independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Star Wars - The Force Awakens - (spoilers...inc trailer...you have been warned)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 10/22/14 12:07pm

SquirrelMeat

avatar

Star Wars - The Force Awakens - (spoilers...inc trailer...you have been warned)

[Edited 11/28/14 8:19am]

.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 10/22/14 12:20pm

JoeTyler

this movie may suck

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 10/22/14 12:27pm

SquirrelMeat

avatar

Its looking cooooool!

.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 10/22/14 12:29pm

JoeTyler

SquirrelMeat said:

Its looking cooooool!

it's looking like a worst case scenario

instead of going forward, opening new horizons/themes, they are re-using elements of the Oold Trilogy: stormtroopers, the Empire, Darth Vader's Armour and what looks like a robotic Palpatine

troublesome so far

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 10/22/14 12:36pm

SquirrelMeat

avatar

JoeTyler said:

SquirrelMeat said:

Its looking cooooool!

it's looking like a worst case scenario

instead of going forward, opening new horizons/themes, they are re-using elements of the Oold Trilogy: stormtroopers, the Empire, Darth Vader's Armour and what looks like a robotic Palpatine

troublesome so far


My guess is JJ wants to show that after the party of ROTJ, the galaxy ended up in civil war. Parralels with Iraq or Afganistan. I'm guessing Cyborg Palpatine is actually....Luke. "The cave, remember your failure at the cave".....

.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 10/22/14 1:06pm

JoeTyler

SquirrelMeat said:

JoeTyler said:

it's looking like a worst case scenario

instead of going forward, opening new horizons/themes, they are re-using elements of the Oold Trilogy: stormtroopers, the Empire, Darth Vader's Armour and what looks like a robotic Palpatine

troublesome so far


My guess is JJ wants to show that after the party of ROTJ, the galaxy ended up in civil war. Parralels with Iraq or Afganistan. I'm guessing Cyborg Palpatine is actually....Luke. "The cave, remember your failure at the cave".....

that would be like THE WORST idea ever

Luke already conquered his anger by refusing to kill Vader in ROTJ

I can accept Cyborg Palpatine (unlikely to happen since McDiarmid will not take part in this-as far as we know), but get out with the idea of an evil Luke or someone using the armor of Vader, UGH!

this movie may suck, that concept art is all kinds of WRONG

[Edited 10/22/14 13:07pm]

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 10/23/14 8:53am

lazycrockett

avatar

If they bring back Darth then this movie is gonna suck nerfherders. Lame.

The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 10/23/14 11:45am

ufoclub

avatar

I like that this artist is imitating the John Berkey style. It doesn't have the photoshop look or clumped style of most of the concept art from the last 20 years from Lucasfilm.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 10/23/14 11:53am

V10LETBLUES

The concept artist is obviouly a very skilled and talented artist, but it only underscores the the creativity and uniqueness of Ralph McQuarrie. Ralph's concept art was awe inspiring. The characters, objects, spaceships, droids all made you go ooohh.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 10/23/14 3:04pm

SquirrelMeat

avatar

ufoclub said:

I like that this artist is imitating the John Berkey style. It doesn't have the photoshop look or clumped style of most of the concept art from the last 20 years from Lucasfilm.



JJ Abrams has insisted on a return to basics to ensure continuity. subtle evolution, real sets not CGI and a even more worn universe.

.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 10/23/14 8:22pm

ufoclub

avatar

SquirrelMeat said:

ufoclub said:

I like that this artist is imitating the John Berkey style. It doesn't have the photoshop look or clumped style of most of the concept art from the last 20 years from Lucasfilm.



JJ Abrams has insisted on a return to basics to ensure continuity. subtle evolution, real sets not CGI and a even more worn universe.

That's great! But I HATED "Super-8" and the last Star Trek film was really bad (although the visual styles are cool). The dude has a problem making a strong story with solid character arcs. I'm scared...

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 10/24/14 2:46pm

kpowers

avatar

SquirrelMeat said:

ufoclub said:

I like that this artist is imitating the John Berkey style. It doesn't have the photoshop look or clumped style of most of the concept art from the last 20 years from Lucasfilm.



JJ Abrams has insisted on a return to basics to ensure continuity. subtle evolution, real sets not CGI and a even more worn universe.

Glad to hear that

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 10/25/14 7:41am

JoeTyler

kpowers said:

SquirrelMeat said:



JJ Abrams has insisted on a return to basics to ensure continuity. subtle evolution, real sets not CGI and a even more worn universe.

Glad to hear that

i believe it when I see it

the EXACT thing said Spielby about Indy 4...and we all know the result...

[Edited 10/25/14 7:41am]

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 10/25/14 11:54am

V10LETBLUES

What turned me off to Star Wars was shifting in tone from a vilian like Vader, to more cliched cartoonish cackling villians towards the end. Vadar was evil but not over the top so. From Jedi to the prequels all the bad guys seem to be cackling wizards. Everything went over the top including the Jedi. Nothing toned down, no gravity to anything. Flying Jedi and cackling wizards.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 10/25/14 12:24pm

kpowers

avatar

ufoclub said:

SquirrelMeat said:



JJ Abrams has insisted on a return to basics to ensure continuity. subtle evolution, real sets not CGI and a even more worn universe.

That's great! But I HATED "Super-8" and the last Star Trek film was really bad (although the visual styles are cool). The dude has a problem making a strong story with solid character arcs. I'm scared...

Honestly JJ Abrams got so much praise for the first Star Trek movie but honestly I really don't think it's better. Hated changing the time line, destroying Vulcan inexcusable , the look of the ship inside is horrible barf

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 10/25/14 2:25pm

OldFriends4Sal
e

V10LETBLUES said:

What turned me off to Star Wars was shifting in tone from a vilian like Vader, to more cliched cartoonish cackling villians towards the end. Vadar was evil but not over the top so. From Jedi to the prequels all the bad guys seem to be cackling wizards. Everything went over the top including the Jedi. Nothing toned down, no gravity to anything. Flying Jedi and cackling wizards.

And for me it seems every story had to be about a galactic scale war.

There are so many smaller stories they can tell. Without rushing the original crew to old age

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 10/26/14 3:05am

JoeTyler

OldFriends4Sale said:

V10LETBLUES said:

What turned me off to Star Wars was shifting in tone from a vilian like Vader, to more cliched cartoonish cackling villians towards the end. Vadar was evil but not over the top so. From Jedi to the prequels all the bad guys seem to be cackling wizards. Everything went over the top including the Jedi. Nothing toned down, no gravity to anything. Flying Jedi and cackling wizards.

And for me it seems every story had to be about a galactic scale war.

There are so many smaller stories they can tell. Without rushing the original crew to old age

EXACTLY, somehow I think they won't folllow your advice, unfortunately

boy, how I'd like to see personal (yet dangerous-lethal) stories set in a peaceful (overall) New Republic

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 11/28/14 8:20am

SquirrelMeat

avatar

.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 11/29/14 1:12pm

lrn36

avatar

JoeTyler said:

kpowers said:

Glad to hear that

i believe it when I see it

the EXACT thing said Spielby about Indy 4...and we all know the result...

[Edited 10/25/14 7:41am]

I know this is an old post, but here is a thread that shows all the extensive use of full scale sets and miniature models for the Star Wars prequels. I don't know where Abrams gets this idea of going back to basics when the new trailer is full of cgi.

http://boards.theforce.ne....50017310/

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 11/29/14 4:14pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

SquirrelMeat said:

[Edited 11/28/14 8:19am]

for some reason I think the dialog in the teaser is this scene

"Keep on shilling for Big Pharm!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 12/02/14 2:46am

SquirrelMeat

avatar

lrn36 said:



JoeTyler said:




kpowers said:




Glad to hear that





i believe it when I see it



the EXACT thing said Spielby about Indy 4...and we all know the result...


[Edited 10/25/14 7:41am]



I know this is an old post, but here is a thread that shows all the extensive use of full scale sets and miniature models for the Star Wars prequels. I don't know where Abrams gets this idea of going back to basics when the new trailer is full of cgi.



http://boards.theforce.ne....50017310/



For me, there is a big difference in the JJ vision and the prequels. No CGI landscapes. It looks much more realistic with the desert, the lake and the sky (behind the Falcon). I don't think a SW film will feel like a SW film without spacecraft battles and I think JJs approach is the perfect balance.

If GL had made the new trailer, there would have been little location shooting at this point. He got carried away with the power of CGI.
.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 12/02/14 3:10am

JoeTyler

one thing is for sure: The Imperial Remnants will be featured as the (one of the?) villian(s)

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 12/02/14 12:01pm

lrn36

avatar

SquirrelMeat said:

lrn36 said:

I know this is an old post, but here is a thread that shows all the extensive use of full scale sets and miniature models for the Star Wars prequels. I don't know where Abrams gets this idea of going back to basics when the new trailer is full of cgi.

http://boards.theforce.ne....50017310/

For me, there is a big difference in the JJ vision and the prequels. No CGI landscapes. It looks much more realistic with the desert, the lake and the sky (behind the Falcon). I don't think a SW film will feel like a SW film without spacecraft battles and I think JJs approach is the perfect balance. If GL had made the new trailer, there would have been little location shooting at this point. He got carried away with the power of CGI.

That entire sequence including the sky and the desert was all cgi. The ball droid, the x wing fighters, and even probably the cloaked figure with the lightsaber was cgi as well. Trust me there will probably be more cgi in this film than any of the prequels.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 12/02/14 1:26pm

OldFriends4Sal
e

JoeTyler said:

OldFriends4Sale said:

And for me it seems every story had to be about a galactic scale war.

There are so many smaller stories they can tell. Without rushing the original crew to old age

EXACTLY, somehow I think they won't folllow your advice, unfortunately

boy, how I'd like to see personal (yet dangerous-lethal) stories set in a peaceful (overall) New Republic

different cosmos I know but the previous Star Trek I just the Enterprise was going to be destroyed. I loved the tv Capt Picard Enterprise and all the character building shows.

With Star Wars it was too much about galactic wars, Luke always had to be disabled

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 12/02/14 3:15pm

V10LETBLUES

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 12/02/14 6:24pm

FragileUnderto
w

avatar

V10LETBLUES said:

Cant believe my purple psychedelic pimp slap pimp2

And I descend from grace, In arms of undertow
I will take my place, In the great below
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 12/02/14 7:04pm

V10LETBLUES

FragileUndertow said:

V10LETBLUES said:

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 12/02/14 8:18pm

FragileUnderto
w

avatar

V10LETBLUES said:

lol
http://0.media.dorkly.cvcdn.com/33/11/ce96f862a09deabc3100c2b7c1973974.jpghttp://pix-geeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/star-lightsaber.png

Cant believe my purple psychedelic pimp slap pimp2

And I descend from grace, In arms of undertow
I will take my place, In the great below
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 12/03/14 2:28am

BombSquad

avatar

[img:$uid]http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/the-force-awakens-memes.jpg[/img:$uid]

Has anyone tried unplugging the United States and plugging it back in?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 12/03/14 9:52am

SquirrelMeat

avatar

V10LETBLUES said:



I wonder how many fans realise that droid is one of the original designs for an R2 unit?

.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Star Wars - The Force Awakens - (spoilers...inc trailer...you have been warned)