independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Sun 22nd Nov 2009 8:15pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > Nov. 7, 2009 -- House Passes Health Care Bill!
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 12 123456789>Last »
Add a reply to this topic   Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
AuthorMessage
Thread started 11/07/09 9:04pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

Nov. 7, 2009 -- House Passes Health Care Bill!





Now comes the hard part.....The Senate.
[Edited 11/7/09 21:08pm]

Tupac "Makaveli" Shakur (RIP 1971-1996) & Michael Jackson (RIP 1958-2009)

2 men that had their lives taken away the moment they were speaking out AND rebelling against the dark side of the music industry once too often.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 11/07/09 9:18pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

No, that's not the hard part.
The Senate will not be voting on the Houses' bill.
The Senate has its own.
The hard part is merging the two bills into one that will clear both Houses of Congress.


The bill proposes to spend $1.055 trillion to add 36 million Americans to the insurance rolls, largely paid for with a 5.4% surtax on the top 0.3% of earners and cutting Medicare Advantage programs.

It would create an exchange where small businesses and the uninsured could buy coverage, including a government-run public option. The abortion amendment bars anyone who gets federal subsidies from abortion coverage. The public option does not cover any elective abortions.

Under the bill, no insurance company could consider preexisting conditions, out-of-pocket expenses would be capped, there would be no co-pays for preventive care and the so-called "donut hole" would be closed in Medicare prescription drug coverage.

"This is the most important legislation I've voted on in my 21 years in Congress," Bronx Rep. Eliot Engel said.

Republicans argued the measure is too expensive, too tax-heavy, and a threat to jobs and American freedom.

Liberals savaged the anti-abortion provision. "This amendment threatens the health and rights of women to seek a legal procedure," said Westchester Rep. Nita Lowey, calling it "unnecessary and reprehensible."

But pro-choice Democrats voted for the overall measure anyway, helped along by Obama, who implored them to be on the "right side of history" and invoked the shootings at Fort Hood in his emotional appeal.

"He was absolutely inspiring. In a very moving way, he reminded us what sacrifice really is," said Rep. Rob Andrews, a New Jersey Democrat.

"It made a lot of people feel a little less sorry for themselves about their political problems."

A $61 billion GOP substitute bill failed after Democrats mocked it, noting that non-partisan number crunchers found it did little to help people get insurance.

mmcauliff@nydailynews.com



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.co...z0WF4sTJMn

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 11/07/09 9:24pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

Senate now in healthcare spotlight
Sun Nov 8, 2009 12:12am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - After a narrow win in the House of Representatives, President Barack Obama's fight for a sweeping healthcare overhaul moves to the Senate where it faces a difficult path to approval.

The Senate's version of healthcare reform has been stalled as Democratic leader Harry Reid awaits cost estimates from congressional budget analysts and searches for an approach that can win the 60 votes needed to overcome Republican procedural hurdles.

Eventually, the House and Senate will have to reconcile their separate bills into a single proposal that can be signed by Obama, who has set a now-threatened goal of finishing work by the end of the year.

Here is a look at how the issue might play out as it moves through Congress over the next few weeks:

SENATE BILL

Reid has made his toughest decision in merging the separate bills passed by the Finance and Health panels: He included a national government-run public insurance option, which was part of the Health bill but was not in the Finance measure.

Reid also included a compromise that would allow states to decline to participate, or "opt out," of the government-run program -- an effort to appease moderates, most from conservative Republican-leaning states, who oppose a national public option.

Reid has little margin for error -- Democrats control exactly 60 votes, the number needed to overcome procedural hurdles and pass a bill. Most of the dozen or so Democratic moderates in the Senate remain uncommitted or oppose the public option.
[Edited]
http://www.reuters.com/ar...7N20091108

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 11/07/09 10:11pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

SUPRMAN said:

No, that's not the hard part.
The Senate will not be voting on the Houses' bill.
The Senate has its own.
The hard part is merging the two bills into one that will clear both Houses of Congress.



I'll be very surprise if that happens at all. Remember, Joe Lieberman is considering to vote nay, which will definitely make the democrats' 60 votes down to 59. The Democrats need 60 to avoid all filibusters.

I'm looking for President Obama to cut a side deal with a CFR member within the Senate GOP to force a 60th vote.

Tupac "Makaveli" Shakur (RIP 1971-1996) & Michael Jackson (RIP 1958-2009)

2 men that had their lives taken away the moment they were speaking out AND rebelling against the dark side of the music industry once too often.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 11/07/09 11:12pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

TonyVanDam said:

SUPRMAN said:

No, that's not the hard part.
The Senate will not be voting on the Houses' bill.
The Senate has its own.
The hard part is merging the two bills into one that will clear both Houses of Congress.



I'll be very surprise if that happens at all. Remember, Joe Lieberman is considering to vote nay, which will definitely make the democrats' 60 votes down to 59. The Democrats need 60 to avoid all filibusters.

I'm looking for President Obama to cut a side deal with a CFR member within the Senate GOP to force a 60th vote.


That's how it's done with any legislation, unless it is assigned by the Constitution to a specific House. The respective Houses craft their own bill, then a joint committee works to create one bill from the two versions, which then goes to both Houses to be voted on. If it passes both Houses then it goes to the President.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 11/08/09 5:13am

purplemansionF
L

avatar

we finally have a health care bill in the works that works, the Republican bill did nothing for anyone that didnt hav insurance, this bill is for every American no matter their welth or social status, this is wat the Spirit of America is all about.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 11/08/09 7:08am

cborgman

avatar

woot!

"passing strange"... experience the real
http://www.youtube.com/wa...NFbc7gLzQE
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 11/08/09 7:19am

cborgman

avatar

to paraphrase palin:

merge baby, merge!

"passing strange"... experience the real
http://www.youtube.com/wa...NFbc7gLzQE
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 11/08/09 7:52am

OnlyNDaUsa

Just remember Obama 'gave' money to a business and now he wants to contol it...

Well now when he 'gives' us health care he will use that an an excuse to control us.

He has already said he wants to tax sugar! So what is next fried food? Is the hamburger next?

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 11/08/09 8:21am

BobGeorge909

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

Just remember Obama 'gave' money to a business and now he wants to contol it...

Well now when he 'gives' us health care he will use that an an excuse to control us.

He has already said he wants to tax sugar! So what is next fried food? Is the hamburger next?



shut up

One bright day in the middle if the night,
2 dead boys got up to fight.
Back 2 back they faced each other,
drew their swords and shot each other
A deaf Policeman head this noise,
he came and shot the 2 dead boys.
If you don't believe this lie
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 11/08/09 8:32am

OnlyNDaUsa

So you do not believe that obama WILL use this bill to control us? That it will not usher in a new regulations on what we can eat?

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 11/08/09 8:37am

violetblues

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

Just remember Obama 'gave' money to a business and now he wants to contol it...

Well now when he 'gives' us health care he will use that an an excuse to control us.

He has already said he wants to tax sugar! So what is next fried food? Is the hamburger next?



What's next? We all know what's next!

1. Gonna kill grandma
2. Obama will make you tofu
3. Obama is really Hitler because he wants the po' folk to have medical insurance
4. Everyone must eat mustard with their burger if reform passes
5. Public option is only the first step in joining forces will China and Russia

What a slippery slope!
[Edited 11/8/09 8:37am]

flag
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 11/08/09 8:37am

SUPRMAN

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

Just remember Obama 'gave' money to a business and now he wants to contol it...

Well now when he 'gives' us health care he will use that an an excuse to control us.

He has already said he wants to tax sugar! So what is next fried food? Is the hamburger next?


Do you think health care reform is unnecessary?
Should health care be more accessible, or reserved for those who can pay or are working for an employer that provides it?
You do know that you already subsidize sugar? Congress pays American sugar growers and keeps tariffs on cheaper imported sugar to support the subsidized sugar. So Congress could actually eliminate the tariff and tax sugar and you wouldn't notice.
High fructose corn syrup is a bigger health threat and what should be taxed.
Most manufacturers don't use sugar, they use corn syrup which is detrimental to consumer health.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 11/08/09 8:55am

BobGeorge909

avatar

SUPRMAN said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

Just remember Obama 'gave' money to a business and now he wants to contol it...

Well now when he 'gives' us health care he will use that an an excuse to control us.

He has already said he wants to tax sugar! So what is next fried food? Is the hamburger next?


Do you think health care reform is unnecessary?
Should health care be more accessible, or reserved for those who can pay or are working for an employer that provides it?
You do know that you already subsidize sugar? Congress pays American sugar growers and keeps tariffs on cheaper imported sugar to support the subsidized sugar. So Congress could actually eliminate the tariff and tax sugar and you wouldn't notice.
High fructose corn syrup is a bigger health threat and what should be taxed.
Most manufacturers don't use sugar, they use corn syrup which is detrimental to consumer health.



I applaud your ability to respond to this type of ignorance. It is a skill set I am working on.

One bright day in the middle if the night,
2 dead boys got up to fight.
Back 2 back they faced each other,
drew their swords and shot each other
A deaf Policeman head this noise,
he came and shot the 2 dead boys.
If you don't believe this lie
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 11/08/09 9:26am

OnlyNDaUsa

SUPRMAN said:


Do you think health care reform is unnecessary?


Yes I do. But I think this bill is going to do much more harm than good.

Should health care be more accessible, or reserved for those who can pay or are working for an employer that provides it?


YES I think it should be affordable and accessible for all. Except I think this bill would do the opposite. It will drive cost and access up for most. (and make major medical issues harder to get treated for ALL--except for the elites.

You do know that you already subsidize sugar? Congress pays American sugar growers and keeps tariffs on cheaper imported sugar to support the subsidized sugar. So Congress could actually eliminate the tariff and tax sugar and you wouldn't notice.


Of course we would notice, that would increase the production cost and that cost would be passed on to the consumer. So are you for raising the cost of sugary foods? (it would include corn syrup)


High fructose corn syrup is a bigger health threat and what should be taxed. Most manufacturers don't use sugar, they use corn syrup which is detrimental to consumer health.


Which is a choice the CONSUMER should make not the government. Same with trans-fats. Same with tar and nicotine levels. It is up to the individual to make choices.

But by this post it seems you agree that the government SHOULD be more active in regulating what THE PEOPLE are able to eat.

As far as those that just want to call names and not debate I just ask you remember what I am saying. That if this MESS passes and goes into full effect that the government will start to ban (or over tax) some things (not just foods but activities) they deem harmful for the common good and as a money savings regulation. And the masses blind by their fear of no heal

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 11/08/09 10:01am

2elijah

--
[Edited 11/8/09 10:10am]

Education, the greatest weapon
---
To know about humans, you first have to learn where they came from...
http://www.youtube.com/wa...V6A8oGtPc4
http://www.youtube.com/wa...04FKo3adw8
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 11/08/09 10:12am

violetblues

avatar

BobGeorge909 said:

SUPRMAN said:



Do you think health care reform is unnecessary?
Should health care be more accessible, or reserved for those who can pay or are working for an employer that provides it?
You do know that you already subsidize sugar? Congress pays American sugar growers and keeps tariffs on cheaper imported sugar to support the subsidized sugar. So Congress could actually eliminate the tariff and tax sugar and you wouldn't notice.
High fructose corn syrup is a bigger health threat and what should be taxed.
Most manufacturers don't use sugar, they use corn syrup which is detrimental to consumer health.



I applaud your ability to respond to this type of ignorance. It is a skill set I am working on.


Yeah, i was thiking the same thing, but really i think its just futile.
They really dont care, to some its just a game about seeing Obama fail.
[Edited 11/8/09 10:13am]

flag
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 11/08/09 10:44am

OnlyNDaUsa

violetblues said:



Yeah, i was thiking the same thing, but really i think its just futile.
They really dont care, to some its just a game about seeing Obama fail.



Not at all. It is a matter of opinion that this heath care bill is going to be bad for out nation health care system and that it will accelerate the government regulating our day ti day lives and activities. I believe that it will raise the cost and lower the access and quality. It has nothing to do with obama. So I will ask nice to NOT make up things about me or my motives.

Like I said I believe this bill if passed will be used to eliminate most private insurance (which is what Obama and Hillary have both said) companies and plans (except for the people passing this thing and the rich). I believe that total destruction of choice and competition for most people will do much more harm than good. Yet I am not resorting to incivilities.

And I am not being like the democrats who I believe to be liars by saying one thing (the public option is to create "choice and competition") and meaning another (this bill is to create single payer.) This is based on what they have said. So if you are for single payer then say so. If you are for the government regulating our behaviors in the name of the common good then just say you do. But there is not need to be rude when i say "President Obama wants single payer and wants to regulate what we eat and drink."

But ask yourself this! if this plan is so great why has congress given itself a opt out? If it is so much better, why when Obama was asked if he and his family would be on this government plan or seek out the best care, he said he would want the best care for his family. Do you really trust the salesperson that doesn't even use or trust the product they are selling?

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 11/08/09 11:35am

Bohemian67

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

violetblues said:



Yeah, i was thiking the same thing, but really i think its just futile.
They really dont care, to some its just a game about seeing Obama fail.



Not at all. It is a matter of opinion that this heath care bill is going to be bad for out nation health care system and that it will accelerate the government regulating our day ti day lives and activities. I believe that it will raise the cost and lower the access and quality. It has nothing to do with obama. So I will ask nice to NOT make up things about me or my motives.

Like I said I believe this bill if passed will be used to eliminate most private insurance (which is what Obama and Hillary have both said) companies and plans (except for the people passing this thing and the rich). I believe that total destruction of choice and competition for most people will do much more harm than good. Yet I am not resorting to incivilities.

And I am not being like the democrats who I believe to be liars by saying one thing (the public option is to create "choice and competition") and meaning another (this bill is to create single payer.) This is based on what they have said. So if you are for single payer then say so. If you are for the government regulating our behaviors in the name of the common good then just say you do. But there is not need to be rude when i say "President Obama wants single payer and wants to regulate what we eat and drink."

But ask yourself this! if this plan is so great why has congress given itself a opt out? If it is so much better, why when Obama was asked if he and his family would be on this government plan or seek out the best care, he said he would want the best care for his family. Do you really trust the salesperson that doesn't even use or trust the product they are selling?



You've never had this system so why don't you wait and see how it goes. Do you think everything here in EU is regulated, meaning our activities, food, drink etc. Nonsense. Absolute nonsense really. Everybody deserves and has a right to Health insurance no matter how rich or poor.

"You're just another part of me" MJ
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 11/08/09 11:46am

OnlyNDaUsa

Bohemian67 said:



You've never had this system so why don't you wait and see how it goes. Do you think everything here in EU is regulated, meaning our activities, food, drink etc. Nonsense. Absolute nonsense really. Everybody deserves and has a right to Health insurance no matter how rich or poor.


I rather not risk it. Maybe if Obama was honest about what his plan is I would be more trusting.

And I have to ask of those that support this bill: did you support the patriot act? Bush said it was necessary to keep us all safe. Yet some people said it did more harm than good!

Or the wars? Some said it would make things worst. But Bush said it would make us safer!

Why is it all of a sudden wrong to not trust the president? And I at least have evidence that Obama i a lair when he says it is just an option.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 11/08/09 11:56am

Bohemian67

avatar

Sure I understand your logic, but I really think Bush and Obama are from two different trees. At least the money for the health bill, as opposed to war, is being spent on the people at home. With all the shootouts that happen in America, can one really be "safe" anywhere there?

"You're just another part of me" MJ
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 11/08/09 11:58am

OnlyNDaUsa

Bohemian67 said:

Sure I understand your logic, but I really think Bush and Obama are from two different trees. At least the money for the health bill, as opposed to war, is being spent on the people at home. With all the shootouts that happen in America, can one really be "safe" anywhere there?



Liberty over life.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 11/08/09 12:01pm

lazycrockett

avatar

They need to get the Stupak Amendment out of it post haste.

"...I will go to the animal shelter and get you a kitty cat. I will let you fall in love...with that kitty cat. And then on some dark, cold night I will steal away into your home...and punch you in the face!"
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 11/08/09 5:25pm

shellyann

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

violetblues said:



Yeah, i was thiking the same thing, but really i think its just futile.
They really dont care, to some its just a game about seeing Obama fail.



Not at all. It is a matter of opinion that this heath care bill is going to be bad for out nation health care system and that it will accelerate the government regulating our day ti day lives and activities. I believe that it will raise the cost and lower the access and quality. It has nothing to do with obama. So I will ask nice to NOT make up things about me or my motives.

Like I said I believe this bill if passed will be used to eliminate most private insurance (which is what Obama and Hillary have both said) companies and plans (except for the people passing this thing and the rich). I believe that total destruction of choice and competition for most people will do much more harm than good. Yet I am not resorting to incivilities.

And I am not being like the democrats who I believe to be liars by saying one thing (the public option is to create "choice and competition") and meaning another (this bill is to create single payer.) This is based on what they have said. So if you are for single payer then say so. If you are for the government regulating our behaviors in the name of the common good then just say you do. But there is not need to be rude when i say "President Obama wants single payer and wants to regulate what we eat and drink."

But ask yourself this! if this plan is so great why has congress given itself a opt out? If it is so much better, why when Obama was asked if he and his family would be on this government plan or seek out the best care, he said he would want the best care for his family. Do you really trust the salesperson that doesn't even use or trust the product they are selling?


No way! If the cogressman will not use it for themselves, then I don't trust it! If they were told they had to be on this plan too....they would all be working their tails off to ammend it!

As an employer of a very small company, trying to scrape by in this economy, taking huge paycuts myself, and borrowing money to keep paying my employees....I will be brutally honest.If this healthcare plan goes through, many more people will lose their jobs. We, along with many other small businesses, are hanging on by a thread and the penalty or/and insuring some of our older people will put us out of business! We were hoping our business would grow and eventually we would be able to offer health insurance. Now we can't even meet payroll without loans!

Wake up!......Wake up!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 11/08/09 5:45pm

BobGeorge909

avatar

shellyann said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:




Not at all. It is a matter of opinion that this heath care bill is going to be bad for out nation health care system and that it will accelerate the government regulating our day ti day lives and activities. I believe that it will raise the cost and lower the access and quality. It has nothing to do with obama. So I will ask nice to NOT make up things about me or my motives.

Like I said I believe this bill if passed will be used to eliminate most private insurance (which is what Obama and Hillary have both said) companies and plans (except for the people passing this thing and the rich). I believe that total destruction of choice and competition for most people will do much more harm than good. Yet I am not resorting to incivilities.

And I am not being like the democrats who I believe to be liars by saying one thing (the public option is to create "choice and competition") and meaning another (this bill is to create single payer.) This is based on what they have said. So if you are for single payer then say so. If you are for the government regulating our behaviors in the name of the common good then just say you do. But there is not need to be rude when i say "President Obama wants single payer and wants to regulate what we eat and drink."

But ask yourself this! if this plan is so great why has congress given itself a opt out? If it is so much better, why when Obama was asked if he and his family would be on this government plan or seek out the best care, he said he would want the best care for his family. Do you really trust the salesperson that doesn't even use or trust the product they are selling?


No way! If the cogressman will not use it for themselves, then I don't trust it! If they were told they had to be on this plan too....they would all be working their tails off to ammend it!

As an employer of a very small company, trying to scrape by in this economy, taking huge paycuts myself, and borrowing money to keep paying my employees....I will be brutally honest.If this healthcare plan goes through, many more people will lose their jobs. We, along with many other small businesses, are hanging on by a thread and the penalty or/and insuring some of our older people will put us out of business! We were hoping our business would grow and eventually we would be able to offer health insurance. Now we can't even meet payroll without loans!



well...working for a small company w/o health insurance, they're screwed either way. If they have a job and get cancer...then they're gonna be unemployed shortly before they die because they'd be too ill to work.

If they're unemployed because of mandatory health insurance raised operating costs for the emplyer...then they'll still loose their job. Oh, but because of the insurance mandated , with the cost assisted in part or in whole by the gov't, they'll still have their life when they get through the chemo.


I'm sorry the business was unsuccessful, but at least this person is still alive because of health insurance.

Maybe a better business plan could have accounted for the problems U encountered, maybe not. Either way, the cost of personal insurance is IMPOSSIBE for an individual to cover without employer or gov't assistance.

One bright day in the middle if the night,
2 dead boys got up to fight.
Back 2 back they faced each other,
drew their swords and shot each other
A deaf Policeman head this noise,
he came and shot the 2 dead boys.
If you don't believe this lie
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 11/08/09 5:54pm

BobGeorge909

avatar

When I was 19, through NO FAULT of my own. I developed a kidney stone. I was leaving school, needed to work full time, and couldn't balance the two. SInce I was no longer in school My fathers health insurance was dropping me. My coverage ended on June 30. I got this Stone on June 26th, or summin like that. I told the Dr. what was happening in regards to insurance...he hurried the whole process up to get it done and our before the end of the month. The stone was too big to pass. It was larger than the diameter of my ureter.

Fast forward to the 29th, thwe perform the operation to get it out. Un successful. Still ther. Still in LOADS of pain. Another operation could not be done befor the end of the month. They got it out on the 3rd or some shit like that. The cost to me was a full $15,000. Now I'm 19-20 years old. Paying rent, car note, car insurance, utilities...all that jazz. Needless to say. I donb't bhave the dought to pay this shit. Before my life got started, my credit was screwed through not much fault of my own. This started a whole larger ball getting rolling that I'm not even going into right now. Had I just been the resident of a country w/ national health care, this huge ball would have never started rolling.

I'M POSITIVE I am not the only one who, though no fault of their own, had their lives turned around because of a simple medical process that costs them more than they have.

One bright day in the middle if the night,
2 dead boys got up to fight.
Back 2 back they faced each other,
drew their swords and shot each other
A deaf Policeman head this noise,
he came and shot the 2 dead boys.
If you don't believe this lie
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 11/08/09 5:59pm

OnlyNDaUsa

BobGeorge909 said:



well...working for a small company w/o health insurance, they're screwed either way. If they have a job and get cancer...then they're gonna be unemployed shortly before they die because they'd be too ill to work.

If they're unemployed because of mandatory health insurance raised operating costs for the emplyer...then they'll still loose their job. Oh, but because of the insurance mandated , with the cost assisted in part or in whole by the gov't, they'll still have their life when they get through the chemo.


I'm sorry the business was unsuccessful, but at least this person is still alive because of health insurance.

Maybe a better business plan could have accounted for the problems U encountered, maybe not. Either way, the cost of personal insurance is IMPOSSIBE for an individual to cover without employer or gov't assistance.



Ya know, if it was REALLY a private option that was set up to actually compete HONESTLY with private companies then sure, why not a government run health care plan. However the plan is set up to crush private insurance. No company could ever get away with what this bill is calling for.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 11/08/09 6:15pm

violetblues

avatar

shellyann said:



No way! If the cogressman will not use it for themselves, then I don't trust it! If they were told they had to be on this plan too....they would all be working their tails off to ammend it!

As an employer of a very small company, trying to scrape by in this economy, taking huge paycuts myself, and borrowing money to keep paying my employees....I will be brutally honest.If this healthcare plan goes through, many more people will lose their jobs. We, along with many other small businesses, are hanging on by a thread and the penalty or/and insuring some of our older people will put us out of business! We were hoping our business would grow and eventually we would be able to offer health insurance. Now we can't even meet payroll without loans!



First of all. i don't understand why the right keep talking like its a mandate, If you like your insurance, that's great, keep it. It's an "option" hence the term "public option".
Secondly, i feel you, I'm on the same boat with a "very small business", and as one of the self employed, i cant get the rate discounts big companies get, so I'm on my own.
The current House version would exempt small business employers with payrolls below $500,000 from a requirement to provide health insurance coverage to employees. If you are a "very small business" i would say you are exempt.

That just reminds me of the "Joe The Plumber" nonsense,.. when the dude would actually get a tax cut.

For me this is a huge step in the right direction, not just for me, but for my employees, and the country as a whole.

Now, if you really want to talk about what really hurts small business, lets talk about out of control workers comp! More small businesses cut workers or close shop for that one thing.
[Edited 11/8/09 18:39pm]

flag
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 11/08/09 6:16pm

shellyann

avatar

BobGeorge909 said:

shellyann said:

[/b]

No way! If the cogressman will not use it for themselves, then I don't trust it! If they were told they had to be on this plan too....they would all be working their tails off to ammend it!

As an employer of a very small company, trying to scrape by in this economy, taking huge paycuts myself, and borrowing money to keep paying my employees....I will be brutally honest.If this healthcare plan goes through, many more people will lose their jobs. We, along with many other small businesses, are hanging on by a thread and the penalty or/and insuring some of our older people will put us out of business! We were hoping our business would grow and eventually we would be able to offer health insurance. Now we can't even meet payroll without loans!



well...working for a small company w/o health insurance, they're screwed either way. If they have a job and get cancer...then they're gonna be unemployed shortly before they die because they'd be too ill to work.

If they're unemployed because of mandatory health insurance raised operating costs for the emplyer...then they'll still loose their job. Oh, but because of the insurance mandated , with the cost assisted in part or in whole by the gov't, they'll still have their life when they get through the chemo.


I'm sorry the business was unsuccessful, but at least this person is still alive because of health insurance.

Maybe a better business plan could have accounted for the problems U encountered, maybe not. Either way, the cost of personal insurance is IMPOSSIBE for an individual to cover without employer or gov't assistance.


You make some good points, but I am not ready to throw in the towel or lay my people off yet. When we started the company,the individuals we hired did not need health insurance. They have spouses who work at hospitals with great insurance covering their whole families. They knew they were taking a risk with a start-up and wanted to be a part of it. One employee is a young guy who asked for additional pay to cover his own, which we were happy to provide. The other 3 employees are in our immediate family and we have an individual family plan.No one in our company is without health insurance! But an 8% penalty doesn't even reflect profit margin at this point.

Wake up!......Wake up!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 11/08/09 6:26pm

shellyann

avatar

violetblues said:

shellyann said:



No way! If the cogressman will not use it for themselves, then I don't trust it! If they were told they had to be on this plan too....they would all be working their tails off to ammend it!

As an employer of a very small company, trying to scrape by in this economy, taking huge paycuts myself, and borrowing money to keep paying my employees....I will be brutally honest.If this healthcare plan goes through, many more people will lose their jobs. We, along with many other small businesses, are hanging on by a thread and the penalty or/and insuring some of our older people will put us out of business! We were hoping our business would grow and eventually we would be able to offer health insurance. Now we can't even meet payroll without loans!



First of all. i don't understand why the right keep talking like its a mandate, If your plan is great keep it. It's an "option" hence the term "public option.
Secondly, i feel you, I'm on the same boat with a "very small business", and as a one of the self employed, i cant get the rate discounts big companies get and I'm on my own.
The current House version would exempt small business employers with payrolls below $500,000 from a requirement to provide health insurance coverage to employees. If you are a "very small business" i would say you are exempt.

That all just reminds me of the "Joe The Plumber" nonsense,.. when the dude would actually get a tax cut.

For me this is a huge step in the right direction, not just for me, but for my employees, and the country as a whole.

Now, if you really want to talk about what really hurts small business, lets talk about out of control workers comp! More small businesses cut workers or close shop for that one thing.


Well, that would call for a brand new thread! lol

It is true we are not at the 500K mark yet, but just like any business, we would like to be able to provide that many jobs to our community, and until the economy tanked we were on target to have enough hires to be there by 3Q 2010. Now, we just want to survive!

Wake up!......Wake up!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 12 123456789>Last »
Add a reply to this topic   Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > Nov. 7, 2009 -- House Passes Health Care Bill!