independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Tue 20th Feb 2018 5:09pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > Trump administration looking to attack and invade Iran in what will be 10x worse than Iraq.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 02/06/18 1:24am

hausofmoi7

avatar

Trump administration looking to attack and invade Iran in what will be 10x worse than Iraq.

I feel that perhaps like the situation with Israel -Palestine, North Korea and Venezuela that Donald Trump is getting bi-partisan support for militarism and an attack on Iran.
After all, Silk Road 2.0 is not possible without control of Iran.






[Edited 2/6/18 1:35am]
"It means finding the very human narrative of a man navigating between idealism and pragmatism, faith and politics, non-violence, the pitfalls of acclaim as the perils of rejection" – Lesley Hazleton on the first muslim, the prophet.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 02/06/18 1:28am

hausofmoi7

avatar

"Trillions with an 's' on the end" - General Patreaus.

"It means finding the very human narrative of a man navigating between idealism and pragmatism, faith and politics, non-violence, the pitfalls of acclaim as the perils of rejection" – Lesley Hazleton on the first muslim, the prophet.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 02/06/18 1:31am

hausofmoi7

avatar

Coltan from the Congo up next.
"It means finding the very human narrative of a man navigating between idealism and pragmatism, faith and politics, non-violence, the pitfalls of acclaim as the perils of rejection" – Lesley Hazleton on the first muslim, the prophet.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 02/06/18 1:49am

hausofmoi7

avatar

Please note the Nuance
In the west we have both the "left" and "right"
aiming for a war with Russia and China.
The reason being that Russia and China are imperial threats to the U.S.
A war with either Russia and China will always be abhorrent and reprehensible due to the human casualties, and must be opposed at every chance.
We must also acknowledge that just like the U.S, both Russia and China are militarily setting up in Africa to control the resources.
The result of African casualties and imperialism on the continent at the hands of either the U.S, Russia and China is an issue.


A war between U.S, Russia and China is not the answer.
We must also be vocal about what all three nations are doing on the continent in thier attempt to control resources.




[Edited 2/6/18 3:32am]
"It means finding the very human narrative of a man navigating between idealism and pragmatism, faith and politics, non-violence, the pitfalls of acclaim as the perils of rejection" – Lesley Hazleton on the first muslim, the prophet.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 02/06/18 3:33am

hausofmoi7

avatar

In the case of the U.S Vs Russia or U.S Vs China, we can not enter into a debate that is tantamount to "my massa is better than your massa" argument.
Let's keep it "100"


All three nations (u.s, China and Russia) have racist propaganda and undertones to support thier imperial ambitions.





.
[Edited 2/6/18 3:53am]
"It means finding the very human narrative of a man navigating between idealism and pragmatism, faith and politics, non-violence, the pitfalls of acclaim as the perils of rejection" – Lesley Hazleton on the first muslim, the prophet.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 02/06/18 7:13am

TrivialPursuit

The U.S. has been beating the war drums for Iran since Obama's years, at least. There is no reason to go into Iran. ZERO. Other than Imperialism.


Imperialism:

noun

  1. the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies.
  2. advocacy of imperial or sovereign interests over the interests of the dependent states.
  3. imperial government; rule by an emperor or empress.
  4. an imperial system of government.
  5. British. the policy of so uniting the separate parts of an empire with separate governments as to secure for certain purposes a single state.
This experience will cover courtship, sex, commitment, fetishes, loneliness, vindication, love, and hate.
http://bit.ly/1D3FG2U
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 02/06/18 7:42am

KoolEaze

avatar

hausofmoi7 said:

In the case of the U.S Vs Russia or U.S Vs China, we can not enter into a debate that is tantamount to "my massa is better than your massa" argument. Let's keep it "100" r imperial ambitions. . [EdAll three nations (u.s, China and Russia) have racist propaganda and undertones to support thieited 2/6/18 3:53am]

China? Racist?

How so?

" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"




http://kooleasehvac.com/
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 02/06/18 8:36am

hausofmoi7

avatar

N/m
[Edited 2/6/18 9:21am]
"It means finding the very human narrative of a man navigating between idealism and pragmatism, faith and politics, non-violence, the pitfalls of acclaim as the perils of rejection" – Lesley Hazleton on the first muslim, the prophet.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 02/06/18 8:58am

RodeoSchro

avatar

Wehn our genius president took office, Steve Bannon said we would ultimately be engaged in three wars. Two of them were the North China Sea, and Iran (can't remembe the third one, probably because I went into shock). One thing I know for a fact about neo-cons and alt-right Republicans like Bannon:

If they say they are going to do something, they ARE going to do it.

I have no doubt that if our genius president remains in office long enough, he'll get us into wars with Iran and North Korea.

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 02/06/18 9:12am

hausofmoi7

avatar

North Korea, Iran and Venezuela are the new targets.
"It means finding the very human narrative of a man navigating between idealism and pragmatism, faith and politics, non-violence, the pitfalls of acclaim as the perils of rejection" – Lesley Hazleton on the first muslim, the prophet.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 02/06/18 9:25am

RodeoSchro

avatar

hausofmoi7 said:

North Korea, Iran and Venezuela are the new targets.



Venezuela, yes that was the third one. Thanks.

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 02/06/18 10:46am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Read William Polk.

DJ is da man
"2freaky is very down." 2Elijah.
"2freaky convinced me to join Antifa: OnlyNDA
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > Trump administration looking to attack and invade Iran in what will be 10x worse than Iraq.