independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Fri 14th Dec 2018 6:32pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > IVANKA'S EMAILS
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 7 1234567>
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 11/20/18 12:08am

DiminutiveRock
er

avatar

IVANKA'S EMAILS

Well well well - shoes on the other foot now, isn't it?


https://www.bbc.com/news/...-46271021



Ivanka Trump used personal email for White House business

  • 2 hours ago
_104407843_hi038839916.jpgImage copyrightWIN MCNAMEE/GETTY IMAGESImage captionMs Trump reportedly stopped using her personal email for official work after being told the rules

Ivanka Trump used a personal email account to send hundreds of messages discussing official White House business last year, officials confirm.

A review into her emails revealed she had used her private address to contact government officials.

"'Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.'' - Thomas Jefferson
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 11/20/18 2:28am

jaawwnn

avatar

And you will now see how much the GOP and their fans do not actually give a fuck about these things and what they hated was Hillary, not her email etiquette. Stop trying to score points against people who don't play the game.

[Edited 11/20/18 2:31am]

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 11/20/18 2:36am

BombSquad

avatar

^^

well, at elast we should give them a chance

we should give them the chance to come up with an excuse

we should give them the chance to "explain" why this is different and not comparable

we should give them the chance to expose themselves as the sad dumb pathetic rotten partisan fucks they are

2013 Obama & Castro - "and barack has once again bowed down to a despot"
2018 Trump & Kim - "and it is happening now! after nearly 65 years and 11 presidents"
biggest fucking hypocrite around LOL only in da forum...
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 11/20/18 2:43am

jaawwnn

avatar

Their response will be good for a laugh yeah, that's about it though.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 11/20/18 3:48am

SuperFurryAnim
al

avatar

Is Ivanka Trump an elected official? YES OR NO?

Trump turns from 'humbling' grief to midterm fire and furry
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 11/20/18 4:21am

BombSquad

avatar

LMFAO see? just as dumb as predictable

so should we give him a few hours before he spots his factual mistake himself?

I think so

2013 Obama & Castro - "and barack has once again bowed down to a despot"
2018 Trump & Kim - "and it is happening now! after nearly 65 years and 11 presidents"
biggest fucking hypocrite around LOL only in da forum...
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 11/20/18 4:23am

BombSquad

avatar

I just wondered... when are the next elections for secretary of state scheduled? don't wanna miss it LOL

2013 Obama & Castro - "and barack has once again bowed down to a despot"
2018 Trump & Kim - "and it is happening now! after nearly 65 years and 11 presidents"
biggest fucking hypocrite around LOL only in da forum...
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 11/20/18 4:28am

BombSquad

avatar

I also see that only elected officials have to follow the rules

right? RIGHT?




the hypocritic dumbfuckery is priceless

2013 Obama & Castro - "and barack has once again bowed down to a despot"
2018 Trump & Kim - "and it is happening now! after nearly 65 years and 11 presidents"
biggest fucking hypocrite around LOL only in da forum...
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 11/20/18 4:54am

13cjk13

BombSquad said:

I also see that only elected officials have to follow the rules

right? RIGHT?




the hypocritic dumbfuckery is priceless

He's waiting on NewsMax and Breitbart to supply him with some batshit crazy explanation. Hell, Fox "news" will probably give him some good lies and bullshit to spew about it. lol

"Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost".
-Thomas Jefferson
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 11/20/18 5:28am

jaawwnn

avatar

13cjk13 said:

BombSquad said:

I also see that only elected officials have to follow the rules

right? RIGHT?




the hypocritic dumbfuckery is priceless

He's waiting on NewsMax and Breitbart to supply him with some batshit crazy explanation. Hell, Fox "news" will probably give him some good lies and bullshit to spew about it. lol

here you go

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ivanka-trumps-lawyer-slams-misinformation-being-peddled-after-report-that-she-used-private-email-for-government-business


 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 11/20/18 6:43am

RodeoSchro

avatar

SuperFurryAnimal said:

Is Ivanka Trump an elected official? YES OR NO?



Is high-security-clearance federal employee Ivanka Trump subject to the same rules and laws as every other high-security-clearance federal employee? YES OR NO?

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 11/20/18 6:44am

RodeoSchro

avatar

BombSquad said:

I just wondered... when are the next elections for secretary of state scheduled? don't wanna miss it LOL



falloff Best post of the month! highfive

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 11/20/18 7:10am

DiminutiveRock
er

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

BombSquad said:

I just wondered... when are the next elections for secretary of state scheduled? don't wanna miss it LOL



falloff Best post of the month! highfive


AGREED ^ clapping




Apparently Jared was using his personal email to communicate with WH staff also. biggrin

"'Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.'' - Thomas Jefferson
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 11/20/18 7:23am

PennyPurple

avatar

Lock her up!

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 11/20/18 7:24am

PennyPurple

avatar

BombSquad said:

I just wondered... when are the next elections for secretary of state scheduled? don't wanna miss it LOL

Good one! lol

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 11/20/18 7:30am

jjhunsecker

avatar

Put the bitch behind bars !

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 11/20/18 9:43am

poppys

heart this thread. I'll buy the next round! falloff

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 11/20/18 10:17am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

if any were classified then that is a violation. but unless you wanted hillary charged too then you can not honestly want her charged.

so far 9 hypocrites in this topic....

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 11/20/18 10:23am

PennyPurple

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

if any were classified then that is a violation. but unless you wanted hillary charged too then you can not honestly want her charged.

so far 9 hypocrites in this topic....

lol The hypocrites are the Trump camp who started the lock her up chant, with Hillary.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 11/20/18 10:23am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

SuperFurryAnimal said:

Is Ivanka Trump an elected official? YES OR NO?



Is high-security-clearance federal employee Ivanka Trump subject to the same rules and laws as every other high-security-clearance federal employee? YES OR NO?

yup. and if she (as that woman ms clinton did) violate the law she should be investigated.


Yes or No Hillary should have been charged? (and she had 4 kinds of violations: 1) sending and receiving highly classified information on unsecured systems. 2) relocating/failing to secure highly classified information. 2) deleting tens of thousands of emails subject to an investigation. 4) public records violations. And a Bonus: she ordered the classification markers to be removed from a document and send it to her...

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 11/20/18 10:25am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

PennyPurple said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

if any were classified then that is a violation. but unless you wanted hillary charged too then you can not honestly want her charged.

so far 9 hypocrites in this topic....

lol The hypocrites are the Trump camp who started the lock her up chant, with Hillary.

only if the emails were classified... but you defended that woman miss clinton so NOW you want the law enforced even when you have no idea if the law was even broken?

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 11/20/18 10:29am

PennyPurple

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

PennyPurple said:

lol The hypocrites are the Trump camp who started the lock her up chant, with Hillary.

only if the emails were classified... but you defended that woman miss clinton so NOW you want the law enforced even when you have no idea if the law was even broken?

You must be on crack.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 11/20/18 10:32am

RodeoSchro

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

RodeoSchro said:



Is high-security-clearance federal employee Ivanka Trump subject to the same rules and laws as every other high-security-clearance federal employee? YES OR NO?

yup. and if she (as that woman ms clinton did) violate the law she should be investigated.


Yes or No Hillary should have been charged? (and she had 4 kinds of violations: 1) sending and receiving highly classified information on unsecured systems. 2) relocating/failing to secure highly classified information. 2) deleting tens of thousands of emails subject to an investigation. 4) public records violations. And a Bonus: she ordered the classification markers to be removed from a document and send it to her...




I'm fine with both of them being charged. One will win, and one will not win. I know which is which, and you do, too. And so does our president, which is why he will never let his daughter be charged. She'd lose, and go to jail.

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 11/20/18 10:42am

jjhunsecker

avatar

PennyPurple said:

lol The hypocrites are the Trump camp who started the lock her up chant, with Hillary.

Exactly ! But not a word from those folks...

It's the double standrds that disgust me

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 11/20/18 10:43am

Camileyun

When you are given a security clearance, they don't just hand it to you. You are briefed about the rules and the consequences of not following them. In the article cited above, they said that Ivanka was not told about the rules and when she found out, she fixed the issue. That seems highly unlikely. But Hillary is another story...she's been in government, in some capacity, for...well,way too long, knew the rules and blatantly did everything she could to get around them. She has yet to be held accountable. I have NO idea what Ivanka actually does in this administration, but I doubt China is clamouring to hack her email account.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 11/20/18 10:44am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

yup. and if she (as that woman ms clinton did) violate the law she should be investigated.


Yes or No Hillary should have been charged? (and she had 4 kinds of violations: 1) sending and receiving highly classified information on unsecured systems. 2) relocating/failing to secure highly classified information. 2) deleting tens of thousands of emails subject to an investigation. 4) public records violations. And a Bonus: she ordered the classification markers to be removed from a document and send it to her...




I'm fine with both of them being charged. One will win, and one will not win. I know which is which, and you do, too. And so does our president, which is why he will never let his daughter be charged. She'd lose, and go to jail.

your gal violated the law tens-of-thousands of times... and you really think she would be found not guilty?

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 11/20/18 10:49am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

Camileyun said:

When you are given a security clearance, they don't just hand it to you. You are briefed about the rules and the consequences of not following them. In the article cited above, they said that Ivanka was not told about the rules and when she found out, she fixed the issue. That seems highly unlikely. But Hillary is another story...she's been in government, in some capacity, for...well,way too long, knew the rules and blatantly did everything she could to get around them. She has yet to be held accountable. I have NO idea what Ivanka actually does in this administration, but I doubt China is clamouring to hack her email account.

yup... but it was very foolish for anyone in the trump camp to use private emails for any government stuff. but that is not necessarily a crime. but some of the two faced hillary lovers invent that it is as far as we know not comparable.

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 11/20/18 10:49am

poppys

See the source image

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 11/20/18 10:51am

jjhunsecker

avatar

Camileyun said:

When you are given a security clearance, they don't just hand it to you. You are briefed about the rules and the consequences of not following them. In the article cited above, they said that Ivanka was not told about the rules and when she found out, she fixed the issue. That seems highly unlikely. But Hillary is another story...she's been in government, in some capacity, for...well,way too long, knew the rules and blatantly did everything she could to get around them. She has yet to be held accountable. I have NO idea what Ivanka actually does in this administration, but I doubt China is clamouring to hack her email account.

Like her father, Ivanka believes that the rules don't actually apply to her...those are the rules for those beneath them, not for a TRUMP....

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 11/20/18 10:55am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

poppys said:

See the source image

talk to yourself much? She needs to be investigated. and if she sent or received any classified info she needs to face the music.

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 7 1234567>
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > IVANKA'S EMAILS