independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Mon 23rd Nov 2009 6:36pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > If Hillary Can't Manage Her Campaign Finances How Can She Manage Our Nation?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
AuthorMessage
Thread started 02/11/08 12:21am

sosgemini

avatar

If Hillary Can't Manage Her Campaign Finances How Can She Manage Our Nation?

Major credibility issue here:




http://weblogs.baltimores...ma_to.html

Patti Solis Doyle had been living on borrowed time as Clinton's campaign manager following the disastrous showing in Iowa and the rockiness leading up to the New Hampshire primary.

"What happened today would have happened the day after New Hampshire had we lost," one source said, adding that others may soon follow Solis Doyle's departure.

Initially, Clinton's former White House chief of staff, Maggie Williams, was brought in to run the campaign even though Solis Doyle was still there. The result was confusion and awkwardness for the staff, who weren't sure who was really in charge.

But even more problematic was the campaign's money crunch. Over the last seven years, Clinton had raised $175 million for her reelection and her presidential campaign. But Solis Doyle didn't tell Clinton that there was next to no cash on hand until after the New Hampshire primary.

"We were lying about money," a source said. "The cash on hand was nothing."

In turn, Clinton didn't tell Solis Doyle that she was lending her own money to keep the campaign afloat. Solis Doyle found out third-hand. And when she asked Clinton about it, the senator told her she couldn't understand how the campaign had gotten to such a point.

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 02/11/08 12:52am

shanti0608

Awwww..... sounds like she is struggling.
[Edited 2/11/08 0:54am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 02/11/08 1:01am

mdiver

It always amazes me how much these people spend on a campaign that brings a job paying way less neutral

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 02/11/08 3:21am

SpcMs

avatar

Not half as bad as Mitt Romney paying almost his whole campain while presenting himself as the smart business man among the candidates.

"It's better 2 B hated 4 what U R than 2 B loved 4 what U R not."

My IQ is 139, what's yours?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 02/11/08 7:23am

sosgemini

avatar

SpcMs said:

Not half as bad as Mitt Romney paying almost his whole campain while presenting himself as the smart business man among the candidates.


nod

probably why he isn't in the game anymore.

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 02/11/08 7:48am

sosgemini

avatar

this could be what costs her the campaign. the fact that she kept her financial woes a secret for a lengthy period of time does not bode well...already bloggers are pointing out a pattern of secrecy that can be compared to Dubya....from her health care plan, her tax returns to this she has displayed a pattern of secrecy that many seem to want ended.

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 02/11/08 7:56am

Sowhat

avatar

mdiver said:

It always amazes me how much these people spend on a campaign that brings a job paying way less neutral



It's about the power they get...not the money, at least at this point. But the money will come wink .

"Always blessings, never losses......"

Ya te dije....no manches guey!!!!!

mad I'm a guy!!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 02/11/08 7:58am

mdiver

Sowhat said:

mdiver said:

It always amazes me how much these people spend on a campaign that brings a job paying way less neutral



It's about the power they get...not the money, at least at this point. But the money will come wink .


Oh i know, there is a payback, just amazes me the lengths.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 02/11/08 8:06am

RodeoSchro

First of all, that's a cheap shot IMHO. She raised a lot of money, she spent a lot of money, and she WAS on top of the money. As you pointed out, it was Hillary that loaned the campaign money, even before Solis Doyle admitted keeping information about the campaign's cash secret from Hillary.

Second, campaigns ebb and flow according to momentum. If you have momentum, you get the cash. That's why all the people that lose the first primary or two immediately bow out. No one will contribute to them any longer.

If Hillary wins big in Texas and Ohio next month, she'll have more money than she knows what to do with. Same holds true for Obama.

Third, a lack of money is a sign of weakness. I think we all agree that you keep signs of weakness private as much as you can.

"Guitar" on Leno is the greatest performance in the history of rock ' roll

Second Funkiest White Man in America

flag flag It sure is nice having adults running our government now flag flag
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 02/11/08 8:09am

shanti0608

RodeoSchro said:

First of all, that's a cheap shot IMHO. She raised a lot of money, she spent a lot of money, and she WAS on top of the money. As you pointed out, it was Hillary that loaned the campaign money, even before Solis Doyle admitted keeping information about the campaign's cash secret from Hillary.

Second, campaigns ebb and flow according to momentum. If you have momentum, you get the cash. That's why all the people that lose the first primary or two immediately bow out. No one will contribute to them any longer.

If Hillary wins big in Texas and Ohio next month, she'll have more money than she knows what to do with. Same holds true for Obama.

Third, a lack of money is a sign of weakness. I think we all agree that you keep signs of weakness private as much as you can.



Good point.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 02/11/08 8:12am

Sowhat

avatar

mdiver said:

Sowhat said:




It's about the power they get...not the money, at least at this point. But the money will come wink .


Oh i know, there is a payback, just amazes me the lengths.



Yeah but I bet there are too many unseen "perks" that comes with that kind of power to make it all worth while.

But it does seem funny that candidates spend millions upon millions for job that pays $400,000 a year.

"Always blessings, never losses......"

Ya te dije....no manches guey!!!!!

mad I'm a guy!!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 02/11/08 8:52am

guitarslinger4
4

avatar

sosgemini said:

this could be what costs her the campaign. the fact that she kept her financial woes a secret for a lengthy period of time does not bode well...already bloggers are pointing out a pattern of secrecy that can be compared to Dubya....from her health care plan, her tax returns to this she has displayed a pattern of secrecy that many seem to want ended.



This has been the Hillary pattern for YEARS! If you want 4 more years of "Executive Priviledge" then vote for Hillary!

www.adamjames.net -official website
www.myspace.com/adamjames -check out my music

"Sausage Fingers With His Guitar & Mullet" avatar made possible by a grant from BeingTheHero at chapelofresonance.com
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 02/11/08 8:53am

sosgemini

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

First of all, that's a cheap shot IMHO. She raised a lot of money, she spent a lot of money, and she WAS on top of the money. As you pointed out, it was Hillary that loaned the campaign money, even before Solis Doyle admitted keeping information about the campaign's cash secret from Hillary.

Second, campaigns ebb and flow according to momentum. If you have momentum, you get the cash. That's why all the people that lose the first primary or two immediately bow out. No one will contribute to them any longer.

If Hillary wins big in Texas and Ohio next month, she'll have more money than she knows what to do with. Same holds true for Obama.

Third, a lack of money is a sign of weakness. I think we all agree that you keep signs of weakness private as much as you can.


how was she on top of the money if she didn't know leading up to New Hampshire that her campaign was broke? :confused:

and your right, campaigns ebb and flow but she kept the secret of loaning money until after Super Tuesday which is evidence that she kept this a secret for political gain. Romney never kept it a secret that he was giving his campaign funds...he was upfront about it.

and your right, lack of money is a sign of weakness. no disagreement there.

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 02/11/08 7:58pm

sosgemini

avatar

new hillary commercial. disbelief

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 02/11/08 8:02pm

sosgemini

avatar

and to compete with "yes we can" we present...well, i don't know what it is but enjoy.

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 02/11/08 8:06pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

sosgemini said:

new hillary commercial. disbelief


I quite liked it! lol

2009: Mermaids and Dolphins...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 02/11/08 10:05pm

lastdecember

avatar

All of this talk of raising money is what makes me sick to my stomach at this system, that is bogus and corrupt and its core. We tell people that you are EQUAL no matter what money you have and then our political game shows that you can only win if you have money. As David Letterman said to Hilary Clinton when she said how much candidates had raise money wise, he said "Wouldnt it be great if that money could be put to solving actual issues instead".


a-ha "foot of the mountain TOUR 2009"
a-ha "Ending on a High Note Final TOUR 2010" going everywhere!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 02/11/08 10:10pm

sosgemini

avatar

lastdecember said:

All of this talk of raising money is what makes me sick to my stomach at this system, that is bogus and corrupt and its core. We tell people that you are EQUAL no matter what money you have and then our political game shows that you can only win if you have money. As David Letterman said to Hilary Clinton when she said how much candidates had raise money wise, he said "Wouldnt it be great if that money could be put to solving actual issues instead".


this is what i don't get...obama's campaign (and now hillary's campaign) are being fueled by grassroots power. people like you and i giving ten, fifteen and one hundred dollars...

what's wrong with that? how is that bogus and corrupt?

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 02/12/08 12:11am

DiminutiveRock
er

avatar

sosgemini said:

lastdecember said:

All of this talk of raising money is what makes me sick to my stomach at this system, that is bogus and corrupt and its core. We tell people that you are EQUAL no matter what money you have and then our political game shows that you can only win if you have money. As David Letterman said to Hilary Clinton when she said how much candidates had raise money wise, he said "Wouldnt it be great if that money could be put to solving actual issues instead".


this is what i don't get...obama's campaign (and now hillary's campaign) are being fueled by grassroots power. people like you and i giving ten, fifteen and one hundred dollars...

what's wrong with that? how is that bogus and corrupt?


It's not - but even I have to admit how disconcerting it is to hear about all these millions of dollars being batted about... and yet there is poverty and homelessness and starvation...

In an ideal world - they all would be allocated x-amount to campaign and cap it - make the playing ground even. shrug Unrealistic, I know.

"I think one of the things that we're probably proudest of -- I certainly am -- is that the message was always love, in any form we portrayed it." - Paul McCartney
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 02/12/08 12:18am

Ottensen

sosgemini said:

this could be what costs her the campaign. the fact that she kept her financial woes a secret for a lengthy period of time does not bode well...already bloggers are pointing out a pattern of secrecy that can be compared to Dubya....from her health care plan, her tax returns to this she has displayed a pattern of secrecy that many seem to want ended.


The only thing I'm having a problem with is that she won't be transparent about her income. I just read on Yahoo's homepage that she will release her income information IF she secures the democratic nomination confuse. Why wait? It makes me feel uneasy and it's evolving into a trust issue for me. I actually understand a person not wanting to show how they balance their checkbook (personally, mine is a mess), and we all have blunders we don't neccessarily want others to see. However,this is a different situation. As a taxpaying citizen, I don't think it's overstepping a boundary to know where my next possible president's income derives from. If she's got securities investsments in developing nations that (unwittingly or not) are propping up dictator regimes in southeast Asia or eastern Africa, or domestic companies that outsource or ship much needed jobs overseas, then sorry, but it affects my voting decision.

By her not sharing with us, it makes it appear more as if she has something to hide, and if not , that she's playing the entitlement game to scurry out of this, which is even worse.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 02/12/08 2:29am

SexyBeautifulO
ne

Well...well...a Clinton keeping secrets...who'd have thunk it? Oh wait...anyone with a memory!! giggle

How many "secrets" were brought to light during the other Clinton's administration? How much fertilizer was spread around trying to keep those secrets hidden? How many of those lies unraveled right before our eyes?

I don't know about the rest of you but personally I'm sick and tired of not being able to TRUST and BELIEVE in the person that leads our nation!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 02/12/08 3:56am

fcukthepolice

SexyBeautifulOne said:[quote]Well...well...a Clinton keeping secrets...who'd have thunk it? Oh wait...anyone with a memory!! giggle

How many "secrets" were brought to light during the other Clinton's administration? How much fertilizer was spread around trying to keep those secrets hidden? How many of those lies unraveled right before our eyes?

I don't know about the rest of you but personally I'm sick and tired of not being able to TRUST and BELIEVE in the person that leads our nation![/quote]


That would NOT be the president.

When hilary is president; papa bush for example will still have more power and be pulling more strings. The president has little power and is a mere puppet.

The only way for the goverment to take back power is to get rid of the federal reserve

The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses... This little coterie...run our government for their own selfish ends. It operates under cover of a self-created screen...seizes...our executive officers...legislative bodies...schools...
courts...newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.”
N.Y. Mayor, John Hylan

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 02/12/08 4:52am

WellInever

mdiver said:

It always amazes me how much these people spend on a campaign that brings a job paying way less neutral



Well for most candidates that use their own money it could be just about power. But keep in mind that after leaving office they can make millions a year on book deals and speaking engagements. Not to mention they often keep getting paid by the party.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 02/12/08 4:53am

fcukthepolice

LOUIS T. MCFADDEN AND ACTIVITIES ABOUT THE FEDERAL RESERVE
In the earlier 1930’s, a true American Patriot, Senator Louis T. McFadden spoke out against the activities about the Federal Reserve:

“Mr. Chairman, we have in this Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. The Fed has cheated the Government of these United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the Nation's debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Fed have cost enough money to pay the National debt several times over.

“This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Fed and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.

“Some people think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lender.

“In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into states to buy votes to control our legislatures; there are those who maintain International propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us into granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime.”

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 02/12/08 6:13am

Mars23

Moderator

avatar

moderator

SexyBeautifulOne said:

Well...well...a Clinton keeping secrets...who'd have thunk it? Oh wait...anyone with a memory!! giggle

How many "secrets" were brought to light during the other Clinton's administration? How much fertilizer was spread around trying to keep those secrets hidden? How many of those lies unraveled right before our eyes?

I don't know about the rest of you but personally I'm sick and tired of not being able to TRUST and BELIEVE in the person that leads our nation!



1

This is untoward! This is not toward!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 02/12/08 7:03am

RodeoSchro

sosgemini said:

new hillary commercial. disbelief



That is the greatest commercial I have ever seen!

"Guitar" on Leno is the greatest performance in the history of rock ' roll

Second Funkiest White Man in America

flag flag It sure is nice having adults running our government now flag flag
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > If Hillary Can't Manage Her Campaign Finances How Can She Manage Our Nation?