independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Mon 20th Nov 2017 7:24am
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Nasa admits we never went to the moon.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 11/08/17 8:24am

BombSquad

avatar

Graycap23 said:

Lol....there is more than one actual current Nasa employess admitting in this video that the technology for going to the Moon doesn't exist.

actually, the technology and logistics for FAKING a moon landing do and did not exist in 1969


that would have been 1000 times more complicated (i.e. impossible) than actually going there

I live in constant fear that Trump will deport my latina mother-in-law who lives at 1837 3rd street, LA 90023, blue house. she gets off work at 6
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 11/08/17 9:26am

Lianachan

avatar

BombSquad said:

Graycap23 said:

Lol....there is more than one actual current Nasa employess admitting in this video that the technology for going to the Moon doesn't exist.

actually, the technology and logistics for FAKING a moon landing do and did not exist in 1969


that would have been 1000 times more complicated (i.e. impossible) than actually going there



Indeed. As it says on rationalwiki:



If we assume a conspiracy exists, we need to know what it involves. Given the number of people that would need to be paid off (or killed) to stay silent, the effort required to pull the wool over the USSR's eyes (and the eyes of other countries who were watching), the ground-based fakery – rockets, launches, control rooms – fakery such as moon rocks and the photography and video taken from the moon... wouldn't it seem more logical and far simpler to just go to the moon?

A-nis bidh fios aig daoine nuair a tha mi a 'mionnachadh aig dhaibh.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 11/08/17 9:59am

RodeoSchro

avatar

Lianachan said:

BombSquad said:

actually, the technology and logistics for FAKING a moon landing do and did not exist in 1969


that would have been 1000 times more complicated (i.e. impossible) than actually going there



Indeed. As it says on rationalwiki:



If we assume a conspiracy exists, we need to know what it involves. Given the number of people that would need to be paid off (or killed) to stay silent, the effort required to pull the wool over the USSR's eyes (and the eyes of other countries who were watching), the ground-based fakery – rockets, launches, control rooms – fakery such as moon rocks and the photography and video taken from the moon... wouldn't it seem more logical and far simpler to just go to the moon?



Correct. Someone (and who, exactly?) would have had to have kept 20,000 people silent - and that's just at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. There were another 20,000+ people working at NASA facilities in Florida and elsewhere.

To believe that anyone could get that many people to keep a secret is childish. People that don't believe we went to the moon are not in touch with reality. They have a mental problem.

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 11/08/17 10:02am

RodeoSchro

avatar

heartbeatocean said:

RodeoSchro said:



Well, there's your problem! These moon-deniers either cannot or will not think. Strange, isn't it?

I have NO patience for NASA deniers. laser



Those moonbats evoke a stronger emotion in me since I live where it all happened, and know lots of the people that made it happen.

It's like these cretins are calling all my friends liars.

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 11/08/17 11:18am

Graycap23

avatar

BombSquad said:

Graycap23 said:

Lol....there is more than one actual current Nasa employess admitting in this video that the technology for going to the Moon doesn't exist.

actually, the technology and logistics for FAKING a moon landing do and did not exist in 1969


that would have been 1000 times more complicated (i.e. impossible) than actually going there

I don't know if they went 2 the moon or not. What I do know is that current NASA employees in this video have stated that the tech doesn't esist.

Correct a wise man and u create a leader. Correct a FOOL and u create an enemy.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 11/08/17 12:52pm

RodeoSchro

avatar

Graycap23 said:

BombSquad said:

actually, the technology and logistics for FAKING a moon landing do and did not exist in 1969


that would have been 1000 times more complicated (i.e. impossible) than actually going there

I don't know if they went 2 the moon or not. What I do know is that current NASA employees in this video have stated that the tech doesn't esist.



Unbelievable.

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 11/08/17 12:58pm

NorthC

Lianachan said:



BombSquad said:




Graycap23 said:


Lol....there is more than one actual current Nasa employess admitting in this video that the technology for going to the Moon doesn't exist.





actually, the technology and logistics for FAKING a moon landing do and did not exist in 1969



that would have been 1000 times more complicated (i.e. impossible) than actually going there







Indeed. As it says on rationalwiki:





If we assume a conspiracy exists, we need to know what it involves. Given the number of people that would need to be paid off (or killed) to stay silent, the effort required to pull the wool over the USSR's eyes (and the eyes of other countries who were watching), the ground-based fakery – rockets, launches, control rooms – fakery such as moon rocks and the photography and video taken from the moon... wouldn't it seem more logical and far simpler to just go to the moon?


As usual, "rationalwiki" is more like "sarcasticwiki". I'm not saying that I believe these claims about not going to the Moon are true. I think they make as much sense as the claims about the earth being flat (remember funkcreep?). I'm just saying that I don't have much faith in "rationalwiki".
[Edited 11/8/17 13:03pm]
[Edited 11/8/17 13:06pm]
Don't ever lose your dreams.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 11/08/17 1:22pm

ThatWhiteDude

Graycap23 said:

And here's the clear evidence in a Video, comming straight out of YouTube University, or what I call it, bitchville, where you can learn things for free and still won't gain knowledge at all.

"Like books and BLACK LIVES, Albums still MATTER."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 11/08/17 2:39pm

Lianachan

avatar

NorthC said:

Lianachan said:



BombSquad said:




Graycap23 said:


Lol....there is more than one actual current Nasa employess admitting in this video that the technology for going to the Moon doesn't exist.





actually, the technology and logistics for FAKING a moon landing do and did not exist in 1969



that would have been 1000 times more complicated (i.e. impossible) than actually going there







Indeed. As it says on rationalwiki:





If we assume a conspiracy exists, we need to know what it involves. Given the number of people that would need to be paid off (or killed) to stay silent, the effort required to pull the wool over the USSR's eyes (and the eyes of other countries who were watching), the ground-based fakery – rockets, launches, control rooms – fakery such as moon rocks and the photography and video taken from the moon... wouldn't it seem more logical and far simpler to just go to the moon?


As usual, "rationalwiki" is more like "sarcasticwiki". I'm not saying that I believe these claims about not going to the Moon are true. I think they make as much sense as the claims about the earth being flat (remember funkcreep?). I'm just saying that I don't have much faith in "rationalwiki".
[Edited 11/8/17 13:03pm]
[Edited 11/8/17 13:06pm]


It’s well referenced, logical and usually reliable. I enjoy the “sarcasticwiki” aspect you mention, as idiots of that magnitude should be laughed at.
A-nis bidh fios aig daoine nuair a tha mi a 'mionnachadh aig dhaibh.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 11/08/17 4:02pm

morningsong

avatar

Buzz Adrin is a liar then. Funny he can verify one CT but be ignored debunking another.

“Do I dare Disturb the universe?”
― T.S. Eliot

“Only by acceptance of the past, can you alter it”
― T.S. Eliot
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 11/13/17 9:48am

Slave2daGroove

Yeah, the Earth is flat too, right?

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 11/13/17 10:53am

RodeoSchro

avatar

Slave2daGroove said:

Yeah, the Earth is flat too, right?



You'd better believe it! falloff

Probably the funniest thread in Org history! http://prince.org/msg/100...?&pg=1

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 11/13/17 4:51pm

Slave2daGroove

RodeoSchro said:

Slave2daGroove said:

Yeah, the Earth is flat too, right?



You'd better believe it! falloff

Probably the funniest thread in Org history! http://prince.org/msg/100...?&pg=1

I only went thru the first page and I want to bill someone for the time I spent on that ridiculous crap.


lol

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 11/14/17 5:51am

ThatWhiteDude

RodeoSchro said:

Slave2daGroove said:

Yeah, the Earth is flat too, right?



You'd better believe it! falloff

Probably the funniest thread in Org history! http://prince.org/msg/100...?&pg=1

Boy, airheads like that, I see them on a daily basis on FB. Makes you think if these nutshots ever been on an airplane, or on a fucking boat. You ACTUALLY see that the earth ain't flat. You can see the curve and shit.

They are dumb as dog shit, but amusing nonetheless lol lol lol

"Like books and BLACK LIVES, Albums still MATTER."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 11/14/17 7:17am

RodeoSchro

avatar

Slave2daGroove said:

RodeoSchro said:



You'd better believe it! falloff

Probably the funniest thread in Org history! http://prince.org/msg/100...?&pg=1

I only went thru the first page and I want to bill someone for the time I spent on that ridiculous crap.


lol




falloff funkcreep was AWESOME! He kept that schtick up for DAYS.

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 11/14/17 6:12pm

TonyVanDam

Graycap23 said:


I also heard that Stanley Kubrick directed the [fake] video.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 11/14/17 7:49pm

RJOrion

luvsexy4all said:

im surprized the government doesnt fake an alien invasion and give us something to believe in

they're too busy faking "terrorist" invasions the last 15-20 years...give them some time to catch up...

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 11/16/17 2:40pm

RodeoSchro

avatar

TonyVanDam said:

Graycap23 said:


I also heard that Stanley Kubrick directed the [fake] video.



You heard wrong. Do you believe we went to the moon, or not?


Here is the debunking of the Kubrick/fake moonlanding video (HINT: That wasn't Stanley Kubrick in the video):

http://www.telegraph.co.u...hoax-fake/


Perhaps the biggest giveaway is the fact that man in the video quite clearly isn't Kubrick. While there is a superficial resemblance, a comparison between a video of Kubrick from 1997 and the man in the hoax film, made by the website Snopes, makes it obvious that they are two different people.


The Snopes article also points out that some unedited video from the interview, released on YouTube, actually shows Murray addressing the actor as “Tom”, and instructing him on how to perform certain scenes (skip to 14 minutes in).


A date shown on a title card at the beginning of the film also raises some red flags; while the interview is said to have taken place in May 1999, Kubrick in fact died in the March of that year.


And the late director’s widow has stated, through a spokesperson, that the film is definitely a hoax.


"The interview is a lie, Stanley Kubrick has never been interviewed by T Patrick Murray the whole story is made up, fraudulent and untrue,” she told the website Gawker.


Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Nasa admits we never went to the moon.