independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > no murder charge likely in prince's death CBS news - Part 2
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 26 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 03/08/18 1:02pm

laurarichardso
n

fortuneandserendipity said:

laurarichardson said:


But there is a big difference between removed once upon a time, as in given up or to be replaced - and cameras removed by someone suspiciously. What I was meaning in that context, I don't see anyone 'suspiciously' removing cameras. The way it's worded in the search warrant, there wasn't a live system there. Therefore nothing to take away.

If he had a system once and the warrant is telling you none is there. Would that not mean it was taken away? True we do not know when but at some point in time this system was removed.

I do not think anything is suspicious about it. The person who payed the bills have them moved.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 03/08/18 1:23pm

WeDaBest

I recently came across this video where Tyka says not only did she know for sometime that Prince was dying, but that she also picked out his funeral attire.....Not sure what to think of this except there probably won't be any charges with these type of comments.

http://www.dailymail.co.u...raine.html

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 03/08/18 2:06pm

fortuneandsere
ndipity

laurarichardson said:

fortuneandserendipity said:


But there is a big difference between removed once upon a time, as in given up or to be replaced - and cameras removed by someone suspiciously. What I was meaning in that context, I don't see anyone 'suspiciously' removing cameras. The way it's worded in the search warrant, there wasn't a live system there. Therefore nothing to take away.

If he had a system once and the warrant is telling you none is there. Would that not mean it was taken away? True we do not know when but at some point in time this system was removed.

I do not think anything is suspicious about it. The person who payed the bills have them moved.


Or, despite the sign outside, may have been dummy imitation CCTV? There's no way of knowing, but lots of people have those systems. He also used to be meticulous with locking the gate, and so surveillance system... in addition to security personnel which we know he did employ... maybe overkill.

The world's problems like climate change can only be solved through strategic long-term thinking, not expediency. In other words all the govts. need sacking!

If you can add value to someone's life then why not. Especially if it colors their days...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 03/08/18 2:09pm

cloveringold85

avatar

disch said:

After the laptop was retrieved it was subjected to a forensic exam by an expert flown in from out of state. It would be REALLY hard for someone who isn’t a top level computer expert to hide stuff from a forensic specialist. Additionally princes emails were subpoenaed directly from google (this stuff is from the warrabts) - If someone were trying to hide something important on princes laptop, they would’ve just taken the whole laptop and thrown it in a dump or something. Since they didn’t I feel pretty confident the experts would’ve been able to get anything if value off it and/or from the emails. cloveringold85 said:

.

Well, Prince's laptop was moved and people were in and out of Paisley on the 21st, so there is really no telling if there was footage or if it was purposely "removed".

[Edited 3/7/18 21:46pm]

.

Yes, that is very true. The thing that bothers me is who was moving Prince's laptop around? Nothing should be touched, when there is a criminal investigation going on. I'm sure they fingerprinted that laptop.

.

And, what about Prince's Twitter (was it twitter or IG) that was updated after Prince died. We never found out who did that?

.

Strange, to say the least. eek

"With love, honor, and respect for every living thing in the universe, separation ceases, and we all become one being, singing one song." - Prince Roger Nelson (1958-2016)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 03/08/18 2:10pm

cloveringold85

avatar

laurarichardson said:

Police should have taken the laptop and not have left it at Paisley and people should not have been allowed to give away notebooks and send out screen shots.

You are missing the point that this was a sloppy investigation from day one. It does not mean a conspiracy was taking place but it is not a good look on that police department.

disch said:

After the laptop was retrieved it was subjected to a forensic exam by an expert flown in from out of state. It would be REALLY hard for someone who isn’t a top level computer expert to hide stuff from a forensic specialist. Additionally princes emails were subpoenaed directly from google (this stuff is from the warrabts) - If someone were trying to hide something important on princes laptop, they would’ve just taken the whole laptop and thrown it in a dump or something. Since they didn’t I feel pretty confident the experts would’ve been able to get anything if value off it and/or from the emails. cloveringold85 said: [Edited 3/7/18 21:46pm]

[Edited 3/8/18 5:39am]

.

Exactly!

.

I have been the one who's been saying it was a half-assed investigation all along.

"With love, honor, and respect for every living thing in the universe, separation ceases, and we all become one being, singing one song." - Prince Roger Nelson (1958-2016)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 03/08/18 2:12pm

cloveringold85

avatar

1Sasha said:

I agree on how this was handled. If only for the reason that this was an international icon - they should have locked down PP and brought in the Feds. Botched from Day 1.

.

YES!! They waited too long to do the search warrant. The Feds should have been called in as soon as they realized how much work needed to be done -- they were not equipped to manage the task at-hand.

"With love, honor, and respect for every living thing in the universe, separation ceases, and we all become one being, singing one song." - Prince Roger Nelson (1958-2016)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 03/08/18 2:14pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

cloveringold85 said:

1Sasha said:

I agree on how this was handled. If only for the reason that this was an international icon - they should have locked down PP and brought in the Feds. Botched from Day 1.

.

YES!! They waited too long to do the search warrant. The Feds should have been called in as soon as they realized how much work needed to be done -- they were not equipped to manage the task at-hand.

The Feds didnt have jurisdiction to investigate.

They Feds only investigate if a crime crosses state lines.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 03/08/18 2:15pm

cloveringold85

avatar

disch said:

Laura, you have lost me on what you're even arguing.

-

The question was: Is the lack of security video from the night of April 20 strange/atypical (i.e., a sign that cameras were specifically shut off that night when typically they would be recording), or typical? You're saying it's strange/atypical and I'm saying, we don't know, because we don't know what was typical practice at PP (where and what was covered by video surveillance esp at times when the building wasn't hosting an event.)

-

We don't agree and there's nothing more to say about that.

-

(And your bullying tone -- demanding me to "knock it off" -- is out of line.)

laurarichardson said:

Knock it off. Signs are inside and out and people who have been their are telling you this. If is about security systems and legal reasons. Do you think he put the signs up for no reason?

According to the police no footage is avalible.

[Edited 3/8/18 11:33am]

.

Who's on first? Who's on second? This place is nuts!! nuts

.

It's been a crazy week for me, and this place gives me some comic relief!! lol lol

"With love, honor, and respect for every living thing in the universe, separation ceases, and we all become one being, singing one song." - Prince Roger Nelson (1958-2016)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 03/08/18 2:20pm

cloveringold85

avatar

fortuneandserendipity said:

laurarichardson said:

If he had a system once and the warrant is telling you none is there. Would that not mean it was taken away? True we do not know when but at some point in time this system was removed.

I do not think anything is suspicious about it. The person who payed the bills have them moved.


Or, despite the sign outside, may have been dummy imitation CCTV? There's no way of knowing, but lots of people have those systems. He also used to be meticulous with locking the gate, and so surveillance system... in addition to security personnel which we know he did employ... maybe overkill.

.

^^That is very true. A lot of places have camera's and signs that say "This property is under surveillance" -- and it could be a fake camera to deter people.......Not saying Prince did this, but a lot of places do.

"With love, honor, and respect for every living thing in the universe, separation ceases, and we all become one being, singing one song." - Prince Roger Nelson (1958-2016)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 03/08/18 2:21pm

cloveringold85

avatar

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

cloveringold85 said:

.

YES!! They waited too long to do the search warrant. The Feds should have been called in as soon as they realized how much work needed to be done -- they were not equipped to manage the task at-hand.

The Feds didnt have jurisdiction to investigate.

They Feds only investigate if a crime crosses state lines.

.

Okay. neutral

.

If I recall correctly, Carver County Sheriff did call in the next county over to help out, because they were in over their heads.

"With love, honor, and respect for every living thing in the universe, separation ceases, and we all become one being, singing one song." - Prince Roger Nelson (1958-2016)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 03/08/18 6:01pm

laurarichardso
n

WeDaBest said:

I recently came across this video where Tyka says not only did she know for sometime that Prince was dying, but that she also picked out his funeral attire.....Not sure what to think of this except there probably won't be any charges with these type of comments.




http://www.dailymail.co.u...raine.html


She decided on her funeral attire not his.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 03/08/18 6:02pm

laurarichardso
n

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:



cloveringold85 said:




1Sasha said:


I agree on how this was handled. If only for the reason that this was an international icon - they should have locked down PP and brought in the Feds. Botched from Day 1.



.


YES!! They waited too long to do the search warrant. The Feds should have been called in as soon as they realized how much work needed to be done -- they were not equipped to manage the task at-hand.




The Feds didnt have jurisdiction to investigate.


They Feds only investigate if a crime crosses state lines.


The DEA was working on the case.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 03/08/18 9:38pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

laurarichardson said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

The Feds didnt have jurisdiction to investigate.

They Feds only investigate if a crime crosses state lines.

The DEA was working on the case.

Not the same as the FBI.

DEA was called in after P's drug test came back.

DEA is focused on illegal drug trafficking.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 03/08/18 11:37pm

Rebeljuice

CCTV isnt going to prevent a break in. It will help catch the trespasser after the fact, but it wont stop the act itself unless someone is sitting watching a monitor screen 24/7 on the premises. For all we know, the outside security cameras may well have been working as normal. But seeing as the events that took place that night happened inside the building, any outside camera footage is of no interest.

Why were the inside cameras off? Because Prince was ill with (withdrawals/cancer/AIDS/Ebola... whatever). He turned them off because he didn't want his current state of wellness being recorded by all-seeing eyes in his home. No one knows how long they were off. It seems some people are jumping to the conclusion that they were switched off that night. For all we know they may have been offline for days/weeks/months.

I think people are looking for things where there isn't really anything to find.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 03/08/18 11:49pm

Vannormal

What about Prince written 50 pages or so of his own biography ?

I wonder how he looked at it all ...

-

Whatever. He's dead now. Let him rest in puprle.

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. And wiser people so full of doubts" (Bertrand Russell 1872-1972)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 03/09/18 6:29am

laurarichardso
n

Rebeljuice said:

CCTV isnt going to prevent a break in. It will help catch the trespasser after the fact, but it wont stop the act itself unless someone is sitting watching a monitor screen 24/7 on the premises. For all we know, the outside security cameras may well have been working as normal. But seeing as the events that took place that night happened inside the building, any outside camera footage is of no interest.

Why were the inside cameras off? Because Prince was ill with (withdrawals/cancer/AIDS/Ebola... whatever). He turned them off because he didn't want his current state of wellness being recorded by all-seeing eyes in his home. No one knows how long they were off. It seems some people are jumping to the conclusion that they were switched off that night. For all we know they may have been offline for days/weeks/months.

I think people are looking for things where there isn't really anything to find.

The only thing we know is that there is no footage from the search warrants and that Charles said the camaras were removed.

It would be odd to remove them or turn them off with the amount of trespassing he had been having.

Also if he was sick in the building I am pretty sure the cameras have an erase button and I doubt cameras are in the bathrooms.

It is one odd thing about the case.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 03/09/18 7:19am

Bodhitheblackd
og

Rebeljuice said:

CCTV isnt going to prevent a break in. It will help catch the trespasser after the fact, but it wont stop the act itself unless someone is sitting watching a monitor screen 24/7 on the premises. For all we know, the outside security cameras may well have been working as normal. But seeing as the events that took place that night happened inside the building, any outside camera footage is of no interest.

Why were the inside cameras off? Because Prince was ill with (withdrawals/cancer/AIDS/Ebola... whatever). He turned them off because he didn't want his current state of wellness being recorded by all-seeing eyes in his home. No one knows how long they were off. It seems some people are jumping to the conclusion that they were switched off that night. For all we know they may have been offline for days/weeks/months.

I think people are looking for things where there isn't really anything to find.

co-sign

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 03/09/18 9:39am

1Sasha

I think they had been off for a while.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 03/09/18 10:06am

laurarichardso
n

1Sasha said:

I think they had been off for a while.

I do as well and some people cannot see the level of misdiretion that still has the case open.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 03/09/18 12:56pm

Vannormal

Bodhitheblackdog said:

Rebeljuice said:

CCTV isnt going to prevent a break in. It will help catch the trespasser after the fact, but it wont stop the act itself unless someone is sitting watching a monitor screen 24/7 on the premises. For all we know, the outside security cameras may well have been working as normal. But seeing as the events that took place that night happened inside the building, any outside camera footage is of no interest.

Why were the inside cameras off? Because Prince was ill with (withdrawals/cancer/AIDS/Ebola... whatever). He turned them off because he didn't want his current state of wellness being recorded by all-seeing eyes in his home. No one knows how long they were off. It seems some people are jumping to the conclusion that they were switched off that night. For all we know they may have been offline for days/weeks/months.

I think people are looking for things where there isn't really anything to find.

co-sign

I would love you to share with me the things that you smoke. wink

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. And wiser people so full of doubts" (Bertrand Russell 1872-1972)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 03/09/18 1:41pm

cloveringold85

avatar

I do not believe Prince turned the camera's off or had them removed. I also do not believe he committed suicide. He loved God and was a very spiritual man. A lot of you don't have to agree with me, but I trust what my instincts tell me, and usually my instincts are 99.9% correct. God willing, one day the truth will be known. Prince was all about the truth--that is how he lived his life.

"With love, honor, and respect for every living thing in the universe, separation ceases, and we all become one being, singing one song." - Prince Roger Nelson (1958-2016)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 03/09/18 2:02pm

zenarose

cloveringold85 said:

I do not believe Prince turned the camera's off or had them removed. I also do not believe he committed suicide. He loved God and was a very spiritual man. A lot of you don't have to agree with me, but I trust what my instincts tell me, and usually my instincts are 99.9% correct. God willing, one day the truth will be known. Prince was all about the truth--that is how he lived his life.








yeahthat
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 03/09/18 2:06pm

cloveringold85

avatar

zenarose said:

cloveringold85 said:

I do not believe Prince turned the camera's off or had them removed. I also do not believe he committed suicide. He loved God and was a very spiritual man. A lot of you don't have to agree with me, but I trust what my instincts tell me, and usually my instincts are 99.9% correct. God willing, one day the truth will be known. Prince was all about the truth--that is how he lived his life.

yeahthat

.

Zena!! There you are!! Missed ya, Gurl!! biggrin

.

hug

"With love, honor, and respect for every living thing in the universe, separation ceases, and we all become one being, singing one song." - Prince Roger Nelson (1958-2016)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 03/09/18 2:24pm

bonatoc

avatar

Vannormal said:

Rebeljuice said:

Why were the inside cameras off? Because Prince was ill with (withdrawals/cancer/AIDS/Ebola... whatever). He turned them off because he didn't want his current state of wellness being recorded by all-seeing eyes in his home.

I would love you to share with me the things that you smoke. wink


I wouldn't. Talk about a bad trip.

Rebel, do you really think a video surveillance fims private apartments?
Prince was not Tony Montana. I bet there were cameras in hallways, and above sensitive entrances
like the Vault, Prince's offices, the studios, the stage.

Anyway, the alibi of the cameras to put again with an end-of-times epidemy theory
all over poor Prince is pretty unfair. You're over-projecting.
The guy goes to the Wrecka Stow some days before.
Show me anyone in terminal conditions
who goes on a bike ride or shopping for records.

It's not only the few hours we don't know about life in PP.
Prince wanted it that way for quite some time.
What he does under his roof is none of your business,
and it goes the other way around.

He closed the commercial activities,
he was rich enough to take it easy.
Would you have cameras inside your house, if already external cameras
and the blatancy of the building provide dissuasive enough?

The Colors R brighter, the Bond is much tighter
No Child's a failure
Until the Blue Sailboat sails him away from his dreams
Don't Ever Lose, Don't Ever Lose
Don't Ever Lose Your Dreams
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 03/09/18 2:30pm

leec1

Bodhitheblackdog said:

Rebeljuice said:

CCTV isnt going to prevent a break in. It will help catch the trespasser after the fact, but it wont stop the act itself unless someone is sitting watching a monitor screen 24/7 on the premises. For all we know, the outside security cameras may well have been working as normal. But seeing as the events that took place that night happened inside the building, any outside camera footage is of no interest.

Why were the inside cameras off? Because Prince was ill with (withdrawals/cancer/AIDS/Ebola... whatever). He turned them off because he didn't want his current state of wellness being recorded by all-seeing eyes in his home. No one knows how long they were off. It seems some people are jumping to the conclusion that they were switched off that night. For all we know they may have been offline for days/weeks/months.

I think people are looking for things where there isn't really anything to find.

co-sign

Co-sign as well.

It seems some members just can't accept the fact this was an accidental death.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 03/09/18 2:49pm

Menes

Why would someone who was procuring/addicted to illicit substances have cameras on to recording anything? How reasonable is that?

No one else had the justification to shut off any external/internal video surveillance, remove the system or delete/edit any data except for Prince . If one believes the system was still active ( specifically after the incident in Moline), but the investigators are withholding that information ,then it speaks volumes regarding Prince's state of mind. As in: That of a full blown addict who was seriously impaired in the area of reasoning, or, one who no longer cared. He had to at least have thought that after Moline, there was a possibility that law enforcement or the media may be interested in finding out why and how he overdosed in Moline.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 03/09/18 9:03pm

purplefam99

fortuneandserendipity said:



laurarichardson said:




fortuneandserendipity said:




But there is a big difference between removed once upon a time, as in given up or to be replaced - and cameras removed by someone suspiciously. What I was meaning in that context, I don't see anyone 'suspiciously' removing cameras. The way it's worded in the search warrant, there wasn't a live system there. Therefore nothing to take away.



If he had a system once and the warrant is telling you none is there. Would that not mean it was taken away? True we do not know when but at some point in time this system was removed.



I do not think anything is suspicious about it. The person who payed the bills have them moved.






Or, despite the sign outside, may have been dummy imitation CCTV? There's no way of knowing, but lots of people have those systems. He also used to be meticulous with locking the gate, and so surveillance system... in addition to security personnel which we know he did employ... maybe overkill.




On Judith’s website there is a video called back in time at paisley.
Where she is talking to Prince thru the intercom and he is inside and clearly
Knows it is her from the outside. She even looks up like “ how are you seeing
Me”. If you pause the video you can see there is what maybe a camera above her head when she puts her back against the white wall. The camera or whatever it is
Is white too so you have to look close. So his cctv doesn’t seem to be imitation
According to this video.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 03/09/18 11:46pm

Rebeljuice

bonatoc said:

Vannormal said:

I would love you to share with me the things that you smoke. wink


I wouldn't. Talk about a bad trip.

Rebel, do you really think a video surveillance fims private apartments?
Prince was not Tony Montana. I bet there were cameras in hallways, and above sensitive entrances
like the Vault, Prince's offices, the studios, the stage.

Anyway, the alibi of the cameras to put again with an end-of-times epidemy theory
all over poor Prince is pretty unfair. You're over-projecting.
The guy goes to the Wrecka Stow some days before.
Show me anyone in terminal conditions
who goes on a bike ride or shopping for records.

It's not only the few hours we don't know about life in PP.
Prince wanted it that way for quite some time.
What he does under his roof is none of your business,
and it goes the other way around.

He closed the commercial activities,
he was rich enough to take it easy.
Would you have cameras inside your house, if already external cameras
and the blatancy of the building provide dissuasive enough?

You are presuming I am advocating the terminal illness narative. I am not. I added the various illnesses to illustrate it doesn't really matter what narative you follow. Was he ill? Yes. What was his illness? Opioid addiction. Do we know anything other than that? No. The only narative I know to be true is the one that reads "accidental overdose" - This is the only fact we know.

I can speculate as well as the rest, but the only illness connection MY narative comes up with is addiction and the possibility he was trying to kick the habit on his own making himself more ill. Withdrawals and falling off the wagon time and again wreaks havok on the body. It is hell most of the time and isn't pretty. Ergo, a possible reason the cameras within PP were off.


Read what I said with a bit more care and attention before you project a narative on me that I dont subscribe to

Having said all that, i am not exactly clear on what it was you said because your pseudo-English twaddle very oft makes you out to be the one tripping. A below-the-belt "bad trip" jibe back at ya. 1 - 1.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 03/10/18 3:40am

Vannormal

I know you put it between like this : (withdrawals/cancer/AIDS/Ebola... whatever), and that trigger me. wink I'm sorry.

-

I've seen a picture somewhere of Prince lying in his elevator. Was that real? Or was it a fake ?

Let me look for it...

-

Rebeljuice said:

bonatoc said:


I wouldn't. Talk about a bad trip.

Rebel, do you really think a video surveillance fims private apartments?
Prince was not Tony Montana. I bet there were cameras in hallways, and above sensitive entrances
like the Vault, Prince's offices, the studios, the stage.

Anyway, the alibi of the cameras to put again with an end-of-times epidemy theory
all over poor Prince is pretty unfair. You're over-projecting.
The guy goes to the Wrecka Stow some days before.
Show me anyone in terminal conditions
who goes on a bike ride or shopping for records.

It's not only the few hours we don't know about life in PP.
Prince wanted it that way for quite some time.
What he does under his roof is none of your business,
and it goes the other way around.

He closed the commercial activities,
he was rich enough to take it easy.
Would you have cameras inside your house, if already external cameras
and the blatancy of the building provide dissuasive enough?

You are presuming I am advocating the terminal illness narative. I am not. I added the various illnesses to illustrate it doesn't really matter what narative you follow. Was he ill? Yes. What was his illness? Opioid addiction. Do we know anything other than that? No. The only narative I know to be true is the one that reads "accidental overdose" - This is the only fact we know.

I can speculate as well as the rest, but the only illness connection MY narative comes up with is addiction and the possibility he was trying to kick the habit on his own making himself more ill. Withdrawals and falling off the wagon time and again wreaks havok on the body. It is hell most of the time and isn't pretty. Ergo, a possible reason the cameras within PP were off.


Read what I said with a bit more care and attention before you project a narative on me that I dont subscribe to

Having said all that, i am not exactly clear on what it was you said because your pseudo-English twaddle very oft makes you out to be the one tripping. A below-the-belt "bad trip" jibe back at ya. 1 - 1.

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. And wiser people so full of doubts" (Bertrand Russell 1872-1972)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 03/10/18 4:49am

laurarichardso
n

Vannormal said:

I know you put it between like this : (withdrawals/cancer/AIDS/Ebola... whatever), and that trigger me. wink I'm sorry.


-


I've seen a picture somewhere of Prince lying in his elevator. Was that real? Or was it a fake ?


Let me look for it...


-




Rebeljuice said:




bonatoc said:




I wouldn't. Talk about a bad trip.

Rebel, do you really think a video surveillance fims private apartments?
Prince was not Tony Montana. I bet there were cameras in hallways, and above sensitive entrances
like the Vault, Prince's offices, the studios, the stage.

Anyway, the alibi of the cameras to put again with an end-of-times epidemy theory
all over poor Prince is pretty unfair. You're over-projecting.
The guy goes to the Wrecka Stow some days before.
Show me anyone in terminal conditions
who goes on a bike ride or shopping for records.

It's not only the few hours we don't know about life in PP.
Prince wanted it that way for quite some time.
What he does under his roof is none of your business,
and it goes the other way around.

He closed the commercial activities,
he was rich enough to take it easy.
Would you have cameras inside your house, if already external cameras
and the blatancy of the building provide dissuasive enough?



You are presuming I am advocating the terminal illness narative. I am not. I added the various illnesses to illustrate it doesn't really matter what narative you follow. Was he ill? Yes. What was his illness? Opioid addiction. Do we know anything other than that? No. The only narative I know to be true is the one that reads "accidental overdose" - This is the only fact we know.

I can speculate as well as the rest, but the only illness connection MY narative comes up with is addiction and the possibility he was trying to kick the habit on his own making himself more ill. Withdrawals and falling off the wagon time and again wreaks havok on the body. It is hell most of the time and isn't pretty. Ergo, a possible reason the cameras within PP were off.



Read what I said with a bit more care and attention before you project a narative on me that I dont subscribe to

Having said all that, i am not exactly clear on what it was you said because your pseudo-English twaddle very oft makes you out to be the one tripping. A below-the-belt "bad trip" jibe back at ya. 1 - 1.




It was fake.
[Edited 3/10/18 4:56am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 26 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > no murder charge likely in prince's death CBS news - Part 2