neosoulheart said:

lust said:

I find the whole "royal family" concept stupid. But that's just me.

I have naked pics of the Queen on the toilet, but nobody will buy them.

I'm still trying 2 understand why any one especially in the U.S. gives a dman about these people.

2freaky4church1 said:

Graycap23 said:

TypoQueen said:

neosoulheart said:
Diana was hounded to death by the press, no one wishes to see this ever to happen again.

Or hounded to death by a Royal Family who didn't want an Arab/Muslim/African in the family.

ISF said:

Nope, not just you.

smoothcriminal12 said:

I find the whole "royal family" concept stupid. But that's just me.

lust said:

I lived in London during some wayward years and us Americans who

are apoplectic about any royal family are that way because we have

never experienced a royal family. The English take their royal traditions

very seriously. We've no reference for "royality" other than maybe

the Kennedys during the 60s and 70s.

And they do actually work. It's mostly volunteer stuff but they aren't

sitting on they ass up in Buckingham Palace....

duccichucka said:

I lived in London during some wayward years and us Americans who

are apoplectic about any royal family are that way because we have

never experienced a royal family. The English take their royal traditions

very seriously. We've no reference for "royality" other than maybe

the Kennedys during the 60s and 70s.

And they do actually work. It's mostly volunteer stuff but they aren't

sitting on they ass up in Buckingham Palace....

Oh please, the Royal Family is a complete joke. All this Commonwealth bullshit.

Prince Phillip going to Africa saying to himself ''Oh, hello little African man, dance for me! Don't you know we used to own your family? Dance for me, little negro!''

What kind of a title is OBE? ''Order of the British Empire''. God bless Benjamin Zephaniah for rejecting the title.

You mean her royal rack.

ISF said:

duccichucka said:

I lived in London during some wayward years and us Americans who

are apoplectic about any royal family are that way because we have

never experienced a royal family. The English take their royal traditions

very seriously. We've no reference for "royality" other than maybe

the Kennedys during the 60s and 70s.

And they do actually work. It's mostly volunteer stuff but they aren't

sitting on they ass up in Buckingham Palace....

Oh please, the Royal Family is a complete joke. All this Commonwealth bullshit.

Prince Phillip going to Africa saying to himself ''Oh, hello little African man, dance for me! Don't you know we used to own your family? Dance for me, little negro!''

What kind of a title is OBE? ''Order of the British Empire''. God bless Benjamin Zephaniah for rejecting the title.

ISF said:

Okay. Let me make my position clearer.

1) I'm not offended by critisisim of the royals. I am neither for or against them. I am indifferent to the concept. I'm offended by falacial reasoning skills so tell me how the royals are leeches and and the U.K should be a republic. I'm fine with that. It's talking shit that offends me.

2) Disagreeing with your suggestion is not indicative of me being fearful of governmental retribution. It's rediculous to leap to that conclusion. So are you suggesting that anyone who disagrees publicly with critisism of any authority (or the employees of an authority) is only doing so out of fear? Okay, so everyone secretly agrees with you but is afraid to admit it. Very narcicistic.
Besides. I live in a democracy where I feel safe in airing my views against those who govern us. I am fortunate in that regard. I wasn't born into a culture than supresses views that negate the government. E.G many of the former and current dictatorships in the Arab and Islamic world.

3) Don't be offended by my using the term "conspiracy theory" to describe your sugestion. It is by definition. You see, you theorised that the royals conspired to create this scandal. Actually. Perhaps I should have called it a conspiracy hypothesis as you are yet to turn it into a theory by anomoly hunting for confirming info in support of your pre supposition. It's easy. Let me help. Why are they suing the magazine and not the paparazi photographer. Because he was in on it? There you go easy. Baseless, but easy to do. You'll easily find plenty of people who'll take that instantly as confirming evidence.

Anyway that's my opinion given freely and without fear of reprisal. It's a critique of your reasoning skills not support for the royals or the numptys that run Britain.

The royal family are redundant in my opinion in all but as a great income stream from tourism as the yanks seem to love that shit. But I have nothing against them as individuals. Live and let live and all that.

neosoulheart said:

no offense typo the 'royal family' is an 'older' person celebrity thing, kids have no interest, baby boomers are probably the last generation to give respect or damn about a royal family,




I don't think there is any reason why the royal family is above the same tactics as a Kardashian?

who have more 'people power than the real royal family,

Kim and Kanye would get a bigger audience than William and his wife,

lust said:

lust said:

I nervously screamed conspiracy?


Ok. So my real opinion is being repressed by fear of governmental retribution?

Righto. That's the only viable conclusion!

neosoulheart said:

lust said:

I nervously screamed conspiracy? Ok. So my real opinion is being repressed by fear of governmental retribution? Righto. That's the only viable conclusion!

No but you have held people I assume you don't know to higher standards than everyone else. You shut down the 'thought' because for whatever reason you feel people who are Royalty are above tactics that every other human is capable of doing? You have no idea what people would do for power, getting your "tits" out is hardly pushing it, espically if you can be made to look like a victim,