemy #44 (by Adam Yauch) and Run-D.M.C #48 (by Chuck D) Check it ouuuut! PazFredPeaceFriedePax /David, Sweden U,ME,WE!....2FUNKY! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ELBOOGY said: NPGFlav said: Prince is # 29 in Rolling Stone magazine's cover story about "The Immortals: The Fifty Greatest Artists of All Time".
I am never surprised by these majority white owned magz always rank the the beatles,elvis,and the RS as the top 3 of whatever pole that is taken. They should never be ranked higher than Little Richard , Chuck Berry or James Brown because they were influenced by these black artist. They should be in the top 10 but the first 3 spots is just disrespectful! Rollingstone saya that the poll was answered by these musicians peers but i seriously doubt it! Prince should be way ahead of nirvana and probably ranked in the late teens.The story is laid out so other artists write about theese fifty names and it's Amir Thompson (?uestlove) that's writin' about Prince. The first spots are as expected reserved for The Beatles, Elivs and The Rolling Stones. Other names inlclude: Michael Jackson #35 (by Anthony La Reid), David Bowie #39(by Lou Reed), Sly And The Family Stone #43 (by Don Was), Public Enemy #44 (by Adam Yauch) and Run-D.M.C #48 (by Chuck D) Check it ouuuut! PazFredPeaceFriedePax /David, Sweden And where in the hell is George Clinton/Parliment Funkadelic who would blow the Rolling Stones of the stage!!!!! U,ME,WE!....2FUNKY! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
its hard for me to think of 28 artist being better than prince, and as for nirvana being ahead of prince, thats just a joke, an absolute joke | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
36) Madonna by Britney Spears
Sumtimez It Snowz In April
Joy y don't u love me baby joy y can't u love me baby Joy come on and love me baby joy in repetition | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
radici27 said: its hard for me to think of 28 artist being better than prince, and as for nirvana being ahead of prince, thats just a joke, an absolute joke
Same feeling here, he's easily worthy of a spot in the top 10. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: lets do this...ill post the two oft repeated statements and then we can lock this thread up and save net space, k?
Comment Number 1) Gosh!! How come people just cant realize the genious that is Prince..He deserves to be way higher then [insert artist here]. Rolling Stone is stupid!!! Its the same people that put the Olsen Twins on the cover..Completly out of touch.. and then Comment Number 2) Its just a list people..calm down!! Its only an opinion and you know what? Prince doesnt deserve to be higher....Cause he isnt as talented as [insert artist here] The people that run 'Rolling Stone' must be part of the MTV click. The have lost touch with what real artist and 'rock and roll' is all about. If anybody remembers not too long ago 'Rolling Stone' came out with a list of the 'greatest guitar players of all time and I dont believe 'Prince' was even on the list. How can you leave this guy off of any guitar list when you look at the top players in music in the last 20 to 30 years? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SunDance said: radici27 said: its hard for me to think of 28 artist being better than prince, and as for nirvana being ahead of prince, thats just a joke, an absolute joke
Same feeling here, he's easily worthy of a spot in the top 10. U,ME,WE!....2FUNKY! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cool! Fuck this tame shit, who wants some "Head"? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
funny he makes this but not there 100 best guitar players | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
These list are bogus at best. I form my own opinions don't need nobody telling me who's great and who ain't. Prince is better than most on the list. And no Parliament/Funkadelic, Supremes, Temptations, EWF...PLEEASSE!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
how cool! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fans when Rolling Stone bag/don't acknowledge their favourite artists:
Join the Peace Industry! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[color=darkred:fcc6f6cf0e]i am glad that he is [/i][/b][/color]AT [color=darkred:f071342a3b]least acknowledged . i am that he has made the list even at that high of a number. those artists have made names for themselves for all different reasons, so i am glad that he is on the countdown. that is great. he beat michael jackson and that is a zillion times better than not beating Jacko.[/color]
rosemary | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I got my copy from Barnes and Noble yesterday!! "Just like the sun, the Rainbow Children rise."
"I'm gonna make u happy baby...happier than happy itself..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
/David, Sweden[/quote]I am never surprised by these majority white owned magz always rank the the beatles,elvis,and the RS as the top 3 of whatever pole that is taken. They should never be ranked higher than Little Richard , Chuck Berry or James Brown because they were influenced by these black artist. They should be in the top 10 but the first 3 spots is just disrespectful! Rollingstone saya that the poll was answered by these musicians peers but i seriously doubt it! Prince should be way ahead of nirvana and probably ranked in the late teens.[/quote]
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ELBOOGY said: NPGFlav said: Prince is # 29 in Rolling Stone magazine's cover story about "The Immortals: The Fifty Greatest Artists of All Time".
I am never surprised by these majority white owned magz always rank the the beatles,elvis,and the RS as the top 3 of whatever pole that is taken. They should never be ranked higher than Little Richard , Chuck Berry or James Brown because they were influenced by these black artist. They should be in the top 10 but the first 3 spots is just disrespectful! Rollingstone saya that the poll was answered by these musicians peers but i seriously doubt it! Prince should be way ahead of nirvana and probably ranked in the late teens.The story is laid out so other artists write about theese fifty names and it's Amir Thompson (?uestlove) that's writin' about Prince. The first spots are as expected reserved for The Beatles, Elivs and The Rolling Stones. Other names inlclude: Michael Jackson #35 (by Anthony La Reid), David Bowie #39(by Lou Reed), Sly And The Family Stone #43 (by Don Was), Public Enemy #44 (by Adam Yauch) and Run-D.M.C #48 (by Chuck D) Check it ouuuut! PazFredPeaceFriedePax /David, Sweden How freaky...right when I read that list, I thought the exact same thing. So So true. These list never mean anything. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Two ideas come to mind when reading this list
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I dont think you really really can rate artists. Do you? I mean they all have their strengths and their weaknesses. I love the Beatles, but they definatly could not dance like JAmes Brown or Michale Jackson, and I dont think anyone could play instruments like Prince. I dont know... Just a thought. What do you think? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think it's a friggin joke that people actually refer to these kind of lists as "white lists" then bitch about not having guys like James Brown near the top. Just what exactly are you trying to prove here? That your "black lists" mean more than the "white lists" out there? Seems pretty hypocritical to me.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"I am never surprised by these majority white owned magz always rank the the beatles,elvis,and the RS as the top 3 of whatever pole that is taken. They should never be ranked higher than Little Richard , Chuck Berry or James Brown because they were influenced by these black artist. They should be in the top 10 but the first 3 spots is just disrespectful! Rollingstone saya that the poll was answered by these musicians peers but i seriously doubt it! Prince should be way ahead of nirvana and probably ranked in the late teens."
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.