206Michelle said:

pinkcashmere23 said:

Lala's latest FB post is very suggestive. I wonder about her sometimes.The writer of Prince's article in Mojo magazine also said that he was with a beautiful Latina during the interview.I'm not sure she was an official girlfriend but I think they may have dated at one time.

[Edited 5/11/18 18:06pm]

I wonder about Prince and Lala’s relationship as well.

Has her name come up in the Carver County documents and/or phone records?

poppys said:

This is insane Pink/Fly. We all know you post using multiple IDs. Get REAL. There is only one person shoving Andy down our throats on every thread. You are not doing her any favors either. She probably needs extra security.

I've went from liking AA.....to see ya later, don't want to see ya no mo. Only because of posters who change threads (like this one) to nothing but AA.

FlyOnTheWall said:

206Michelle said:

pinkcashmere23 said: I wonder about Prince and Lala’s relationship as well.

Has her name come up in the Carver County documents and/or phone records?

Not that I have heard of. She was never mentioned in any reports that I have read.I saw some familiar names in some of the emails that were sent after he passed. I noticed Shelbey Rodríguez and Esperanza.Hannah Simone said to call her.I think she was the actress from New Girl iirc.

[Edited 5/12/18 7:28am]

PennyPurple said:

poppys said:

This is insane Pink/Fly. We all know you post using multiple IDs. Get REAL. There is only one person shoving Andy down our throats on every thread. You are not doing her any favors either. She probably needs extra security.

I've went from liking AA.....to see ya later, don't want to see ya no mo. Only because of posters who change threads (like this one) to nothing but AA.

If you go back to the first or second page, you will see that it was actually posts like yours that brought her name into this thread. I have only been responding to such posts. And, IMHO, if you really like someone, it would take more than posts on Prince.org to change that.

pinkcashmere23 said:

It appears that the thread order has changed on the board and some threads don't move when replied to.

[Edited 5/12/18 6:03am]

You clicked something on your browser

Sorted by time of last post.
Sort by time of first post

pinkcashmere23 said:

FlyOnTheWall said:

Has her name come up in the Carver County documents and/or phone records?

Not that I have heard of. She was never mentioned in any reports that I have read.

I guess that pretty much confirms what I've suspected all along: Lala exaggerates and embellishes her association with Prince.

[Edited 5/12/18 7:31am]

Well looks like some folks (the usual suspects) took the moderators' request to "get it all out of their system" to heart on this thread. But anyone who's looked at this section knows tha some people's "system" has no limit.

-

It seems that the vast majority of people who expressed an opinion on this thread want to see threads about the girlfriends consolidated in some way.

-

My thought is: prince.org is a community. If the community seems to prefer a particular approach to make this a more inviting for everyone, with varied interests and opinions, to participate, then others shoud be wiling to go along with that. If they're not willing, then I'd wonder: is the person here to exchange ideas, info, and opinions with a robust communithy, or for some other reason?

-

Listen I participate in some topics here that routinely get re-routed by moderators. Is that personally "annoying" or time-consuming to me? I guess, sometimes. But I also recognize that not every person here has the same interests as me, and that this community is a shared space, and I respect that.

-

I hope that if the moderators take some efforts to change this section, no one then tries to express their disagreement by flooding the main board with complaints, attempting to divert unrelated threads to their preferred topic, etc. I think that woud be not helpful to this community at large.

-

And if someonen REALLY can't tolerate the rules or atmosphere here, that they're able to find another place on the internet (or in real life) that's more the kind of community they're looking for.

FlyOnTheWall said:

I agree. And, the ONLY thing that will fix this problem is a strictly adhered to ZERO TOLERANCE policy prohibiting personal attacks, name-calling, and bullying. That should be the focus of the moderators, not trying to censor the volume of threads about certain Prince love interests.

OldFriends4Sale said:

pinkcashmere23 said:

It appears that the thread order has changed on the board and some threads don't move when replied to.

[Edited 5/12/18 6:03am]

Thanks! My computer has been acting up since spilling tea on my keyboard and it sometimes jumps around as a result. It probably did it with out me realizing it.

You clicked something on your browser

Sorted by time of last post.
Sort by time of first post

Duplicate Post.

[Edited 5/12/18 7:39am]

FlyOnTheWall said:

pinkcashmere23 said:

Not that I have heard of. She was never mentioned in any reports that I have read.

I guess that pretty much confirms what I've suspected all along: Lala exaggerates and embellishes her association with Prince.

[Edited 5/12/18 7:31am]

I don't know. She has some video clips on her IG that were posted in September of 2013 while at the Mall of America and what she said was taken at the arboretum in Eden Prairie. She was in Minneapolis for some reason.

disch said:

Well looks like some folks (the usual suspects) took the moderators' request to "get it all out of their system" to heart on this thread. But anyone who's looked at this section knows tha some people's "system" has no limit.

-

It seems that the vast majority of people who expressed an opinion on this thread want to see threads about the girlfriends consolidated in some way.

-

My thought is: prince.org is a community. If the community seems to prefer a particular approach to make this a more inviting for everyone, with varied interests and opinions, to participate, then others shoud be wiling to go along with that. If they're not willing, then I'd wonder: is the person here to exchange ideas, info, and opinions with a robust communithy, or for some other reason?

-

Listen I participate in some topics here that routinely get re-routed by moderators. Is that personally "annoying" or time-consuming to me? I guess, sometimes. But I also recognize that not every person here has the same interests as me, and that this community is a shared space, and I respect that.

-

I hope that if the moderators take some efforts to change this section, no one then tries to express their disagreement by flooding the main board with complaints, attempting to divert unrelated threads to their preferred topic, etc. I think that woud be not helpful to this community at large.

-

And if someonen REALLY can't tolerate the rules or atmosphere here, that they're able to find another place on the internet (or in real life) that's more the kind of community they're looking for.

FlyOnTheWall said:

I agree. And, the ONLY thing that will fix this problem is a strictly adhered to ZERO TOLERANCE policy prohibiting personal attacks, name-calling, and bullying. That should be the focus of the moderators, not trying to censor the volume of threads about certain Prince love interests.

So, you've done a formal count? In so doing, are you able to weed out the people with multiple screen names who set out to skew perceptions here on Prince.org?

pinkcashmere23 said:

FlyOnTheWall said:

I guess that pretty much confirms what I've suspected all along: Lala exaggerates and embellishes her association with Prince.

[Edited 5/12/18 7:31am]

I don't know. She has some video clips on her IG that were posted in September of 2013 while at the Mall of America and what she said was taken at the arboretum in Eden Prairie. She was in Minneapolis for some reason.

I didn't say that I suspect that her association is fabricated. I said exaggerated.

FlyOnTheWall said:

pinkcashmere23 said:

I don't know. She has some video clips on her IG that were posted in September of 2013 while at the Mall of America and what she said was taken at the arboretum in Eden Prairie. She was in Minneapolis for some reason.

I didn't say that I suspect that her association is fabricated. I said exaggerated.

I wonder about that as well. She may have been working on a project for him at the time. The screen shot of the email that appears to be from him,looks like he was teasing her about how long it took for her to get ready to go out.

Nope, no formal count! But I'm very confident in my assessment. Feel free to formally count (people who posted on this thread expressly supporting unlimited threads about the same girlfiend vs people who posted on this thread supporting consolidation of threads about the same girlfriend and/or other limitations) and prove me wrong.

-

FlyOnTheWall said:

disch said:

Well looks like some folks (the usual suspects) took the moderators' request to "get it all out of their system" to heart on this thread. But anyone who's looked at this section knows tha some people's "system" has no limit.

-

It seems that the vast majority of people who expressed an opinion on this thread want to see threads about the girlfriends consolidated in some way.

-

My thought is: prince.org is a community. If the community seems to prefer a particular approach to make this a more inviting for everyone, with varied interests and opinions, to participate, then others shoud be wiling to go along with that. If they're not willing, then I'd wonder: is the person here to exchange ideas, info, and opinions with a robust communithy, or for some other reason?

-

Listen I participate in some topics here that routinely get re-routed by moderators. Is that personally "annoying" or time-consuming to me? I guess, sometimes. But I also recognize that not every person here has the same interests as me, and that this community is a shared space, and I respect that.

-

I hope that if the moderators take some efforts to change this section, no one then tries to express their disagreement by flooding the main board with complaints, attempting to divert unrelated threads to their preferred topic, etc. I think that woud be not helpful to this community at large.

-

And if someonen REALLY can't tolerate the rules or atmosphere here, that they're able to find another place on the internet (or in real life) that's more the kind of community they're looking for.

So, you've done a formal count? In so doing, are you able to weed out the people with multiple screen names who set out to skew perceptions here on Prince.org?

[Edited 5/12/18 7:53am]

FlyOnTheWall said:

PennyPurple said:

I've went from liking AA.....to see ya later, don't want to see ya no mo. Only because of posters who change threads (like this one) to nothing but AA.

If you go back to the first or second page, you will see that it was actually posts like yours that brought her name into this thread. I have only been responding to such posts. And, IMHO, if you really like someone, it would take more than posts on Prince.org to change that.

AA, You(fly) & pink is the reason this change is happening. I didn't bring AA love life into this thread, I said there are so many threads about AA. You have run with the love story on this thread and every thread, we can't talk about Judith Hill, Natayla without you bringing AA into it, other people have told you to stop hijacking their threads.

Was I the biggest AA fan ever, NO do I like AA, yes. Right now I'm sick of hearing so much about AA and 1/2 of it isn't even true, that I can't stand to hear her name.

So keep running with your fantasy Fly, because my bet is, you've turned quite a few people off to AA.

---------------

What this forum needs is an ignore button.

disch said:

Nope, no formal count! But I'm very confident in my assessment. Feel free formally count (people who posted on this thread expressly supporting unlimited threads about the same girlfiend vs people who posted on this thread supporting consolidation of threads about the same girlfriend) and prove me wrong.

-

FlyOnTheWall said:

So, you've done a formal count? In so doing, are you able to weed out the people with multiple screen names who set out to skew perceptions here on Prince.org?

Why would I waste my time doing that? Besides which, after I consolidated the identities of those using multiple screen names, I feel sure our results would be vastly different.

PennyPurple said:

FlyOnTheWall said:

If you go back to the first or second page, you will see that it was actually posts like yours that brought her name into this thread. I have only been responding to such posts. And, IMHO, if you really like someone, it would take more than posts on Prince.org to change that.

AA, You(fly) & pink is the reason this change is happening. I didn't bring AA love life into this thread, I said there are so many threads about AA. You have run with the love story on this thread and every thread, we can't talk about Judith Hill, Natayla without you bringing AA into it, other people have told you to stop hijacking their threads.

Was I the biggest AA fan ever, NO do I like AA, yes. Right now I'm sick of hearing so much about AA and 1/2 of it isn't even true, that I can't stand to hear her name.

So keep running with your fantasy Fly, because my bet is, you've turned quite a few people off to AA.

---------------

What this forum needs is an ignore button.

I see I'm not the only one who suspects that this whole thread is about trying to tamp down interest in and enthusiasm for Andy Allo. That's deep. But there's no problem with thread after thread about Mayte and whatever Prince product(s) she is selling.

FlyOnTheWall said:

PennyPurple said:

AA, You(fly) & pink is the reason this change is happening. I didn't bring AA love life into this thread, I said there are so many threads about AA. You have run with the love story on this thread and every thread, we can't talk about Judith Hill, Natayla without you bringing AA into it, other people have told you to stop hijacking their threads.

Was I the biggest AA fan ever, NO do I like AA, yes. Right now I'm sick of hearing so much about AA and 1/2 of it isn't even true, that I can't stand to hear her name.

So keep running with your fantasy Fly, because my bet is, you've turned quite a few people off to AA.

---------------

What this forum needs is an ignore button.

I see I'm not the only one who suspects that this whole thread is about trying to tamp down interest in and enthusiasm for Andy Allo. That's deep. But there's no problem with thread after thread about Mayte and whatever Prince product(s) she is selling.

Personally, I could do without those threads too.

I think it should be 1 (one) thread per associate to discuss anything about said associate and be done with it. I don't know why we need all of these different threads about the same associate. Just combine them to 1 thread of their own.

Will the ones such as Mayte's Appreciation thread no longer be allowed? As I mentioned earlier,it appears to be locked.

pinkcashmere23 said:

Will the ones such as Mayte's Appreciation thread no longer be allowed? As I mentioned earlier,it appears to be locked.

I would guess that thread probably self-locked. It had been open for months now.

PennyPurple said:

FlyOnTheWall said:

I see I'm not the only one who suspects that this whole thread is about trying to tamp down interest in and enthusiasm for Andy Allo. That's deep. But there's no problem with thread after thread about Mayte and whatever Prince product(s) she is selling.

Personally, I could do without those threads too.

I think it should be 1 (one) thread per associate to discuss anything about said associate and be done with it. I don't know why we need all of these different threads about the same associate. Just combine them to 1 thread of their own.

The "ignore button" is mental. That is, if there are multiple threads about something/someone about which you have no interest, all you have to do is scroll past them. Why should things be changed because certain people are apparently unwilling to ignore threads that don't interest them?

FlyOnTheWall said:

pinkcashmere23 said:

Will the ones such as Mayte's Appreciation thread no longer be allowed? As I mentioned earlier,it appears to be locked.

I would guess that thread probably self-locked. It had been open for months now.

That's what I was thinking since the last post was on May 2nd.

Change can't come soon enough for me.

Be careful what you ask for.

FlyOnTheWall said:

PennyPurple said:

Personally, I could do without those threads too.

I think it should be 1 (one) thread per associate to discuss anything about said associate and be done with it. I don't know why we need all of these different threads about the same associate. Just combine them to 1 thread of their own.

The "ignore button" is mental. That is, if there are multiple threads about something/someone about which you have no interest, all you have to do is scroll past them. Why should things be changed because certain people are apparently unwilling to ignore threads that don't interest them?

I do scroll right past them. If you notice my commenting on the associate threads has dwindled down quite a bit.

Change has to come because it is starting to be a huge problem, that has spun out of control.

PennyPurple said:

FlyOnTheWall said:

The "ignore button" is mental. That is, if there are multiple threads about something/someone about which you have no interest, all you have to do is scroll past them. Why should things be changed because certain people are apparently unwilling to ignore threads that don't interest them?

I do scroll right past them. If you notice my commenting on the associate threads has dwindled down quite a bit.

Change has to come because it is starting to be a huge problem, that has spun out of control.

Actually, I had not noticed.

PennyPurple said:

Personally, I could do without those threads too.

I think it should be 1 (one) thread per associate to discuss anything about said associate and be done with it. I don't know why we need all of these different threads about the same associate. Just combine them to 1 thread of their own.

I agree.

Then when they self lock thread can be started as they do for all other threads on PM&M.

I liked the Appreciation threads and participated in all of them.I also don't see a problem with a thread dedicated to a certain album or project of a protege or associated artist.I did think an update thread to keep up with news like OF4S suggested in one of Latin's threads about Andy was a good idea.

FlyOnTheWall said:

disch said:

Many other forums have ignore buttons for specific posters, to make it easier to avoid seeing posts from people who you don’t want to see. - Would you object to adding that functionality to this site fly? If so why? - FlyOnTheWall said:

The "ignore button" is mental. That is, if there are multiple threads about something/someone about which you have no interest, all you have to do is scroll past them. Why should things be changed because certain people are apparently unwilling to ignore threads that don't interest them?

Not at all, disch; however, I was making a point about the scrolling function that might have escaped you. In fact, I would LOVE to be able to push a button to block certain Orgers...but I don't see how that would work unless it were for orgNotes.

[Edited 5/12/18 8:30am]