independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Prince fan community site
Create new topic 
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)| Author | Message |
Andrea Yates - Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity http://www.cnn.com/2006/L...index.html
| |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
Actually, I remember thinking back when it first happened that if this bitch ain't insane, nobody is.
| |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I question her craziness | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Emotions said: I question her craziness
That's what I'm saying. Just read the testimonies of Dr. Welner & Dr. Dietz. She waited until her husband left for work to kill her kids, covered them with a sheet and called 911? Come on. Her ex-husband is just as nuts as she is. Dude's a f-n robot. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
that is tragic I think ahead of you, I think instead of you
Will you spend your life with me And stifle me? I know why the caged bird sings, I know why | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I am disgusted that this woman has been able to basically get up and walk free.. She is going to be deemed "insane" and skip going to prison but spend time in a psych ward until the court "deems fit for her to leave"..
The day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom - Anais Nin
"Unnecessary giggling"...  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Revoke her right to life. Show her the same mercy she showed her children.
"What a lovely fat beat with a zompige baslijn" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
shouldn't the death penalty -- if used at all -- be used on someone with no hope of rehabilitation? why are people so blood thirsty? it doesn't bring anyone back and it doesn't change anything.
| |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sallysassalot said: shouldn't the death penalty -- if used at all -- be used on someone with no hope of rehabilitation? why are people so blood thirsty? it doesn't bring anyone back and it doesn't change anything.
i rarely believe in the insanity defense...the bottom line is if you hid it, you knew what you did was wrong and insanity is out the window. this woman's case seemed different. i'd hate to see someone who has an illness (and is no doubt suffering emotionally because she killed her own children due to that illness) be killed because of that illness. a psych ward is the right place for her. and when she's healthy enough to live in society i wish her the best. some people are a little loose and, one day, they just go crazy. people aren't dogs, you don't just kill them for getting ill. And ten years from now when she out and "healthy" and she is married with children again and kills her children again what will be your defense for keeping her on this planet? And that is not hypothetical, it happens everyday, because we protect the criminals rights above the victims in this society. Life is precious and when you abuse the lives of innocents so brutally you have revoked your right to life. Saying, "sorry, I wasn't feeling well then but I'm better now." Is bullshit. "What a lovely fat beat with a zompige baslijn" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Her husband did have his mother watching here, but since she was "doing better" the mother-in-law left her alone for an hour. She was just biding her time so she could get the right moment to kill them. The husband is an accomplice and should have been charged as well. He is not innocent. I would never leave my children with the other parent, if I thought it was unsafe. They probably thought they could pray the problem away | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Emotions said: Her husband did have his mother watching here, but since she was "doing better" the mother-in-law left her alone for an hour. She was just biding her time so she could get the right moment to kill them. The husband is an accomplice and should have been charged as well. He is not innocent. I would never leave my children with the other parent, if I thought it was unsafe. They probably thought they could pray the problem away
Send the pig to jail for life. He had a responsibility to protect those children. The only part he seemed interested in was making them. "What a lovely fat beat with a zompige baslijn" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
roanmairin said: sallysassalot said: shouldn't the death penalty -- if used at all -- be used on someone with no hope of rehabilitation? why are people so blood thirsty? it doesn't bring anyone back and it doesn't change anything.
i rarely believe in the insanity defense...the bottom line is if you hid it, you knew what you did was wrong and insanity is out the window. this woman's case seemed different. i'd hate to see someone who has an illness (and is no doubt suffering emotionally because she killed her own children due to that illness) be killed because of that illness. a psych ward is the right place for her. and when she's healthy enough to live in society i wish her the best. some people are a little loose and, one day, they just go crazy. people aren't dogs, you don't just kill them for getting ill. And ten years from now when she out and "healthy" and she is married with children again and kills her children again what will be your defense for keeping her on this planet? And that is not hypothetical, it happens everyday, because we protect the criminals rights above the victims in this society. Life is precious and when you abuse the lives of innocents so brutally you have revoked your right to life. Saying, "sorry, I wasn't feeling well then but I'm better now." Is bullshit. the repeat offender is usually someone who went into prison, got no rehabilitative therapy, and was released. the percentage of repeat offenses made by individuals who went through the restorative justice process is very low. and nobody is saying to let her walk away or forget about the victims or say, "sorry, it won't happen again" and end it there. nobody's running out to join a psych ward cheerleading team, ya know. she's got a lot of work ahead of her but the numbers favor that she won't harm anyone again. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
roanmairin said: Emotions said: Her husband did have his mother watching here, but since she was "doing better" the mother-in-law left her alone for an hour. She was just biding her time so she could get the right moment to kill them. The husband is an accomplice and should have been charged as well. He is not innocent. I would never leave my children with the other parent, if I thought it was unsafe. They probably thought they could pray the problem away
Send the pig to jail for life. He had a responsibility to protect those children. The only part he seemed interested in was making them. how have you come to this conclusion? and if that's the case...if you're right...i guess we should put every parent in jail who makes a bad judgment about their kids. i don't know about you but my parents NEVER made a mistake that could have put me in harm's way without even realizing it. NEVER. they were perfect.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sallysassalot said: the repeat offender is usually someone who went into prison, got no rehabilitative therapy, and was released. the percentage of repeat offenses made by individuals who went through the restorative justice process is very low. and nobody is saying to let her walk away or forget about the victims or say, "sorry, it won't happen again" and end it there. nobody's running out to join a psych ward cheerleading team, ya know. she's got a lot of work ahead of her but the numbers favor that she won't harm anyone again. Wholly shit! sallysassalot said: the numbers favor that she won't harm anyone again.
Why take that chance? Are you betting on her not recommiting? That is some cold shit. What does she have to offer us other than stories of how she murdered her five helpless babies in cold blood? How bad of a crime does someone have to commit too become to dangeruos to risk having them around anymore? Where is the fear and compassion for the children she could harm in the future? At the very least she should be sterilized. "What a lovely fat beat with a zompige baslijn" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Emotions said: Her husband did have his mother watching here, but since she was "doing better" the mother-in-law left her alone for an hour. She was just biding her time so she could get the right moment to kill them. The husband is an accomplice and should have been charged as well. He is not innocent. I would never leave my children with the other parent, if I thought it was unsafe. They probably thought they could pray the problem away
Exactly my point.. if she was biding her time, she KNEW what she was planning and waiting to do.. That isn't insanity, that is pre-meditated murder.. and the bitch should rot in jail for life..Let someone stick her head in a pool of water for a few hours.. Show the bitch how it feels! The day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom - Anais Nin
"Unnecessary giggling"... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Create new topic Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
