Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)| Author | Message |
If someone ask you why Obama? Tell them this... If someone ask you why Obama? Tell them this...
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Wouldn't it be better to give them an opinion formed on your own rather than one you knicked from a Prince website?
There were two side effects:
1. He can mess up a guy, just by touching him. 2. He became a humorless dick. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Good points.
Ignore this post.
I don't need the encouragement. "Criticism is the laziest form of expression ." - some deep dude. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrysharronsluvchild said: If someone ask you why Obama? Tell them this...
I'll answer this in two parts: 1) Why I'm not voting for Hillary: She is now running on the claim that she has 35 years of experience, however that's obviously a bogus claim. She's 60. So basically, she's saying that everything she's done since she graduated from college gives her the experience to be president. If that's so, then how is that different from any other candidate. If we're to elect someone on years since college then we should all vote McCain. She claims that being First Lady gave her the experience to be President, yet last I checked First Lady wasn't a cabinet position. She claims that she was a trusted advisor to Bill, but when the press went after communications that would demonstrate her roll in his presidency, Bill made sure that they couldn't get to them until after the primary season. Also, she brings up the battles she's fought agaisnt the Republicans throughout the years, but how many has she won? She says she has a proven track record of winning, but she was first put in charge of bringing about universal healthcare back in '93. Do we have universal healthcare. No, because she failed, and the enemies who defeated her then are still around today and hate her even more because she's been fighting them and losing in the Senate since then. Furthermore, she was the last of the major candidates to give a detailed platform. She was the last with a healthcare plan. For most of 2007, she was basically simply saying "elect me, my name is Clinton." Then when that started to fail because Barack's groundwork started to kick in and he became a contender, she turned to tears (and again yesterday). What's even more disgusting is that when her back was against the wall, she turned dirty. She's run a horribly nasty campaign, launching personal attacks at Obama through surrogates so that she can use plausible deniability when anyone tried to hold her to account. In SC, she and Bill, sensing that black voters had finally embraced Barack, used race baiting to try and make his race the issue that it hadn't been prior to then so that they could paint him as the "Black candidate" to the rest of the country and abate his legitimacy. This has said to me that she will do anything to be President. She is after power, which is probably why she stayed with Bill through his BS. If anyone remembers Bill Clintons second term, he was very popular, but the federal government was at a complete stand still as the Republican Congress refused to compromise and all we had was bitter partisan bickering. Clinton brings that with her. Just her name alone is a divisive factor. 2) Why Obama? Before I knew anything about Obama, I thought Hillary would be a better candidate, but I pledged to do the research on both of them and I've paid close attention throughout the entire campaign season. The more I researched Obama's platform, the more I started to feel that he had a good plan. Meanwhile, back when I was doing this, Hillary didn't have a platform. Then, in the middle of 2007, she announced her platform and made universal healthcare its central focal point. However, this isn't the universal healthcare that Canada, Great Brittain, France, etc. have. The isurance companies are still involved. It is still a for-profit system. It may lower costs quite a bit, but including a mandate just punishes people for no reason. A mandate must be enforced. How will it be enforced? Those are details she leaves out. How are they enforced in the one state, Massachussetts, that has them? People get fined. If someone can't afford healthcare even after the costs are lowered, how would fining them help? And if you don't fine them what, send them to jail? The TRUTH about healthcare is even a mandate doesn't guarantee universal coverage. And even universal coverage doesn't guarantee adequate coverage, as the movie Sicko illustrated. It's still a for-profit system. Obama's plan is at least cheaper and more honest. Also, the way Obama has run his campaign has been remarkable and is really unprecedented in modern politics. He has stayed relatively positive. He hasn't taken PAC money. Hillary hasn't even promised to keep the lobbyist influence out of the White House. Whenever she is pressed on that issue, she refuses to commit to doing anything about it because she is already bought and paid for by them. Obama's campaign money comes more from a groundswell movement for change in the country and a person of integrity in the White House. Obama represents the death of the cynicism that causes people to believe that politics has to be as disgusting as it is. In most of our elections, we are forced to choose between two people we don't like. But Obama is someone who motivates people to get involved in the process like no candidate has done before. He's such an agent of change that he's already completely changed the way every candidate, even Republicans, has run their campaign. Hillary wasn't talking about change before Obama kicked her but in Iowa. The effect of Obama's experience as a community organizer has even shown in his campaign. Read up about how it is structured like a grassroots movement. In short, Obama is about empowering people to improve the way things are. His words inspire people. His policies make sense. His life is a reflection of his rhetoric, not a contradiction. Clinton is about telling everyone how she's the only one smart enough to do what she thinks they want. Obama will bring respectability back to America on the worldwide stage. He is someone who I would be proud to have as the leader of my nation, not just someone I could stomach. I sent this as email to my white grandmother who is 70's years old this was her responce to me by email AFTER READING THIS.....WHY ON EARTH ARE YOU A DEMOCRAT????? YES, HE MAKES A LOT OF PROMISES FOR FREEBIES....FREE????I DON'T THINK SO...DOWN THE LINE, YOU WILL GET THE BILL!!!! MOVE THE TROUPS OUT AND LEAVE OUR CLOSEST NEIGHBOR, CANADA HIGH AND DRY WITH THEIR TROUPS STILL THERE AFTER WE PROMISED TO BE THERE WITH THEM.....SO MUCH FOR KEEPIING OUR PROMISES. NICE TO HAVE CLOSEST NEIGHBORS AGAINST US. NOTHING LIKE PUTTING A NOVICE IN FORIEGN AFFAIRS WITH NO EXPERIENCE IN CHARGE. I WOULDN'T EVEN PUT HIM IN CHARGE OF A MAJOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION WITH HIS BACKGROUND. AND ALSO WATCH OUT FOR THE MRS.....LIKE PUTTING ANOTHER HILLARY IN THE WHITE HOUSE. HE HAS PLAYED THE "POOR MAN" CARD AND THE "RACE CARD" TO APPEAL TO THE MASSES AND GOD BLESS THEM, THEY FELL FOR IT!!!!! HE CLAIMS THE RACE CARD WAS NOT HIM, BUT.....THINK ABOUT HIS WIFE AND CHURCH FRIENDS. MOST OF THE SO CALLED INFORMED IDIOTS THAT MARCH AND RALLY ARE IN TRUTH UNINFORMED AND ARE LED LIKE SHEEP TO THE SLAUGHTER . TO MOST, IT IS JUST A BIG PARTY. THEY SHOULD SPEND THEIR TIME READING HISTORY INSTEAD OF LISTENING TO THEIR EQUALLY UNINFORMED BUDDIES THAT ARE JUST USED TO GETTING FREEBIES AND LIVING OFF THE GOVERNMENT AND WANT UNCLE SAM TO HAND IT ALL TO THEM. ASK THE SO CALLED SUPPORTERS HOW MANY HAVE BEEN ON THE LIST OF AT,ONE TIME OR ANOTHER , ON THE GOV. HANDOUT OR ASSISTANCE. INSTEAD OF PAYING THEIR OWN WAY. IT IS A HANDOUT GENERATION THAT WOULD NOT KNOW HOW TO LIVE WITHOUT SOMEONE PAYING THEIR WAY. YOU HAVE MEN AND WOMEN FIGHTING TO GIVE YOU THAT PRIVILEGE AND IT PISSES ME OFF WHEN THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTED. AND THE DEMOCRAT PARTY COULDN'T CARE LESS. JUST ASK THE DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS. AND YOU WANT MORE OF THAT??? THE MOST INEFFECTIVE CONGRESS LED BY THE WORSE LEADER KNOWN TO MAN. HEY, JUST REMEMBER SHE IS THIRD IN LINE FOR THE PRESIDENCY. GOD HELP US AND NOW, THE TWO WORSE DEMOCRATIC CANIDATES EVER PUT UP FOR YOU VOTE. YOU HAD BETTER THINK ABOUT THIS LONG AND HARD BECAUSE YOU ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE TO LIVE WITH IT. SOME WISE MAN ONCE SAID."WHAT THE GOVERNMENT GIVES, THE GOVERNMENT CAN TAKE" JUST REMEMBER THAT!!!!! FROM A WISE GRANDMOTHER THAT HAS ALREADY SEEN TOO MUCH....ME! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| Moderator
|
Mars23 said: Wouldn't it be better to give them an opinion formed on your own rather than one you knicked from a Prince website?
wtf? Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
How about neither or McCain since they are ALL full of it. Rick Springfield - Venus in Overdrive Best album of the year, the last ROCKSTAR | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I wonder how much presidential experience young JFK had when he took office? Sometimes Hillary's remarks are just plain s-t-u-p-i-d.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrysharronsluvchild said: Marrysharronsluvchild said: If someone ask you why Obama? Tell them this...
I'll answer this in two parts: 1) Why I'm not voting for Hillary: She is now running on the claim that she has 35 years of experience, however that's obviously a bogus claim. She's 60. So basically, she's saying that everything she's done since she graduated from college gives her the experience to be president. If that's so, then how is that different from any other candidate. If we're to elect someone on years since college then we should all vote McCain. She claims that being First Lady gave her the experience to be President, yet last I checked First Lady wasn't a cabinet position. She claims that she was a trusted advisor to Bill, but when the press went after communications that would demonstrate her roll in his presidency, Bill made sure that they couldn't get to them until after the primary season. Also, she brings up the battles she's fought agaisnt the Republicans throughout the years, but how many has she won? She says she has a proven track record of winning, but she was first put in charge of bringing about universal healthcare back in '93. Do we have universal healthcare. No, because she failed, and the enemies who defeated her then are still around today and hate her even more because she's been fighting them and losing in the Senate since then. Furthermore, she was the last of the major candidates to give a detailed platform. She was the last with a healthcare plan. For most of 2007, she was basically simply saying "elect me, my name is Clinton." Then when that started to fail because Barack's groundwork started to kick in and he became a contender, she turned to tears (and again yesterday). What's even more disgusting is that when her back was against the wall, she turned dirty. She's run a horribly nasty campaign, launching personal attacks at Obama through surrogates so that she can use plausible deniability when anyone tried to hold her to account. In SC, she and Bill, sensing that black voters had finally embraced Barack, used race baiting to try and make his race the issue that it hadn't been prior to then so that they could paint him as the "Black candidate" to the rest of the country and abate his legitimacy. This has said to me that she will do anything to be President. She is after power, which is probably why she stayed with Bill through his BS. If anyone remembers Bill Clintons second term, he was very popular, but the federal government was at a complete stand still as the Republican Congress refused to compromise and all we had was bitter partisan bickering. Clinton brings that with her. Just her name alone is a divisive factor. 2) Why Obama? Before I knew anything about Obama, I thought Hillary would be a better candidate, but I pledged to do the research on both of them and I've paid close attention throughout the entire campaign season. The more I researched Obama's platform, the more I started to feel that he had a good plan. Meanwhile, back when I was doing this, Hillary didn't have a platform. Then, in the middle of 2007, she announced her platform and made universal healthcare its central focal point. However, this isn't the universal healthcare that Canada, Great Brittain, France, etc. have. The isurance companies are still involved. It is still a for-profit system. It may lower costs quite a bit, but including a mandate just punishes people for no reason. A mandate must be enforced. How will it be enforced? Those are details she leaves out. How are they enforced in the one state, Massachussetts, that has them? People get fined. If someone can't afford healthcare even after the costs are lowered, how would fining them help? And if you don't fine them what, send them to jail? The TRUTH about healthcare is even a mandate doesn't guarantee universal coverage. And even universal coverage doesn't guarantee adequate coverage, as the movie Sicko illustrated. It's still a for-profit system. Obama's plan is at least cheaper and more honest. Also, the way Obama has run his campaign has been remarkable and is really unprecedented in modern politics. He has stayed relatively positive. He hasn't taken PAC money. Hillary hasn't even promised to keep the lobbyist influence out of the White House. Whenever she is pressed on that issue, she refuses to commit to doing anything about it because she is already bought and paid for by them. Obama's campaign money comes more from a groundswell movement for change in the country and a person of integrity in the White House. Obama represents the death of the cynicism that causes people to believe that politics has to be as disgusting as it is. In most of our elections, we are forced to choose between two people we don't like. But Obama is someone who motivates people to get involved in the process like no candidate has done before. He's such an agent of change that he's already completely changed the way every candidate, even Republicans, has run their campaign. Hillary wasn't talking about change before Obama kicked her but in Iowa. The effect of Obama's experience as a community organizer has even shown in his campaign. Read up about how it is structured like a grassroots movement. In short, Obama is about empowering people to improve the way things are. His words inspire people. His policies make sense. His life is a reflection of his rhetoric, not a contradiction. Clinton is about telling everyone how she's the only one smart enough to do what she thinks they want. Obama will bring respectability back to America on the worldwide stage. He is someone who I would be proud to have as the leader of my nation, not just someone I could stomach. I sent this as email to my white grandmother who is 70's years old this was her responce to me by email AFTER READING THIS.....WHY ON EARTH ARE YOU A DEMOCRAT????? YES, HE MAKES A LOT OF PROMISES FOR FREEBIES....FREE????I DON'T THINK SO...DOWN THE LINE, YOU WILL GET THE BILL!!!! MOVE THE TROUPS OUT AND LEAVE OUR CLOSEST NEIGHBOR, CANADA HIGH AND DRY WITH THEIR TROUPS STILL THERE AFTER WE PROMISED TO BE THERE WITH THEM.....SO MUCH FOR KEEPIING OUR PROMISES. NICE TO HAVE CLOSEST NEIGHBORS AGAINST US. NOTHING LIKE PUTTING A NOVICE IN FORIEGN AFFAIRS WITH NO EXPERIENCE IN CHARGE. I WOULDN'T EVEN PUT HIM IN CHARGE OF A MAJOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION WITH HIS BACKGROUND. AND ALSO WATCH OUT FOR THE MRS.....LIKE PUTTING ANOTHER HILLARY IN THE WHITE HOUSE. HE HAS PLAYED THE "POOR MAN" CARD AND THE "RACE CARD" TO APPEAL TO THE MASSES AND GOD BLESS THEM, THEY FELL FOR IT!!!!! HE CLAIMS THE RACE CARD WAS NOT HIM, BUT.....THINK ABOUT HIS WIFE AND CHURCH FRIENDS. MOST OF THE SO CALLED INFORMED IDIOTS THAT MARCH AND RALLY ARE IN TRUTH UNINFORMED AND ARE LED LIKE SHEEP TO THE SLAUGHTER . TO MOST, IT IS JUST A BIG PARTY. THEY SHOULD SPEND THEIR TIME READING HISTORY INSTEAD OF LISTENING TO THEIR EQUALLY UNINFORMED BUDDIES THAT ARE JUST USED TO GETTING FREEBIES AND LIVING OFF THE GOVERNMENT AND WANT UNCLE SAM TO HAND IT ALL TO THEM. ASK THE SO CALLED SUPPORTERS HOW MANY HAVE BEEN ON THE LIST OF AT,ONE TIME OR ANOTHER , ON THE GOV. HANDOUT OR ASSISTANCE. INSTEAD OF PAYING THEIR OWN WAY. IT IS A HANDOUT GENERATION THAT WOULD NOT KNOW HOW TO LIVE WITHOUT SOMEONE PAYING THEIR WAY. YOU HAVE MEN AND WOMEN FIGHTING TO GIVE YOU THAT PRIVILEGE AND IT PISSES ME OFF WHEN THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTED. AND THE DEMOCRAT PARTY COULDN'T CARE LESS. JUST ASK THE DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS. AND YOU WANT MORE OF THAT??? THE MOST INEFFECTIVE CONGRESS LED BY THE WORSE LEADER KNOWN TO MAN. HEY, JUST REMEMBER SHE IS THIRD IN LINE FOR THE PRESIDENCY. GOD HELP US AND NOW, THE TWO WORSE DEMOCRATIC CANIDATES EVER PUT UP FOR YOU VOTE. YOU HAD BETTER THINK ABOUT THIS LONG AND HARD BECAUSE YOU ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE TO LIVE WITH IT. SOME WISE MAN ONCE SAID."WHAT THE GOVERNMENT GIVES, THE GOVERNMENT CAN TAKE" JUST REMEMBER THAT!!!!! FROM A WISE GRANDMOTHER THAT HAS ALREADY SEEN TOO MUCH....ME! I don't take advice from people who are unable to understand how to work a caps lock. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)