independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Tue 23rd Oct 2018 11:24am
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The Estate Discussion - Part 16
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #150 posted 10/06/18 2:13pm

206Michelle

PennyPurple said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Another crazy filed saying she is P's wife.

I cant read her writing.

I think the first name is Yolanda?

Isn't it to late for that? It should be thrown out, shouldn't it?

One would think so.

Live 4 Love ~ Love is God, God is love, Girls and boys love God above
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #151 posted 10/07/18 8:06am

1Sasha

Since the estate will be open for many more years to come, I am sure the occasional deluded person will pop up to claim something or other.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #152 posted 10/10/18 8:39pm

PennyPurple

avatar

Does this mean that there may be a Cirque de Solei show in the works?



Applicants have made requests for compensation in categories other than those discussed above, such as Fee Petition, General, Short Form Agreements, UMG Agreement, Meetings with Clients, Bravado, Estate Investors, Travel, Cirque de Solei, Sirius, Court Appearance and Filings, Prince Act, Tidal, etc. In respect these categories not addressed above, the Applicants have failed to provide affidavit or other submissions adequately showing any benefit or other qualifying element of the statute. Also, there have been requests for costs without an adequate showing as to how the costs were tied to services about which a benefit was shown. In short, Applicants (1) have failed to adequately show how the services (and time entries) in these other categories or costs were to the extent of contributions to a benefit, and (2) have failed to adequately show, or provide any information as to, how the compensation associated with these services (and time entries) or costs were “commensurate” with any benefit “from” such services.


http://www.mncourts.gov/m...-Issue.pdf

[Edited 10/10/18 20:40pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #153 posted 10/10/18 8:44pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

PennyPurple said:

Does this mean that there may be a Cirque de Solei show in the works?



Applicants have made requests for compensation in categories other than those discussed above, such as Fee Petition, General, Short Form Agreements, UMG Agreement, Meetings with Clients, Bravado, Estate Investors, Travel, Cirque de Solei, Sirius, Court Appearance and Filings, Prince Act, Tidal, etc. In respect these categories not addressed above, the Applicants have failed to provide affidavit or other submissions adequately showing any benefit or other qualifying element of the statute. Also, there have been requests for costs without an adequate showing as to how the costs were tied to services about which a benefit was shown. In short, Applicants (1) have failed to adequately show how the services (and time entries) in these other categories or costs were to the extent of contributions to a benefit, and (2) have failed to adequately show, or provide any information as to, how the compensation associated with these services (and time entries) or costs were “commensurate” with any benefit “from” such services.


http://www.mncourts.gov/m...-Issue.pdf

[Edited 10/10/18 20:40pm]



Sounds like at the very least, it was discussed at one time.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #154 posted 10/10/18 8:53pm

PennyPurple

avatar

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

PennyPurple said:

Does this mean that there may be a Cirque de Solei show in the works?



Applicants have made requests for compensation in categories other than those discussed above, such as Fee Petition, General, Short Form Agreements, UMG Agreement, Meetings with Clients, Bravado, Estate Investors, Travel, Cirque de Solei, Sirius, Court Appearance and Filings, Prince Act, Tidal, etc. In respect these categories not addressed above, the Applicants have failed to provide affidavit or other submissions adequately showing any benefit or other qualifying element of the statute. Also, there have been requests for costs without an adequate showing as to how the costs were tied to services about which a benefit was shown. In short, Applicants (1) have failed to adequately show how the services (and time entries) in these other categories or costs were to the extent of contributions to a benefit, and (2) have failed to adequately show, or provide any information as to, how the compensation associated with these services (and time entries) or costs were “commensurate” with any benefit “from” such services.


http://www.mncourts.gov/m...-Issue.pdf

[Edited 10/10/18 20:40pm]



Sounds like at the very least, it was discussed at one time.

Interesting. I think that would be awesome.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #155 posted 10/16/18 9:17am

ChocolateBox31
21

I do admit I like how CoAmerica Bank is handling Prince's estate.

So Prince, whom fought 4 his first record deal & got it, fought 4 a movie deal & got it, fought 4 freedom from his WB contract & got it, fought 4 his masters & got them.Gets a curable illness & says 2 himself ok, I'm done. "Life is a Box Of Chocolates"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The Estate Discussion - Part 16