independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Star Trek thread version 2.3
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #150 posted 12/10/17 8:13pm

kpowers

avatar

djThunderfunk said:

kpowers said:

Don't forget

Image result for star trek the animated series dvd


Oh yeah. Got that too. I've got every Star Trek, movie & TV, on DVD and/or Blu-ray. If I didn't, I might be willing to pay for CBS All Access. But since I already have everything else and will be buying Discovery when it comes out, CBS All Access isn't getting my money.

Me too, except for the Chris Pines movies, not buying them.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #151 posted 12/11/17 6:10am

djThunderfunk

avatar

kpowers said:

Me too, except for the Chris Pines movies, not buying them.


You don't like them?

Liberty > Authority
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #152 posted 12/11/17 3:45pm

uPtoWnNY

kpowers said:

morningsong said:

kpowers said: Naw she wasn't but there are many episodes we don't see her, partially why she wanted to quit in the first place.

True. But just making a point of how different the 2nd pilot was. Honestly I think a lot of season 1 was aired out of order. There are a like 1 or 2 episodes in which Uhura was wearing a yellow uniform. I have a feeling those were the first episodes to feature Uhura.

Related imageRelated imageRelated image

My first TV crush.....the most beautiful woman on TOS, bar none. Nancy Kovack (Nona) is second.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #153 posted 12/11/17 9:49pm

morningsong




I know you can't see this kpower but this is about to make my heart explode, not quite since there is zero comformation online but just the thought of these memes being true...*doin' the happy dance*






  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #154 posted 12/11/17 11:16pm

kpowers

avatar

morningsong said:




I know you can't see this kpower but this is about to make my heart explode, not quite since there is zero comformation online but just the thought of these memes being true...*doin' the happy dance*






ok what are you talking about?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #155 posted 12/11/17 11:18pm

kpowers

avatar

djThunderfunk said:

kpowers said:

Me too, except for the Chris Pines movies, not buying them.


You don't like them?

They blew up Vulcan..............inexcusable

[Edited 12/11/17 23:18pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #156 posted 12/12/17 6:29am

djThunderfunk

avatar

kpowers said:

djThunderfunk said:


You don't like them?

They blew up Vulcan..............inexcusable

[Edited 12/11/17 23:18pm]


My biggest problem with them is the idea that when Nero went back in time and changed things he created an alternate timeline for the new movies to exist in, separate from the original timeline.

Anybody who's seen The City On The Edge Of Forever, Yesterday's Enterprise, First Conact, etc, etc... would know that in Star Trek, when you go back in time and make a change, you do NOT create an alernate timeline but rather CHANGE history.

They tried to have their cake and eat it too with the alternate timeline theory, but, I'm not buying it. The new movies erase everything came before, they do not exist in an alternate universe.

Other than that (and a few nitpicks I can ignore) I loved Star Trek 2009. Into Darkness was great until the last 20-30 minutes when they decided to just take the end of Wrath Of Kahn and flip some of the details. That ruined an otherwise terrific movie for me. I thought Beyond was pretty great, no issues.


Liberty > Authority
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #157 posted 12/12/17 9:22am

kpowers

avatar

djThunderfunk said:

kpowers said:

They blew up Vulcan..............inexcusable

[Edited 12/11/17 23:18pm]


My biggest problem with them is the idea that when Nero went back in time and changed things he created an alternate timeline for the new movies to exist in, separate from the original timeline.

Anybody who's seen The City On The Edge Of Forever, Yesterday's Enterprise, First Conact, etc, etc... would know that in Star Trek, when you go back in time and make a change, you do NOT create an alernate timeline but rather CHANGE history.

They tried to have their cake and eat it too with the alternate timeline theory, but, I'm not buying it. The new movies erase everything came before, they do not exist in an alternate universe.

Other than that (and a few nitpicks I can ignore) I loved Star Trek 2009. Into Darkness was great until the last 20-30 minutes when they decided to just take the end of Wrath Of Kahn and flip some of the details. That ruined an otherwise terrific movie for me. I thought Beyond was pretty great, no issues.


Yes hate that they changed the time line. Hated the first movie, last movie was fun. I love that they destroyed the Enterprise. Hated Hated Hated the look of the ship. Hated everything about the ship. Just a bad approached. They change the time line so they can have all the cast members in it. For the first movie I would only have Kirk, Spock and Scotty in it, maybe McCoy at the end after they kill off Dr. Piper. Second movie introduce Sulu and Uhura. Third movie you can bring in Chekov but he can't be apart of the bridge crew. That's how I would have done it.

350?cb=20110311195817&path-prefix=en

Dr. Piper

[Edited 12/12/17 9:23am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #158 posted 12/12/17 10:20am

morningsong

kpowers said:

morningsong said:




I know you can't see this kpower but this is about to make my heart explode, not quite since there is zero comformation online but just the thought of these memes being true...*doin' the happy dance*






ok what are you talking about?



Movie posters with the individual images each TNG crew member as they looked in their last movie, "TO BOLDLY GO, ONE MORE TIME.." and "2019" at the bottom.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #159 posted 12/12/17 10:28am

djThunderfunk

avatar

morningsong said:

kpowers said:

ok what are you talking about?



Movie posters with the individual images each TNG crew member as they looked in their last movie, "TO BOLDLY GO, ONE MORE TIME.." and "2019" at the bottom.


Even with this answer, I have to repeat kpowers question, what are you talking about? What posters? Where?

Liberty > Authority
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #160 posted 12/12/17 10:33am

morningsong

I can't post it any better. I've tried from this source before to post pictures in various ways. Some people can see them, others can't. I see them every way I've posted them so I haven't a clue what the problem is.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #161 posted 12/12/17 10:34am

djThunderfunk

avatar

morningsong said:

I can't post it any better. I've tried from this source before to post pictures in various ways. Some people can see them, others can't. I see them every way I've posted them so I haven't a clue what the problem is.


How about a link? Or, just more information so we can find it ourselves with google.

Liberty > Authority
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #162 posted 12/12/17 10:35am

morningsong

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #163 posted 12/12/17 10:46am

djThunderfunk

avatar

What is the source of this poster?

Liberty > Authority
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #164 posted 12/12/17 11:01am

kpowers

avatar

morningsong said:

https://lh3.googleusercon...RfWDDs.jpg



All I can do.

OK just saw only a LaForge poster, is this just fan made stuff?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #165 posted 12/12/17 11:51am

morningsong

djThunderfunk said:

What is the source of this poster?



Don't know. I got it from elsewhere, I looked it up and didn't see anything backing it up but it still didn't stop me from being excited about the possibility.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #166 posted 12/12/17 12:53pm

kpowers

avatar

A 3D Printer is a replicator, you guys agree????

Image result for 3D Printer

Image result for star trek replicator

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #167 posted 12/12/17 1:50pm

morningsong

^^^If it isn't it definitely is a prototype.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #168 posted 12/13/17 11:16am

morningsong

Quentin Tarantino’s ‘Star Trek’ Movie May Be Inspired by 1 Classic Episode



Tarantino won’t be writing the new Star Trek film. He’s only going to serve as its director. However, that doesn’t mean he’s not involved in the story at all.

According to Deadline, Tarantino came up with the idea for the new movie, and he pitched it to J.J. Abrams and Paramount Pictures. They liked his concept so much that they immediately began assembling a writer’s room to put together a screenplay.

So the movie might not be as chock-full of Tarantino-isms as you’d expect, considering it will be the first film he directs without also writing. Still, the thrust of the movie comes from his brain. The film will also have an R rating, like all of Tarantino’s work.

Tarantino named one particular episode as being one of the best ever written: “Yesterday’s Enterprise,” from The Next Generation Season 3. In that episode, an Enterprise-C ship travels forward in time and inadvertently alters the present timeline. As a result, a massive war between the Klingons and the humans is now underway.

Later, we find out that the Enterprise-C ship originally went down protecting a Klingon ship. Because of this, the Klingons never went to war with the humans. But when a rift in spacetime brings the Enterprise-C ship ahead and prevents that from happening, the war takes place. So the only way to prevent the war is to send the Enterprise-C crew back in time to their demise.

“I actually think that is one of the great … not only space stories, but the way it dealt with the mythology of the whole thing — that actually could bear a two-hour treatment,” Tarantino said

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #169 posted 12/13/17 2:03pm

kpowers

avatar

morningsong said:

Quentin Tarantino’s ‘Star Trek’ Movie May Be Inspired by 1 Classic Episode



Tarantino won’t be writing the new Star Trek film. He’s only going to serve as its director. However, that doesn’t mean he’s not involved in the story at all.

According to Deadline, Tarantino came up with the idea for the new movie, and he pitched it to J.J. Abrams and Paramount Pictures. They liked his concept so much that they immediately began assembling a writer’s room to put together a screenplay.

So the movie might not be as chock-full of Tarantino-isms as you’d expect, considering it will be the first film he directs without also writing. Still, the thrust of the movie comes from his brain. The film will also have an R rating, like all of Tarantino’s work.

Tarantino named one particular episode as being one of the best ever written: “Yesterday’s Enterprise,” from The Next Generation Season 3. In that episode, an Enterprise-C ship travels forward in time and inadvertently alters the present timeline. As a result, a massive war between the Klingons and the humans is now underway.

Later, we find out that the Enterprise-C ship originally went down protecting a Klingon ship. Because of this, the Klingons never went to war with the humans. But when a rift in spacetime brings the Enterprise-C ship ahead and prevents that from happening, the war takes place. So the only way to prevent the war is to send the Enterprise-C crew back in time to their demise.

“I actually think that is one of the great … not only space stories, but the way it dealt with the mythology of the whole thing — that actually could bear a two-hour treatment,” Tarantino said

Great episode, hope they don't F it up

Image result for yesterday's enterprise

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #170 posted 12/13/17 2:05pm

kpowers

avatar

morningsong said:

^^^If it isn't it definitely is a prototype.

Yup. prototype from the 1960's

Related image

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #171 posted 12/13/17 5:30pm

kpowers

avatar

djThunderfunk said:

What is the source of this poster?

Think it's just fan made. I meet most of TNG cast this past August. All were very nice and friendly and they all were open on what projects they were doing and not doing. No of them metioned another TNG project, however they all had the same answer, pay them and they will do it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #172 posted 12/13/17 10:09pm

morningsong

kpowers said:

djThunderfunk said:

What is the source of this poster?

Think it's just fan made. I meet most of TNG cast this past August. All were very nice and friendly and they all were open on what projects they were doing and not doing. No of them metioned another TNG project, however they all had the same answer, pay them and they will do it.



But what if...it's just a drip of what's to be. Dare to dream.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #173 posted 12/14/17 5:40pm

morningsong

V

By Carlos Pedraza

OWC Studios head Alec Peters sent Axanar donors an update describing 2017’s healthy progress toward making the Axanar short films allowed under the CBS-Paramount lawsuit settlement, gliding over the production’s serious personnel and financial obstacles.

FACT CHECK is an AxaMonitorseries examining claims made with regard to the Axanar case, chiefly Alec Peters’ blog posts, interviews and public announcements. Read the series »

AxaMonitor fact-checks Peters’ claims in a newsletter emailed to Axanar’s donors on December 12, 2017.

OWC Studios

Peters’ crowning 2017 achievement was establishing the subsidized OWC Studios in Lawrenceville, Ga., after having to abandon its California studio in May, moving its contents cross-country to the new warehouse.

“OWC Studios is now officially open!” Peters wrote in the update, thanking Illinois-based OWC for its “continued support of our efforts!”1)

Peters assured donors, “The studio is YOUR studio. While we couldn’t make Ares Studios in Los Angeles a success due to CBS’ lawsuit, OWC Studios in Georgia is the happy successor and the result of every single donor’s donation. So THANK YOU!”

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Star Trek thread version 2.3