independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Tot Mom NOT GUILTY of Murder - Caylee Anthony
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 4 of 17 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #90 posted 07/05/11 5:35pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I would like to know what evidence, or lack thereof led the jury not to convict. If it is strictly circumstancial with no actual evidence other than that, they made the right choice.

People have been executed based on circumstantial evidence.

Actual evidence isn't legally required.

I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #91 posted 07/05/11 5:42pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

SUPRMAN said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I would like to know what evidence, or lack thereof led the jury not to convict. If it is strictly circumstancial with no actual evidence other than that, they made the right choice.

People have been executed based on circumstantial evidence.

Actual evidence isn't legally required.

I realize that but there should be actual evidence to commit.

2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #92 posted 07/05/11 5:43pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

Serena said:

XxAxX said:

there was a ton of space. the evidence was entirely circumstantial. expert witnesses were contradicting expert witnesses.

Circumstantial evidence IS evidence and a case can be decided only on it. The only way expert witnesses contradicted themselves was when they were called by the defense and got turned State's witnesses. The defense had NO credible experts AT ALL, if you think so, name one.

?

Their cross examination may favor one side or the other but the experts are paid by their respective sides and do not "turn."

It is perfectly legal to use an expert to refute another expert's testimony.

I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #93 posted 07/05/11 5:48pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

Serena said:

btw...Cindy testified to cleaning out the car and trunk because it stunk so bad, sprayed Fabreeze all over it and washed Casey's pants that were in there. She knows what evidence she destroyed to cover up for her evil child. Did any of you hear the 911 call where she said it smelled like a dead body had been in the car? She's A NURSE and knows what human decomposition smells like.

Objection.

How do we know that a nurse knows what human decomposition smells like?

Being a nurse does not equate to smelling human decomposition.

A nurse would be more likely to be exposed, but no given.

I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #94 posted 07/05/11 5:48pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

Serena said:

XxAxX said:

you're far more involved emotionally than i am over this issue. i'm just looking at the case with interest bordering on objectivity. i work at a law firm, we've talked about this case there.

as for engaging in a bit of back and forth with you over this? nope. i ain't got time for no fight up in here. agree to disagree. me 'n the jury will just chill and watch the backlash happen

Yeah, I tend to get emotional when someone gets away with murdering their child. But you keep on enjoying yourself with that ignorant jury.

Really? Or just when it's on tv?

I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #95 posted 07/05/11 6:06pm

uPtoWnNY

728huey said:

JustErin said:

This is pretty pathetic to say but I actually watched the case every day. boxed

Taking into account all that was presented there is no way I would ever agree to a not guilty verdict.

There was evidence to prove motive and that it was more than an accident. There was ZERO evidence provided to even suggest that it was "an accident that snowballed out of control".

But you have to remember, in the American court system, Casey Anthony's lawyer didn't actually have to prove that Caylee died accidentally; he just had to show enough evidence to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors to save Casey's behind. I believe Casey Anthony killed her daughter in cold blooded fashion, but since the medical examiner couldn't indicate Caylee's time of death or how she died, the jury had no choice but to let her off. But even though she'll probably be out of jail by Thursday (yes, she was convicted of lying to cops, but she has been in jail since she was charged with murder, and the maximum sentence she could get is four years, but she will most likely be sentenced with time served), this woman is already persona non grata, and she won't be able to show herself in any public place without people calling her a child murderer, so her life is going to suck for years to come.

But frankly, unless you live in Florida, I don't even know why the media blew this case up in the first place and made first run headlines on all the news channels. We have far more serious problems facing our country right now with the economy and two wars, yet the news media wants to focus on some little kid's murder which was allegedly done by her mother. There are pending cases all over this country just like that, but they probably don't involve some otherwise photogenic defendant. Personally I could care less about this case. sigh disbelief

typing

nod

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #96 posted 07/05/11 6:10pm

babynoz

Good analysis on Cnn.

Prince, in you I found a kindred spirit...Rest In Paradise.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #97 posted 07/05/11 6:39pm

Identity

Heartbreaking that the kid was discarded as so much trash, but let's be honest, If Casey Anthony and her family were minorities the media would have paid the case scant attention. If a missing person or murder victim isn't a white female the coverage is either limited or nonexistent.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #98 posted 07/05/11 6:43pm

jockeyb4u

avatar

SUPRMAN said:

Serena said:

Yeah, I tend to get emotional when someone gets away with murdering their child. But you keep on enjoying yourself with that ignorant jury.

Really? Or just when it's on tv?

What an insulting question. What normal person doesn't feel some sort of emotion when someone murders their child, and then to make matters worse, gets away with it. Regardless, if its on TV or not.

I can't think of any reason why you would ask this person a question like this other than just being a prick.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #99 posted 07/05/11 6:49pm

jockeyb4u

avatar

Identity said:

Heartbreaking that the kid was discarded as so much trash, but let's be honest, If Casey Anthony and her family were minorities the media would have paid the case scant attention. If a missing person or murder victim isn't a white female the coverage is either limited or nonexistent.

Oh shit, if this had been a black female, and the media raked her over the coals like they have Casey, the media would have been lambasted for being racist.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #100 posted 07/05/11 7:12pm

jockeyb4u

avatar

Facts that are known: Casey Anthony did not report the death of her child, and was aware of "someone" dumping her dead body in the woods to rot and be eaten by animals and maggots. She then proceeded to party and get a "bella vita" (beautiful life) tattoo. No innocent mother that has just lost a child would do this shit. That alone may not be enough to convict her of capital 1 murder, but by god it surely is damning enough for a manslaughter conviction.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #101 posted 07/05/11 7:16pm

RenHoek

avatar

moderator

jockeyb4u said:

Identity said:

Heartbreaking that the kid was discarded as so much trash, but let's be honest, If Casey Anthony and her family were minorities the media would have paid the case scant attention. If a missing person or murder victim isn't a white female the coverage is either limited or nonexistent.

Oh shit, if this had been a black female, and the media raked her over the coals like they have Casey, the media would have been lambasted for being racist.

a predominantly white media can't be accused of racism against a white sociopath... neutral

like the saying goes... "she got away with murder"

hope she has a fun life watchin' her back... missile

A working class Hero is something to be ~ Lennon
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #102 posted 07/05/11 7:29pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

Serena said:

TonyVanDam said:

And THAT^ is a fair opinion. But the jurors disagree with you.

The jury made the right (controversial) decision on this case. Yes, Casey Anthony was and maybe still is a lying slut. But since there was no solid evidences to prove that Casey planned to killed her own daughter nor were there any witnesses that actually seen Casey do the actual murder, they jury has no choice but to find Casey "not guilty".

It was either "not guilty" or hung jury. Either way, Casey will only serves (less than?!?) a year in prison for lying to investigators. End of story. No re-trial.

No one needs to be a witness to a murder, there was TONS of evidence in this case that this suckass jury didn't even bother to look at when they were deliberating. They just wanted to go home and took the easy way out. I hope each and every one of them quickly have a rude awakening as to the wrong they have committed. Their family and friends should shun them for their ignorant and lazy work on this case.

According to THIS follow-up report, there were not any "tons" of solid evidences to begin with, hence why the D.A. office lost big time:

http://news.yahoo.com/anthony-trial-lack-evidence-good-defense-000636253.html

ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — Prosecutors proved Casey Anthony was a liar, but convinced the jury of little else.

The government failed to establish how 2-year-old Caylee Anthony died and they couldn't find her mother's DNA on the duct tape they said was used to suffocate her. There was conflicting testimony on whether the putrid smell inside the family's car was a decomposing body or simply trash, and it was never quite clear why chloroform was so important.

The lack of evidence and the doubt raised by the defense — that Caylee accidentally drowned in the family's pool — was enough to win an acquittal. After a trial of a month and a half, the jury took less than 11 hours to find Anthony not guilty of first-degree murder, aggravated manslaughter and aggravated child abuse.

She was convicted only of four misdemeanor counts of lying to investigators who were looking into the June 2008 disappearance of Caylee. She lied about being employed at Universal Studios. She lied about leaving Caylee with a baby-sitter, then again when she recounted to investigators that she had told two imaginary people that Caylee was missing. She also lied about receiving a phone call from Caylee the day before she was reported missing.

Lead defense attorney Jose Baez was criticized by many legal pundits for his strategy and loosely throwing around allegations of molestation and incest. Baez suggested early on that Casey's father, George Anthony, helped cover up the drowning and sexually abused his daughter, accusations the father vehemently denied. Baez also claimed Casey's brother might be Caylee's father and that a meter reader who discovered the girl's remains may have moved them, more allegations that weren't substantiated.

Ultimately, though, the burden of proof wasn't on Baez.

"I don't think it was Baez' great lawyering that won the case," said Richard Rosenbaum, a Fort Lauderdale criminal defense attorney who closely followed the trial but wasn't involved in the case. "I think it goes back to the prosecution and the weaknesses in their case."

Kendall Coffey, a former U.S. attorney for Miami and now a defense attorney, said Baez had to offer an alternative to the prosecution's theory of how Caylee was killed, though he was less impressed with the molestation accusations.

"The biggest questions were the 'how' and the 'why,'" Coffey said. "Even the state acknowledged they weren't exactly sure of how Caylee was killed. That was a candid acknowledgement, but Baez seized on that."

Orlando's chief prosecutor said his attorneys were disappointed with the verdict but they presented every piece of evidence that existed.

"This is a dry-bones case. Very, very difficult to prove," said Orange County State Attorney Lawson Lamar. "The delay in recovering little Caylee's remains worked to our considerable disadvantage."

Shortly after Lamar's news conference, one of the lead prosecutors on the case, Jeff Ashton, announced he would retire at the end of the week following 30 years as a prosecutor. A spokeswoman for the prosecutor's office said Ashton and Lamar had previously discussed his retirement.

The six-month gap between when Casey was reported missing and when her remains were found in December 2008 affected the amount of scientific evidence investigators could glean from the pieces of bones, some as small as a pebble. And prosecutors didn't have any evidence that put Casey at the scene where the remains were found.

There was also confusion on why chloroform was so important. Chloroform is a chemical compound that can be used to knock someone unconscious and also is found in human decomposition, but prosecutors never made clear exactly what its role it played in Caylee's death.

Prosecutors said Casey searched for the term "chloroform" on the family's computer, though when her mother, Cindy, took the stand late in the trial, she said she searched for it. Later, job records indicated that Cindy might have been at work when the searches were made.

Then there was the smell test. After prosecutors presented an expert witness who said that a carpet stain taken from the family's car trunk had a smell consistent with a decomposing body, the defense called the expert's former colleague who testified to the opposite.

Baez addressed his naysayers during a press conference.

"This case has brought on new challenges for all of us. Challenges in the criminal justice system, challenges in the media, and I think we should all take this as an opportunity to learn and to realize that you cannot convict someone until they have had their day in court," he said.

Yale Galanter, who has represented O.J. Simpson in a number of cases since 2000, said he was not surprised by the verdict.

"The issue is there was absolutely no evidence linking her to the death. None," said the Miami lawyer. "So what the defense did was brilliant, they brought up the drowning, they brought up the sexual molestation, and it really got the jury to focus away from the bad behavior of the mom."

____

Lush reported from St. Petersburg. Associated Press writers Laura Wides-Munoz and Kelli Kennedy in Miami contributed to this report.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #103 posted 07/05/11 7:33pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

jockeyb4u said:

SUPRMAN said:

Really? Or just when it's on tv?

What an insulting question. What normal person doesn't feel some sort of emotion when someone murders their child, and then to make matters worse, gets away with it. Regardless, if its on TV or not.

I can't think of any reason why you would ask this person a question like this other than just being a prick.

I was responding to Serena making the same accusation toward XxAxX and I felt like you did:

Serena said:

XxAxX said:

you're far more involved emotionally than i am over this issue. i'm just looking at the case with interest bordering on objectivity. i work at a law firm, we've talked about this case there.

as for engaging in a bit of back and forth with you over this? nope. i ain't got time for no fight up in here. agree to disagree. me 'n the jury will just chill and watch the backlash happen

Yeah, I tend to get emotional when someone gets away with murdering their child. But you keep on enjoying yourself with that ignorant jury.

Really? Or just when it's on tv?

I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #104 posted 07/05/11 7:37pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

babynoz said:

Timmy84 said:

That case was fucked up to begin with. She's guilty but the jury, presented with the evidence they got, had no choice. Well she's gonna get her judgment day anyways so whatever.

For the life of me I don't understand why nobody ever questions the prosecution's case. They failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt but nobody's ever mad at them?

Most of us believe she did it, but that's not enough in court.

That is because most of the American people are more pissed with the jurors not seeing the case the same exact way that American people (as public opinions) themselves see it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #105 posted 07/05/11 7:39pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

SUPRMAN said:

TonyVanDam said:

In the cases of Martha Stewart & Lil'Kim, they ended up in prison for "not snitching".

These days, "Not Snitching" and/or not reporting anything at all to law enforcers and investigators counts as lying under oath.


Under what law?

Ask THAT^ question to the New York justice system.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #106 posted 07/05/11 7:43pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

TonyVanDam said:

babynoz said:

For the life of me I don't understand why nobody ever questions the prosecution's case. They failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt but nobody's ever mad at them?

Most of us believe she did it, but that's not enough in court.

That is because most of the American people are more pissed with the jurors not seeing the case the same exact way that American people (as public opinions) themselves see it.

The public is seeing a different picture than the jurors.

I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #107 posted 07/05/11 7:45pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

Identity said:

Heartbreaking that the kid was discarded as so much trash, but let's be honest, If Casey Anthony and her family were minorities the media would have paid the case scant attention. If a missing person or murder victim isn't a white female the coverage is either limited or nonexistent.

If Casey Anthony was a poor working-class black woman from the south, you can best believe that her trial would have had a different outcome. Better yet, the whole trial would have only been local news.

And this is a black man tell you this.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #108 posted 07/05/11 7:48pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

jockeyb4u said:

Identity said:

Heartbreaking that the kid was discarded as so much trash, but let's be honest, If Casey Anthony and her family were minorities the media would have paid the case scant attention. If a missing person or murder victim isn't a white female the coverage is either limited or nonexistent.

Oh shit, if this had been a black female, and the media raked her over the coals like they have Casey, the media would have been lambasted for being racist.

The racist New Black Panther Party would have been declaring war on Fox News AND CNN/HLN by accusing both corporate news companies for hating on a black woman.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #109 posted 07/05/11 8:01pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

TonyVanDam said:

SUPRMAN said:

Under what law?

Ask THAT^ question to the New York justice system.

It's not lying under oath if you haven't taken an oath.

[EDITED]

Ordinarily, an investigating officer is free to ask a person for identification without implicating the Amendment. INS v. Delgado, 466 U. S. 210, 216. Beginning with Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1, the Court has recognized that an officer's reasonable suspicion that a person may be involved in criminal activity permits the officer to stop the person for a brief time and take additional steps to investigate further. Although it is well established that an officer may ask a suspect to identify himself during a Terry stop, see, e.g., United States v.Hensley, 469 U. S. 221, 229, it has been an open question whether the suspect can be arrested and prosecuted for refusal to answer, see Brown, supra, at 53, n. 3. The Court is now of the view that Terry principles permit a State to require a suspect to disclose his name in the course of a Terry stop. Terry, supra, at 34. The Nevada statute is consistent with Fourth Amendment prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures because it properly balances the intrusion on the individual's interests against the promotion of legitimate government interests. See Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U. S. 648, 654. An identity request has an immediate relation to the Terry stop's purpose, rationale, and practical demands, and the threat of criminal sanction helps ensure that the request does not become a legal nullity. On the other hand, the statute does not alter the nature of the stop itself, changing neither its duration nor its location. Hiibel argues unpersuasively that the statute circumvents the probable-cause requirement by allowing an officer to arrest a person for being suspicious, thereby creating an impermissible risk of arbitrary police conduct. These familiar concerns underlayKolender, Brown, and Papachristou. They are met by the requirement that a Terry stop be justified at its inception and be "reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified" the initial stop. Terry, 392 U. S., at 20. Under those principles, an officer may not arrest a suspect for failure to identify himself if the identification request is not reasonably related to the circumstances justifying the stop. Cf. Hayes v. Florida, 470 U. S. 811, 817. The request in this case was a commonsense inquiry, not an effort to obtain an arrest for failure to identify after a Terry stop yielded insufficient evidence. The stop, the request, and the State's requirement of a response did not contravene the Fourth Amendment. Pp. 6-10.

[EDITED]

http://supreme.justia.com.../case.html

I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #110 posted 07/05/11 8:19pm

728huey

avatar

SUPRMAN said:

TonyVanDam said:

That is because most of the American people are more pissed with the jurors not seeing the case the same exact way that American people (as public opinions) themselves see it.

The public is seeing a different picture than the jurors.

And the public wasn't actually privvy to all of the evidence and testimony brought into the case either, nor did they have to take the law into account the way the jurors did during deliberations. Plus the jurors were sequestered from having to watch Nancy Grace and all of the TV pundits practically convict Casey Anthony before all the evidence was presented. Just because the juors voted to acquit Casey Anthony doesn't mean they are a bunch of idiots; in fact, they may have thought she was a sociopathic liar who butchered her daughter like John Wayne Gacy but let her go because the prosecution couldn't prove Caylee was even murdered, let alone that Casey Anthony actually killed her.

typing

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #111 posted 07/05/11 8:24pm

babynoz

TonyVanDam said:

babynoz said:

For the life of me I don't understand why nobody ever questions the prosecution's case. They failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt but nobody's ever mad at them?

Most of us believe she did it, but that's not enough in court.

That is because most of the American people are more pissed with the jurors not seeing the case the same exact way that American people (as public opinions) themselves see it.

Right. Trying the case in the media isn't the same as inside the courtroom, trust me. In the article you posted for example, how can there be a smell of death in the car trunk and no dna evidence in there? Or how could they not find dna on the duct tape? And what about the experts who disagreed on the way the autopsy was done?

And all of attorneys and judges they have interviewed so far say the same thing. The State Attorney over-charged the case in the first place because they didn't have enough for a first degree case to begin with.

The defense didn't even seem that good but it seems the prosecution wasn't able to close up the gaping holes in their case.

Prince, in you I found a kindred spirit...Rest In Paradise.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #112 posted 07/05/11 8:34pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

728huey said:

SUPRMAN said:

The public is seeing a different picture than the jurors.

And the public wasn't actually privvy to all of the evidence and testimony brought into the case either, nor did they have to take the law into account the way the jurors did during deliberations. Plus the jurors were sequestered from having to watch Nancy Grace and all of the TV pundits practically convict Casey Anthony before all the evidence was presented. Just because the juors voted to acquit Casey Anthony doesn't mean they are a bunch of idiots; in fact, they may have thought she was a sociopathic liar who butchered her daughter like John Wayne Gacy but let her go because the prosecution couldn't prove Caylee was even murdered, let alone that Casey Anthony actually killed her.

typing

And lets NEVER forget how corporate news media screw up (especially Nancy [Dis]Grace):

http://www.youtube.com/wa...P3F_GoBTvg

http://www.youtube.com/wa...Krjq7eJkkc

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #113 posted 07/05/11 8:39pm

Michelesky

avatar

NaughtyKitty said:

Wow. Just. Wow. I have no words for this.

Me either. I'm still walking around in a state of shock and disbelief... disbelief

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #114 posted 07/05/11 9:15pm

LadyLuvSexxy

I finally had time to think it out, but I'm trying so hard right now not to break into tears. With all the circumstance, the attention, the photos, and Nancy Grace, I have to admit that the extra drama made me watch. I hear stories about children getting killed and it REALLY bothers me. Some fucked up family in Indiana treated their 13 year old son like trash, starving him and eventually tossing him into concrete like he was nothing. The poor boy wrote letters wondering why his family hated him. Child Services came along and claimed they did all they could. It's stories like that which make me wonder WHY people feel compelled to lay down and have sex if they aren't fully capable of raising antoher human being. I mean, DAMN as much as I want one myself, the time isn't right. I'm trying to educate myself, get a job, etc. I want to be able to be on that level of comfort my mother and father were at when they had me. They weren't rich, but I never suffered as a child. I knew what love was and I STILL DO.

I look at that beautiful little girl and get completely upset. Where is her justice? How long is it going to take before we EVER know what really happened? For me, all the Internet searches were just TOO MUCH. The Cholroform to Chlorophyll garbage, people talking about what they smelled...I guess that wasn't good enough. I can't sit here and state all the facts because I just was floored and my mind literally raced knowing this mother of hers--the partying you-know-what, got off with WHATEVER she did. She's not completely innocent.

I don't know who that was on HLN talking about justice was served today, but I wanted to smack him. I had my back semi-turned while I was watching tonight. I'll be watching some more news channels tonight. I just don't feel right knowing her mom was in that courtroom smiling and somewhere out there, champagne is flowing and a party is being had. And the icing on the cake? The shoddy "nobody is a winner today" speech. Give me a BREAK!

I feel completley awful. I take care of a girl who is about the same age.My entire world would fall apart if something happened to her. The way the Tot Mom and her parents acted in the candid video outside the courtroom (way to go, jumping grandma) was the last straw. That little girl deserved far more better treatment than to be tossed around in the wild to be washed away and forgotten. Too many children in this world are tossed around like that. They are gifts to this world, not forgettables in the forest.

Somebody knows something, and I guess we have to wait until they're on a deathbed full of remorse to hear anything at all. disbelief

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #115 posted 07/05/11 10:28pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

728huey said:

SUPRMAN said:

The public is seeing a different picture than the jurors.

And the public wasn't actually privvy to all of the evidence and testimony brought into the case either, nor did they have to take the law into account the way the jurors did during deliberations. Plus the jurors were sequestered from having to watch Nancy Grace and all of the TV pundits practically convict Casey Anthony before all the evidence was presented. Just because the juors voted to acquit Casey Anthony doesn't mean they are a bunch of idiots; in fact, they may have thought she was a sociopathic liar who butchered her daughter like John Wayne Gacy but let her go because the prosecution couldn't prove Caylee was even murdered, let alone that Casey Anthony actually killed her.

typing

Yes.

As much as I agree with everyone else that she killed her daughter, when it comes to prosecution by the state, the onus is on the STATE to prove their shit beyond a reasonable doubt. Too many people convicted and dead because the state had the power to do that just because. No real evidence, no conviction. Even for a likely killer as Miss Anthony.

2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #116 posted 07/05/11 10:32pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

LadyLuvSexxy said:

I finally had time to think it out, but I'm trying so hard right now not to break into tears. With all the circumstance, the attention, the photos, and Nancy Grace, I have to admit that the extra drama made me watch. I hear stories about children getting killed and it REALLY bothers me. Some fucked up family in Indiana treated their 13 year old son like trash, starving him and eventually tossing him into concrete like he was nothing. The poor boy wrote letters wondering why his family hated him. Child Services came along and claimed they did all they could. It's stories like that which make me wonder WHY people feel compelled to lay down and have sex if they aren't fully capable of raising antoher human being. I mean, DAMN as much as I want one myself, the time isn't right. I'm trying to educate myself, get a job, etc. I want to be able to be on that level of comfort my mother and father were at when they had me. They weren't rich, but I never suffered as a child. I knew what love was and I STILL DO.

I look at that beautiful little girl and get completely upset. Where is her justice? How long is it going to take before we EVER know what really happened? For me, all the Internet searches were just TOO MUCH. The Cholroform to Chlorophyll garbage, people talking about what they smelled...I guess that wasn't good enough. I can't sit here and state all the facts because I just was floored and my mind literally raced knowing this mother of hers--the partying you-know-what, got off with WHATEVER she did. She's not completely innocent.

I don't know who that was on HLN talking about justice was served today, but I wanted to smack him. I had my back semi-turned while I was watching tonight. I'll be watching some more news channels tonight. I just don't feel right knowing her mom was in that courtroom smiling and somewhere out there, champagne is flowing and a party is being had. And the icing on the cake? The shoddy "nobody is a winner today" speech. Give me a BREAK!

I feel completley awful. I take care of a girl who is about the same age.My entire world would fall apart if something happened to her. The way the Tot Mom and her parents acted in the candid video outside the courtroom (way to go, jumping grandma) was the last straw. That little girl deserved far more better treatment than to be tossed around in the wild to be washed away and forgotten. Too many children in this world are tossed around like that. They are gifts to this world, not forgettables in the forest.

Somebody knows something, and I guess we have to wait until they're on a deathbed full of remorse to hear anything at all. disbelief

I cannot say that this made any difference in her little life or during her death but how many people are loving that little girl and remembering her and holding her in the light? Millions upon millions including you. She is not alone and she will never be alone. She is remembered and loved because she is a Divine expression of humanity who had an untimely and tragic exit. She is loved......

2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #117 posted 07/05/11 11:09pm

ThruTheEyesOfW
onder

avatar

Let's remember this little angel...safe in the loving arms of God.

I try to look at is, she's been spared the agony of living with that kinda mother.

I just can't imagine her dead..I just can't...cry cry Poor baby...

The salvation of man is through love and in love. - Dr. V. Frankl

"When you close your heart, you close your mind." - Michael Jackson (Man In The Mirror)

"I don't need anger management, I need people to stop pissing me off" lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #118 posted 07/05/11 11:22pm

NastradumasKid

scriptgirl said:

It's a big deal because a mother killed her own child-that never stops being haunting

Granted it is a big deal but let's not act like this never happened before. She isn't the first and she will not be the last woman to kill her children. Susan Smith anyone?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #119 posted 07/05/11 11:45pm

Tittypants

avatar

If Casey Anthony was a minority, would she had still been found not guilty?

الحيوان النادلة ((((|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|)))) ...AND THAT'S THE WAY THE "TITTY" MILKS IT!
My Albums: https://zillzmp.bandcamp.com/music
My Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/zillz82
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 4 of 17 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Tot Mom NOT GUILTY of Murder - Caylee Anthony