lorenzolee said:

laurarichardson said:

The case that he had back in 94 was thrown out. I believe in his previous filing the Breamer attorneys had the 94 trail info as a response to his bogus claim.

He has no written proof that he owns anything so even if he is telling the truth ( why would Prince give his entire music catalogue to this guy for a $1.00?) so what. His name is not on the copyrights to anything. If he wants to go to the family and make an offer for the catalogue he is free to do so like anyone else.

He does not seem like he is crazy. He is crazy. Check out his website.

there's no proof that anyone has a contract with prince, if you YouTube The Tavist Smiley interview with prince, He states himself that his company doesn't do Written contracts... so issuing a dollar is considered A consideration of a dept owed ,not a catalogue Purchase . I'm sure there are many artist that have also Co-created music with prince, but they haven't made A claim in this probate ... I don't think he deserves a billion dollars But if his claims are true , on co-creating some music , he should get Justice for exactly what's owed, if anything . Saying someone is crazy for standing up for themselves is Making an assumption that we were there when the two parties Entered into whatever agreement if any. I'm not sure...none can be sure. The paper work in exhibits shows that the Law suit in 94 was not dismissed totally , It was only dismissed as far as WB Records, It remained in effect against Prince. I read all 66 pages and all his filings, and as I have knowledge of Copyright contract Law. Only in my opinion, he has a claim...even if it's 1000 dollars He isn't crazy. My question is, how was he the only one Who introduced Prince Contract for his vault into Probate..how did he know prince filed it In the library of Congress.. no one else knew it, Not the Family, not the special administrator . Hmmm things that make you go hmmmm.

[Edited 10/20/16 7:21am]

As much as Prince talked about not having contracts he had them. We know he had them back in the WB days and he had to have them for employees to keep them from running their mouths.

My thinking is he may have done somethings on a handshake like the Musicology tour but keep in mind his ass was directly on the line if the tour bombed

He is not the only one introducting anything into the Probate. My guess is Breamer has all of these documents and Dixion got them from discovery. How would Breamer at this point not know about the LLC? How would the administer of the estate not know about NPG records and publishing Some portion of it or maybe all of it is a part of the estate depending on how it was structured. Dixion is not providing any information that was not known by the probate court about Prince's publishing.

He has no claim because he has no written contract and copyrights on any of the music. What was in effect from the 94 suit because Prince continued on with his carreer with no involvment of Mr. Dixion? Did the court in 94 award Mr. Dixion anything in that case? Why is the judge in this case kicking out Mr. Dixion's claims if he won something in the 94 case.

Check out his website he is fucking crazy.

The next thing you know the woman that say she was spirtually married to Prince since 1980 and is owed 3 milllion should get her share as well because she has no marriage certificate but her word is good enough.

Our judicial system does not go on people's recollections. You have to have written proof. If you want to get paid off of songs then you need to own the copyright on some portion of the copyrighted material or have proof it was stolen from you. What proof does Rodney have beyond his statements which seem to have changed a few times since 1994? In addtion, if some asshat like this guy gets any of P's music what do you think will happen to the music.

[Edited 10/21/16 6:13am]

lorenzolee said:

laurarichardson said:

As much as Prince talked about not having contracts he had them. We know he had them back in the WB days and he had to have them for employees to keep them from running their mouths.

My thinking is he may have done somethings on a handshake like the Musicology tour but keep in mind his ass was directly on the line if the tour bombed

He is not the only one introducting anything into the Probate. My guess is Breamer has all of these documents and Dixion got them from discovery. How would Breamer at this point not know about the LLC? How would the administer of the estate not know about NPG records and publishing Some portion of it or maybe all of it is a part of the estate depending on how it was structured. Dixion is not providing any information that was not known by the probate court about Prince's publishing.

He has no claim because he has no written contract and copyrights on any of the music. What was in effect from the 94 suit because Prince continued on with his carreer with no involvment of Mr. Dixion? Did the court in 94 award Mr. Dixion anything in that case? Why is the judge in this case kicking out Mr. Dixion's claims if he won something in the 94 case.

Check out his website he is fucking crazy.

The next thing you know the woman that say she was spirtually married to Prince since 1980 and is owed 3 milllion should get her share as well because she has no marriage certificate but her word is good enough.

Our judicial system does not go on people's recollections. You have to have written proof. If you want to get paid off of songs then you need to own the copyright on some portion of the copyrighted material or have proof it was stolen from you. What proof does Rodney have beyond his statements which seem to have changed a few times since 1994? In addtion, if some asshat like this guy gets any of P's music what do you think will happen to the music.

[Edited 10/21/16 6:13am]

Something doesn't smell right in this preventing Dixon from further filings, The Judge previously dismissed his claim on the basis of time expired Copyright ...but I'm reading Mr. Dixon 66 page memorandum which breaks down copyright contract Law, and proves there is no statute of limitation on Copyright...he was sent a one dollar consideration by Prince legal team thus Showing an acknowledgment of an agreement 2 months after he sued him in 94. No where on the Judge's order does it refer to the error of dismissing him out Of probate.. dealing with copyright expiration, as he stated as the reason before for dismissal... nor does the dollar that Prince sent to Mr. Dixon was mentioned As a point of discovery... that's very suspicious, I think we should be looking at More than Dixon as shady. I don't think Bremer is performing according to the contract From Prince That Rodney introduced into these procedings. The Court???? Hmmmmm

Dixion had no proof that the dollar came from Prince and even if it did he has no copyright on any of the songs. No legal document stating that he should be put in charge of Prince' s estate. He has nothing. What does the statute of limitations on copyrights have to do with anything if you do not own the copyrights in the first place.

Nooriginalusername said:

if P. were all too concerned about his heirs, he would have filed a will.

.

Exactly.

laurarichardson said:

lorenzolee said:

laurarichardson said:

laurarichardson said:

lorenzolee said:

The Dollar came from Edelstein, prince attorney of record at that time... the proof is in the Exhibits, not speculating ... in copyright law, you don't need a signature, just a contract, and a Dollar. When you know copyright law, you'll know copyright law..it will shine a different light , im not pro or con, it's just the Law... and in this case, it's overlooked.

-- The dollar does not matter. Mr. Dixion's name is not listed as a copyright holder on those songs. He does not own those songs if he is not listed as a writer or co-author. Why take a dollar and not have your named placed as a copyright holder. Why do you think the court is throwing out his claim? Also why would Prince sell anything to anyone for a dollar?

Everyone understands that Dixon does not have evidence or a valid claim. I would not be surprised if lorenzolee is Dixon. Same arguement here as in the courts.

Dixon has been removed and that is good. Hopefully the next big hurdle of Duane and his offspring will be resolved, though I have a feeling either way, it will be appealed. But it will be nice to resolve this quickly, but correctly, to limit the strain on the estate finances.

lorenzolee said:

nelcp777 said:

Everyone understands that Dixon does not have evidence or a valid claim. I would not be surprised if lorenzolee is Dixon. Same arguement here as in the courts.

Dixon has been removed and that is good. Hopefully the next big hurdle of Duane and his offspring will be resolved, though I have a feeling either way, it will be appealed. But it will be nice to resolve this quickly, but correctly, to limit the strain on the estate finances.

Did I hear Lorenzolee is Dixon? Wow, I've heard it all now, I'm not Dixon , maybe ur Dixon ? I'm just a paralegal who understands the law, and What's proper justice ... what I hear you alleging is emotional Not exactly Legal. Truth is truth, I was opposed to Dixon's arguments like Everyone else , until I saw his evidence filed. If it's not forged, then it seems he has a valid Contract. My opinion ... sorry

I was trying to lighten the mood. I do not have any legal knowledge. We are all entitled to our opinions. There is no need to apologize for yours. We disagree on the subject, nothing wrong with that.

lorenzolee said:

Something doesn't smell right in this preventing Dixon from further filings, The Judge previously dismissed his claim on the basis of time expired Copyright ...but I'm reading Mr. Dixon 66 page memorandum which breaks down copyright contract Law, and proves there is no statute of limitation on Copyright...he was sent a one dollar consideration by Prince legal team thus Showing an acknowledgment of an agreement 2 months after he sued him in 94. No where on the Judge's order does it refer to the error of dismissing him out Of probate.. dealing with copyright expiration, as he stated as the reason before for dismissal... nor does the dollar that Prince sent to Mr. Dixon was mentioned As a point of discovery... that's very suspicious, I think we should be looking at More than Dixon as shady. I don't think Bremer is performing according to the contract From Prince That Rodney introduced into these procedings. The Court???? Hmmmmm

Then I guess Mr. Dixon needs to appeal the Judge's Decision to a higher court and attempt to convince them that this nonsense claim is legit, eh?

lorenzolee said: