Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)| Author | Message |
The Catholic Vote and Abortion The Catholic Church caution voters to give consideration to their eternal salvation regarding their vote on a non-negotiable issue.
Welcome to the New World Odor and
the Mythmaking Moonbattery of Obamanation. Chains We Can Bereave In LIBERALISM IS A CONSPIRACY THEORY | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I am catholic and I I were from the USA I would vote for Obama as my conscience would tell me it's the right thing to do Martina, now orgs official resident fairy/pixie Your name...it means Warrior. So, you are the "warrior fairy!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Considering how they handled all those molestation charges, they should probably worry about their own salvation. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Jesus died for peoples' sins, not the Catholic Church. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on progress of social uplift is approaching spiritual death."-MLK, Jr. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
There is only one unforgivable sin and abortion aint it. 2009: Mermaids and Dolphins... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: Considering how they handled all those molestation charges, they should probably worry about their own salvation.
I agree. I think it's safe to say that the Catholic Church has lost whatever moral authority it could ever claim to have. The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleKnight said: Imago said: Considering how they handled all those molestation charges, they should probably worry about their own salvation.
I agree. I think it's safe to say that the Catholic Church has lost whatever moral authority it could ever claim to have. It's almost comedic | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleKnight said: Imago said: Considering how they handled all those molestation charges, they should probably worry about their own salvation.
I agree. I think it's safe to say that the Catholic Church has lost whatever moral authority it could ever claim to have. In what do you think the Church has always claimed for as its ground or source of authority? its own perfection...? or, to generalize the question, what is the source of any moral authority? your dismissal of the Church's position on abortion, or its authority to speak authoritatively on the issue, is aimed at a straw-man. Welcome to the New World Odor and
the Mythmaking Moonbattery of Obamanation. Chains We Can Bereave In LIBERALISM IS A CONSPIRACY THEORY | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: There is only one unforgivable sin and abortion aint it.
amen brotha. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on progress of social uplift is approaching spiritual death."-MLK, Jr. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: PurpleKnight said: I agree. I think it's safe to say that the Catholic Church has lost whatever moral authority it could ever claim to have. It's almost comedic Listen to the second clip and you'll notice those forgiving priests using "Hussein" as a selling point for their fraud! 2009: Mermaids and Dolphins... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HiinEnkelte said: PurpleKnight said: I agree. I think it's safe to say that the Catholic Church has lost whatever moral authority it could ever claim to have. In what do you think the Church has always claimed for as its ground or source of authority? its own perfection...? or, to generalize the question, what is the source of any moral authority? your dismissal of the Church's position on abortion, or its authority to speak authoritatively on the issue, is aimed at a straw-man. Where did I ever use words like "perfection" or dismiss their position on abortion? Ironically, you're the one making a straw man out of me while bringing up the term. The Church claims moral authority on the basis of representing the word of almighty God. Judging them by their actions, though, their treatment of the molestation charges has shown them to be a hypocritical institution. The video doesn't take into account that while Obama being pro-choice is a conflict of interest for Catholics, John McCain supporting an indefinite extension of a war where adults and children are being killed every day is an equally important moral issue, if not an altogether greater one. The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HiinEnkelte said: PurpleKnight said: I agree. I think it's safe to say that the Catholic Church has lost whatever moral authority it could ever claim to have. In what do you think the Church has always claimed for as its ground or source of authority? its own perfection...? or, to generalize the question, what is the source of any moral authority? your dismissal of the Church's position on abortion, or its authority to speak authoritatively on the issue, is aimed at a straw-man. Let me get this straigh. You have an organization that protected closetted men who are guilty of abusing children and they get some kind of pass because it is not they who are the source of this "authority" you speak of. But voting for a candidate that sympathizes with women who choose abortion are off limits and potentially damning the very souls of Catholics? 2009: Mermaids and Dolphins... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hiin, you're right insofar as abortion is a bright-line issue on which Catholics are taught to stand against.
Catholics often face difficult choices about how to vote. This is why it is so important to vote according to a well-formed conscience that perceives the proper relationship among moral goods. A Catholic cannot vote for a candidate who takes a position in favor of an intrinsic evil, such as abortion or racism, if the voter’s intent is to support that position. In such cases a Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in grave evil. At the same time, a voter should not use a candidate’s opposition to an intrinsic evil to justify indifference or inattentiveness to other important moral issues involving human life and dignity.
A Catholic can in good conscience vote for a candidate whom s/he believes is the best candidate, notwithstanding the candidate's pro-choice position. Those clergy and lay Catholics that imply otherwise are speaking out of clear conscience, but the USCCB's statement contradicts them. And, pay attention to the last sentence of the passage. The Amercian bishops don't want Catholic teachings to be misread such that a voter/politician's pro-life position is a free pass to ignore the other issues on which it takes a clear stand. Such as services for the poor, healthcare, immigration, education, and other issues many "pro-life" Catholics, in my view, ignore because they feel overly justified by their anti-abortion stands. http://www.usccb.org/fait...tement.pdf Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
namepeace said: Hiin, you're right insofar as abortion is a bright-line issue on which Catholics are taught to stand against.
But voting for a candidate is not that simple. And, contrary to what many Catholics would have us believe, the Church's position is more nuanced. In the U.S. Conference on Catholic Bishops' paper, Faithful Citizenship, here is the standard (which I've posted many times, and which, IIRC, you have not addressed despite my many invitations to do so): Catholics often face difficult choices about how to vote. This is why it is so important to vote according to a well-formed conscience that perceives the proper relationship among moral goods. A Catholic cannot vote for a candidate who takes a position in favor of an intrinsic evil, such as abortion or racism, if the voter’s intent is to support that position. In such cases a Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in grave evil. At the same time, a voter should not use a candidate’s opposition to an intrinsic evil to justify indifference or inattentiveness to other important moral issues involving human life and dignity.
A Catholic can in good conscience vote for a candidate whom s/he believes is the best candidate, notwithstanding the candidate's pro-choice position. Those clergy and lay Catholics that imply otherwise are speaking out of clear conscience, but the USCCB's statement contradicts them. And, pay attention to the last sentence of the passage. The Amercian bishops don't want Catholic teachings to be misread such that a voter/politician's pro-life position is a free pass to ignore the other issues on which it takes a clear stand. Such as services for the poor, healthcare, immigration, education, and other issues many "pro-life" Catholics, in my view, ignore because they feel overly justified by their anti-abortion stands. http://www.usccb.org/fait...tement.pdf 2009: Mermaids and Dolphins... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleKnight said: HiinEnkelte said: In what do you think the Church has always claimed for as its ground or source of authority? its own perfection...? or, to generalize the question, what is the source of any moral authority? your dismissal of the Church's position on abortion, or its authority to speak authoritatively on the issue, is aimed at a straw-man. Where did I ever use words like "perfection" or dismiss their position on abortion? Ironically, you're the one making a straw man out of me while bringing up the term. The Church claims moral authority on the basis of representing the word of almighty God. no, that is not what their authority as they understand it, is based on. the moral failings of any number of priests bears not at on the authority of The Church, and they never claimed otherwise. that's why the charge of hypocrisy misses the mark as responsive on the question of authority. Judging them by their actions, though, their treatment of the molestation charges has shown them to be a hypocritical institution.
there is perfection and there is non-perfection. the salvation of the Church and its authority are not of its own works or because of its moral rectitude. The video doesn't take into account that while Obama being pro-choice is a conflict of interest for Catholics, John McCain supporting an indefinite extension of a war where adults and children are being killed every day is an equally important moral issue, if not an altogether greater one.
that would be to weakly pit a argument about the most prudential course of action with regard to the iraq & afghanistan wars, something over which reasonable and moral minds can reasonably differ, against a non-negotiable issue of fundamental principle, an issue upon which no reasonable or moral disagreement is possible. just as no one could reasonably argue that any other class human beings can be killed as a matter of fundamental right and personal choice, be they mexicans, blacks, women, the elderly, albinos, etc, simply for being numbered among that class of humans. . [Edited 11/3/08 12:31pm] Welcome to the New World Odor and
the Mythmaking Moonbattery of Obamanation. Chains We Can Bereave In LIBERALISM IS A CONSPIRACY THEORY | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I can't be bothered watching all that.....did anyone quote any scriptures? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: Considering how they handled all those molestation charges, they should probably worry about their own salvation.
“When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a Communist.” Brazilian bishop Dom Hélder Câmara | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleKnight said: Imago said: Considering how they handled all those molestation charges, they should probably worry about their own salvation.
I agree. I think it's safe to say that the Catholic Church has lost whatever moral authority it could ever claim to have. The premise is that the Church's moral authority as based solely in the clergy who run it. That is only partially true. The Church's authority is derived from Jesus Christ. Not a pope, cardinal, archbishop, bishop, priest deacon or nun, whose respective moral authorities are distinct. I'd also add that Catholics as a collective carry great moral authority. Unless you believe that each and every one of the billion or so Catholics is morally bankrupt. Together, they have a pretty good amount of moral authority, don't you think? By that reasoning, the Church's teaching of abortion as morally wrong, which has its basis in the Scriptures, is a nullity based on the Church's separate failure to protect the kids. The sin of the Church is indelible. But I'm just giving you something else to think on. [Edited 11/3/08 13:32pm] Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HiinEnkelte said: PurpleKnight said: there is perfection and there is non-perfection. the salvation of the Church and its authority are not of its own works or because of its moral rectitude. Is that a justification for crimes they perpetrate? If so, it is a very weak one. Their handling of the molestation charges is not non-perfection, but rather explicit immorality. If the authority is indeed not based on the clergy and their actions, I'd argue that it rightly should be. that would be to weakly pit a argument about the most prudential course of action with regard to the iraq & afghanistan wars, something over which reasonable and moral minds can reasonably differ, against a non-negotiable issue of fundamental principle, an issue upon which no reasonable or moral disagreement is possible.
I'm also arguing on the basis of a fundamental principle; that illegal occupation is morally wrong and also non-negotiable. just as no one could reasonably argue that any other class human beings can be killed as a matter of fundamental right and personal choice, be they mexicans, blacks, women, the elderly, albinos, etc, simply for being numbered among that class of humans.
You seem to be leading the topic into a debate about abortion, which I have no interest engaging in with you again. . [Edited 11/3/08 12:31pm] [Edited 11/3/08 13:30pm] The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
there is perfection and there is non-perfection.
the salvation of the Church and its authority are not of its own works or because of its moral rectitude. Uh-oh, salvation and justification talk, batten down the hatches. But I'd agree with the general premise that the Church's salvation, and the extent of its authority, is derived through Christ its Lord. Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
namepeace said: PurpleKnight said: I agree. I think it's safe to say that the Catholic Church has lost whatever moral authority it could ever claim to have. The premise is that the Church's moral authority as based solely in the clergy who run it. That is only partially true. The Church's authority is derived from Jesus Christ. Not a pope, cardinal, archbishop, bishop, priest deacon or nun, whose respective moral authorities are distinct. I'd also add that Catholics as a collective carry great moral authority. Unless you believe that each and every one of the billion or so Catholics is morally bankrupt. Together, they have a pretty good amount of moral authority, don't you think? Just giving you something else to think on. Again, judging by how slient the "billions" or so Catholics were on the molestation issues, those "billions" still lack moral authority to talk about anything. “When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a Communist.” Brazilian bishop Dom Hélder Câmara | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I just object in general to the idea that the actions of the Church's most prominent figures should in no way detract from the Church's moral authority on the basis of a divine claim. The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleKnight said: I just object in general to the idea that the actions of the Church's most prominent figures should in no way detract from the Church's moral authority on the basis of a divine claim.
Exactly. I mean how can anyone with a straight face FORCE personal responsibility on a woman and then come up with these cryptic answers in response to the church's moral authority, this the same church who looked the other way for DECADES while children were being abused by the clergy? 2009: Mermaids and Dolphins... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm curious to know to what extent it's proper to characterize comments by two individual bishops as the statements of "the Catholic Church." I'd imagine there are more than a few catechists who'd arrive at similar conclusions with regard to formal cooperation with an excommunicable act; but I'd imagine there are many who'd hold equally informed readings of catechesis, yet glean quite different implications (e.g. the U.S. Conference on Catholic Bishops) ...especially where something as tense as eternal salvation is regarded.
________________
Sundiata J., Prince fan extraordinaire. R.I.P., brother. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: There is only one unforgivable sin and abortion aint it.
I hope it's not killing cats or you're screwed . [Edited 11/3/08 14:22pm] You owe me $5. I caught the big fish....again | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Catholics for Obama: No qualms about abortion issue
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lascantas said: Barack Obama: The making of a candidate Photos CatholicsforObama.org argues that voting on the basis of only one issue runs afoul of the faith. Obama's broader social policies would do more to reduce the number of abortions than anything proposed by Sen. John McCain, who is an open opponent of the landmark Roe v. Wade decision. the group says. The crux of the argument is that criminalizing the procedure is less effective in reducing abortions than addressing the social circumstances that lead women to seek them.
This is ALL WE ARE SAYING! I can't believe that this part of the equation is so willingly ignored by those who claim the moral highhorse. I can't wait till that horse is dogfood and glue 2009: Mermaids and Dolphins... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JellyBean said: Again, judging by how slient the "billions" or so Catholics were on the molestation issues, those "billions" still lack moral authority to talk about anything. For the record, there are 1 billion Catholics in this world. And second of all, who exactly are you to say that we were all silent? You don't know what a billion people have done, internally and publically, to deal with their Church's abuses. In many cases, the rank-and-file members were kept in the dark about the backgrounds of many of these clergy. That's awfully high and mighty of you to overgeneralize, your argument is facile. Unless your name is Jesus Christ, your judgment of the moral authority of so many individuals is laughable. [Edited 11/3/08 14:36pm] [Edited 11/3/08 14:37pm] Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
namepeace said: JellyBean said: Again, judging by how slient the "billions" or so Catholics were on the molestation issues, those "billions" still lack moral authority to talk about anything. For the record, there are 1 billion Catholics in this world. And second of all, who exactly are you to say that we were all silent? You don't know what a billion people have done, internally and publically, to deal with their Church's abuses. That's awfully high and mighty of you. I think the point is that Catholics are expected to follow priestly edicts like lemmings to the polls. Catholics who blindly vote on this issue can hardly be held up as illustrative expamples of a constituency that is challenging the church on any issue. 2009: Mermaids and Dolphins... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleKnight said: I just object in general to the idea that the actions of the Church's most prominent figures should in no way detract from the Church's moral authority on the basis of a divine claim.
Fair, but let's not conflate Christ's authority with that of the leaders of his Church. Abortion isn't considered a sin because a pope or cardinal says it is, or because any one Catholic says it is. It's considered a sin because of God's mandate that all life is of Him and therefore sacred. If the basis of the principle was the moral authority of humans, then you would be right that the authority on which the abortion teaching is based would be indelibly compromised. Because none of us have perfect moral authority. Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)