Thread started 02/19/18 10:24pmStrawberrylova 123 |
NEW Reelzchannel documentary coming out in Feb.25 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #1 posted 02/19/18 11:24pm
purplerabbitho le |
Reelz channel is so damn sleazy. A white dude is playing Prince in this show...not light skinned black or of color in another way (hispanic or arabic or persian)...a caucasion dude... Plus, the damn show looks super cheesy and simplistic.
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #2 posted 02/20/18 4:05am
dance4me3121 |
i cant get the video to work for me.But if it's by REELZ then i know it isnt any good |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #3 posted 02/20/18 4:45am
jdcxc |
Can’t the Estate block this garbage? |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #4 posted 02/20/18 6:57am
Strawberrylova 123 |
jdcxc said: Can’t the Estate block this garbage? I wish |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #5 posted 02/20/18 8:22am
TrivialPursuit
|
jdcxc said:
Can’t the Estate block this garbage?
Why? It is the freedom of the press and freedom of speech. Folks are also free to not watch it. I don't. They were actually running Prince stuff back to back last night. Again. Believe me, I'm not making a moral argument for it, or a fan's argument - it's a freedom of them to do it whether anyone else likes it or not. We have a right to be offended but we don't have a right to be consoled or righted for being offended.
So no, they cannot block it. They have no legal ground to block it. You can talk about anyone you wish especially dead people. That's why there are a gazillion unauthorized biographies and movies out there. They can't even block the photos because a photographer has the ownership rights to a photograph they take, not the subject in it. (That's why paparazzi have an ongoing job - they own the photos, not the stars in them.) So if one of these sleazy people at Reelz buys rights to a bunch of photographs of Prince, they can use them. If there are any in Getty Images or otherwise, they can use them.
I mean, they're really slapping this shit together anyway with a bunch of half-baked notions and lies. I don't know why folks on here (eg: the OP) are surprised by that.
Anyone who has been here for a minute knows Reelz is a dumpster fire.
" don’t really care so much what people say about me because it is a reflection of who they r." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #6 posted 02/20/18 8:30am
sulls |
Last night, I caught part of something on Reelz called Prince The Secret Life or someshit. It was awful! I changed the channel immediately. [Edited 2/20/18 8:32am] "I like to watch." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #7 posted 02/20/18 8:38am
namepeace |
I saw it. I was surprised so many people who knew him well participated in it. The interviews added a lot of context, but the narratives were lazy and incomplete, and the dramatizations were off. Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016
Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #8 posted 02/20/18 8:41am
Strawberrylova 123 |
namepeace said: I saw it. I was surprised so many people who knew him well participated in it. The interviews added a lot of context, but the narratives were lazy and incomplete, and the dramatizations were off. It hasn't premiered yet |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #9 posted 02/20/18 9:46am
bashraka |
The estate sends cease and desist of people positng Prince's music, videos and pics on Instagram and Facebook but sleazy programs produced National Enquirer with lies and exaggeration about Prince go unchallenged. FOH! 3121 #1 THIS YEAR |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #10 posted 02/20/18 10:06am
purplethunder3 121 |
Again... "Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato
https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #11 posted 02/20/18 10:12am
Genesia |
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #12 posted 02/20/18 10:54am
sulls |
bashraka said:
The estate sends cease and desist of people positng Prince's music, videos and pics on Instagram and Facebook but sleazy programs produced National Enquirer with lies and exaggeration about Prince go unchallenged. FOH!
"I like to watch." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #13 posted 02/20/18 10:55am
sulls |
I have to say, seeing the breaking news flash about a death at PP upset me all over again... "I like to watch." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #14 posted 02/20/18 10:57am
laytonian
|
namepeace said: I saw it. I was surprised so many people who knew him well participated in it. The interviews added a lot of context, but the narratives were lazy and incomplete, and the dramatizations were off. When they were interviewed, they didn't know what the final product world be. Andre was pissed. Welcome to "the org", laytonian… come bathe with me. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #15 posted 02/20/18 10:58am
laytonian
|
Strawberrylova123 said: namepeace said: I saw it. I was surprised so many people who knew him well participated in it. The interviews added a lot of context, but the narratives were lazy and incomplete, and the dramatizations were off. It hasn't premiered yet We've seen these before. They will take the footage and create something "new" with a new title. Welcome to "the org", laytonian… come bathe with me. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #16 posted 02/20/18 1:09pm
namepeace |
Strawberrylova123 said:
namepeace said:
I saw it. I was surprised so many people who knew him well participated in it. The interviews added a lot of context, but the narratives were lazy and incomplete, and the dramatizations were off.
It hasn't premiered yet
Sorry, Reelz has one in the can already, and I can't remember what it's called.
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016
Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #17 posted 02/20/18 2:22pm
Reply #18 posted 02/20/18 2:37pm
purplethunder3 121 |
luvsexy4all said:
who owns REELZ channel?
Interestingly enough the Hubbard Broadcasting Co. that owns Reelz is based in St. Paul, Minnesota... "Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato
https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #19 posted 02/20/18 2:38pm
TrivialPursuit
|
luvsexy4all said:
who owns REELZ channel?
Hubbard Broadcasting, which is based in.... wait for it... Minneapolis! It was founded there 93 years ago. It has flagship station in that area. Reelz is headquartered in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Their sister station is Ovation.
" don’t really care so much what people say about me because it is a reflection of who they r." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #20 posted 02/21/18 1:01pm
laurarichardso n |
TrivialPursuit said:
jdcxc said: Can’t the Estate block this garbage?
Why? It is the freedom of the press and freedom of speech. Folks are also free to not watch it. I don't. They were actually running Prince stuff back to back last night. Again. Believe me, I'm not making a moral argument for it, or a fan's argument - it's a freedom of them to do it whether anyone else likes it or not. We have a right to be offended but we don't have a right to be consoled or righted for being offended.
So no, they cannot block it. They have no legal ground to block it. You can talk about anyone you wish especially dead people. That's why there are a gazillion unauthorized biographies and movies out there. They can't even block the photos because a photographer has the ownership rights to a photograph they take, not the subject in it. (That's why paparazzi have an ongoing job - they own the photos, not the stars in them.) So if one of these sleazy people at Reelz buys rights to a bunch of photographs of Prince, they can use them. If there are any in Getty Images or otherwise, they can use them.
I mean, they're really slapping this shit together anyway with a bunch of half-baked notions and lies. I don't know why folks on here (eg: the OP) are surprised by that.
Anyone who has been here for a minute knows Reelz is a dumpster fire.
They can block the use of his image and music. They have already done it with some goofy stage show in Britain. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #21 posted 02/21/18 2:40pm
TrivialPursuit
|
laurarichardson said:
TrivialPursuit said:
Why? It is the freedom of the press and freedom of speech. Folks are also free to not watch it. I don't. They were actually running Prince stuff back to back last night. Again. Believe me, I'm not making a moral argument for it, or a fan's argument - it's a freedom of them to do it whether anyone else likes it or not. We have a right to be offended but we don't have a right to be consoled or righted for being offended.
So no, they cannot block it. They have no legal ground to block it. You can talk about anyone you wish especially dead people. That's why there are a gazillion unauthorized biographies and movies out there. They can't even block the photos because a photographer has the ownership rights to a photograph they take, not the subject in it. (That's why paparazzi have an ongoing job - they own the photos, not the stars in them.) So if one of these sleazy people at Reelz buys rights to a bunch of photographs of Prince, they can use them. If there are any in Getty Images or otherwise, they can use them.
I mean, they're really slapping this shit together anyway with a bunch of half-baked notions and lies. I don't know why folks on here (eg: the OP) are surprised by that.
Anyone who has been here for a minute knows Reelz is a dumpster fire.
They can block the use of his image and music. They have already done it with some goofy stage show in Britain.
Partially incorrect, as I noted. I've bolded it for you since you probably glazed over it in an attempt to rebutt something you didn't read.
Do you think all these people - Toure, Alan Light, Ro Ronin, Per Nilsen, Alex Hahn and the link - got permission from Prince or his people to use his image or to simply write a book about him?
Did Steve Parke? Of course not, and you know why? Because he owns the photos. He took them. That is the law. Prince obviously didn't buy every single negative from Parke, Katz, or anyone else who photographed him. I worked in the photography field for a good while and lived with a photographer for 20 years. I know exactly what can and can't be used.
That's why you can't take your Sears or Olan Mills portraits to Walmart and copy them on that Kodak Photomaker machine (which is a fancy computer, scanner, & printer). The people who are in the photos have no right to reproduce them without express written permission of the photographer. There are people who took photos of Prince, either candidly or professionally, who own the photos (ie: Prince didn't buy their negatives to control a situation). And those people can lend or lease out the photos to Reelz, Showtime, or ol' drunk Bob down on Main to use for their projects.
A stage show is entirely different with laws and impersonations than an unauthorized biography either in print or on TV. The music is a different issue, and that's why you hear sound-alike songs in these dumpster fire biographies. Sound-alikes are allowable by law (so are parodies or satire).
" don’t really care so much what people say about me because it is a reflection of who they r." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #22 posted 02/21/18 3:33pm
ThatWhiteDude |
purplerabbithole said:
Reelz channel is so damn sleazy. A white dude is playing Prince in this show...not light skinned black or of color in another way (hispanic or arabic or persian)...a caucasion dude... Plus, the damn show looks super cheesy and simplistic.
That should be the main reason to boycott this bullshit. [Edited 2/21/18 15:39pm] |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #23 posted 02/21/18 5:08pm
laurarichardso n |
TrivialPursuit said:
laurarichardson said:
TrivialPursuit said:
Why? It is the freedom of the press and freedom of speech. Folks are also free to not watch it. I don't. They were actually running Prince stuff back to back last night. Again. Believe me, I'm not making a moral argument for it, or a fan's argument - it's a freedom of them to do it whether anyone else likes it or not. We have a right to be offended but we don't have a right to be consoled or righted for being offended.
So no, they cannot block it. They have no legal ground to block it. You can talk about anyone you wish especially dead people. That's why there are a gazillion unauthorized biographies and movies out there. They can't even block the photos because a photographer has the ownership rights to a photograph they take, not the subject in it. (That's why paparazzi have an ongoing job - they own the photos, not the stars in them.) So if one of these sleazy people at Reelz buys rights to a bunch of photographs of Prince, they can use them. If there are any in Getty Images or otherwise, they can use them.
I mean, they're really slapping this shit together anyway with a bunch of half-baked notions and lies. I don't know why folks on here (eg: the OP) are surprised by that.
Anyone who has been here for a minute knows Reelz is a dumpster fire.
They can block the use of his image and music. They have already done it with some goofy stage show in Britain.
Partially incorrect, as I noted. I've bolded it for you since you probably glazed over it in an attempt to rebutt something you didn't read.
Do you think all these people - Toure, Alan Light, Ro Ronin, Per Nilsen, Alex Hahn and the link - got permission from Prince or his people to use his image or to simply write a book about him?
Did Steve Parke? Of course not, and you know why? Because he owns the photos. He took them. That is the law. Prince obviously didn't buy every single negative from Parke, Katz, or anyone else who photographed him. I worked in the photography field for a good while and lived with a photographer for 20 years. I know exactly what can and can't be used.
That's why you can't take your Sears or Olan Mills portraits to Walmart and copy them on that Kodak Photomaker machine (which is a fancy computer, scanner, & printer). The people who are in the photos have no right to reproduce them without express written permission of the photographer. There are people who took photos of Prince, either candidly or professionally, who own the photos (ie: Prince didn't buy their negatives to control a situation). And those people can lend or lease out the photos to Reelz, Showtime, or ol' drunk Bob down on Main to use for their projects.
A stage show is entirely different with laws and impersonations than an unauthorized biography either in print or on TV. The music is a different issue, and that's why you hear sound-alike songs in these dumpster fire biographies. Sound-alikes are allowable by law (so are parodies or satire).
There are photos that Prince had the copyright on that cannot be used. His image is controlled by the estate and of course the music is owned by the estate. So all images cannot be used. If you took the time to read the court documents you would know that a stage production in Britain using his image and music has been stopped.That is my point. If your estate knew about this project I’m sure they could’ve put a stop to it or at least made it difficult. If you’re OK with some white boy playing prince then you watch and enjoy. [Edited 2/21/18 17:09pm] |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #24 posted 02/21/18 5:51pm
TrivialPursuit
|
laurarichardson said:
There are photos that Prince had the copyright on that cannot be used. His image is controlled by the estate and of course the music is owned by the estate. So all images cannot be used. If you took the time to read the court documents you would know that a stage production in Britain using his image and music has been stopped.That is my point. If your estate knew about this project I’m sure they could’ve put a stop to it or at least made it difficult. If you’re OK with some white boy playing prince then you watch and enjoy.
Yes the photos he owned cannot be used without permission. The sun also comes up in the east. Tell us something not so obvious.
His image is controlled, to an extent, by the estate. All images he doesn't own and that are up for lease or sale can be used. That includes people taking photos when he walked out of a store, or had a camera phone and snapped a shot of him at a concert, or that person who photographed him on his bicycle, or the guy who took that iconic photo from the Piano and a Microphone tour. They own the image, not Prince. The estate cannot randomly control anyone who took a photograph of him for the sake of his image or likeness. There is no basis for it legally. And that is why entities like Reelz can gather images and make a 'documentary' (I use the term loosely). I get that you do not understand that. But the truth is the truth, no matter where you hear it.
I couldn't care less about a stage play that isn't happening. I don't have a dog in that race.
" don’t really care so much what people say about me because it is a reflection of who they r." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #25 posted 02/22/18 5:58am
laurarichardso n |
TrivialPursuit said:
laurarichardson said:
There are photos that Prince had the copyright on that cannot be used. His image is controlled by the estate and of course the music is owned by the estate. So all images cannot be used. If you took the time to read the court documents you would know that a stage production in Britain using his image and music has been stopped.That is my point. If your estate knew about this project I’m sure they could’ve put a stop to it or at least made it difficult. If you’re OK with some white boy playing prince then you watch and enjoy.
Yes the photos he owned cannot be used without permission. The sun also comes up in the east. Tell us something not so obvious.
His image is controlled, to an extent, by the estate. All images he doesn't own and that are up for lease or sale can be used. That includes people taking photos when he walked out of a store, or had a camera phone and snapped a shot of him at a concert, or that person who photographed him on his bicycle, or the guy who took that iconic photo from the Piano and a Microphone tour. They own the image, not Prince. The estate cannot randomly control anyone who took a photograph of him for the sake of his image or likeness. There is no basis for it legally. And that is why entities like Reelz can gather images and make a 'documentary' (I use the term loosely). I get that you do not understand that. But the truth is the truth, no matter where you hear it.
I couldn't care less about a stage play that isn't happening. I don't have a dog in that race.
Apparently it was not obvious to you. I seriously doubt if the entire doc is made up from images that the estate does not own and I am sure if the estate knew about it they could have done something. The info I provided about the show in London is an example. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #26 posted 02/22/18 1:10pm
cloveringold85 |
Those shows are not very accurate. "With love, honor, and respect for every living thing in the universe, separation ceases, and we all become one being, singing one song." - Prince Roger Nelson (1958-2016) |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #27 posted 02/22/18 5:04pm
Vashtix |
jdcxc said:
Can’t the Estate block this garbage?
THANK YOU!
.
I am so sick of REELZ and their cheap docs every few months.
.
Where are the docs for Tom Petty and Bowie and others? They stay on Prince and are flimsy with facts. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #28 posted 02/22/18 6:04pm
TrivialPursuit
|
cloveringold85 said:
Those shows are not very accurate.
Let's be honest - they're not supposed to be. Frankly, I'm surprised they've never partnered with Star or National Inquirer to create programming.
" don’t really care so much what people say about me because it is a reflection of who they r." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #29 posted 02/23/18 11:49am
cloveringold85 |
Vashtix said:
jdcxc said:
Can’t the Estate block this garbage?
THANK YOU!
.
I am so sick of REELZ and their cheap docs every few months.
.
Where are the docs for Tom Petty and Bowie and others? They stay on Prince and are flimsy with facts.
.
Yea, and the sad part is that people believe it like gospel. "With love, honor, and respect for every living thing in the universe, separation ceases, and we all become one being, singing one song." - Prince Roger Nelson (1958-2016) |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
copyright © 1998-2024 prince.org. all rights reserved.